Robert Spencer

|

Pamela Geller

|

Bat Ye'or

|

Brigitte Gabriel

|

Daniel Pipes

|

Debbie Schlussel

|

Walid Shoebat

|

Joe Kaufman

|

Wafa Sultan

|

Geert Wilders

|

The Nuclear Card

Raymond Ibrahim and the Islamophobic Cash Cow

Posted on 13 January 2010 by Emperor

Raymond Ibrahim

Raymond Ibrahim

Raymond Ibrahim is a friend of Robert Spencer and used to be a regular contributor to JihadWatch, he was one of the many who took advantage of the “Islamophobic cash cow” that took off after 9/11 and overnight transformed from “research librarian” into “Islamic scholar” and “Middle East Expert.”

InFocus did a great piece back in 2007 exposing Ibrahim for what he is: a faker.

The Islamophobic Cash Cow

By Salaam Abdul Khaliq

OK, so you’re a failed writer who toiled for years to achieve fame, fortune and immortality. You’ve spent years in obscurity struggling to pay the bills and keep your head above water, hoping for the day you would eventually earn the attention of some big publisher.

But, sadly for you, all your efforts went by the wayside.

The good news is there is hope. There is just one thing left to do, one thing that would guarantee fame, fortune, a publishing contract and a lot of free media bonanza.

Would you like to know the secret that escaped hundreds of other failed writers like you – academics, journalists, the poor and huddled masses that had bad luck striking gold in the land of opportunity?

OK, here it is - and you need to sit down for this - it’s called “The Islamophobia cash cow.”

Post 9/11, the fastest and surest way to gain celebrity status in the West and garner respect and attention you would otherwise never achieve on your own mediocre merit is to go on an “Islam-bashing” campaign.

And, mind you, you don’t need to be an expert on the subject matter, just make sure to quote verses from the Qur’an out of context, cite Osama Bin Laden as the role model of Muslim behavior, bank on tired canaries like “Islam oppresses women,” and “Islam was spread by the sword,” and other washed out cliches, and voila!

You’re a celebrity, a famous author (a rich, famous author, mind you), a Good Samaritan defending the civilized world from the evils of Islam.

Meet Raymond Ibrahim, the latest client of the “Islamophobia cash cow industry.”

Ibrahim was recently a guest of Air Talk, hosted by Larry Mantle on the Pasadena-based NPR affiliate KPCC. Ibrahim had his 15 minutes at last.

An unknown and obscure menial research librarian at the Library of Congress, Ibrahim thrust himself into the limelight by writing a book called “The Al Qaeda Reader,” (published in 12/06). The newly Christened crusader finally broke down the doors of rejection and abject obscurity and made it to the pantheon of famous “Islam experts.”

And you wonder how many other poor research librarians have risen out of nothingness to sudden fame in a matter of weeks?

Not to worry, Ibrahim has now shown them the fastest path to sleazy righteousness.

Write something that bashes Islam and your “research librarian” title will suddenly transform into “historian of the Middle East and Islam” and “scholar and writer on the Middle East and Islam,” and many other promiscuous titles that have as much worth as fortune cookie sayings.

Then one wonders why a respected talk show host like Mantle would cede the podium to an Islamophobe like Ibrahim without balance, without bringing someone like Karen Armstrong. for example, to challenge his twisted and warped views.

Instead, Mantle let Ibrahim run amuck quoting verses from the Quran ad hoc and out of context, saying for instance that the verse “there is no compulsion in religion” was reprobated, meaning canceled out, by verses of war in what is known as “naskh.”

Ibrahim was given free reign to unabashedly spew lethargic tirades with impunity, shamelessly proclaiming that if Prophet Muhammad, peace be upon him, were alive today, he would do what Bin Laden is doing now.

Ibrahim also implied that American Muslims presented a danger to American society because their faith teaches them to kill their enemies wherever they are and by all means necessary.

Such alarmism and incitement to hate and paranoia are simply unacceptable, especially coming from an NPR affiliate station that prides itself in being liberal and inclusive.

It is unconscionable for a respected talk show host like Mantle to hand over the microphone to a petty, anti-Muslim research librarian to freely bash Islam and up the ante on American Muslims in order to hype his anti-Islam-disguised-as-a-critique-of-Al-Qaeda book for material gain.

Just like his fellow Arab American Islam-bashers Wafa Sultan and Nonie Darwish, Ibrahim ought to take notice that Arabs and Muslims have always been in the same boat.

Most Americans don’t make the difference. You are whom you bash.

Many icons of Islamophobia before Ibrahim who sought to make a quick buck by viciously maligning Islam and Muslims sold their souls and ended up as dejects, discarded and washed out has-beens with no credibility and no respect.

It won’t be long before the wisdom of “Islamophobia, like crime, does not pay” will catch on. Media outlets and talk show hosts should take notice.

After this piece was published, Raymond revealed that he faced heat from his employers eventually leading to his “resignation”:

after this Islamist op-ed was published, I received much heat from my supervisors at the Library of Congress, partially culminating in my recent resignation from that American bibliotech — another institution that goes out of its way to appease, especially where Saudi money and princes are concerned.

It was good to see the Library of Congress take a stand against rabid anti-Muslims like Raymond Ibrahim. Notice also how he does what Islamophobes do best, resort to conspiracy theories and blaming it on those “influential” Saudis.

No, Raymond those who employed you at the Library of Congress weren’t “appeasers” or “dhmmis” beholden to the world wide influence of the Saudis, they just got fed up with your hate. Kudos to them.

  • TyRight

    I understand why this palce is called loonwatch

  • Pingback: The Muslim Brotherhood: Crucifixion or Just Plain Fiction? | Spencer Watch

  • akbar

    Is the Koran consistent with Science?

    There is an excellent book for those who wish to be informed concerning this question. Its called:

    The Bible, The Quran and Science by Maurice Bucaille

    http://www.witness-pioneer.org/vil/Books/MB_BQS/default.htm

    In the book, MB claims that all statements in the Koran are compatible with science.

  • Jayver

    Well, if I was expecting to find on this page a dispassionate, well reasoned account as to why Mr. Ibrahim might be deemed not credible (which is what I was hoping for), I was certainly disappointed in the extreme. What I found was the kind of fall-back, ad hominem argumet by insult that many on the reflexively left fall into when substantive arguments are not available to them. If this was the best you could do, it was really piss-poor and deserves nothing less than complete dismissal. What is more disturbing is that this sort of ad hominem attack seems to focus more and more on anyone who says anything remotely critical of complete 100% acceptance of, and capitulation to, Islam – and that pretty much confirms Mr. Ibrahim’s exposition of “jihad by grievance”. So you’ve really added to his credibility rather than subtracting from it.

  • Pingback: Frontpage Muslim-bashing Authority Can’t Do a Two Second Google Search | Islamophobia Today eNewspaper

  • http://thebandofstrangers.blogspot.com/ Jack Cope

    So you’ve read this website then Tony? I think not… your post shows it.

    “Quoting the original source texts of Islam, its authentic commentators and its consensus formed over 1400 years in hardly ‘shallow’. It’s as in-depth as it gets.”

    You missed one word, ‘selectively’. ‘Selectively quoting’ etc *is* shallow and it’s why the arguments don’t stand. And most of the stuff I read on the sites you seem to frequent is *not* from authentic sources.

    And why do you people try and point score by attempting to be the last poster on random old threads? Scared of debate on the active ones? This one is a year old for crying out loud!

  • Tony

    Ad hominems do not refute facts.

    The poisoned well argument does not prove falsity of a premise.

    This article is therefore a crafty track to shill morons.

    Quoting the original source texts of Islam, its authentic commentators and its consensus formed over 1400 years in hardly ‘shallow’. It’s as in-depth as it gets.

    This blog is merely an apology for blasphemy laws and discriminatory Sharia, the repression of women and all ‘others’.

    We don’t want your backward 7th century camel barbarism.

  • http://eaazi.blogspot.com Joachim Martillo

    I am certainly willing to debate Cassidy any time, but for the record I disagree with a lot of the material from Walt and Mearsheimer.

    I use the term Israel lobby for convenience, but the Israel lobby is not a lobby in any conventional sense. It is the public face of the Zionist Virtual Colonial Motherland or Judonia, which is natural development of Jewish political economic history just 19th century Polonia was a natural development of Polish political economic history.

    Here are three links that are a gentle introduction to historical Jewish political economics:

    Not Just an Ordinary Lobby

    Martillo’s Three Hypotheses Plus One

    Introduction: Jewish Historical Political Economics

    While I feel sympathy for Palestinians, my main concerns lie in Jewish studies and the damage that the Zionist Imperial System is doing to the USA.

    I have to make an additional comment. While I am not a specialist in Ottomoan slavery or the associated Islamic law, I have attended Hebrew University seminars given by experts in the fields and have some possibly relevant blog entries that allude to the complexity of the issue in the context of Jewish and Islamic studies:

    Origins of Modern Jewry

    Modern Identity Creates Ancient Origins

  • Imad

    @ nabeela

    I try to be open minded and Cassidy seems to make a good point. Like I said I can’t nessecarily agree or disagree, but I wanna hear her side of the argument.

  • Cassidy

    @Seffi

    “It was bigoted- religion is not incompatible with science….”

    No it’s simply a factual statement; religion is based on faith, science is based on the scientific method, now does that mean that religious people are stupid? Of course not.

    science has yet to prove God doesn’t exist…I won’t hold my breath.”

    That’s kind of my point; religion basically says “God exists take our word for it” science on the other hand demands evidence, proof etc.

    “How exactly does religion stop someone ‘believing’ in gravity? or medical advancements? or astronomy? It doesn’t.”

    As I stated above, I’m not claiming that religious people are stupid, however what happens if a scientist who happens to be religious discovers something that contradicts his or her faith?

    “That statement is offensive and elitist…yes, because the white western men tell us our beliefs are incompatible with their science and technology they have a right to dominate and ridicule us”

    Oh please don’t try to drag race into this; my comment isn’t just about islam, there are people with religious agendas who try to credit all European and American achievements to Christianity, which irritates me, remember I’m talking about religion in general.

  • Nabeela

    Seffi and Imad, you’re abetting Cassidy, in leading threads of topic, ignore this troll please

    Cassidy, it’s time for you to explain why you post here. You’ve tried various techniques, deceiving and pretending, but you must be motivated by something to spend so much time obsessively posting here where nobody likes you, and most see you as a prize irritant and an unwelcome distraction.

    Why do you post here?

  • Seffi

    It was bigoted- religion is not incompatible with science….science has yet to prove God doesn’t exist…I won’t hold my breath.
    The only time religion and science clash is when it comes to evolution or how the world came about- things even scientists argue about.
    How exactly does religion stop someone ‘believing’ in gravity? or medical advancements? or astronomy? It doesn’t.

    No you can’t credit scientific achievements to religion- except for the fact that it was a part of the people who made those achievements either in motivation or inspiration…and considering all the phDs I know are Muslim females all in the field of science who would credit their achievements to God…your statement is yet another example of your own assumptions and prejudice.

    That statement is offensive and elitist…yes, because the white western men tell us our beliefs are incompatible with their science and technology they have a right to dominate and ridicule us, ignore our achievements and deny our history and contributions because we must be ‘backward’ and ‘anti modern’ to have faith in something science can’t rationlise and caegorise (mostly in eurocentric terms and notions)

    And oh please- the ADL?! They are rabidly pro Israel and have accused anyone even slightly fair towards the Palestinians of being ‘anti-semitic’. I’m sure you put a lot of stock in CAMERA or MEMRI too!

  • Imad

    @ Cassidy:

    the science and religion thing is definitly an interesting claim. I can’t rly agree or disagree as I don’t know much in the subject but I completly reject evolution. Without religion I can’t imagine life. Can u gimme examples of science being incompatible with religion?

  • Cassidy

    “or you to call anyone a bigot is just so beyond hypocritical when you make statements about ‘invisble men in the sky caring about what women wear’. You have zero knowledge about Islam, a complete disregard for anyone’s opinion when it differs from yours.”

    How was that bigoted? It’s the simple truth; religion is an absurdity incompatible with science.

    “Religious’ rejection of Darwinism isn’t as straightforward as you seem to think and a lot of the scientific knowledge in this world came from men and women with strong religious convictions- it’s not your place to judge what is and isn’t compatible.”

    True very true; but those men and women achieved what they did in spite of religion; not because it, crediting scientific achievements to a religion is ludicrous.

    “Maybe the you might actually get some perspective and quit using Zionist propaganda as the unquestionable truth.”

    And provide with a few examples of this alleged ‘propaganda’.

  • Seffi

    Ah Lou,

    “Islam produces nothing”
    We produce a lot of babies….and will continue to do so until we outnumber everyone, then we will forcibily convert everyone, make them wear pink jubbas and eat ladoos and baklava.

    Now run along and wait for the coming end of the civilised world in your bunker.

    @Cassidy- for you to call anyone a bigot is just so beyond hypocritical when you make statements about ‘invisble men in the sky caring about what women wear’. You have zero knowledge about Islam, a complete disregard for anyone’s opinion when it differs from yours.

    ‘Religious’ rejection of Darwinism isn’t as straightforward as you seem to think and a lot of the scientific knowledge in this world came from men and women with strong religious convictions- it’s not your place to judge what is and isn’t compatible.

    and Cassidy- in your tireless efforts to defend anything and everything Israel does and denigrate Palestinians and disregard their suffering- have you considered visiting the OPTs? Maybe the you might actually get some perspective and quit using Zionist propaganda as the unquestionable truth.

  • Cassidy

    @Yusuf

    “What is Arab imperialism?”

    Just look at any Arab state secular or otherwise.

    “Pro-Palestinian intellectuals do not use the Holocaust for their own self-interests”

    Oh please practically every pro-palestinian individuals rushes at the chance to compare israel to nazi germany.

    “And Iran is not Nazi Germany. Not even close.”

    The comparison is highly fitting, Iran’s vile anti-gay policies mirror the nazi’s policies towards jews such as ahmadinejad claiming that ‘Iran doesn’t have homosexuals’. Also look into the vile murder of Mona Mahmudnizhad, an action easily comparable to nazism. Plus there’s the fact that khomeini was an avid listener to nazi propaganda broadcasts.

    “Israel has been attacking its neighbors for 6 decades.”

    Yes because we all know that those brutal dictatorships just want to be pals.

    “Where did I deny Islamic slavery? I didn’t. I said that European Christian slavery was worse, which is a fact.”

    There is no such thing as ‘worse’ or ‘better’ slavery; by making that absurd argument you are trying to minimalize the suffering of countless people just how genocide deniers try to minamalize mass murder, just like how David Irving tries to minimize the amount of people who died in the holocaust. Try telling these people what they experienced was ‘humane’ or ‘not so bad’:

    “Many freed slaves bore signs of beatings, burnings and other tortures. More than three-quarters of formerly enslaved women and girls reported rapes.”

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Slavery_in_Sudan

    “Massad and Abukhalil thoughts on the Israel Lobby were more convincing because they approached it as pro-Palestinian Arabs.”

    If the Israel Lobby is really that big of a deal then why the guys who wrote that crappy book the israel lobby distort facts?

    “When the authors imply that the bipartisan support of Israel in Congress is a result of Jewish influence, they function as classic conspiracy theorists who attribute decisions to nefarious alliances rather than to the choices of a democratic electorate.”

    “The paper contains three types of major errors: quotations are wrenched out of context, important facts are misstated or omitted, and embarrassingly weak logic is employed.”

  • DrM

    Fortune 500 companies? LOL The only thing Lou is a pioneer is in trying to convince everyone that his seven shades of turd doesn’t stink. This guys ancestors were wallowing in dirt while Muslims were putting together the periodic table. These retarded idiots ought to be banned.
    The usual zionazi mental defectives chiming in their racist absurd nonsense living 5000 years in the past. How typical.

  • Cassidy

    @Nabeela

    “How dare you blame Britain for fabricating the iraq war evidence, and for someone who claims to be pro american, you sure don’t have a problem with Douglas Feith being a traitor.”

    You miss my point; if Feith’s treason ‘proves’ alleged Jewish control over America then surely the British fabrication of evidence proves British control of America, of course it doesn’t.

    “Give me Lou, or Dolly or Milad, or Laurnece at least they don’t pretend to be our friends, or put on a neutral air, whilst trying to intimidate.”

    And where have I tried to intimidate anyone?

    “Your statement on religion being incompatible with science is something that you like to hide behind to show your contempt for religion. some religions are like Christinaity, because they discourage thinking and learing, but Islam is not like that, neither is Judaism.”

    That’s pure nonsense, all religions of incomptible with science, since religion is based on faith while science isn’t, just look at the religious rejection of darwinism.

    “Islam and science are wholly compatible.”

    I hate to break it to you but there’s nothing remote scientiffic about believing in an invisible man in the sky who care what women wear. The rest of your post is a collection whiney garbage that doesn’t merit a response, if you can’t stand me then stop replying to me.

  • Cassidy

    “Cassidy lies, and attributes things to people they have not said, all the time apologising for American terror, and excusing American crimes by the neo cons.”

    Could you back your baseless accusations up with examples? Oh wait that’s right you can’t.

    ” Yusuf, Cassidy objected to being told that America groomed Bin Laden and the Taliban,”

    What I objected to was someone claiming that bin laden was a CIA agent.

    “Cassidy has yet to explain why he/she posts here, nor why she/he never invites the Islamophobes to debate her/him offline.”

    We’ve already gone over this.

    “your love for paganism”

    Ah yes your bigoted opinions against pagans; of course you actually know very little about paganism (which is actually a blanket term it doesn’t refer to a single faith).

  • Yusuf

    Okay, I apologize Lou. I have no reason to not believe you. Congratulations. I’m an engineering graduate student at the moment.

    I know Nabeela. Cassidy is so obsessed with Israel it’s hard to resist sometimes.

  • The guy who’s not imad :p

    @ Lou:

    congrats on the company, although u cud by lying, I don’t see why u would be. I’ll tell u rite now tho, I’m a Muslim, and I’m in high school getting straight As, and my failure Muslim parents are not only devout toward their “cult”, they are BOTH successful doctors, my dad himself is a heart surgeon and my mom a pediatrician. My mom wears a hijab by her own choice, as does my older sister. My mom has her own car which my DAD bought for her. As for myself, I wanna combat islamophobia and become an influential politician like wilders except with a better brain. Hell, I may even be the first Muslim president!

    So, if ur gonna refer to Muslims as failures, just be a little more careful.

  • Nabeela

    Yusuf

    You’re feeding the troll called Cassidy, don’t fall into his/her trap, he/she is here to deliberately take threads off topic, by pretending to be a neutral whilst in reality the picture is quite ugly

    Cassidy lies, and attributes things to people they have not said, all the time apologising for American terror, and excusing American crimes by the neo cons. He is an apologist for terror, an apologist for Zionist crimes, an apologist for Douglas Feith, an apologist for American traitors who are neo cons, and he does this, not like Lou or Durendal, in an honest way, but in a nasty insiduous low down cheap cunning way.

    Unlike neo cons we don’t want fake support. Take your neutrality and shove it where the sun doesn’t shine, Cassidy you apologist for terror. Yusuf, Cassidy objected to being told that America groomed Bin Laden and the Taliban,

    I for one as sick of seeing this ugly character here

    Cassidy has yet to explain why he/she posts here, nor why she/he never invites the Islamophobes to debate her/him offline.

    and no Cassidy don’t respond to this ,with your usual lies, history revising and pretence neatrality, your love for paganism, what the hell are you doing in a club for Monotheists?

    go and join a pagan cult and leave us alone

  • Nabeela

    Oh poor Lou, look at his whining

    “I’ve been intimately involved in 2 successful startup companies that went on to be acquired by Fortune 500 companies. Thats the American Dream, nimrod. That provides jobs and security for hundreds of families.”

    Boo hoooooooooo, hey Yusuf, you grossly underestimated Lou LOL, man, didn’t you know being “intimately involved” in building Fortune 500 companies can be construed to mean, making tea..being a delivery boy…well you get my drift..please give Lou his dues

    I personally think Lou is either Robert Spencer, or Daniel Pipes or someone sent by them…

    and Lou,

    “Islam produces nothing. Anywhere. Oh geez, did I forget about 1001 islamic inventions? What a joke that one is. Islam, always living in the past.”

    Perhap’s you should’ve studied economics whilst you were builing (…..coughs) your Fortune 500 companies. You would’ve discovered that the reason the Muslim countries they’re in the mess they’re in now is because of colonial misrule, that imposed dictatorships, that claim to be Muslim, but they’re usually some other ideology masquerading as Islam. The Islamic system of rule does’t exist anywhere in the world today, it’s mainly tin pot dictatorships, abusing religion for power.

    However this is a temporary phase, and it was actually foretold in Islamic prophecies, which i won’t go into since you’re not Muslim. Everything is being played out as foretold.

    But anyway, the Middle Eastern countries along with indonesia and RUssia, India, and other tiger economies are the power houses of tomorrow.

    Cassidy

    If you choose to selectively answer some, and ignore that which exposes your duplicity, then don’t bother to answer at all.

    You pretend to be all neutral and anti-hate but youre a sly deceiver and i can see through you. We don’t need fake allies like you. How dare you blame Britain for fabricating the iraq war evidence, and for someone who claims to be pro american, you sure don’t have a problem with Douglas Feith being a traitor.

    It’s patently clear what you’re trying to do here, we can see your pretence and lies.

    Give me Lou, or Dolly or Milad, or Laurnece at least they don’t pretend to be our friends, or put on a neutral air, whilst trying to intimidate.

    Your statement on religion being incompatible with science is something that you like to hide behind to show your contempt for religion. some religions are like Christinaity, because they discourage thinking and learing, but Islam is not like that, neither is Judaism.

    Islam and science are wholly compatible. You’re a hypocrite and a fake, and i can see through you, i also know what you’re doing here. Don’t worry, i shall be right behind you, exposing you at every step.

    So go and take your self fabricated garbage, and your “air of neutrality” and shove it where the sun doesn’t shine.

    Yusuf, don’t be taken in by Cassidy, you obviously don’t read all his posts or you’d understand what he/she is all about.

  • Silly Willy

    Raymond Ibrahim has never been a research librarian. He was a library technician spending most of his day at the front desk.

  • Lou

    Lou is a moron who’s been hanging around here for a while now. He takes out his frustrations on Muslims because he can’t deal with the fact that he has a pathetic life devoid of any real value and full of failures. Ignore him. He’s not worth responding to.

    Geez Jusuf. Your revelations on people you’ve never met are simply amazing! Pathetic life devoid of value and full of failures?

    I’ve been intimately involved in 2 successful startup companies that went on to be acquired by Fortune 500 companies. Thats the American Dream, nimrod. That provides jobs and security for hundreds of families.

    No Jusuf, the devotees of islam are the pathetic failures whose lives are devoid of meaning. Just look at the middle east and tell me differently. These jihadis simply have nothing better to do with themselves. And they are even more frustrated because of the strict segregation of the sexes.

    Islam produces nothing. Anywhere. Oh geez, did I forget about 1001 islamic inventions? What a joke that one is. Islam, always living in the past.

Advertise Here
Advertise Here