Robert Spencer

|

Pamela Geller

|

Bat Ye'or

|

Brigitte Gabriel

|

Daniel Pipes

|

Debbie Schlussel

|

Walid Shoebat

|

Joe Kaufman

|

Wafa Sultan

|

Geert Wilders

|

The Nuclear Card

Nonie Darwish Caught in a Pool of Lies

Posted on 18 February 2010 by Mooneye

Nonie Darwish

Nonie Darwish

We are going to have an explosive breakdown of the clownish Nonie Darwish, another charlatan akin to Wafa Sultan who is milking the Islamophobic cash cow for all it’s worth. Jim Holstun, a professor at SUNY Buffalo wrote this great piece in 2008 that lays bear Nonie’s excessive Islamophobia, as well as her contradictions and lies.

Nonie Darwish and the al-Bureij Massacre

StandWithUs is a Zionist advocacy group in Los Angeles. It concentrates on US colleges and universities, offering fellowships, book donations, lectures, training and hands-on activism. I first heard about the group in 2005, after its Executive Director, Roz Rothstein, wrote my university’s president, provost and Arts and Sciences dean to warn them that I was teaching courses in Palestinian culture. She passed along some hysterical libels from anonymous community members (not my students), gave a detailed critique of my syllabuses, encouraged them to investigate me and two other colleagues, and helpfully suggested a few questions they might want to ask.

StandWithUs manages an impressive stable of Zionist speakers, including several who are Arabs, Muslims, or ex-Muslims: Brigitte Gabriel, Ishmael Khaldi, Walid Shoebat, Khaled Abu Toameh, and Nonie Darwish. Darwish, born an Egyptian Muslim, now an American Evangelical Christian, is one of the most energetic. She manages the website Arabs for Israel and has appeared on FOX News, on the website Frontpage Magazine, and in the film Obsession: Radical Islam’s War Against the West. She is also the author of Now They Call Me Infidel: Why I Renounced Jihad for America, Israel, and the War on Terror. Penguin Books publishes it under its Sentinel imprint — a special line of conservative titles. Since her book’s publication in 2006, Darwish has toured extensively, speaking primarily at colleges and universities.

Now They Call Me Infidel has blurbs from all the usual crew: Daniel Pipes, David Horowitz, Robert Spencer, Bat Ye’Or, former Senator Rick Santorum, Representative Tom “Nuke Mecca” Tancredo, and General Paul Vallely, who advocates the final ethnic cleansing of all Palestinian citizens of Israel. In the book itself, Darwish interweaves stories of her Egyptian girlhood with potted accounts of female genital mutilation, arranged marriages, polygamy, veiling, domestic abuse, honor killings, sharia law, jihad, censorship, hate-oriented education, the rejection of modernity, the cult of martyrdom, Islamic imperialism, and the pathological, groundless hatred of Israel.

In her interviews and in her book, she insists that she is not anti-Arab or anti-Islamic, and even suggests from time to time that she is still a Muslim. Then she pivots nimbly and attacks “the Arab mind,” “the seething Arab street,” and “the Muslim world,” with its “culture of jihad,” “culture of death,” and “culture of envy.” There are “no real distinctions between moderate or radical Muslims,” and no significant differences within or among Arab or Muslim cultures: for Darwish, Egyptian President Gamal Abdel Nasser’s secular Arab nationalism was essentially jihadist. Darwish is allergic to social history: “I realized that the Arab-Israeli conflict is not a crisis over land, but a crisis of hate, lack of compassion, ingratitude, and insecurity.” Instead of history, scholarship, and footnotes, she gives us a watered-down version of Raphael Patai’s The Arab Mind: a dictionary of Islamophobic commonplaces underwritten by the authority of an ex-Muslim native informant: I was there — I know.

Darwish’s portraits of Israel and of the US, to which she emigrated in 1978, are diametrically opposite but equally fatuous: Israeli Jews are tolerant, pragmatic, and peace-loving. From 1967 to 1982, they made the Sinai bloom. Americans are honest, charitable, industrious, self-sufficient, intellectually curious, and benevolent toward the foreign nations to whom they bring liberty. They err only in their excess of credulous goodness: because of “the simplicity of American values such as truthfulness,” they risk falling prey to duplicitous jihadist immigrants and dangerous professors, who “indoctrinate American young people with the radical Muslim agenda.”

Her outsider’s view of America complements her insider’s view of the Arab and Muslim world, for imperial states want not only other people’s land and labor, but their love. Here, we may compare Now They Call Me Infidel not only to recent anti-Islamic conversion narratives like Ayaan Hirsi Ali’s Infidel (her conversion was to neoconservative atheism and the American Enterprise Institute), but to earlier works in the genre. In her 1964 Editions Gallimard autobiography, O mes soeurs musulmanes, pleurez! (O My Muslim Sisters, Weep!), Zoubeida Bittari recounts her escape from Algerian Muslim patriarchy to French Christian bliss as a domestic servant to a Pied-Noir family; Nonie Darwish finds friends, family, and faith in southern California, including a Republican women’s group, an American husband, and Christian fellowship in Pastor Dudley Rutherford’s Shepherd of the Hills Church. As Bittari helped French colons feel better about their ungratefully rebuffed civilizing mission in Algeria, so Darwish helps Americans feel better about the long and bumpy road to global democratization.

There are occasional flashes of something more individual and authentic in Darwish’s book. For instance, her reiterated heartfelt attack on Nasser’s rent control laws (her mother lived partly off of her Cairo rentals) helps us understand why she feels so much more at home in southern California, where she arrived with enough money to buy a house with a swimming pool. But as a whole, the book is tedious, predictable, and badly edited — born to be bought, scanned and displayed, not actually read. But this will not diminish the demand for Darwish as a lecturer, which derives not from her writing but from her parentage: her father was Colonel Mustafa Hafez, head of Egyptian army intelligence in the Gaza Strip in the early ’50s, who was killed by an Israeli letter bomb in July 1956. Every lecture notice, every interview, even the title page of her book announces her as “a Muslim Shahid’s Daughter.”

Throughout her book, Darwish struggles to maintain love and loyalty both to the father she lost at age eight and to the Israeli state that killed him. In a parting flourish, she says that “My father — and potentially my whole family — was sent to his death in Gaza by Nasser, who was consumed by his desire to destroy Israel,” and she fondly imagines him surviving and flying with assassinated Egyptian president Anwar Sadat to Israel. But this argument sometimes requires a torturous chronology: “When, on January 16, 1956, Nasser vowed a renewed offensive to destroy Israel, the pressure on my father to step up operations increased. More fedayeen groups were organized, and their training expanded to other areas of the Gaza Strip. Often my father was gone for days at a time. In an attempt to end the terror, Israel sent its commandos one night to our heavily guarded home.”

The problem here is that this early, failed assassination attempt occurred in 1953, when Hafez was struggling to prevent destabilizing Palestinian infiltration from Gaza into Israel. Things changed dramatically in February 1955, when then military commander Ariel Sharon’s Gaza raid killed 37 Egyptian soldiers and wounded 31. This raid brought shocked international condemnation, the end of Israeli Prime Minister Moshe Sharett’s ongoing negotiations with Nasser, mass demonstrations of Palestinian refugees in the Gaza Strip, and Nasser’s decision to have Hafez organize and arm Palestinian fedayeen for cross-border forays. Israeli historians Avi Shlaim and Benny Morris see the raid as a turning point in Israeli-Arab relations. Darwish never mentions it.

Continuing with her discussion of the earlier undated raid on her family’s home (it actually occurred on 28-29 August 1953), she says, “My father was not at home that night, and the Israelis found only women and children — my mother, two maids, and five small children. The commandos left us unharmed. I personally did not even wake up or know of the incident until later in life, when I read a book written about my father. After I read it, I called my mother immediately, and she confirmed the story. The Israelis chose not [to] kill us even though the Egyptian-organized fedayeen did kill Israeli civilians, women and children.”

Young Nonie must have been a very sound sleeper, since one squad blew the gate off her house, injuring several civilians, and, by one account, proceeded to demolish the house. Grown-up Nonie seems not to know that the Israeli commandos were part of Ariel Sharon’s newly-organized Unit 101. While the one squad attacked her house, Sharon’s was cornered nearby in al-Bureij refugee camp. He decided they would bomb and shoot their way through the camp rather than retreat from it. General Vagn Bennike, the Danish UN Truce Chief, reported to the Security Council on the ensuing massacre: “Bombs were thrown through the windows of huts in which the refugees were sleeping and, as they fled, they were attacked by small arms and automatic weapons. The casualties were 20 killed, 27 seriously wounded, and 35 less seriously wounded.” Other sources estimate from 15 to 50 fatalities.

The Israeli army blamed the raid on rogue kibbutzniks, and Ariel Sharon tried to reassure his men, telling them that all the dead women were camp whores or murderous Palestinian infiltrators. But some of them remained shocked at what they had done. Participant Meir Barbut said they felt as if they were slaughtering the pathetic inhabitants of a Jewish transit camp: “The boys threw Molotov cocktails at [innocent] people, not at the saboteurs we had come to punish. It was shameful for the 101 and the IDF [Israel army].” Another asked, “Is this screaming, whimpering multitude … the enemy? … How did these fellahin sin against us?” In 2006, Palestinian journalist Laila El-Haddad interviewed a survivor for Al Jazeera English:

“Mohammad Nabahini, 55, was two at the time and lived in the camp. He survived the attack in the arms of his slain mother. ‘My father decided to stay behind when they attacked. He hid in a pile of firewood and pleaded with my mother to stay with him. She was too afraid, and fled with hundreds of others, only to return to take me and a few of her belongings with her,’ he said. ‘As she was escaping, her dress got caught in a fence around the camp, just over there,’ he gestured, near a field now covered with olive trees. ‘And then they threw a bomb at her, Sharon and his men. She tossed me on the ground behind her before she died.’”

Though Darwish never mentions it, the al-Bureij Massacre hasn’t exactly been a secret — both Zionist and anti-Zionist historians have described it clearly, with little disagreement save the number of fatalities, with the high-end estimate coming from an Israeli history. If it tends not to loom large in Palestinian historical memory, that’s because it was overshadowed just two months later by the Qibya Massacre, during which Sharon’s Unit 101 killed 67, women and children, demolishing buildings over their heads and shooting them down when they tried to flee — the tactic pioneered at al-Bureij. Given its propensity for civilian soft targets, this daredevil elite unit might be better described as a death squad.

We probably shouldn’t expect Nonie Darwish to alter her campus presentations anytime soon. The bookings by StandWithUs might dry up if she were to start supplementing her cautionary tales about sharia law, jihadi immigrants, and female genital mutilation with a serious discussion of Israeli massacres at Deir Yassin, Tantura, al-Bureij, Qibya, Kfar Qasim, Sabra and Shatila, and Beit Hanoun. In any case, Darwish prefers simple cultural generalities and intimate personal reflection to historical analysis. But since that’s the case, someone at her next lecture might ask if she remembers playing with any of the refugee children murdered at al-Bureij, and why the kindly Israeli commandos who spared her family decided to blow up Mohammad Nabahini’s mother.

Jim Holstun teaches world literature and Marxism at SUNY Buffalo and can be reached at jamesholstun A T hotmail D O T com.

  • Wala

    A friend sent me this today. I looked up Darwish. She is not right about everything, but just because some people don’t like her, doesn’t mean that everything she says us wrong. I guess that also means that not everything the other side, CAIR, since it’s mentioned, is wrong in so many ways, especially in fattening their pockets by feeding our minds with conspiracies. And yes, every country has faults and no one is perfect, but other nations have so many organizations who criticize the system without having to go from zero to a revolution and deal with social issues, changing the laws and rules on the streets, daily. We don’t. we won’t, we accept the envy culture and that is, if one thing she said is correct, is something we have. Maybe we should hear what she says, take out the extras and just focus on the truth that we’re so ashamed of, that we choose to close my eyes that seeing. Isn’t that what we believe in? At least, when I chose to study religions on my own, including mine, I found out how little Imams know about Islam and how much they know about scaring and controling people, in general anyway. Islam is against the rank system in the faith, we’re not Catholics. I can study and I found out that I was so wrong about Islam. Maybe that’s what drove so many to leave Islam, even in the Muslm world. Isn’t time to take our faith back and not be so ashamed of any facts that we try so hard to lie in order to hide it?

  • Pingback: Ayaan Hirsi Ali: Sympathizes with Terrorist Anders Behring Breivik | Islamophobia Today eNewspaper

  • Sir David Illuminati membership number 16.69

    DLW
    Our Soil ?
    Where are you then ?
    Remember there is life on all 5 continents these days.

  • DLW

    Hmmm, I suppose the honor killings and female mutilations in the news were hoaxes! And they were committed on our soil!

  • Eldon Mner

    What he might wish to be a rebuttal of she says, but what he really exposes is his own antagonism toward and Israel that is threaten to extinction by the Muslims all around her.

  • Pingback: Nonie Darwish on C-Span: Spreads Anti-Muslim Hate at Clare Boothe Luce Policy Institute | Islamophobia Today eNewspaper

  • http://thepenofawanderingstranger.com/personal/ Jack Cope

    Dean;

    I ‘accepted’ that ‘invitation’ many years ago while studying various religions and guess what? I’m a Muslim now. Now have you actually read the Qu’ran?

    Jack

  • Dean

    I guess people accuse Islam and the Quran of blah blah blah … How much do you know about it ???? have you tried to read through it ???
    THIS IS MY INVITATION TO YOU ALL … Go through it and if you ever believed that there is one thing you don’t like

  • Stephen Huff

    When I read the Koran I noticed that very frequently it commands ‘do not exceed the limits’. There are two ways of interpreting this, strict interpretation of the ‘Sharia’ or ‘do nothing which is hateful’ obey the golden rule. Taken in context in the Koran, the interpretation that do not exceed the limits means obey the golden rule is the only correct interpretation. If you look at Islam in the Golden Age, it is clear that at that time that is how it was interpreted.

    Then the Mongols conquered Islam and caused the Koran and Hadith to be interpreted in the way they wanted. They wanted a strick orthodoxy which supported continued wars of conquest, so that became the ‘Sharia’ which is the Sharia of Genghis Khan, not the Sharia of Mohammed, pboh.

    The same thing happened in China, where they converted to Confucianism and forced a strict Confucian orthodoxy on China. These strick orthodoxies killed free speech halted scientific thought, and froze these, then advanced, civilizations into stasis.

    Nonie Darwish is exactly correct in everything she says about Islam today, she should not blame these faults on Mohammed, but on Genghis Khan, but aside from that she is absolutely right in everything she said.

    None of you are Muslims, you are all liars and hypocrites. Allah knows what is in the hearts of men, he knows that you worship your own pride and vanity and do not ever care about him at all.

    Enjoy your fate.

  • Pingback: ما فعلته الهندية المسيحية للمرأة المسلمة — Arab Voices

  • JohnReb

    It is interesting to me to see that some people think God gave Adam & Eve free will when he knew exactly what would happen when they exercised it. Do you know how dull it would be and have been for God had A & E and the rest of us remained innocent. I noticed that A & his partner( I heard her name was Lilith) were formed at the same time but apparently that didn’t work out so we had the first separation and Adam got Eve by giving up a rib. Comparing the Church to a woman is in itself kind of strange. Now Lilith went her own way and Eve got Adam in trouble by bringing him the fruit. This does not compare to a pure innocent church. And by the way how are christian slaves allowed. Maybe we know more about humans than we used to although not more than God knew. And at what time do we want to designate that piece of land now called Israel as being rightfully owned? While the Jews were still in Egypt? Before 1947? Now? What manner of barbarism is allowable to take over a place. What outside powers have the right to intercede. It must be might makes right because that is usually happens. But after all free will doesn’t enter into this activity. Someone already knows. And Christians should look in the past at their own zealots and judge Islam.

  • PinkCashmere

    Hmmmmm what a very interesting, and somewhat amusing site, NOT – the TRUTH is – BEFORE any modern day religion (Christianity, Islam, Muslim bla bla bla) we ALL lived in a Matriachal society (Spelling is not one of my fortes lol) – so just have a little think about that – ALL modern day religion/faith what ever BS you wish to call it put the male first. LIFE should be a JOINT VENTURE – MALE & FEMALE MAKING JOINT DECISIONS.

    That’s it from me

    PC

  • Pingback: International Intelligence Summit (New & Improved Reprisal) « Fed up USA

  • SKhan

    @Good for Her:

    Um, you realize that her conversion story was not only ridden with fallacies, but also contradictory, right?

  • Good For Her…

    …for accepting Jesus Christ as her Lord and Savior. I hope her testimonies lead more people from spiritual darkness into the light.

  • ryder

    For the Christians quoting phrases from the Bible, please do a favour just Google – “The Zionist-Created Scofield ‘Bible’ The Source Of The Problem In The Mideast – Why Judeo-Christians Support War By C. E. Carlson”. You will find the answer for the Islamphobia in the US and the never ending trouble in the MiddleEast and the start of the WW3.

  • Pingback: True Story -Joys of Muslim Women By Nonie Darwish - Christian Forums

  • Ali

    Do NOT believe the lies of the Islamophobic bigots and liars.

    @Lawrence, you are a liar.

    The holy, pure, perfect, and infallible Prophet Muhammad (SAW/Peace be upon him) is NOT as they say and never did as they are saying.

    The truth is that the holy, pure, perfect, and infallible Prophet Muhammad (SAW/Peace be upon him) saved the lives of people, spoke truth, spread justice, and is the MOST honourable and righteous man ever.

    The holy, pure, perfect, and infallible Prophet Muhammad (SAW/Peace be upon him) is the MOST honourable, righteous, pious, kind, sincere, handsome, beautiful, pure, intelligent, honest, modest, and GREATEST of all God’s creation! Salvation is through him (SAW/Peace be upon him)!

    The holy, pure, perfect, and infallible Prophet Muhammad (SAW/Peace be upon him) is the beloved of Allah (SWT) and is has the NOBLEST character.

    The BEST man ever is the holy, pure, perfect, and infallible Prophet Muhammad (SAW/Peace be upon him)!

  • Sir David ( Illuminati membership number 5:32) Warning Contains Irony

    Cristina
    There is no need to use caps all the time you know . It just makes what you say look even more foolish than the content .
    I would suggest you try to read with an open mind rather than one that is closed and argue about any point you think incorrect .

  • Cristina G.

    THANK YOU NELSON J. FOR BEING STRONG AND COURAGEOUS. I CANT AGREE MORE WITH YOU.
    AS FOR YOU JOHN J. I PIT YOU.

  • http://www.bandofstrangers.org Jack Cope

    Sheesh ‘Historian’, is there anything in your comment that is actually true? As Mosizzle points out it just proves the point of the article about Ms Darwish. If you can’t find anything objectionable in her speakings and you believe that your comment is 100% truth then you’ve nailed your own coffin.

    Also, why do you all comment on old threads? And you make us real historians embarrassed, chose a different name…

  • http://facebook.com/cathiewilliams Cathie

    It’s really a horrible thing this liar has done to herself and others who buy into her lies. With all her learning, she has not gone very far on the spiritual path. To lie is bad enough, but each and every time some one reads her lie, it is as if she is lying over and over again. That’s scary! What’s worst, she is blocking the truth from others. She will have to bare her burden and some of others she has caused to block the truth from. In the size of a lie there always contained a certain factor of credibility, since the mass of people will more easily fall victim to a great lie, opposed to a small one. This is an abominable lie told by this woman. I wonder how much the Zionist are paying her. No amount of money should be worth your soul. All you people who are so gullible and So ready and willing to accept this lie, go ahead and be my guest, but eventually the truth will undeceive you. This woman is being paid just as others are being paid to lie against Islam and the Muslims. This is undoubtedly a feeble attempt to discredit this beautiful way of life due to fear of change. The greed misers are loath to give up stealing people’s wealth, being able to control other countries resources at a whim, buy what they want or just take what they want, but everyone knows that change is constant no matter how we try to prevent it. There is truly a GOD and people like her and her comrades will suffer a great punishment for lying and capitalizing on it. She has tricked a lot of people with these lies, but after darkness comes the light. Women are honored in Qur’an. Muslim women were the first to be given equal rights on this planet. Sharia law is democracy but under GOD’S commands. Under Shariah Law, no one will lose their homes because they can’t pay their mortgage and rape is next to unheard of because it rarely exist due to strict enforced laws, the so called honor killings are not Islamic laws, but acts practiced by backwards people who are stuck in their customs, it not Sharia law and women circumcising is a crime and is not allowed in Islam, etc…. Why am I telling you all this? Just go read up on Shariah laws. Go to the source and check it out for yourselves and stop being easy prey of the Zionist killing machine. Go and seek truth oppose to falling prey to this Zionist Machine.

Advertise Here
Advertise Here