Top Menu

Dennis Prager at War with Muslims

Dennis Prager is at war with leftists, secularists, labor unions, civil rights organizations, Big Government, academics, atheists, Europeans, internationalists, “moral relativists” — and Muslims. Nothing personal, it’s just his worldview — that and the fact that not one Muslim in the entire world is a moderate:

There are a billion Muslims in the world. How is it possible that essentially none have demonstrated against evils perpetrated by Muslims in the name of Islam? This is true even of the millions of Muslims living in free Western societies. What are non-Muslims of goodwill supposed to conclude?

Long before it was fashionable to burn Qu’rans, Prager, a Republican convert, began trash-talking them:

In 2006 he wrote that “America, not Keith Ellison, decides what book a congressman takes his oath on,” in taking great offense that the first Muslim elected to Congress had decided to take his oath of office on a Qu’ran and not on a Christian bible. The ADL noted the bigotry of Prager’s remarks and conservative talk show host Tucker Carlson pointed out the irony that “here we have a Jew pushing a Muslim to use the Christian Bible.”

In Moment Magazine, which features articles of contemporary Jewish interest, Prager awkwardly (and self-contradictorily) defended his views, even after it was pointed out that many politicians had sworn their oath of office on books other than the bible or on none at all:

America has no state religion, nor should it ever be allowed to have one. But it has always been a Judeo-Christian country. Jews—and America itself—will suffer if we cease to be one. Just ask the Jews of secular Europe how their secular societies treat them and Israel. For that matter, just think about how our secular universities have become anti-Israel hate centers.

On the one hand Prager says America should be secular. But on the other hand he says it should privilege Jews and Christians. This is vintage Prager — a new believer in Kulturkampf between Islam and the West.

Despite his own advanced case, Prager denies that Islamophobia actually exists. As the co-author of a book on anti-Semitism himself, Prager should know better, but he wrote:

The fact remains that the term “Islamophobia” has one purpose — to suppress any criticism, legitimate or not, of Islam. And given the cowardice of the Western media, and the collusion of the left in banning any such criticism (while piling it on Christianity and Christians), it is working.

When it comes to anti-Semitism, however, Prager rejects identical arguments and in fact argues that Zionism is part of Judaism — so any criticism of Israel or Jewry amounts to the same thing:

Among the many lies that permeate the modern world, none is greater — or easier to refute — than the claim that Zionism is not an integral part of Judaism or the claim that anti-Zionism is unrelated to anti-Semitism.

Thus, anyone who challenges Zionism — for example, Palestinians who are in conflict with Israel or the legions of academics, NGOs, international organizations, or human rights groups, even many Jews — is by definition an anti-Semite.

The Middle East conflict? Bah! That’s just anti-Semitism he writes in a piece, “The Middle East conflict is hard to solve but easy to explain:”

Those who deny this and ascribe the conflict to other reasons, such as “Israeli occupation,” “Jewish settlements,” a “cycle of violence,” “the Zionist lobby” and the like, do so despite the fact that Israel’s enemies regularly announce the reason for the conflict. The Iranian regime, Hizbollah, Hamas and the Palestinians — in their public opinion polls, in their anti-Semitic school curricula and media, in their election of Hamas, in their support for terror against Israeli civilians in pre-1967 borders — as well as their Muslim supporters around the world, all want the Jewish state annihilated.

Thus Prager completely dismisses any geopolitical causes or “trivial issues” like land theft or ethnic cleansing. No, there is just one reason for all this hostility and it can only be Islam. And it’s clear that Prager is not just talking about a few fanatical winguts when he lumps all of the world’s Muslims into this denunciation, in an article entitled “The Islamic threat is greater than German and Soviet threats were:”

A far larger number of people believe in Islamic authoritarianism than ever believed in Marxism. Virtually no one living in Marxist countries believed in Marxism or communism. Likewise, far fewer people believed in Nazism, an ideology confined largely to one country for less than one generation. This is one enormous difference between the radical Islamic threat to our civilization and the two previous ones. But there is yet a second difference that is at least as significant and at least as frightening: Nazis and Communists wanted to live and feared death; Islamic authoritarians love death and loathe life.

But in fact, for Prager, who participated in one of David Horowitz’s “Islamo-Fascism Awareness Week” events, “Islam is identical to “Islamofascism:

So once one acknowledges the obvious, that there is fascistic behavior among a core of Muslims — specifically, a cult of violence and the wanton use of physical force to impose an ideology on others — the term “Islamo-Fascism” is entirely appropriate.

Dennis Prager’s attitudes toward Muslims are echoed in his views on immigrants in America. A Tea Party supporter, Prager supports Arizona Law SB1070 and believes in American Exceptionalism or Judeo-Christian Dominionism. In this clip at a Tea Party event in Colorado, sitting next to Sarah Palin, Prager describes his revulsion for internationalism and European morality, praising something rather like an American version of Zionism. His is a world view common to the Tea Party, Likudniks, and neoconservatives.

As for Islamophobia — it’s just one of Prager’s many hobbies — but integral to this worldview.

, , , , , , , , , , , , ,

  • Neotropic

    Thank you Gefilte for a much needed rational analysis of Dennis Prager and his biased, fear-mongering propaganda. Far too many otherwise seemingly rational Jews have supported his unbalanced and falsehood-riddled philosophy. His “Prager University” isn’t a university at all. It’s simply a vehicle to spread his own twisted version of the right-wing agenda. Makes sense that he’d be pals with Sarah Palin.

  • Dawood

    JD, there is also this – The Amman Message.

  • JD

    Ctl+D

    Ty

  • JD, just for your attention, many of your links do not work. I personally have this to cut and paste whenever I face such an accusation:

    Databank of condemnations: http://www.muhajabah.com/otherscondemn.php

    And more: http://www.religioustolerance.org/islfatwa.htm

    Even more: http://www.islamfortoday.com/terrorism.htm

    And yet more (there are hundreds on this page): http://facts-not-fear.blogspot.com/search/label/Muslim%20condemnation%20of%20terrorism

    Few more: http://www.ciogc.org/Go.aspx?link=7655053

    And lastly a survey by Gallup: http://muslimmatters.org/2008/03/01/93-worlds-muslims-moderates-gallup-poll-didnt-believe-us-first-time-round/ http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/7267100.stm

  • Garo

    Beautiful Muslim Doll,

    My knowledge about integrityonline is limited. Hence,I feel unconfortable answering a question about something I do not know much about. Sorry for that.

    However,I can provide you with the following information as sent to me by integrityonline via Google and perhaps you would be able to take it from there to find out more about integrityonline. I just have no time to pursue the matter any further. The following is the exact text I received:

    Quote
    =====

    IntegrityOnLine 1.800.INTEGRITY
    ————————————————————————–

    PAGE BLOCKED

    The requested document will not be shown

    Reason Found in Denied List

    If you feel that the site you requested should not be blocked,please click “REQUEST SITE REVIEW” To fill out a Site Rview request

    We will respond to you via email

    Thanks for being part of our Safe Internet

    Unquote
    ========

    Beautiful Muslim Doll,

    The last statement in the above quote,specifically,”Thanks for being part of our Safe Internet family” reminds me that two years ago I was bombarded by unwanted and uncalled for pornography. As a result,I contacted my servicer and demanded to block it since my nine year old grandchild uses my computer once in a while and I did not want him to see what I was bombarded with. My servicer did what I had requested. Since then I have not seen a single pornography on my computer screen. Perhaps,just perhaps,the reason integrityonline has not allowed me to make comments on the article about the Spanish Priest has to do with my request made to my servicer two years ago. I do not know for sure.

    I hope that all of the above may be helpful in answering your question: “What is Integrity On Line?”

  • Beautiful Muslim Doll

    What is this,

    Garo

    “I have just finished trying to post the following comments on the articles about the Spanish Priest etc,but my attempts were blocked by Integrity On Line.And ”

    What is Integrity On Line?

    and rob

    “tinkle”

    I don’t know why you’re leaving your droppings and nonsensical rantings and one line “tinkles”. Your garbage in the Spanish Priest threads was bad enough, and now you’re here

    If you have nothing of value to offer, go away. This is not a place for juvenile pea brains to show their spectacular inability to debate in a rational manner.

  • rob

    tinkle

Powered by Loon Watchers