Robert Spencer

|

Pamela Geller

|

Bat Ye'or

|

Brigitte Gabriel

|

Daniel Pipes

|

Debbie Schlussel

|

Walid Shoebat

|

Joe Kaufman

|

Wafa Sultan

|

Geert Wilders

|

The Nuclear Card

Pamela Geller “Loves” Soldiers Who Urinate on Dead Corpses

Posted on 12 January 2012 by Emperor

US_Soldiers_Urinate_Dead_Afghans

US Soldiers Urinate on Dead Afghans

Pamela Geller “loves” the soldiers pictured above urinating on dead corpses. According to her it may be the “infidel interpretation of the Islamic ritual of washing and preparing the body for burial.”

Interestingly, Geller often wears a necklace with the word “LOVE” showing, which is perplexing considering that to most rational people she is a hate-mongering-attention-seeking loon blogger. I guess this answers the puzzle of her “LOVE” necklace, she “loves” when Muslims are killed, urinated on or otherwise mutilated.

How sick and sadistic can Geller get? Why doesn’t her best friend Robert Spencer condemn her for such asinine comments?

Geller couches her approval and “love” of such actions by implying that those being urinated on deserve it because…they were “jihadis” and “Taliban.” She then trumps out the Nazi analogy, saying,

Would anyone have CAIRed if Marines urinated on dead Nazi soldiers during WWII? (Anyone besides CAIR and nazis, that is)

The US Army probably would care Pam, since it is a violation of their code of conduct, and since they are now engaged in negotiations with the Taliban.

She also goes on an off topic tangent about honor killings and clitorectomies, etc. as if those issues are linked to the actions of the marines.

Here is Geller’s vile screed:

Hamas-tied CAIR, once again sides with jihadists against the US military. Always. Apparently they are a  “Muslim civil rights and advocacy organization” for jihadists and Taliban and Al-Shabaab, Hamas, Hezb’allah, et al).

CAIR has whipped itself up into an Islamic frenzy because  a video surfaced that appears to show US Marines combat gear urinating on several dead jihadis.

Here’s the thing. Hamas liars, CAIR, say jihad and pure Islam is “fringe,” “extremist.” So why do they CAIR about disrespecting the Taliban? According to CAIR lies, Taliban and jihadists do not represent Islam, they have “hijacked Islam”; so why would CAIR care about “respect”? CAIR calls these Marines immoral, but considers honor killings, clitorectomies, forced marriage, child marriage, polygamy, subjugation of women, slaughter of non-Muslims, Jew hatred moral?

Would anyone have CAIRed if Marines urinated on dead Nazi soldiers during WWII? (Anyone besides CAIR and nazis, that is).

I love these Marines. Perhaps this is the infidel interpretation of the Islamic ritual of washing and preparing the body for burial.
video platformvideo managementvideo solutionsvideo player

CAIR Condemns Alleged Desecration of Bodies by U.S. Marines

par CAIR, mercredi 11 janvier 2012, 13:48

(WASHINGTON, D.C., 1/11/12) –- A prominent national Muslim civil rights and advocacy organization today condemned the alleged desecration of corpses in Afghanistan by members of the U.S. Marines.

The Washington-based Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR) said video on the TMZ website appears to show a number of Marines in combat gear urinating on several dead bodies. The person who reportedly distributed the video stated that it shows Marines from Camp Lejeune urinating on dead Taliban. A Marine Corps spokesperson said the incident allegedly shown in the video will be investigated.

SEE: U.S. Marines to Investigate Video of Soldiers Urinating on Corpses

http://tinyurl.com/7rkzvp4

In a letter faxed to Defense Secretary Leon E. Panetta, CAIR National Executive Director Nihad Awad wrote:

“We condemn this apparent desecration of the dead as a violation of our nation’s military regulations and of international laws of war prohibiting such disgusting and immoral actions.

“If verified as authentic, the video shows behavior that is totally unbecoming of American military personnel and that could ultimately endanger other soldiers and civilians.

“We trust that this disturbing incident will be promptly investigated in a transparent manner and that appropriate actions will be taken based on the results of that investigation. Any guilty parties must be punished to the full extent allowed by the Uniform Code of Military Justice and by relevant American laws.”

Update: Geller won’t back down. She is going all the way on this. She’s mighty upset that CAIR called her out on her vileness, and so published another pro-Urinating on dead corpses hate post titled, “Hamas-CAIR Attacks US Marines, Pamela Geller and Atlas Readers in Defense of Jihadists.” She is pulling the usual hate speech out against CAIR, calling it “HAMAS in America” and so forth. I think it is time for CAIR to start suing these individuals for libel, but I guess it would just be a waste of time. Some of what she says sounds downright threatening,

Hamas in America, CAIR, want to harrass and threaten anyone who doesn’t toe their line. Don’t do it. Do not be cowed. Push back.

← Older Comments
  • Who remembers Fallujah?

    I can understand Americans & other people from outside the region being confused & thus ignorant. However, it is amazing how black & white many re-educated Muslims with some links to the region adopting the same one dimensional simplistic caricature.

    That some actually consider something as disparate & fluid as the so-called “Taliban” as somehow being a coherent entity is quite puzzling.

    Perhaps the rise of the Corporate MSM with a local brown face is replacing first hand knowledge a la Al-Arabiya? The conflation of the traditionally independent-minded Waziris as being a “Pakistani Taliban” directly related to the “Afghan Taliban”, just because of the “T” word is amusing. It excludes the centuries of history as centres of resistance against external domination. Perhaps the Russians are correct too when they treat the salvation “Army” as many of us do the “Talibans” with a primed Pavlovian reflexive mental shortcut?

    Another motive could be that the mercenary Pakistani rump considers itself the rightful heir to the British Raj, viewing Afghanistan as its backyard? territorial aggrandisement & jealous eyes from the south always worries the north west frontier tribes into a temporary alliance of convenience, in the same way the corrupt Pakistani rulers ally with the Western invaders.

    As for highly selective & one-sided sensationalised crimes peddled by the MSM, we know that only works one way & the corrupt are not beyond hoaxes. The equivalent Guernica-like crimes where schools are blown up alongside whole towns in a post-Churchillian orgy of automated industrial-scale slaughter & decapitated childrens heads fly aplenty e.g. drones, rarely see the light of day on primetime Faux News. The persecution of Wikileaks & Bradley Manning’s alongside the bombing of Al Jazeeras will see to that.

    As to January 14th, 2012 at 12:01 pm
    “Brit Muslim, you do realize that ANY kind of symphathy to the Taliban is considered treason right?”

    - Try prosecuting on that vague basis, & half the newspapers will be suspect. So is the Geneva Convention, a convention to which many nations are signatories, which gives equal rights & sympathy to foes a recipe for self-prosecution?

    The “Taliban” are an amorphous entity, & it may shock the faint-hearted to know that we have all been talibans at some time or another if one looks deeper at the etymology.

    The paint them all black demonization of the enemy is a familiar tactic, quite childish & dumb. All sides have their scum & their noble heroes, though the propagandists hate to admit it.

    The reality is that we have seen much behind the scenes activity in finally recognising the resistance as nearing Western state diplomatic recognition. Yes it must smart to those who blindly believed that these were devils incarnate, as once were the red Indian savages in an earlier Manifest Destiny.

  • The Cake Is A Lie

    I actually believed Pamela Geller was currently as low as she could go. Obviously she has proven me wrong…

  • Géji

    > “WHAT’S “funny” is that you don’t “realize” how similar you “sound” to those who HATE Muslims and Islam.”

    How flattering, thanks -(particularly enjoyed the capitalize “HATE”, lol)- But, and I hope you don’t mind me saying this, I don’t “HATE” the US “soldiers” for their whatever religion, nor for their whatever ethnicity, nor for their whatever culture. What I do find despicable however, IS their actions across the globe, and mind you as well, that I don’t “HATE” them even for said actions, but actually instead do fell SORRY for them despite of said actions. After all we need to fell sorry for those who are carrying such atrocious actions, as most of them are none but misinformed young men and women persuaded under false pretenses to commit those well known terroristic activities, and only perversely pressed by greater and truer terrorists, whom if any such tittle ever suited perfectly anyone like hand and glove- will be them, and I’m sure you know who those are and where they’re sitting, I don’t have to “spell out”, do I ?? —- So chum! if that’s the best “refutation” you could come up with, in dismissing what I’ve said out about their actions and the terrorist system that manipulates them poor souls, which amigo is only in fact what many around the globe actually do think( you’re just having beef me saying OUT-loud), thus if that’s your “best”, then sorry but that’s not an excuse to excuse terrorism. But BTW, if I can return the delightful “observations”, is it possible you’d be one of those who “HATE” – Muslims and Islam by any chance? Cause one who’s quick to carry such hasty without actual prove “accusations” towards others may be the ones with the heavy heart. And your posts well “sound” as such, but anyhoo – toodle-oo!

  • Géji

    @ Now here’s what may be a challenging question to Loonwatchers, the sane ones at least.

    Here’s a definition -(for the average “Jo” at least)- of terrorism :

    1- The use of violence and intimidation in the pursuit of political aims.

    2- The use of violence and threats to intimidate or coerce, especially for political purposes.

    3- The state of fear and submission produced by terrorism or terrorization.

    —————-

    Now, although it is said there is no international legal consensus regarding the definition of the term “terrorism”, we can all agree that the 3 points above give us at least an indisputable glimpse of what the term means for many of us which we can agree upon, thus, any person, groups or subgroups using said tactics to achieve ends, fall into said category.

    Okey, now if we take an example of groups such as al-Qaeda, Hezbollah, Hamas or Taleban, whom all anyway already are signed under such by US and its allies, and which in all honesty and whatever their “reasons” may be, do in fact use such despicable tactics to achieve their ends, and thus as such do fall under said category, and not just because the “West” said so, but only because their action in caring such tactics proves it. Therefore we all agree that whether we sympathize with the cause behind or not, whether we’re Muslims or not, denying that as fact only prove a level of blindness. So said groups definitely do subscribe to that definition of the term “terrorism”, we all agree.

    But now, here is my question to all of those who (rightfully so) condemn said groups as such. — Will you then by the same token, with the same courage, guts, honesty and straightforwardness – DENY? – that the US regime (not just the current, but previous ones as well) and its “allies”, USE also in much greater level those despicable tactics of using violence, intimidation, coercing and terrorising into submission, creating extreme state of fear?? Brief- TERRORISM??? —————- The question also applies to those who condemn (rightfully so) Hamas regime tactics, let see as well if you HAVE the guts and courage in condemning by like manner the Zionist regime tactics as – TERRORISM.

  • George Watkins

    I don’t believe for a minute that anyone is really shocked by this. War is a brutal bloody mess, and people do awful things to each other (and to each others’ corpses) every day. This kind of behavior is atrocious, I agree. But have we forgotten that the people in the picture are dead because we have taught, and ordered, our youth to kill them? Not surprising to me at all. We send young men (and women) to places to kill other people. In order to do this they must dehumanize, objectify and vilify them and we shouldn’t be surprised when they desecrate bodies. It’s not right…but it happens all the time. We train soldiers to be killers of other humans by teaching them the enemy are lower than they are. The enemy is just that, an enemy that is there to be killed. Once we train our troops to become killers they cease to be normal functioning every day people and become the warriors we wanted them to be. They treat their enemy with all the disrespect we asked them to by acting as we trained them to by taking the most human value away from both the enemy and themselves, they kill other humans. While it may seem disgusting to some that these soldiers are acting in this manner, it is not any worse than the fact that they killed the people on the ground first, so pissing on corpses is now seen as worse than creating corpses?

  • http://www.muslimamerica.net/ma/dominion.htm Hajj Dawud

    JT Says: Brit Muslim, you’re entitled to your opinion but you must know that almost everyone here will not agree with you.

    We sent a muslim attorney to Afghanistan before 9/11 to get some first-hand information. The people of Afghanistan raised the Taliban to power, who had no experience with any “power” except that of the opium barons and warlords who raped their daughters and their sons. Although their “learning curve” had a few rough edges (e.g., insufficient police capacity, no remaining infrastructure, and continuing civil wars set up by the flood of arms to the opium barons and warlords), the people of Afghanistan continue to support the Taliban.

    When the schools were rebuilt, younger sons and daughters went back to class. When the hospitals were rebuilt, nurses and doctors went back to work. When the economy had recovered sufficiently to feed everyone, police forces were hired and trained. Non-muslims were given ID cards showing they were exempt from the “religious” provisions of the law that the people of Afghanistan demanded of the Taliban.

    We knew Afghanistan when the British were using the abandoned Buddha statues for artillery target practice. We didn’t just “discover” a society, yesterday, with strongly conservative traditions that were already established a thousand years before Islam was embraced by the people who had been fighting off invading armies for centuries. We know the Marxist parties who fled the country with the Soviets and became “experts” for the propaganda of the oil cartels.

    We’ll support the people of Afghanistan against those who get their “knowledge” from the western media, and whether they “agree” with us means nothing at all. I was given a soft felt hat ~ like those you see on television, although mine is white, the color worn by some pirs and shaykhs of tasawwuf ~ by one of the mujahideen who drove out the Soviet imperialists, who at the time was working for the U.S. government as a translator for immigrants from Afghanistan. I’ve prayed shoulder-to-shoulder with brothers from Afghanistan who know a lot more about what Americans are doing there than anyone in the media.

    Brit Muslim is “entitled” to his opinion because it’s based on what he himself has seen and experienced, first-hand, with muslims with muslim values. Those who “disagree” are entitled to their opinions even if they’re based on what they have heard from muslims who tell them what they think they want to hear, or on television. I can’t speak for Brit Muslim, but I intend to rely on what I know from sources a little bit closer to Afghanistan than Channel Two, and you people can believe whatever you want.

  • http://www.bandofstrangers.org Jack Cope

    JT I think you hit the nail on the head there, to many Muslims are willing to overlook crimes if someone says it is ‘in the name of Islam’. Our faith speaks against such hypocrisy… I get fed up of it. Criminals are criminals no mater where they come from.

    Jack

  • http://www.bandofstrangers.org Jack Cope

    “If they can Behead people, what’s a little urine? These boys are hero’s for killing the enemy. If they want some stress relief by pissing on some dead Taliban, then I am all for it. Leave these guys alone!!!!”

    Why? When I put on my countries uniform I do it with a little dignity. These Marines should be no different. Carrying out the act is one thing but videoing it and then putting it on YouTube?! This from a supposedly ‘civilized’ nation and military! And of course if you’re going to do something bad at least don’t be so stupid as to get caught.

    So no, I won’t leave them alone and neither will their officers if they have any sense.

    Jack

  • Christian-friend

    Brit Muslim, you do realize that ANY kind of symphathy to the Taliban is considered treason right?

  • khushboo

    Brit Muslim, all I know about the Talibanis is what I’ve read from “The Kite Runner”. It’s hard to believe that Afghanis esp. women support them and that they’ve become “moderate” now.

← Older Comments
Advertise Here
Amago anti-Islam Anti-Muslim Anti-Semitism Barack Obama Bigotry CAIR Christianity EDL Europe FBI Florida France Geert Wilders Glenn Greenwald GOP Hate Hate Crime Ilisha Islam Islamophobia Israel Jihad JihadWatch Jihad Watch Judaism Mosque Muslim Muslims New York Palestine Pamela Geller Pamela Geller Watch Quran racism Right-wing Robert Spencer Robert Spencer Watch Sharia SIOA Tennessee Terrorism UK What if they were Muslim Zionism
Advertise Here

Blogroll