Robert Spencer

|

Pamela Geller

|

Bat Ye'or

|

Brigitte Gabriel

|

Daniel Pipes

|

Debbie Schlussel

|

Walid Shoebat

|

Joe Kaufman

|

Wafa Sultan

|

Geert Wilders

|

The Nuclear Card

Kuala Lampur War Crimes Tribunal: George W. Bush and Co. Guilty of ‘War Crimes’

Posted on 14 May 2012 by Emperor

George Bush, Donald Rumsfeld, Dick Cheney and their legal advisers have been convicted of war crimes by a tribunal in Malaysia. (h/t: Al)

(via. Information Clearing House):

In what is the first ever conviction of its kind anywhere in the world, the former US President and seven key members of his administration were today (Friday) found guilty of war crimes.

Bush, Dick Cheney, Donald Rumsfeld and their legal advisers Alberto Gonzales, David Addington, William Haynes, Jay Bybee and John Yoo were tried in absentia in Malaysia.

The trial held in Kuala Lumpur heard harrowing witness accounts from victims of torture who suffered at the hands of US soldiers and contractors in Iraq and Afghanistan.

They included testimony from British man Moazzam Begg, an ex-Guantanamo detainee and Iraqi woman Jameelah Abbas Hameedi who was tortured in the notorious Abu Ghraib prison.

At the end of the week-long hearing, the five-panel tribunal unanimously delivered guilty verdicts against Bush, Cheney, Rumsfeld and their key legal advisors who were all convicted as war criminals for torture and cruel, inhumane and degrading treatment.

Full transcripts of the charges, witness statements and other relevant material will now be sent to the Chief Prosecutor of the International Criminal Court, as well as the United Nations and the Security Council.

The Kuala Lumpur War Crimes Commission is also asking that the names of Bush, Cheney, Rumsfeld, Gonzales, Yoo, Bybee, Addington and Haynes be entered and included in the Commission’s Register of War Criminals for public record.

This verdict does not currently have any sort of enforcement power behind it but the hope is that it will be taken up by the International Court,

War crimes expert and lawyer Francis Boyle, professor of international law at the University of Illinois College of Law in America, was part of the prosecution team.

After the case he said: “This is the first conviction of these people anywhere in the world.”

While the hearing is regarded by some as being purely symbolic, human rights activist Boyle said he was hopeful that Bush and Co could soon find themselves facing similar trials elsewhere in the world.

“We tried three times to get Bush in Canada but were thwarted by the Canadian Government, then we scared Bush out of going to Switzerland. The Spanish attempt failed because of the government there and the same happened in Germany.”

Boyle then referenced the Nuremberg Charter which was used as the format for the tribunal when asked about the credibility of the initiative in Malaysia. He quoted: “Leaders, organizers, instigators and accomplices participating in the formulation or execution of a common plan or conspiracy to commit war crimes are responsible for all acts performed by any person in execution of such a plan.”

The US is subject to customary international law and to the Principles of the Nuremberg Charter said Boyle who also believes the week-long trial was “almost certainly” being monitored closely by both Pentagon and White House officials.

Professor Gurdial Singh Nijar, who headed the prosecution said: “The tribunal was very careful to adhere scrupulously to the regulations drawn up by the Nuremberg courts and the International Criminal Courts”.

He added that he was optimistic the tribunal would be followed up elsewhere in the world where “countries have a duty to try war criminals” and he cited the case of the former Chilean dictator Augustine Pinochet who was arrested in Britain to be extradited to Spain on charges of war crimes.

“Pinochet was only eight years out of his presidency when that happened.”

The Pinochet case was the first time that several European judges applied the principle of universal jurisdiction, declaring themselves competent to judge crimes committed by former heads of state, despite local amnesty laws.

Throughout the week the tribunal was packed with legal experts and law students as witnesses gave testimony and then cross examination by the defence led by lawyer Jason Kay Kit Leon.

The court heard how
· Abbas Abid, a 48-year-old engineer from Fallujah in Iraq had his fingernails removed by pliers.
· Ali Shalal was attached with bare electrical wires and electrocuted and hung from a wall.
· Moazzam Begg was beaten, hooded and put in solitary confinement.
· Jameelah was stripped and humiliated, and was used as a human shield whilst being transported by helicopter.

The witnesses also detailed how they have residual injuries till today.

Moazzam Begg, now working as a director for the London-based human rights group Cageprisoners said he was delighted with the verdict, but added: “When people talk about Nuremberg you have to remember those tried were all prosecuted after the war.

“Right now Guantanamo is still open, people are still being held there and are still being tortured there.”

In response to questions about the difference between the Bush and Obama Administrations, he added: “If President Bush was the President of extra-judicial torture then US President Barak Obama is the President of extra judicial killing through drone strikes. Our work has only just begun.”

The prosecution case rested on proving how the decision-makers at the highest level President Bush, Vice-President Cheney, Secretary of Defence Rumsfeld, aided and abetted by the lawyers and the other commanders and CIA officials – all acted in concert. Torture was systematically applied and became an accepted norm.

According to the prosecution, the testimony of all the witnesses exposed a sustained perpetration of brutal, barbaric, cruel and dehumanising course of conduct against them.
These acts of crimes were applied cumulatively to inflict the worst possible pain and suffering, said lawyers.

The president of the tribunal Tan Sri Dato Lamin bin Haji Mohd Yunus Lamin, found that the prosecution had established beyond a “reasonable doubt that the accused persons, former President George Bush and his co-conspirators engaged in a web of instructions, memos, directives, legal advice and action that established a common plan and purpose, joint enterprise and/or conspiracy to commit the crimes of Torture and War Crimes, including and not limited to a common plan and purpose to commit the following crimes in relation to the “War on Terror” and the wars launched by the U.S. and others in Afghanistan and Iraq.”

President Lamin told a packed courtroom: “As a tribunal of conscience, the Tribunal is fully aware that its verdict is merely declaratory in nature. The tribunal has no power of enforcement, no power to impose any custodial sentence on any one or more of the 8 convicted persons. What we can do, under Article 31 of Chapter VI of Part 2 of the Charter is to recommend to the Kuala Lumpur War Crimes Commission to submit this finding of conviction by the Tribunal, together with a record of these proceedings, to the Chief Prosecutor of the International Criminal Court, as well as the United Nations and the Security Council.

“The Tribunal also recommends to the Kuala Lumpur War Crimes Commission that the names of all the 8 convicted persons be entered and included in the Commission’s Register of War Criminals and be publicised accordingly.

“The Tribunal recommends to the War Crimes Commission to give the widest international publicity to this conviction and grant of reparations, as these are universal crimes for which there is a responsibility upon nations to institute prosecutions if any of these Accused persons may enter their jurisdictions”.

  • crow

    Ahhhh….they wont go to Malaysia because they’re cowards, just like how the israeli war criminals wont go to England. Cowards

  • Austin

    What a waste of money and time! What did all this amount to or accomplish? NOTHING! To Averroe’s Ghost: First you have NO proof they were ever even notified. Second, they don’t answer to Malaysia, it’s government or it’s corrupt courts. The world saw how Malaysia courts handled Hamza Kashgari! If you want American citizens, come to America and get them yourself, see how that turns out for you! To CriticalDragon1177: I highly doubt they had plans to visit Malaysia before these so called “trials”.

  • khushboo

    Yes Dan, Talibanis are evil too. Are you happy now? Now will you condemn Bush, Cheney, and Rumsfeld for their actions?? and no I’m not a democrat! I’m unhappy with Obama as well.

  • Fantom

    @mark,
    Typical ad hominem when the facts are not with your side.

  • Mark

    This is what we in the rational community refer to as ‘epic fail.’ The author of the article is Vyonne Ridley one of the most vocal taliban supporters in the west; for you guys to bash others over what you see as hatred and the parrot the words of a taliban supporter as fact is hilarious hypocrisy. But what about the tribual? As screw loose change points out it is a “kangaroo court led by a Truther in Malaysia” the testimony is hilarious; Mozzam Begg admitted that he was going to fight for the taliban he’s not a victim by any stretch. There’s no comparison between a kangaroo court that gave a forum to four people who are still alive and the nuremberg trials particularly since people like Begg and Ridley are most comparable to the defendants of nuremberg. A modern equivalent of nuremberg would be trials of mullah omar and others responsible for taliban crimes.

    http://screwloosechange.blogspot.com/search?q=malaysia

    You might as well cite the Montana freemen’s trials of the federal government or people who declared themselves sovereign citizens; it also doesn’t make any sense Malaysia participated in the Afghan coalition. So are they are going to throw their own head of state in the clink? The only thing this proves is your own gullibility and the fact that you do not expose hatred, you support racists like Ridley who openly the slavers and butchers of the taliban. How pathetic.

  • Aspie and Atheist

    I am glad to be informed that justice is in the process of being delivered to these evil people….

  • Géji

    deccal Says: “Fantom, I am simply pointing out the hypocrisy of the situation.

    NO, you’re not “pointing” to anything blindfolded hypocrite, Muslim hater @deccal, you merely in disgusting, pathetic fashion trying to divert from the fingers that are for once in human history pointing-out at the terrorist actions done by your USA and it’s allies regimes, that had criminally without paying the due punishment, barbarically murdered more than one million and half Muslims in their own homelands. May for one day-(Insh-Allah) America’s criminals be brought to Justice for what they did to Muslims, whether via men or through Allah the Almighty.

  • Nur Alia

    UMNO is a political party…not a court of any authority in Malaysia. Yes, it was a ‘mock trial’, but the evidence and witnesses were real.

    I think what pains Americans is that they are critisized, and it questions thier mindset of ‘exceptionalism’ and that thier ‘way of life’ is superior over all others…as they try to colonialise thier way around the world.

    I say to those Americans…the fact that more voices are heard, and those voices are from all around the world and include the victims of American sanctioned crimes present and past…you better understand that this is the new normal in the world…to tear away those paper tigers.

    Arrogance is the the worst enemy of the oppressor, and the best weapon against them by the oppressed.

    Learn it, accept it…Americans…this is a new day.

  • http://thepenofawanderingstranger.com/personal/ Jack Cope

    “When will UMNO be prosecuted by the government for its role in inciting 1969 riots in Malaysia? Oh wait, they ARE the government.”

    Its largely believed that, at best, there were faults on both sides. Regardless, if that is the best refutation of this you can come up with then its kinda weak. The riots killed 2000 (top estimate) and people were punished; Iraq and Afghanistan are ongoing and there have been no trials. To even dare question the legitimacy of these conflicts in many circles will get you in big trouble.

    Yes, this is a show trial, yes this is little more than propaganda by and large a but it does reflect how an awful lot of the world views what happened in Iraq and Afghanistan. People ask why the US is hated, your answer is right before your eyes.

  • deccal

    @Fantom, I am simply pointing out the hypocrisy of the situation. It’s just like the Arab League trying to decide the future of Syria; a club of dictators, despots, and sheikhs deciding the fate of a fellow tyrant.

  • Fantom

    @deccal,
    I am shocked by your one-eyed, one-dimensional way of thinking??!!
    we are talking about war crimes that took the lives of hundreds of thousands of innocent people, occupation of sovereign states, destruction of infrastructure, looting, etc. etc. and the best counter argument you came up with is to go back to a riot that took place 43 years ago?
    I am by no means downplaying the riot incident, but we need some sense of proportionality here. And speaking of inciting riots and coups around the world,I think we all know who is the winner of the gold medal in this field.

  • deccal

    When will UMNO be prosecuted by the government for its role in inciting 1969 riots in Malaysia? Oh wait, they ARE the government.

  • Fantom
  • http://www.youtube.com/user/GargamelGold?feature=mhee CriticalDragon1177

    I have a feeling that Bush is going to stay as far away from Malaysia as possible now.

  • dan20

    Abdul-Rahman unless you demand Mullah Umar and your Taliban buddies to be tried for their war crimes (since you support war crimes as long as Shariah is established), you should stop being a hypocrite being a Taliban supporter and all.

  • Nur Alia

    workingstiff…

    The thing is, there is the ‘ulimate witness’ to thier crimes…and I would personally add Obama to the list of offenders myself.

    I am sure that when they come before the ultimate judge, they will be reminded of Abbas Abid, Ali Shalal, Moazzam Begg, Jameelah Abbas Hameedi, and the thousands who suffered at Abu Grieb, and the many American dungeons around the world, only these excuses for human beings know of, and God himself…and they will answer the charges one by one, of the hundreds of victims…what happened to them, and what ever posessed them to provide for this evil to happen.

    That is why I am not a terrorist. I belive in ultimate justice. Unfortunatly for the evil doers like these people…when they get thier sentance…they will plead for mercy, to only recieve the torture they condoned for thier victims.

  • Abdul-Rahman

    @workingstiff

    Malaysia’s trial of the war criminals Bush and Cheney are far more legitimate in the eyes of the majority of the world then the pathetic joke of the “ICC” (aka the Imperialist Crime Cover-Up) that is little more than Africa’s Guantanamo Bay were European elites send Africans to unfairly sit before the kangaroo court of Ocampo and the “ICC” that never charges (and takes its orders) from the US, the European nations, and “Israel”. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8Vz9atwbExg

  • Averroe’s Ghost

    I’m sure Bush and Cheney would show to such trial…yeh, right theyr Cowards!

  • workingstiff

    What an embarrassment for poor Malaysia. One can only imagine the extent of the politics in that country that resulted in such a confused “trial” (without any defense witnesses of course) verdict like this.

  • JD
  • Reynardine

    I am forwarding this filthy business to people who can pass this exposé on.

  • Black Infidel

    Since Malaysia is near Indonesia, I thought I’d post this here:

    Indonesia’s atheists face battle for religious freedom:

    http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2012/may/03/indonesia-atheists-religious-freedom-aan

  • Benjamin Taghiov

    Here’s a little perspective on the Israeli-Palestinian conflict -

    http://old.btselem.org/statistics/english/Casualties.asp

    And on another note,

    More Anti-Muslim Training Materials Uncovered

    This morning, Danger Room’s Spencer Ackerman continued to shock readers by exposing some of the most vehemently anti-Muslim training documents used by the U.S. government that have come to light to date. (See our past analysis of biased FBI materials.) The newly released military training materials not only contained erroneous stereotypes and derogatory remarks about Muslims and Arabs, they included a four-phase plan for transformation of Islam that would reduce Islam to a “cult status” and possibly result in “total war” against Islam.

    The recently revealed military course—which has since been cancelled—included: offensive caricatures of Muslims; repeated false assertions that all Muslims are inherently in violent conflict with non-Muslims; and assertions that the Geneva Conventions are no longer relevant. The trainers responsible for the materials assert that “Islam IS an Imperialist/Conquering Religion” and that “Ultimately, we can do very little in the West to decide the matter short of waging total war.”

    The biased rhetoric contained in the military course is not only offensive and erroneous, it is in direct contradiction to U.S. military strategy and interest.

    This is why Paul Stockton, Assistant Secretary for Homeland Defense, had no patience for members of Congress who pressed him to articulate a so-called “Islamist Extremist Threat” at a hearing last December. Instead Secretary Stockton made clear that any articulation of U.S. enemies as Islamic was harmful to U.S. security stating:

    “I’ll make it as clear as I can. We are not at war with Islam. [ ] Al Qaeda would love to convince Muslims around the world that the United States is at war with Islam… That is a prime propaganda tool. And I’m not going to aid and abet that effort to advance their propaganda goals.”

    Given the blatant disconnect between the materials’ teachings about “total war” with Islam and Secretary Stockton’s strategic analysis, we have to ask: what are government agencies doing to reverse the impact of the anti-Muslim disinformation campaign that infiltrated their training? One would think that it would be in the United States’ interest to take immediate and effective action to remediate the counterproductive effects of biased training.

    Yet, yesterday, FBI Director John Mueller defended the FBI’s recent review of its training materials before the House Judiciary Committee. Mueller minimized the scope of the problem and noted the creation of a new screening process. But for hundreds if not thousands of personnel already subjected to the biased training, the damage has already been done and continues to spread because the FBI has refused to withdraw intelligence products that further the same flawed concepts. Still Mueller, like Pentagon officials, has made no reference to whether he will pursue corrective training to counteract the impact of anti-Islam dogma.

    Nor has any agency undertaking the White House-mandated review of training materials yet indicated that it will take steps to hold those responsible for biased trainings to account. In fact, there are some members of Congress urging agencies to get the bias put back into training materials. If there is no accountability, how will the relevant agencies ensure that trainers who were paid government funds only to propagate racial stereotypes aren’t awarded more training contracts in the future?

    As more and more information about the biased trainings is made public, U.S. officials need to acknowledge that pulling the problematic materials is not, on its own, sufficient to repair the damage these trainings have caused. Corrective training and accountability are needed if these damaging past mistakes are to be remediated and avoided going forward.

    https://www.aclu.org/blog/religion-belief-national-security/more-anti-muslim-training-materials-uncovered

  • Link182

    “George Bush…convicted of war crimes.”

    Good.

  • Arab Atheist – ملحد عربي

    Those guys above law because they have money and power.

Advertise Here
Advertise Here