Robert Spencer

|

Pamela Geller

|

Bat Ye'or

|

Brigitte Gabriel

|

Daniel Pipes

|

Debbie Schlussel

|

Walid Shoebat

|

Joe Kaufman

|

Wafa Sultan

|

Geert Wilders

|

The Nuclear Card

MotherJones: Meet Larry Smith, Texas’ Wannabe Anti-Shariah Sheriff

Posted on 24 May 2012 by Amago

Meet Larry Smith, Texas’ Wannabe Anti-Shariah Sheriff

By Adam Serwer (MotherJones)

Muslim religious law isn’t coming to the Lone Star State. But one Republican is on the lookout anyway.

Larry Smith, a former Drug Enforcement Administration agent running for sheriff in Smith County, Texas, has a unique plank in his platform: He has pledged to protect this deep-red border county from the creeping menace of Islamic religious law, or Shariah.

Outside of science fiction, this Texas county—which voted for John McCain at a 70 percent clip—doesn’t seem the most likely place for an Islamist takeover. After all, creeping Shariah is mostly a myth. The issue might come up in civil cases if both parties to a contract have accepted an agreement based on religious law, but the Constitution bars religious law from superseding civil law.

Despite his out-there Shariah stance, Smith has earned the endorsement of the county’s local paper. And local Democrats aren’t even fielding a candidate in the sheriff’s race. That means next Tuesday’s Republican primary—which includes four candidates for the county’s top law enforcement post—will likely decide whether Smith County’s next sheriff devotes time to worrying about a Shariah takeover.

Two of Smith’s rivals say Shariah shouldn’t be an issue in the race.

“We hear [about Shariah] on the national media, but here specifically in Smith County, Tyler, in the state of Texas, I’m not seeing that this is going to be a big problem,” says Chris Green, a former game warden running in the primary. “I don’t think it’s gonna occur, especially here; it may in some of the more liberal states.”

Another candidate, Bobby Gorman, Smith County’s chief sheriff’s deputy, suggested Smith was just trying to provoke a controversy over nothing. “Running for sheriff, you always want to get somebody’s attention,” Gorman says.

Anwar Khalifa, a local homebuilder, Muslim leader, and lifelong Republican who speaks with a slight drawl, says he was “shocked” when he heard about Smith’s campaign vow. Before that moment, Khalifa says, he was “actually supporting Larry.” An Egyptian immigrant who moved to Texas when he was eight, Khalifa says that Smith County is a welcoming and tolerant place, but the last few years there has been an influx of anti-Muslim speakers at local churches offering dark warnings about an Islamic takeover.

“They cloak it and say we’re only talking about radical Muslims, but they don’t differentiate,” Khalifa says. “This is anti-Islam.”

Smith’s anti-Shariah pledge seems to have helped him gain at least one endorsement, from a local tea party group called Grassroots America, We the People. The group sponsored an event at a local church hosting Brigitte Gabriel, the head of ACT! for America, an organization that sees itself as defending America from “radical Islam” and according to its website, has a chapter in Smith County. Gabriel has written that Islamic terrorists are “really just very devout followers of Muhammad.” According to Khalifa, Smith provided “security” for Gabriel’s event. (Smith did not respond to several requests for comment.)

“Anti-Muslim grassroots organizations are the vehicles by which these talking points enter the state and local dialogue. That’s why we’ve been seeing it sprout up so suddenly at the local level,” says Wajahat Ali, the lead author of Fear, Inc., a Center for American Progress report on anti-Muslim organizations. “The impetus behind it, though, is a movement that wants to exclude American Muslims from the same rights and freedoms that other Americans enjoy.”

Khalifa says that he recently spoke to Smith, who he says apologized for his anti-Shariah pledge. “[Smith] was very cordial and apologetic,” Khalifa says. But the candidate’s websitestill sports language promising Smith will use his own money to train officers so they understand “why Sharia and international law will never be acceptable substitutes” for the Constitution.

This wasn’t the first time Khalifa tried to convince a fellow Republican to soften his stance on the Shariah issue. State Rep. Leo Berman, a Republican who represents the area, introduced legislation in 2011 to ban the consideration of foreign law in Texas courts, explaining that he had heard Shariah law was being enforced in Dearborn, Michigan. (It isn’t.) When Berman was preparing his legislation, Khalifa helped convince Berman to focus on “international law” rather than only Shariah.

Berman’s legislation didn’t survive the 2012 session of the Texas Legislature, but he says he’ll introduce it again next year if reelected. Asked how he felt about Berman’s legislation, Khalifa said he was happy Shariah wasn’t being identified by name.

“It’s better than singling out my group of folks,” Khalifa says. “If people really want to hate, they’re going to hate, and there’s not a whole lot you can do about it. You just set an example.”

 

  • RDS

    Whoa, AJ, no need to get defensive.

    also, a Texan Muslim with a Southern Drawl. Now I’ve seen everything o_O

  • http://aayjay.wordpress.com AJ

    Aspie and Atheist,

    I am glad you liked it :)

    Simple principle to follow is – Live and Let Live!

    This planet is huge for all of us – the religious ones and the non-religious ones.

  • Sam Seed

    Aspie and Athiest/RationalSkeptic….why the name change?

  • Aspie and Atheist

    @AJ

    OK, first of all….I think you have a great sense of humor, as the part about me popping prozacs, getting f***ed, partying, was very funny and it really made me laugh. Thanks for providing me with a good laugh.

    Secondly, I didn’t mean to offend anyone or hurt anyone’s feelings, it’s just I don’t think that religious courts should form as a sort of loophole or side system parallel to secular courts.

    Again, sorry If I did offend.

    P.S, I personally do not consider myself to be an atheist, I just see myself as someone who embraces reason and rationality.

  • http://aayjay.wordpress.com AJ

    Rational Skeptic,

    As long as a religious court does not defy the rights protected by the US constitution and as long as a religious court does not make its rulings part of the US constitution, they can function alongside civil courts.

    If you are going to argue that atheism is not a religion then let me tell you that worship of a deity and semantics aside, in the end religion is just a way of life. My way of life is to worship one God and live a pious life. Your religion is to perhaps party as if there is no tomorrow, fuck as many people as possible in your lifetime and pop in 10 prozacs along the way – everyday.

    I am not going to shove my religion down your throat, don’t you dare shove your religion i.e. atheism down my throat.

  • Sir David Illuminati membership number 16.69

    Rational Sceptic
    “This country”
    News flash their is life , electricity and the internet outside the USA. Where I assume you live .
    Religious courts if both parties agree are nothing more than committees of private members clubs that agree to arbitrate on desisions of that club . Are you going to outlaw handicap committees at golf clubs as well?

  • RationalSkeptic

    Shariah or any other religious code shall not ever have a legal basis in this country, but international law…yes, the US is obliged to obey International Law, regardless of circumstances.

  • RationalSkeptic

    Secular, not religious authority, should be the law of the land.

  • RationalSkeptic

    There should be no religious courts that bypass the US legal system in the United States. Religion should not have courts in this country, since allowing religion to have courts gives religion more authority. Therefore, Jewish religious courts should not be allowed, Muslim religious courts should not be allowed, and Catholic/Christian religious courts should not be allowed.

    And it doesn’t matter even if the religious courts agree with US law on a specific issue. The mere existence of these religious courts within the US means that other court systems besides the US one are operating, and therefore bypasses the US system.

    NO RELIGIOUS COURTS! PERIOD!

  • khushboo

    we really need a new party for those who are not liberal, but not quite conservative also”

    Yup, Libertarian!

  • Senor

    The author says “Creeping Shariah is mostly a myth.”

    Wrong…It is a myth. Completely fabricated.

  • Sean

    …and while he’s busy chasing after Muslims, who’s going to protect Texas from the Martian invasion?

  • TheBig-T

    Isn’t this the exact same rhetoric that the Nazi’s used against the Jews during the 30′s and 40′s, that the Jews where taking over Germany and stealing all of it money and other nonsence like that?

    when do people stop repeating history and start to find common ground with muslims
    the only people who would gain from this cancer that is Islamophobia is people who will get rich by selling books and tickets

  • mindy1

    With all that’s happening in the USA, why are they wasting time on this??? I feel sorry for the Muslim Republican here-we really need a new party for those who are not liberal, but not quite conservative also.

  • MC

    I just hope he doesn;t gain support.

Advertise Here
Advertise Here