Robert Spencer

|

Pamela Geller

|

Bat Ye'or

|

Brigitte Gabriel

|

Daniel Pipes

|

Debbie Schlussel

|

Walid Shoebat

|

Joe Kaufman

|

Wafa Sultan

|

Geert Wilders

|

The Nuclear Card

Anders Behring Breivik Trial: Norway Killer’s Prosecutors Ask For Psychiatric Care

Posted on 21 June 2012 by Amago

Anders Behring Breivik, a far-right fanatic, who has admitted to the massacre and a bombing in Oslo on July 22, 2011 arrives in the courtroom in Oslo, Monday May 7, 2012. (Photo/Heiko Junge/NTB Scanpix, Pool)

Anders Behring Breivik, a far-right fanatic, who has admitted to the massacre and a bombing in Oslo on July 22, 2011 arrives in the courtroom in Oslo, Monday May 7, 2012. (Photo/Heiko Junge/NTB Scanpix, Pool)

Anders Behring Breivik Trial: Norway Killer’s Prosecutors Ask For Psychiatric Care

OSLO, Norway — Prosecutors on Thursday asked a court to send confessed mass killer Anders Behring Breivik to a mental institution instead of prison for his massacre of 77 people in a gun and shooting rampage.

If the court comes to the same conclusion when it issues its ruling, expected next month, it would mean that Breivik would avoid criminal responsibility for Norway’s worst peacetime massacre.

The attacks at Norway’s government headquarters and a youth summer camp would then not be considered acts of political terrorism, but the work of a blood-thirsty madman.

“We request that he is transferred to compulsory psychiatric care,” prosecutor Svein Holden told the court in closing arguments.

Though there was inconclusive evidence that Breivik was psychotic during the July 22 attacks, there were enough doubts about his sanity that he cannot be sentenced to prison under Norwegian law, Holden said.

The defense is likely to refute the insanity finding on Friday, the last day of the 10-week trial. Breivik, who styles himself as an anti-Muslim militant, claims he is sane and that his attacks were motivated by his political views.

Just like when the trial stared in mid-April, the 33-year-old Norwegian flashed a clenched-fist salute with his right arm before he was led out of the court on Thursday.

Earlier in the trial, Breivik said the psychiatric dimension of the case was a way for Norwegian authorities to ridicule him and divert attention from his ideology.

Breivik claims Norway and Europe are being colonized by Muslims, who make up about 2 percent of Norway’s population. He has said he selected his targets – a government high-rise and a summer camp for the governing Labor Party’s youth organization – to strike against the political forces he claims betrayed the country with liberal immigration policies.

Some of those who lost family members in the massacre were disappointed by the decision.

“They say they want this to be a correct judgment,” said Mette Yvonne Larsen, a lawyer for the bereaved. “They think that imprisonment would be a more justified outcome of what happened on July 22.”

Two teams of psychiatrists reached opposite conclusions about Breivik’s mental health. The first team diagnosed him with “paranoid schizophrenia,” a serious mental illness which would preclude a prison sentence. The second team found him legally sane, saying he suffers from a dissocial and narcissistic personality disorder, but is not psychotic.

Prosecutors said one of the key challenges to Breivik’s sanity was his insistence of belonging to a militant anti-Muslim modeled after the Knights Templar, a Christian military order during the crusades, even though investigators have found no trace of the network.

Though Breivik tried to tone down the significance of the network during the trial, he maintained that it exists and that there are two other cells in Norway.

After the hearing Thursday, prosecutor Inga Bejer Engh stressed that a commitment to psychiatric care would mean that Breivik would be put away for a long time, maybe for the rest of his life.

“We have murderers who have been sentenced to psychiatric care who will probably never get out again,” Engh said, noting that none of them had killed 77 people.

If the court opts for a prison term instead, prosecutors said their preference would be the maximum sentence of 21 years. A sentence can be extended beyond that if a prisoner is considered a menace to society.

  • Pingback: Anders Behring Breivik Trial: Norway Killer’s Prosecutors Ask For Psychiatric Care | Spencer Watch

  • Zakariya Ali Sher

    Is it irrational to want him dead? I wanted bin Ladin dead too. There’s not much difference between the two. They are both murderers. Death in this case is both punishment, and a warning to others that such behavior cannot (and will not) be tolerated. The Norwegians don’t have the cobbles to carry out sentence on this monster. Yes, it might turn him into a ‘martyr’ for the anti-Muslim movement, but then sending him to prison will do the same thing. And either way he will likely be out and walking the streets in a couple decades. And either way, the racist right wingers will hold him as a hero.

    At least confronting them with the possibility of their own mortality would help to dissuade other Islamophobes from carrying out similar attacks. The thing about martyrs is that they are only popular under certain circumstances. Apply enough pressure and even ideas can die.

  • Reynardine

    Hanging him would be the worst thing, because it would give him martyrdom, even though I have often hoped there would be a sufficient nexus to the US to extradite him, so we could kill him. But yes, he’d never meet McNaughton here, even though locking him in nut is the best way to discredit him in Norway.

  • Steve

    @Zakariya Ali Sher, I don’t care if he is locked up for murder or sentenced to a secure psychiatric unit for the rest of his life. I was taking exception to CriticalDragon’s desires.

  • http://www.youtube.com/user/GargamelGold?feature=mhee CriticalDragon1177

    @Amago

    By the way, here’s more on this trail from Yahoo News. Breviks asking that they acquit him of all charges, and claims that history will exonerate him, because what he did was “necessary.”

    Breivik calls for acquittal as terror trial ends
    http://news.yahoo.com/breivik-calls-acquittal-terror-trial-ends-131138257.html

  • http://www.youtube.com/user/GargamelGold?feature=mhee CriticalDragon1177

    @The Knowledgeable,

    Well, you can be both Muslim and European, but not in the eyes of some people like Brevik unfortunately.

    Let’s also not forget he did his heinous act in the name of defeating the “evil of Islam” in Europe. People want to insist that the “counter jihadist” never engage in violence, this is a pretty good example to the use to debunk that.

  • The Knowledgeable

    if he were Muslim these Hypocrites would lock him and throw away the keys, but since he’s european, he’ll get a lesser punishment

  • Franczeska

    “Columnist” = Jimmy Marr

  • Zakariya Ali Sher

    @ Steve:

    Yes, we all know it’s up to the courts to decide, but you already have just as much a bias as any of us. You want to find him insane, because he is a westerner, and because your ‘humanist’ views mandate that we treat him with a combination of pity and mercy. You have brought up the Lockerbie bomber. Would you have considered him as ‘mentally unfit to stand trial’? And if so, would you be willing to without the death penalty on him? As an atheist, you’ve made no secret of the fact that you blame religion (and especially Islam) for many social ills. It makes me suspect you are far more biased AGAINST Muslims (whether they be lapsed, non-practicing or simply mentally unstable) in a way you are not against atheists and nominal Christians, who share your cultural background.

    Myself? I believe that Breivik is a killer. Yes, he is clearly not mentally ‘all there,’ but I think an argument can be made that MOST killers aren’t ‘all there’ either. Dahmer. Gacy. Manson. The whole bloody lot of them. That same mental instability most certainly does not absolve them from their crimes. While I’ve lost much of my former enthusiasm for the death penalty, that does not change the fact that I feel it should be used for those sort of people. They cannot be rehabilitated, they can never really be released back into society. What else to do with them but put them down? The same applies to Breivik. He is a killer, plain and simple, and should be killed before he (or someone else) kills again.

  • Zakariya Ali Sher

    @ Columnist:

    I thought YOU were a Nazi. Considering that you crib mercilessly from Evola and all. Maybe you just aren’t smart and/or ruthless enough. Tell you what, if you ever are dumb enough to set foot in America, I’ll do you the favor of curb stumping you into oblivion, just as my countrymen did to your ideological forebearers back in WWII. :-D

  • Khalid

    @Steve- I agree with you on that we shouldn’t be pulling heart strings by mining numbers but Lockerbie was carried out by the Gaddafi regime: its position as an “act of terrorism” rather than an act of war is incredibly disputed considering nobody has ever taken into account that the A-bombs dropped on Hiroshima and Nagasaki are not accounted for as terrorism.

  • Steve

    @Khalid, I don’t think we should get into victim sweepstakes here but the lockerbie bomber killed more.

    @Critical, nope you said what you wanted to happen because you have already made your mind up why he did it.

  • Khalid

    You know what’s incredibly pathetic here?
    The right endlessly whines about “Muzlum terurizm” when Anders’single terrorist attack was the BIGGEST in all of Europe.

  • http://www.youtube.com/user/GargamelGold?feature=mhee CriticalDragon1177

    @Steve

    I understand, but did I imply in anyway that it would not be up to the courts?

  • Columnist

    Actually, Anders Behring Breivik was quite moderate for a Nazi. A smart and ruthless Nazi would have mutilated his victims, and pointed out that euthanasia is a Nazi practice.

  • crow

    He should be hung and then the picture uploaded to all the genocidal right wing sites like jihad watch, pam shrugs, fascist republic etc…so the next would be brievik knows what will happen if he/she gets too “inspired ” by these trash sites

  • Columnist

    We will see.

  • gil gould

    Breivik may have gone too far, but his views are spot on and none of you left wing [pansies] can deny this.

  • Steve

    @CriticalDragon, it’s up to the court to decide, it doesn’t matter what you want.

  • http://www.youtube.com/user/GargamelGold?feature=mhee CriticalDragon1177

    However I do prefer that he not be found not guilty by reason of insanity, because I want people to see that it was irrational hatred, and bigotry, and not his lack of an ability to tell the difference between right and wrong that led him to do what he did.

  • http://www.youtube.com/user/GargamelGold?feature=mhee CriticalDragon1177

    @mindy1

    Either way Brevik won’t like it. Even ignoring that he might be locked away in a nut house for the rest of his life if the court thinks he’s not sane, Brevik won’t like that either, because one he doesn’t think he’s crazy and two, he wants people to believe that what he did was necessary, even through no one who thinks critically will buy those arguments.

  • Steve

    @Mindy, it’s hardly getting away with it – if he is declared sane there is a maximum prison sentence, if is declared insane they can lock him away for the rest of his life. If he is declared sane the neo-nazis have one of their own incarcerated for his deeds, if is declared insane all they have to hang their hat on is a crazy bloke in a high security psychiatric unit.

  • mindy1

    Dammit can’t believe he might get away with this >:(

Advertise Here
Advertise Here