Robert Spencer

|

Pamela Geller

|

Bat Ye'or

|

Brigitte Gabriel

|

Daniel Pipes

|

Debbie Schlussel

|

Walid Shoebat

|

Joe Kaufman

|

Wafa Sultan

|

Geert Wilders

|

The Nuclear Card

Islamophobia and the Fear of ‘The Other’ in Myanmar

Posted on 11 June 2012 by Emperor

Tensions increase in Burma:

Islamophobia and the fear of ‘the other’ in Myanmar

by Francis Wade

Chiang Mai, Thailand – The mob that set upon and killed a group of Muslims riding a bus through western Myanmar on June 3 displayed a depravity normally the hallmark of the country’s military. News reports that emerged in the wake of the incident, allegedly in response to the gang rape and murder of a Buddhist girl by three Muslim men days before, described the ten victims of a frenzied beating being urinated upon before the bus was set ablaze.

Comments that circulated the internet in the wake of the massacre were almost as shocking. “Killing Kalars is good!” one person said, using the pejorative slur that has become a popular and casual way of referring to Muslims of South Asian decent (one that state media also regularly employs). It mattered little that the men accused of the rape had already been arrested.

The attack was a rare incident; the reactions suggest however that heightened levels of resentment towards the presence of Muslims in Myanmar society exist on a much wider scale. This animosity is shared by senior figures in the government – current representative to the UN, Ye Myint Aung, once described the Rohingya, a Muslim minority in Arakan state who are singled out for particularly savage treatment, as “ugly as ogres”, while since 1982 the government has denied them citizenship, claiming they are “illegal Bengali immigrants”. Persecution of the group has been so protracted and debased that Medicins San Frontieres describes them as being among the world minority groups “most in danger of extinction”.

While Myanmar’s myriad ethnic groups have all suffered egregious treatment at the hands of the military government, which has sought to bring the country “under one flag”, the fear of Muslims is a particular one. On the website of The Voice journal, which issued an apology after being bombarded with threats following its coverage of the massacre, one visitor wrote: “We should either kill all the Kalars in Burma or banish them otherwise Buddhism will cease to exist”.

The ‘other’

Treatment of Muslims as the ‘other’ persists despite the country’s push to embrace the outside world and everything it offers. There is something of a contradiction then in the population’s desire to become global players, which will see it interacting far more with non-Myanmar, non-Buddhist ethnicities. In Arakan state, where tension between Buddhists and Muslims often spills over into violence, hypocrisy is also evident in attempts by Arakanese to goad public opinion against the Rohingya in the name of “nationalism”. These are the same Arakanese who, ironically, regularly accuse the government of attempting to aggressively assimilate Arakanese into the Burman way of life.

Such is the treatment of Rohingya that up to 300,000 now reside in Bangladesh, which in turn sees them as illegal immigrants from Myanmar and denies them citizenship. They are the epitome of stateless, and spend their lives in unofficial camps where conditions are notoriously poor (only 28,000 are registered by the UN). Their disaffection has made them ripe for Islamic militant groups and human traffickers. Many attempt the perilous sea journey from Bangladesh to Malaysia and beyond to find work – in December last year, a boatload of more than 60 who ran into trouble off the coast of southern Myanmar were detained by Myanmar police, ironically on immigration charges.

Read the rest…

  • Ilisha

    @Sony

    We have addressed Boko Haram here:

    Muslim Leaders Condemn Christmas Day Bombings
    http://www.loonwatch.com/2011/12/muslim-leaders-condemn-christmas-day-bombings/

    However, coverage of the situation in Nigeria is largely misleading:

    In Nigeria, Boko Haram Is Not the Problem
    http://www.nytimes.com/2012/01/02/opinion/in-nigeria-boko-haram-is-not-the-problem.html?pagewanted=all

    “It was clear in 2009, as it is now, that the root cause of violence and anger in both the north and south of Nigeria is endemic poverty and hopelessness…

    …Boko Haram has evolved into a franchise that includes criminal groups claiming its identity. Revealingly, Nigeria’s State Security Services issued a statement on Nov. 30, identifying members of four “criminal syndicates” that send threatening text messages in the name of Boko Haram. Southern Nigerians — not northern Muslims — ran three of these four syndicates, including the one that led the American Embassy and other foreign missions to issue warnings that emptied Abuja’s high-end hotels. And last week, the security services arrested a Christian southerner wearing northern Muslim garb as he set fire to a church in the Niger Delta. In Nigeria, religious terrorism is not always what it seems.

    None of this excuses Boko Haram’s killing of innocents. But it does raise questions about a rush to judgment that obscures Nigeria’s complex reality.”

  • Sonny

    How about you also write an article about the Boko Haram and their genocide of the Nigerian Christians. Ofcourse, you couldn’t give a damn about what Muslims do; only nothing should happen to them.

    As for one of the comments mentioning no freedom of expression or religion for the muslims in Burma; well they are just getting what they dish out to everybody in the Muslim countries. Unfortunately others are getting mixed with them in the same lot.

  • Zakariya Ali Sher

    @ Amela:

    Actually, I’m pretty sure that Wanderer is being sarcastic there. I could be wrong though. Humor doesn’t translate well onto the internet.

  • Zakariya Ali Sher

    This is nothing new. In Burma, Muslims are seen as innately ‘foreign,’ and bigotry against them is more or less compounded with bigotry against Indians, or as Burmese call them ‘kalas’ (dark skinned). I know in the past that you’ve expressed (or at least feigned) sympathy for Indians. Burmese nationalists don’t really differentiate much between Muslim, Hindu or Sikh. To them, all Indians are unwelcome foreigners who came in with British colonialism. Perhaps more to the point, one of the big fears on the part of Burmese has always been the ‘dignity of Burmese Buddhist women.’ Interracial marriage was seen as particularly insulting.

    Perhaps Deccal will be glad to know that in the 20s and 30s, there were several riots throughout the country (then under British rule) which killed hundreds of Indians. Perhaps he will also be happy to know that a couple hundred thousand Indians were forced to flee after Burma gained independence, being airlifted into India. And perhaps Deccal will take some amount of pleasure in the fact that Muslims are not allowed freedom of religion or expression in Burma, just like Christians and Hindus. While I am not aware of any such indignity placed upon Muslim Burmese, Christian hill tribes have been forcibly converted to Buddhism in Burma.

    No doubt our conservative friends will be glad to know that school prayer is mandatory. Christians have been expelled from schools or not allowed to attended because they refused to convert to Buddhism. But at least they don’t have that pesky separation of Church and State (or Sangha and State in this case I suppose).

  • Amela

    Wanderer and deccal: loonies are not on this website. Your web address is for like-minded loonies such as Geller, or Spencer, or Ann Coulter’s–because that is where those with pea-sized brains go to make comments like you do.

  • Wanderer

    And it’s a damned shame too hey deccal. Especially at airports, the least they can do is lubricate the gloves! Muslims have it so easy..

    What do u propose the West do about the Islamic expansionist threat that has proliferated to a whopping 2% in the US? Should they be droned like their cousins? Should they be herded into Bantustans like they do in Israel? Should they be sterilised? The current victimisation and unconstitutional surveillance kiddy gloves are clearly not enough, what with all the people they have killed since 2001. And not to mention the countless Jihadi schools that teach them hate and contemptuous sarcasm! They must be stopped.

  • deccal

    Whelp, looks like muslims won’t get kiddy glove treatment in myanmar like they do in Western countries.

  • http://thewanderer05.blogspot.com Wanderer

    @mindy

    Hate has always existed and will always exist. What is required is for society to openly condemn in and create an atmosphere that is intolerant of it. This will push it to the fringes, where it should be. In this case, the government of Myanmar is actually endorsing hate and racism under the guise of national security against an imaginary Islamic expansionist threat. This is the same imaginary threat that is called on internationally to feed Islamophobia. Because you see, as long as you keep a people in fear, you keep them submissive.

  • Sam Seed

    @Christian-friend

    Well said, I totally agree. I wouldn’t blame Christianity if someone had acted in the name of it. It’s good to see that there are some sane voices who want to live in this world that our Creator has made for us, that is to live peacefully with love and respect rather than fear and hatred.

  • Christian-friend

    Ok, before Steve or deccal or HalalPork comes here let me say a few semi-related topics:

    -Unlike Islamophobes, we at Loonwatch don’t go around blaming non-Muslims and their religions for attacks (in general, of course; even I blame Christian Extremist for the stupidities in Scotland).

    -Steve, the reason I don’t argue with you is because you are anything but a hypocrite; You don’t think any religion is above others(or at least that’s what I think). I don’t want to end that streak.

  • Pingback: Islamophobia and the Fear of ‘The Other’ in Myanmar | Islamophobia Today eNewspaper

  • mindy1

    I wish hate would not spread, how do we kill it?? :(

Advertise Here
Advertise Here