Robert Spencer

|

Pamela Geller

|

Bat Ye'or

|

Brigitte Gabriel

|

Daniel Pipes

|

Debbie Schlussel

|

Walid Shoebat

|

Joe Kaufman

|

Wafa Sultan

|

Geert Wilders

|

The Nuclear Card

Women Asked to Remove Headscarves at Some French Airports

Posted on 29 June 2012 by Garibaldi

Couldn’t they accommodate these women by checking their hair and headscarves in a separate room? I know other countries do as much. (via. Islamophobia-Watch):

Women asked to remove headscarves at some French airports

Some French airports have begun to ask headscarf-wearing women to take off their scarves for security reasons, which has spurred criticism from Muslims in the country, who find the practice a discriminatory one.

The Collective Against Islamophobia in France (CCIF) has announced that Nantes Atlantique Airport has made it obligatory for headscarf-wearing women to take off their scarves and place them in the X-ray machine along with their other belongings.

The practice was put into effect two weeks ago by the SGA, the company responsible for Nantes Atlantique Airport’s security. Women affected by the new rules requested that they be allowed to take off their headscarves in a special room staffed only by women, but the request was denied. The women were told that they must place their headscarves on the conveyor going through the X-ray machine if they wanted to avoid missing their plane.

The SGA defended their actions, claiming that dangerous materials could be hidden under the headscarves, which has triggered outrage in France’s Muslim community.

According to EU airport security regulations, security staff do not have the authority to ask women to take their headscarves off.

Click to read more …

  • Alex

    See, the thing here is, if you were a Muslim
    woman, you wouldn’t be fighting people like this. You would understand the significance of a hijab,
    and you would defend your right to wear one, as well as the privacy your religion requires, should you need to take it off. You would understand, and you would be agreeing that this is a violation. You need to learn to see from the other person’s perspective, and not just rattle off nonsense that you think is the right thing, and will be damned if someone else has a different opinion.

  • leia

    *botn=born

  • Leia

    @steve as a human, for you murder of course will always be wrong. i beleive this just as much as i beleive that you were botn with an inherent human nature, that can lead you to the truth, but also can get clouded by the world’s ills. but, theoretically, in an absolute secular society, and theoretically only, its very hard to prove that murder is a very great ultimate wrong. note that not a single society is absolutely secular, as being so would be denying humanity, which is an unseen thing of our souls, something secularists ignore.

  • Steve

    @zangi, we all enjoy the fruits of previous wars and murders. That’s just a sad fact of life.

    leia points out a lot of weird stuff which makes no sense.

    I don’t need a god to show me a moral path, you do it seems. There were moral people before islam and there will be moral people after islam. Personally I prefer to base my morals on my perception of the sum of human experience and my empathy for others. You choose to base yours on the morals of 7th century arabic tribes, that’s fine, if you feel it helps.

  • zangi

    @steve

    Incest is legal in many European countries. just one example here

    http://www.guardian.co.uk/law/2012/apr/16/incest-legality-ethics

    @Steve: In a secular, atheist, society murder is wrong – why do I need to prove that?

    That’s why your governments kill innocent men and women and children with impunity and without any burden on their conscience. And you enjoy the fruits of their murder day in and day out?

    As leia pointed out “is there no such thing as murder as it is an ultimate act and thus an ultimate truth, and thus does not exist?”

    So your argument that murder wrong is bogus because you really don’t know. that’s how may you feel (and i will agree that most people feel the way you feel about murder). but according to you others have equal right to feel otherwise. Do you have any argument why “your feeling” is better than that of the “feeling” of other guy who feels otherwise?

  • Steve

    Ethical and moral behaviour doesn’t need a belief in a god and fear of the notional punishment that god will extract. I don’t need a god in order for me to lead a good life and neither do you, you just think you do.

    Can you name the “many western countries” where incest is legal?

    I don’t believe homosexuals should be persecuted and I support same sex marriage.

    In a secular, atheist, society murder is wrong – why do I need to prove that? The only proof you have that it is wrong is a belief in a god for which no proof exists. I know it is wrong, you believe you have to be told it is wrong.

  • leia

    or is there no such thing as murder as it is an ultimate act and thus an ultimate truth, and thus does not exist? now i really sound crazy right? ;p

  • leia

    @zangi interesting question. theoretically, and critically how do man-made idealogies like secularism prove that murder itself is wrong? is it wrong ultimately, when there is no such thing as ultimate truth, or is it wrong only as long as it serves the best interests of the reality of the time? scary, cuz murder is less wrong these days especially if the victim is someone considered not covered by international human rights laws. american torture camps in Afghanistan for example. or blind drone attacks. and lets never forget palestine.

  • LibertyPhile

    @zangi

    My point?

    You cannot have anarchy (or you can but it is not very nice!). Society has to have agreed overarching standards, and frankly, I for one, would not wish to live in a society where those standards depended on Islam.

    I originally wrote “…. provided by Islam” but I am willing to believe that Islam can provide some good ideas. But no, I would not like my life and well-being depending on a “book” concocted in dark ages Arabia (or Palestine/Syria if you believe the latest opinions on the origin of Islam).

  • Pingback: Payback time for the French… « Musings of a Muslim Pakistani American Mom in Riyadh

  • zangi

    @steve”I am not aware of any french law which prevents people from worshipping who or what they want. Freedom of religion means the freedom to worship what you want or to not worship anything. It doesn’t mean you can do what you like, it doesn’t mean, for example, apostates, homosexuals, adulterers and blasphemers can be murdered (as some people believe their religion calls for) or that children can be tortured to death because of african fundamentalist Christianity.”

    Who gave you the right to define religious freedom as “Freedom of religion means the freedom to worship what you want or to not worship anything” ?

    And even there who gave you right to define worship? in Islam worship is anything we do to please our creator, that includes ritual acts of worship like salaat, zakaat, fasting, hajj and non ritual acts of worship, like smiling at a fellow human being, serving parent, speaking truth, being just, dressing modestly, cleaning road, visiting the sick etc. So when a Muslim women wears her hijab, she is doing an act of worship and you are denying her that right and still consider that you support freedom of religion? how come? how come?

    So now you know how stupid your concept of freedom of religion is? and BTW you can’t even give a reasonable answer to the fundamentalist Christianity who believe “that children can be tortured to death”. After all it is your opinion vs their opinion. In Islam we don’t have these stupidities. Because it is based on revelation from God most high. when we oppose/support something we go and look for evidence in the divine guidance. and where do you look? in your own head. and if that head goes crazy then what you have?

    you have
    *genocide
    *nuclear holocaust
    *ethnic cleansing
    *wars and destruction
    *occupation of weak nations
    *oppression of weak nations
    *apartheid system to run international affairs (what is UN veto?)
    *pornography
    *incest (legal in many western countries)
    *homosexuality (legal is almost all countries)
    *marriage among same sex (already legal in many countries)
    *sex and marriage with animals (you are getting their)

    If a Muslim does any of this, we simply say he violates injunction of his religion whether or not the legal system of his/her country allows it. and if a secular man, such as you, does it? then what? how do you know if that’s wrong? in fact in secular atheistic system you can’t even prove murder (in of itself) is wrong. or can you?

  • zangi

    @libertyphone “Islam tolerated other religions and religious practices, in a controlling way, as long as it was on top. Simple.”

    And you tolerate religions only if secularism (atheism?) is at the top? so your point?

  • Steve

    Sir David, as far as I am aware there is a law preventing people covering their face in public and another disallowing the wearing of religious symbols in public schools.

    I went to a private, independent, fee paying school in the UK, it was owned by a very strict protestant group but none of the pupils were allowed to wear religious symbols despite pupils coming from all over the world (it was a boarding school) and from many different family religious backgrounds. In my year alone we had muslims, jews, sikhs, atheists, catholics, protestants, hindus etc.

  • Sir David

    Steve
    There is a French law that mandates what you wear . Thus if you believe your religion says you have to wear a veil or scarf, hat, turban, skull cap etc you cannot practice your religion freely.
    If I was to design a law to encourage young people religion is cool this would be the law I would draft. The British method of incorporating such items as part of school uniform I would suggest is more effective at discouraging religion in the youth of today :-)

    Sir David
    Vice President Leftwing mooslim Alliance
    West Anjou Branch

    Currently accepting donations for the get Sarko out of jail fund, brown paper envolopes only

    Currently accepting donations for the Sarkozi Bail Fund Cash only brown envolopes

  • Steve

    @Zangi, I am not aware of any french law which prevents people from worshipping who or what they want. Freedom of religion means the freedom to worship what you want or to not worship anything. It doesn’t mean you can do what you like, it doesn’t mean, for example, apostates, homosexuals, adulterers and blasphemers can be murdered (as some people believe their religion calls for) or that children can be tortured to death because of african fundamentalist christianity.

    “That’s why Islam is far superior and advanced than your “civilized” countries.”

    Careful, a french politician said something similar about french civilisation and was shouted down on here – wrongly in my opinion – cultural relativism is a flawed concept and if you wish to believe islamic civilisation is the best then I am happy for you, I believe otherwise but it’s all subjective.

  • LibertyPhile

    @zangi

    Islam tolerated other religions and religious practices, in a controlling way, as long as it was on top. Simple.

    You get closer to the truth when you say “what islam dislikes is people leaving islam or religion or trying to come up with new religions”

    And even you, with your view of some idealised past, has taken some note of present reality, and had to say “….. (… not withstanding certain rules to the contrary among some Muslim nations).”

    I suppose you are referring to Saudi Arabia, Iran (where a Christian pastor is under threat of execution for apostasy), Pakistan, and parts of Indonesia, those shining examples of Islamic tolerance and pluralism.

  • zangi

    @LibPhobe”It isn’t all relative. Human beings have to come together and decide what is right or wrong”

    That’s the difference between islam and you atheists. In Islam we decide based on what God has taught us (irrespective of whether you beleive in God on Not; we Muslim do and we call that source who gave us Quran God). That’s why we are not confused as you are. and we don’t deny these basic human rights to non Muslims living amongst us (not withstanding certain rules to the contrary among some Muslim nations). Prophet gave that rights to Jews of Medina, even in social and criminal laws. So Islam is far far superior than anything you can come up with. Are you willing to advocate separate “halacha” for Jews or “shariah” for Muslims? alcohol/pork is prohibited in islam , yet Christians among by and large throughout history had right to grow/sell and consume these. islam restricted number of wives to four, but jews were allowed to have as many as they wanted because their religion of the time allowed it. so while islam stance on religion is different than yours, as you can see islam is indeed superior to yours in religious freedoms. what islam dislikes is people leaving islam or religion or trying to come up with new religions. well we have a difference here. and we are not ashamed because of this.

    btw we are not discussing penalty for apostasy here. I am just pointing it out that if you are willing to trample upon rights of religious minorities (jews, muslims, sikhs, catholics etc) among you, then you have absolutely no business criticizing muslim countries who restrict rights of non muslims among them. and as “leia” pointed it out, death for apostasy is not the only punishment. an apostate can simply be forgiven if he didn’t do anything which can be considered treason with state. but then that’s a different topic.

  • LibertyPhile

    @Jack Cope

    I’m not sure whether to be encouraged or concerned regarding what you say about airport security these days!! On balance though it seems to be working!

    @zangi

    It isn’t all relative. Human beings have to come together and decide what is right or wrong. And most of us agree that murdering someone who changes his religion is wrong. I’m guessing you agree with that but have the strange notion that if some other people somewhere else decide differently that’s OK by you. You are not going to complain (even on behalf of those so murdered or threatened with murder).

    @AJ

    Get your husband to take you to Stanstead, or Gatwick, or Heathrow (or even Nantes), at the morning’s busiest time and see if you think another queue or private facility for Islamically dressed Muslim ladies would be a good idea.

    Perhaps they should have special queues for women with young children, the elderly, those with particularly heavy cabin baggage, men, women, people not in a hurry …..

  • leia

    the fact that most muslim countries have alternate accomodations for muslim women show that muslim countries, however behind we are, are in many ways more tolerant religiously than certain european countries. i’m rather surprised at any american advocating harsh french laws. france is openly and widely known as one of the most extreme secular countries. America, contrastingly would definitely accomodate religious sensitivites, which is why America is great. i don’t know why ppl fear shariah so much over there, shariah arrived there hundreds of years ago,and still exists, in the form of some of the most humane laws in the world. Although Americans are not mostly muslims, they follow islam in so many aspects of society,in ethical practices, morality, human rights, social welfare,etc. any civilisation practicing reasoning, rational thinking, etc, important islamic principles, will eventually be lead to the highest and best principles.( incidentally i’ve heard that the Quran was studied in the drafting of the constituion. normal/expected really. Back than muslim nations were great, and great civilisatiions always learn from other great civilisations)

Advertise Here
Advertise Here