Robert Spencer

|

Pamela Geller

|

Bat Ye'or

|

Brigitte Gabriel

|

Daniel Pipes

|

Debbie Schlussel

|

Walid Shoebat

|

Joe Kaufman

|

Wafa Sultan

|

Geert Wilders

|

The Nuclear Card

Tariq AlMaeena: Islam Has No Links to the Destruction of Islamic Heritage in Mali

Posted on 09 July 2012 by Garibaldi

An impassioned article from a Saudi-based writer on the destruction of Islamic world heritage sites in Timbuktu, Mali by the Ansar Dine group.

The destruction of world heritage sites is unconscionable, and a display of iconoclasm that really aims at erasing cultural memory. Such actions are akin to cultural self-immolation.

Interestingly, Ansar Dine likely receives inspiration for these acts from trends of Salafism (a.k.a. Wahhabism) that are deeply opposed to saint veneration–sometimes violently so.

The official state brand of Salafism in Saudi Arabia has also been involved in the destruction of historical Islamic heritage sites, creating much resentment in the broader Muslim world.

Islam has no link with these thugs

by Tariq AlMaeena (GulfNews)

There is a war of sorts going on today in Timbuktu in Mali, a West African country. It is a war against culture and civilisation. And those perpetuating it are a band of thugs and criminals who are operating under the cloak of ‘Islamists’.

Since the 11th century, Timbuktu, an ancient Saharan trading depot for salt, gold and other resources, had developed into a renowned seat of Islamic learning and survived occupations by hordes of foreign invaders. By the 12th century, Timbuktu had become a famous centre of Islamic learning, with three distinguished universities and more than 180 schools.

Many call it the golden age of Africa. This love for knowledge and the arts that had brought Islam to medieval Europe in the Dark Ages and led to many great scholars and discoveries continued in this African city for several centuries as well. Books were not only written in Timbuktu, but were also imported and copied there. At the time, there was an unparalleled book industry flourishing in this fabled city. The universities and private libraries contained incomparable scholarly works.

In 1893, the French colonised Mali and Timbuktu came under French control until Mali regained her independence in 1960. However, many manuscripts and books that once were part of Timbuktu’s libraries were plundered and can be found in French museums and universities.

The country has been going through a period of instability and lawlessness since a military coup sparked fighting in March of this year. Much of the country is still in grave turmoil, with an armed gang of thugs calling themselves the Ansar Dine controlling much of the north of the country, where the city of Timbuktu is located. These thugs, who were on the fringes until the rebellion, took advantage of a power vacuum created by the coup in the capital to seize ground in the north.

This band of terrorists has recently turned their guns and fanaticism against the historical shrines that had made the city of Timbuktu a beacon of learning through so many centuries. They have used pick-axes, shovels, hammers and guns to destroy earthen tombs and shrines of local saints in the desert city of Timbuktu, claiming that they are doing so to defend the purity of their faith against idol worship. They are behind the destruction of at least eight Timbuktu mausoleums and several tombs, centuries-old shrines in what is known as the ‘City of 333 Saints’.

The group stated its intent to destroy historic sites in Mali’s northern city of Timbuktu before they implement strict Sharia law, while Mali’s government looks on helplessly. “We’re going to destroy everything before we apply Sharia in this city,” said a spokesman for these rebels. The government did condemn the destruction, and stated that “The council of ministers has just approved, in principle, the referral to the International Criminal Court and a working group is working to this end.”

There has also been immediate condemnation from both within and outside Mali. Souleymane Bachir Diagne, a professor at New York’s Columbia University and an expert on Islamic philosophy in Africa stated: “They are striking at the heart of what Timbuktu stands for. Mali and the world are losing a lot.”

Bouya Ould Sidi Mohammad in Timbuktu stated that the historic city has long had Muslim roots. “Timbuktu was an Islamic city since the 12th century, and we know what the religion says about the saints’ tombs. Contrary to what the Islamists or the Wahabis of Ansar Dine say, here in Timbuktu, the people don’t love the saints like God, but just seek the saints’ blessings because they are our spiritual guides.”

Mahamadou Hima Dit Nourou who was among the tens of thousands Malian refugees who fled to neighbouring Niger lamented: “I think this kind of madness of Ansar Dine is horrible. The entire place for history is in Timbuktu, this is not Sharia. Even if you see what they did, the destruction in Timbuktu, maybe the mosque, the big mosque, the cemetery for person who died, they said is no good — who tell them that? Who tell them it is not in the Quran? We never read that.”

The International Criminal Court has already issued a statement calling the destruction of Timbuktu’s religious landmarks a potential war crime. “My message to those involved in these criminal acts is clear: stop the destruction of the religious buildings now,” said Fatou Bensouda, an ICC prosecutor.

The Organisation of Islamic Countries (OIC), deplored the destruction of historical sites in Timbuktu by religious extremist groups, and said that the sites were part of the rich Islamic heritage of Mali and should not be allowed to be destroyed and put in harms way by bigoted extremist elements.

That is exactly what these rebels are. Thugs, bigoted extremists, and power-mad opportunists who now want to implement their brand of skewered faith in an uncontrolled part of Mali.

For having the gall to label themselves Islamists, they should be rounded up and put in front of an execution squad. No excuses. Islam has no links in relation to the acts of these thugs.

— Tariq A. Al-Maeena is a Saudi socio-political commentator. He lives in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.

  • IbnAbuTalib

    AJ: [Wahabis] just don’t visit the shrine – that doesn’t mean that they destroy them with axes and hammers.

    Unfortunately, they do. Does Jannat al Baqi ring a bell?

  • http://Aayjay.wordpress.com AJ

    Daniel, will you stop blaming Wahhabism for anything bad done by Muslims? You sound exactly like the loons – they blame Islam, you blame Wahhabism. In my ancestral city of Charsadda – people are quite used to building shrines around graves and praying to dead people for salvation. There is a difference between praying “for” a dead person and praying “to” a dead person – in Pakistan it’s always the latter that is done – which is shirk.The Wahhabis don’t visit the shrines or wash them with milk or place rose garlands on them or partake in prostitution at the shrine or sing qawalis or ask the dead saint to give them a healthy son. They just don’t visit the shrine – that doesn’t mean that they destroy them with axes and hammers.

  • http://danielibnzayd.wordpress.com/ Daniel Ibn Zayd

    Bias? How much bias can be bought in riyals? It’s a well-known fact throughout the SWA-NA region whose money is going where. It is also a known fact that the Qataris and Saudis are waging proxy wars against each other. Let’s please not feign ignorance and naivete on this matter.

    “The Islamists who control Timbuktu have destroyed the city’s ‘monument of martyrs’ which pays tribute to victims of the struggle against the dictatorship of General Moussa Traoré in 1991. They have also desecrated a shrine and continue to attack the priceless cultural heritage of the region, which dates for the most part to the twelfth and fifteenth centuries. Non-religious books were removed from libraries because ‘Muslims do not need them’. These invaluable books deal with theology, mathematics, medicine, astronomy, music.”

    http://www.pambazuka.org/en/category/features/83575

    There’s that pesky link connecting capitalism and Wahhabism again….

  • http://Aayjay.wordpress.com AJ

    Idris, I agree with you on both of your comments!

  • Fox-news

    Saudi has a lot to do with for the reason that they oil funded export this same ideology that permits such destruction. They have destroyed 95% of history in Arabia and yet you doubt their connection ? They say shirk shirk shirk by false new definitions of shirk and false analogy’s to idols. The grave of the Prophet of Islam and the two companions was also inside a enclosure/room near the mosque from the time they passed away and became part of the mosque within the first century of Islam . Those who say its wrong and shirk have no connection with Islam for they are saying that shirk is happening from the time Islam existed.

  • Abu Idris Umar

    I suppose I should not be surprised by how easily people use events such as this to attack unrelated issues. Saudi Arabia is not a part of this issue on Mali, it was included in the article by the author with no proof or even allegation that a Saudi has any relation to this. That seems to be more of an indication of a bias or an assumption the author makes even in the absence of evidence. I can names any number of scholars who would praise these young mend intentions while deploring their actions. Muhsin Khan in Afghanistan, Shaykh ar-Ramadhan in Algeria and Shaykh al-Najmi in Yemen to name a few. So why attack the king of an unrelated country? The men of Ansar Ad-din have stated why they did it, so accept their statements until there is proof otherwise. I will say it again, simply because people have performed an action for a long time is not proof of its truth. None of the Sahabah called to worshiping them

  • http://danielibnzayd.wordpress.com/ Daniel Ibn Zayd

    One of the longest admonitions against shirk in the Qur’an is immediately followed by this:

    “Make due allowance for man’s nature, and enjoin the doing of what is right; and leave alone all those who choose to remain ignorant….”

    As with most admonitions that proscribe punishment, this one is followed by a check of those who would rise too quickly to appoint themselves as punishers….cautioning them to lead by example, and not in rising to their anger, whose source is Satan.

    I’m reminded of the Senegalese expressions of adoration for Sheikh Amadou Bamba. They are undoubtedly part of the cultural expression of that place, and it is interesting to note that Bamba was also a primary figure of anti-colonialism in that country.

    This is where I see Wahhabism as being a doppelganger for globalizing Capitalism, which also aims to destroy history and culture and resistance to pave the way for its “pure” ideology. Timbuktu is a site of scholarship and learning; I believe this to be the target, not anything having to do with shirk.

    Because if that were the case, we in Beirut would not have had to look at posters during Ramadan in 2008 representing the so-called king of Saudi Arabia, presented as a deliverer, doctored to make his hand white and glowing, and thus comparing His Very Lowness to Moussa (pbuh).

    How is this okay, and burial tombs for deceased saints not?

  • Sir David Illuminati membership number 16.69

    Ravenscroft
    As a none muslim its not my role nor biz to take sides in what are docrinal disputes within islam. I was just pointing our that Idris is in the majority when he or she agreed that the distruction of the shrines was wrong .

    David

  • Ravenscroft

    @Sir David

    Isn’t one element of fighting Islamophobia challenging negative actions taken supposedly in the name of Islam?

    To say it’s clearly shirk to venerate and worship graves, but also that “do not worship” should not be translated as “destroy” seems helpful to me. This offers the view that being true to Islam does not mean doing this sort of thing.

    I certainly agree that historical sites should remain undisturbed, and this kind of destruction is deplorable, whether it occurs in Bagdad or Timbuktu.

    http://digitaljournal.com/article/275704

  • Sir David Illuminati membership number 16.69

    May I suggest, Idris that if you think that destroying tombs and shrines is wrong and unlikely to win over the population to a point of view then you are in the majority here on this site .
    Weather it is shirk or not, I would humbly suggest as a non muslim is a discussion for another web site and not the role of Loonwatch. More of an inturnal muslim thing although an indecation that Islam is not the well organised jugganaut the loons would have us, not muslims , believe.

    Sir David
    Angers

  • Abu Idris

    I may be in the minority on this site, but I do believe it is shirk to pray to tombs and shrines. Some of the people of Mali and elsewhere pray to walis and pirs and such and call it Islam. Popular forms of religion (meaning what the local masses are upon) have often mixed shirk with the truth. Just because many have done so for long periods if time does not prove it is right, but i would agree that destroying those buildings is counter-productive. Tarbiyah begins with education and purifying the din through dawah, not through such “in your face” methods. Just my ‘wahhabi’ opinion.

  • http://thepenofawanderingstranger.com/personal/ Jack Cope

    Rocky Lore, did you even read the article?

    The OIC: http://www.oic-oci.org/topic_detail.asp?t_id=7002

    I really don’t see why the others would comment as its not a ‘human rights’ issue as pissing on dead bodies was. Or do you support urinating on the dead?

    You really need to stop brining out the same crappy arguments every time an article is posted and maybe, ya know, read them? Might change your mind… oh wait, can’t have that can we ;-) Don’t worry mate, we know how fragile your house of cards is, we know why you don’t read ‘em. And we know you won’t reply to any comments put to you… your position is quite fragile isn’t it lad?

  • Wanderer

    @Prophet of Tolerance

    “They have used pick-axes, shovels, hammers and guns to destroy earthen tombs and shrines of local saints in the desert city of Timbuktu, claiming that they are doing so to defend the purity of their faith against idol worship.”

    The reason for the destruction of shrines is quite explicit here. Say what you want to say, don’t apply your shady agenda.

  • Rocky Lore

    Where is the outrage from the OIC? Where is Amnesty International and the UN? Heck, where is the same CAIR that whined over what happened to some dead Taliban?

  • leia

    may Allah guide these extreme people to the one straight path, and save them from the path of ultimate self destruction that they are heading down. Ameen.

  • leia

    extremists also destroyed parts of the sahaba’s graves.. i agree with the statement that it is not shirk to maintain graves of the past. Also auliahs(saints) were really great people, and if its okay to visit the graves( which is in the sunnah of the prophet(S)) of sahabas and make certain prayers there, then visiting the graves of the greatest of muslims, the friends of God, is def not wrong. Some people may in ignorance committ acts that go against Islam, and are not what sufis or the saints called for at all, but destroying graves is not a solution.(ironically ignorance causes many different types of shirk, targetting one in such a criminal fashion is ridiculous) Not only is it a really silly thing to do, it is an act that could incur serious consequences,in this world and the next as the people lying there are some of the most beloved servants of Allah. A lot of ‘modern reformist’ groups in islam seem to think sufism is an innovation, but don’t realise that some of the greatest aspects of islamic civilisation go back to sufism, and that not only was it around since the earliest of muslims, unlike their groups, but also scholars like alghazzali wrote that sufism is actually a part of islam and in the quran. All the madzhab imams, imam hanafi, imam maliki,imam shafii, hambali etc were sufis. the destruction of graves, extremism towards sufis is not something out of the blue. instead a lot of the blame lies on more moderate muslims, who in their ignorance of what sufism is, denonce it in very harsh terms. *i’m not an expert in this field, so there could be flaws.

  • http://www.krapuul.nl Al Bakrastani

    Did this “saudi “commentator ever condemn the wanton destruction the Sauds practices in Arabia ?? Nothing in this article about the Saud financing this kind of destruction and them being a big part of the cause by spreading their fundamentalist Taqfiri version of Islam ..

  • cl
  • Uthman

    There is no ‘shirk’ in tombs and maintaining them. If it is ‘shirk’, then that means that mainstream Islam, which has built and maintained tombs of the awlias and sahaba for 1000 and 1400 years, has been ‘wrong’ in each and every generation in toto and that this tiny innovative najidi group – the wahabis – who suddenly popped up around a 100 or so years ago, are ‘right’. Therefore, the umah as a whole has been ‘wrong’ and the followers of the misguided Abdul Wahab ‘right’.

    May the curse of Allah be upon these Wahabi Najidi heretics who have caused a great deal of harm to the ahle sunnah wal jamaah. May Allah punish these innovators and blasphemers in this world and in the hereafter. Ameen.

  • ProphetofTolerance

    What’s missing in this article is Ansar Dine’s reason for destroying the city’s shrines.

  • http://thepenofawanderingstranger.com/personal/ Jack Cope

    I was half way through writing on this subject when I found this far superior article on Gulf News! Indeed, while many will not like what the tombs etc stand for (e.g. worship of the dead and so on) there is are far better ways to show that. Simply blowing shite up teaches no one and only causes more problems.

    Because this is not about education. Gangs like these criminals only know violence; they use it to control their followers and they use it against all those that oppose them. By destroying Timbuktu’s heritage, they will send out a harshly worded statement that they take no crap. It was the same with the Buddahs; the Taliban were sabre rattling. Do you genuinely think that these gangs really care what goes on? It is just sending a message message, effectively ‘its your house next’ to all that dare oppose them.

  • Jefferson

    A Islamic website has also condemned this destruction too http://www.blessedislam.com/features/condemning-the-attack-at-sidi-yahya-mosque/

  • Khalid

    This is no different than the Talbian demolition the towering Buddhas in Afghanistan.

    Sick, offensive, loony and aimed at nothing but to terrify.

  • tyrone biggums

    i dont support shirk, but i also do not suport violent force in order to bring muslims away from shirk education is a better solition than violence

  • mindy1

    It’s like when those giant Buddhas were destroyed-even if that’s not your faith, to destroy history like that is wrong, embrace the past, sometimes we can learn from it.

Advertise Here
Advertise Here