Top Menu

Guardian offers bizarre new defense for hiring Islamophobic murder-inciter Joshua Treviño

Joshua Trevino

Joshua Treviño

Guardian offers bizarre new defense for hiring Islamophobic murder-inciter Joshua Treviño

Submitted by Ali Abunimah

The Guardian is offering a bizarre new defense for its decision to hire Joshua Treviño, an extremist Islamophobic ideologue who openly, repeatedly and gleefully incited murder and celebrated the deaths of unarmed civilian Palestine solidarity activists.

Because Treviño’s brand of extremism, hatred and incitement is “ascendant,” an editor claimed, the Guardian is somehow obligated to give it a platform.

At the same time, The Guardian continues to refuse to correct Treviño’s blatant lie that he never made such statements, despite a growing mountain of uncontradicted evidence to the contrary.

The Guardian: a platform for extremism?

On 20 August, the Guardian published Treviño’s first branded column about the debate over Medicare in the United States. However, almost two hundred reader comments to date focused almost entirely on Treviño’s history of racist and violent statements.

Today, Matt WellsThe Guardian’s New York-based blogs editor, made the following statement in the comments section of Treviño’s 20 August article:

I completely understand the strong reaction against Josh [Treviño]. Much of what he has said in the past on Twitter and elsewhere is tasteless, to say the very least. But we have taken Josh on to write about the Republican side of the US presidential campaign because he represents a strand of thinking in the GOP that is in the ascendancy. Whatever we think about it, the Republican party has taken a significant lurch to the right in recent years and we should try and understand why that is, and what’s going on there. Josh is well placed to articulate that.

Who else deserves a column?

This is utterly bizarre reasoning. It is also true that extreme Islamophobia of the kind that inspired mass killer Anders Breivik “is in the ascendancy” in many parts of Europe. Indeed, many of Treviño’s columns have appeared the virulently Islamophobic Brussels Journal.

Does this require the Guardian to provide Pamela Geller or Geert Wilders with columns and to arrange media bookings for them in the name of helping us to “understand” their views? What about David Duke? If his brand of racism and anti-Semitism finds itself “in the ascendancy” can we expect to find Mr. Duke joining the team too?

For many years it was thought Osama Bin Laden style jihadism was “in the ascendancy” in many countries. I don’t recall the Guardian offering a branded column and a media-booking service to any members of Al-Qaida.

Surely when extremism of any kind is “in the ascendancy” you report about it using people who are genuinely knowledgeable, rather than providing its proponents a privileged platform and a media booking service.

Has The Guardian noticed that Islamophobia and anti-Palestinian extremism are central to US electoral debates and campaigns? Thus writing about “the Republican side of the US presidential campaign” is not separate from these issues and Treviño’s hateful and violent views are not irrelevant to them.

Treviño’s experience

Notwithstanding his violent hate speech, the claim that Treviño has something valuable to offer is not particularly convincing. He is a marginal figure with little influence or following. He has never been part on any significant conservative or right-wing platform – except for the website he co-founded – in the United States.

His known experience as a political consultant was primarily to work for the campaign of Chuck DeVore, a right-wing California state assemblyman who came third in his 2010 bid for the Republican nomination for a US Senate seat from California.

Treviño has not disclosed all his consulting clients – a major problem for someone who is supposed to be helping readers understand as Wells claims, and a possible violation of the Guardian’s editorial code related to conflicts of interest.

And while he’s sometimes described as a “Bush speechwriter,” according to his ownLinkedin profile, Treviño was a speechwriter for the US Secretary of Health and Human Services, not for the president. He was hardly at the center of anything.

There are many more informed and influential conservative commentators in the United States who at least come without Treviño’s history of violent hate speech.

Refusing to correct a lie

As I detailed in a post yesterdayThe Guardian has ignored requests to issue a correction to a blatantly false statement Treviño made in a “clarification” the Guardian published on 16 August after the initial outcry over a June 2011 tweet in which he wrote:

Dear IDF: If you end up shooting any Americans on the new Gaza flotilla – well, most Americans are cool with that. Including me.

In his “clarification,” Treviño claimed:

any reading of my tweet of 25 June 2011 that holds that I applauded, encouraged, or welcomed the death of fellow human beings, is wrong, and out of step with my life and record.

However, this is simply a lie. There are numerous examples of tweets by Treviño in which “applauded, encouraged, or welcomed the death of fellow human beings.” Here are a few:

  • On 3 June 2010 in reference to 19-year-old American Furkan Doğan, killed execution-style aboard the Mavi Marmara, Treviño wrote, “Make no mistake: in choosing to aid Hamas on the #flotilla, Furkan Dogan raised his hand against his country. His fate was deserved.”
  • Make no mistake: in choosing to aid Hamas on the , Furkan Dogan raised his hand against his country. His fate was deserved.
  • On 3 June 2010, Treviño tweeted, “There are some Americans we’re better off without. Furkan Dogan is one of them: http://bit.ly/abfbLl #flotilla.”
               

    There are some Americans we’re better off without. Furkan Dogan is one of them: http://bit.ly/abfbLl 

  • On 1 June 2010, the day after Israeli forces murdered 9 unarmed civilians aboard the Mavi Marmara in international waters, Treviño tweeted, “Only way the #flotilla story gets better is if it’s revealed the IDF drew Muhammed on a bulkhead.”
               

    Only way the  story gets better is if it’s revealed the IDF drew Muhammed on a bulkhead.

  • On 2 June 2010, Treviño tweeted, “After examining the facts on #flotilla, I condemn Israel: for being too nice, too soft, too accommodating to the scum of the earth.”

    After examining the facts on , I condemn Israel: for being too nice, too soft, too accommodating to the scum of the earth.

, , , , , , , , , , , , ,

  • Ummer

    Signs of split personality disorder (and that’s if we’re going to be nice to him).

  • Sir David ( Illuminati membership number 5:32) Warning Contains Irony

    Steve
    And your evidence for this is ?
    yawn yet another lazy thinker who believes that being a critic of Isreal is wrong no matter what Isreal does.
    Or another member of the 50 cent army maybe ?

    Sir David
    Angers

  • Sam Seed

    @Steve….what absolute nonsense ‘editorial policy of hating Israel’. What world are you living in?

  • Steve

    Trevino has been sacked, the Guardian can now go back to its editorial policy of hating Israel.

  • There’s partisan partisan, and there’s partisan pretending to be objective. That’s what I meant. The defense of “objectivity” is a pretense that hides a shift in partisanship. (Note “objective” in quotation marks.)

  • Sam Seed

    What a tw@t.

  • Niall

    @Daniel: Then you must have left the US decades ago. News shows are now openly partisan. People choose their news based on the declared ideological orientation of the network. Fox News is a good (?) example of this. So I’m not understanding your point.

  • khushboo

    I’m seriously shocked! Aren’t they the same people who hired Greenwald. Did someone else take over? Where’s Greenwald? Is he okay? What’s his opinion on this?

  • Perhaps most disturbing is the expansion of the hypocritical American notion of “objective” journalism back to the UK. This was one of the great reliefs of having lived in France, having a full spectrum of newspapers, and knowing what you were investing in when you read Libération or L’Humanité as opposed to Le Figaro or Le Monde. That the Guardian seems to be following in the tradition of the great “objective” Pap Peddlers such as the The New York Times or Fox News for that matter is just as disturbing as the hiring of this cowardly hate monger, who doesn’t even have the guts to stand behind the statements he is on record as stating.

  • Ibrahim

    The Guardian will no longer get my clicks or cents.

  • Isa

    This has to be the dumbest justification I have heard in a while. I agree with Daniel. The mainstream media has tricked themselves into this idea that “all voices must be heard” in order to be “fair.” But just contemplating that for a few seconds demonstrates how preposterous that is. There are some people who’s ideas are too insane or hateful, to be given a platform to speak. The media should not be the equivalent of Speakers Corner in the UK, where any crazy person can rant and rave about reptilian-shapeshifters from the 5th dimension manipulating vibrations to make people depressed and angry.

    As the article said, *reporting* on these loons and their antics is one thing; but giving them a *platform* to indulge their delusions to the detriment of themselves and to others, is extremely irresponsible and idiotic. It makes me wonder if they have another agenda in mind.

  • DrM

    Typical Zionist scum.

  • Daniel

    Mindy, he most definitely IS nuts; but the Guardian is truly insane for hiring such a hate-monger.

    So weird…they hire Greenwald and Treviño at the same time. Were they trying for some kind of “balance”? Balance between what? Sanity and madness?

  • mindy1

    Is this guy nuts??? What could he possibly contribute

  • JD

    The pictures of his tweets are not showing up on IE and Firefox

    Can you post them as pictures with this article…

    This site also has pictures of his Twitter comments

    http://electronicintifada.net/blogs/ali-abunimah/new-guardian-team-member-openly-incited-israel-murder-alice-walker-and-others

  • JD

    Please address any correspondence to:
    Kings Place, 90 York Way
    London N1 9GU

    The switchboard number for the Guardian, the Observer and guardian.co.uk is:

    020 3353 2000 or dialling from overseas +4420 3 353 2000

    You can also write to the editor
    Guardian letters@guardian.co.uk

    Chris Elliott – Guardian readers’ editor
    reader@guardian.co.uk

    ============================
    Contact them and ask them if in light of all the EDL protests and hate crimes done by them They want to hire this guy spread his hate also ask them if they would also give David Duke ,Christian Identity Movement aka KKK WhitePower groups a voice.

    Come on everyone lets see how many Emails we can get sent out by end of today.

  • Meryem

    Wow this Treviño guy, sounds extremely bright. In all seriousness, this hate speech against Muslims needs to stop. There are naive people who are easily influenced and they lap up the garbage that is spread by loons like Geller, Hank Williams Jr and Robert Spencer like it’s gospel.

Powered by Loon Watchers