Robert Spencer

|

Pamela Geller

|

Bat Ye'or

|

Brigitte Gabriel

|

Daniel Pipes

|

Debbie Schlussel

|

Walid Shoebat

|

Joe Kaufman

|

Wafa Sultan

|

Geert Wilders

|

The Nuclear Card

Muslim Brothers ‘Abused’ by ‘Rivals’ Parents on Chess Trip

Posted on 15 August 2012 by Emperor

 

Muslim brothers ‘abused’ by rivals’ parents on chess trip

(The Independent)

A gifted young English chess player was physically assaulted and his family subjected to Islamophobic abuse by other parents during a recent competition in Austria, his father claims.

The alleged fracas has plunged the sport’s governing body in England – the English Chess Federation (ECF) – into a racism row amid claims that officials initially did not do enough to tackle the abuse.

Officials have belatedly begun investigating the incident and the Metropolitan Police is expected to start taking statements later today from those involved.

Suhayl Rahman, a maths teacher from Wisbech, Cambridgeshire, told The Independent that his three sons, Yousef, 13, Ibrahim, 10 and Ieysaa, seven, were subjected to abuse from other English parents during a junior chess championship in the Austrian town of Mureck.

All three are talented chess players and Ieysaa went on to win a bronze medal at the games. But the family claim their trip was marred by the increasingly hostile reception they received from the parents of fellow competitors.

According to Mr Rahman’s testimony, trouble began when his wife, Tomasina Contu, complained that the hotel they were staying in would not serve halal food despite assurances that their dietary requirements would be catered for. The competition was being held in the middle of Ramadan.

The abuse allegedly began with snide remarks but intensified throughout the two-week competition, with one parent allegedly spitting at Mrs Contu and another allegedly grabbing Yousef by the chest until blood was drawn.

At one point, Mrs Contu, an Italian-born convert to Islam who wears a hijab, even had to call for a police escort to take her from the venue back to the hotel because of concerns over her family’s safety.

In a series of emails sent to the Rahman family during the competition which have been seen by The Independent, officials at the ECF said they recognised that there was “an increased risk” to the safety of both Mrs Contu and Yousef from the parents of other competitors.

But nothing was done to exclude the potentially violent parents from the venue or from having contact with the children. Instead, the Rahman family were asked to move into a separate hotel, a request that they refused.

On the final day, Mr Rahman said his eldest son, Yousef, was assaulted by the mother of another competitor after he tried to watch his brother’s game.

“His path was blocked by another parent,” he told The Independent. “So he went round her and she grabbed him by his left pec, sunk her claws into his skin and yanked him back. He was bleeding, he was crying and he suffered bad bruising. It was quite terrible.” A photograph of Yousef taken soon after the incident shows his chest marred by a deep, purple bruise.

Mr Rahman said his family felt let down by the ECF, whom he accused of ignoring their repeated concerns.

The ECF has now launched an investigation and has asked witnesses, including the Austrian police, to provide statements. It expects to publish a report later today. Meanwhile the Rahman family have asked the Metropolitan Police to investigate.

“The ECF is taking the matter extremely seriously and has initiated an investigation. A further statement will be issued as soon as possible,” the ECF said in a statement.

UPDATE I: (h/t: Sid)

“ALLEGATIONS OF RACISM, ABUSE AND ASSAULT AT CHESS TOURNAMENT

The ECF has completed a thorough investigation into the events that took place at the European Union Youth Chess Championships in Mureck, Austria, between 31st July and 9 August 2012.

The investigation obtained statements from eye-witnesses. It concluded that the allegations of racist or Islamophobic abuse and of a physical attack are unfounded.

The report found that there was a disagreement amongst the families of the England team that resulted from complaints of perceived disruptive behaviour by individual children. There is no evidence that racism or religious intolerance played any part.

The claims concerning provision of suitable food during the event are inconsistent with both the facts and the extensive efforts made by the tournament organisers, hotel management and ECF Head of Delegation to ensure that the requirements of all members of the England delegation were met.

The ECF takes any charge of racism or religious intolerance extremely seriously and we absolutely condemn discriminatory behaviour of any kind. The ECF is also committed to the safety of all competitors who take part in tournaments at home and abroad.”

  • Ilisha

    In response to:

    thomask
    21 August 2012, 6:53 am
    “I just had a look at “loonwatch” for the first time…”

    Adrian Morgan
    21 August 2012, 9:03 am
    “Bunch of truth-reversalists, antisemites, whiny whatabouterists, denialists and mendacious manipulators, if you ask me. Narcissism is just the gloss that they paint onto the turd that is their general output.”

    http://hurryupharry.org/2012/08/20/muslim-family-protests-of-racial-abuse-against-children-at-chess-tournaments/

  • Ilisha

    Adrian Morgan at Harry’s Place regarding, “Muslim family protests of racial abuse against children at chess tournaments”:

    Adrian Morgan
    20 August 2012, 5:08 pm
    “…This begs the question – if his wife was present at the event, why was SHE herself not making the allegations, as she would have been “closer to events”.
    There seems a simple, though perhaps controversial answer to this question, one that would probably have me labeled by Rahman and others as racist and stereotyping. That answer is that Rahman (already a beardy anti-Israeli supporter of perpetual Palestinian victimhood) is just another sexist pig who believes that when his wife is dressed up in black shrouds that she has no right to advocate on her own behalf. And she is probably an appeaser of sexism who has similarly bought into that myth that the “man” is the sole voice of authority in their household.”

    Adrian Morgan
    20 August 2012, 5:17 pm
    “…I would really love to hear the wife’s side of the story, but then again, she would probably have to wait for her husband to ingest her statements and then regurgitate her views…”

    Adrian Morgan
    20 August 2012, 7:25 pm
    “I tried to make a comment on the vile Loonwatch, but it is awaiting moderation. It is in response to a bigoted comment from one of the “anti-loon” arseholes who frequent the comments section there:…

    [paste of Isa's comment, who Mr. Morgan has the audacity to call a “sectarian bigot” who makes “cretinous and racist statements.”]

    In case any “vile Loonwatch anti-loon arseholes” would like to read his comments in full:

    http://hurryupharry.org/2012/08/20/muslim-family-protests-of-racial-abuse-against-children-at-chess-tournaments/

    Also, some context:

    Showcase: The Neo-Cons, the BNP and the Islamophobia Network
    “…Morgan is a contributing editor to Family Security Matters, which has been described as a front for the Center for Security Policy, a Washington think-tank run by the ultra-neoconservative Frank Gaffney…”
    http://www.loonwatch.com/2009/09/showcase-the-neo-cons-the-bnp-and-the-islamophobia-network/

  • Sarah Brown

    I was very struck by Isa’s comment (the one about antisemitism) too. And I agree that no group/religion has the monopoly on dehumanising language.

  • Ilisha

    @JSB

    “Many means “a large number,” so it can be true that many people have abhorrent views while most are quite decent.”

    Agreed, from an analytical perspective. I just prefer softer language.

    Excellent posts, JSB.

  • Just Stopping By

    @Ilisha: “I think we should concede that both of these statements are true. Sad, but true, though I would probably soften the qualifier–’some’ rather than ‘many.’ I think most ordinary people are quite decent.”

    Many means “a large number,” so it can be true that many people have abhorrent views while most are quite decent. Still, I would have also used “some,” but that’s just my or our choice.

    @Adrian Morgan: “Basically, Isa, before you make cretinous and racist statements about ‘Western people’, you should take a look at your own bloody ‘culture’ and see how intolerant, mediaval and backward it is.”

    Do you really want to take a stand on racism because someone used the word “many” while you describe a whole culture (with that word in quotation marks) as “intolerant, mediaval [sic] and backward”?

    And, if you want to say that someone should look into their own culture, I give tremendous credit to Isa for doing so in a way that few of us have. http://www.loonwatch.com/2012/08/pamela-geller-of-atlasshrugs-bus-ads-inspired-by-ayn-rands-racist-views-of-arabs-and-muslims/#comment-193022. His statement that many (or some) Western people consider Muslims as non-Persons is difficult for me to hear, but I have to say that, sadly, there is a lot of evidence to support it.

  • Ilisha

    @Adrian Morgan

    “Muslims are considered as non-Persons by many Western peoples”

    “Non-Muslims are considered as non-Persons by many Muslim peoples.”

    I think we should concede that both of these statements are true. Sad, but true, though I would probably soften the qualifier–”some” rather than “many.” I think most ordinary people are quite decent.

    As far as referring to Isa as a “sectarian bigot” who makes “cretinous and racist statements,” that seems a bit harsh. He did qualify his statement rather than making sweeping generalizations, and I’ve seen some pretty brash comments you posted about Muslims at Harry’s Place.

    “And if you can acknowledge that, then you may have a point to claim that ‘Muslims are considered as non-Persons by many Western peoples.’”

    I don’t know about Isa, but I will acknowledge and condem the discrimination and persecution you highlighted, though I don’t think the policies of regressive regimes in Muslim-majority lands justify hatred or persecution of ordinary Muslims. I hope you’ll agree.

  • Adrian Morgan

    “Muslims are considered as non-Persons by many Western peoples”

    Oh diddums. Well that only makes up for the fact that in many Muslim nations, “Non-Muslims are considered as non-Persons by many Muslim peoples.”

    This would explain why Malaysia forbids Muslims to convert to other faiths, and why apostasy from Islam is a capital crime in Saudi Arabia, Afghanistan and Iran, and why in Pakistan so many Christians and Ahmadiyyah end up being victims of pernicious blasphemy laws, and why it is a crime under the Pakistan Penal Code for any Ahmidiyyah to declare him or herself to be a Muslim, or to proselytise for their faith.

    Basically, Isa, before you make cretinous and racist statements about “Western people”, you should take a look at your own bloody “culture” and see how intolerant, mediaval and backward it is.

    And if you can acknowledge that, then you may have a point to claim that “Muslims are considered as non-Persons by many Western peoples.”

    Because until you do that you are just a sectarian bigot…..

  • Uthmān

    relief: To be fair, the comment says “many” not “all”.

    Are you talking about articles on this site which generalise about white/American people and Westerns, or do you mean people’s comments beneath the articles?

  • relief

    Steve – On this site you are allowed to generalize about and stereotype any people whatsoever except Muslims. Simply stated, here one white person = all white people. One American/Westerner = all Americans/Westerners etc. This site is also allowed to spin and mislead at will. To say this, of course, makes me a troll and bigot.

  • Steve

    “Muslims are considered as non-Persons by many Western peoples”

    Any evidence of this?

  • Amela

    For every pain inflicted on us, we shall see rewards with the Almighty SWT. Amin. Persevere everyone.

  • Naeem

    As Asif wrote , “the father was not present at the event” but 200 competitors were, along with their parents and coaches. Chess is played in conditions of quiet or indeed silence so it is hard to believe that an adult could assault a child leaving him ‘bleeding, he was crying and he suffered bad bruising’ without any of the other competitors noticing, if only to complain that their concentration was being disturbed. Finally I find it hard to believe that the British police will get involved when the alleged offences all took place in Austria.

  • Sid

    Taken from The English Chess Federation website:
    “ALLEGATIONS OF RACISM, ABUSE AND ASSAULT AT CHESS TOURNAMENT

    The ECF has completed a thorough investigation into the events that took place at the European Union Youth Chess Championships in Mureck, Austria, between 31st July and 9 August 2012.

    The investigation obtained statements from eye-witnesses. It concluded that the allegations of racist or Islamophobic abuse and of a physical attack are unfounded.

    The report found that there was a disagreement amongst the families of the England team that resulted from complaints of perceived disruptive behaviour by individual children. There is no evidence that racism or religious intolerance played any part.

    The claims concerning provision of suitable food during the event are inconsistent with both the facts and the extensive efforts made by the tournament organisers, hotel management and ECF Head of Delegation to ensure that the requirements of all members of the England delegation were met.

    The ECF takes any charge of racism or religious intolerance extremely seriously and we absolutely condemn discriminatory behaviour of any kind. The ECF is also committed to the safety of all competitors who take part in tournaments at home and abroad.”

    Stories like this can be extremely damaging to both Muslims and the organisations involved in the stories- facts should be established before such things are publicised by the press.

  • Aziz

    Be sceptical. Do not believe.

    Note 1: the father was not present at the event.
    Note 2: ECF found that the charges have no substance. Zero.
    So, choose from:
    a) his wife was lying about lots of things to her husband
    b) he and/or his wife is/are utter loons
    c) he has a political agenda (you can google him for his failed attempts to get elected from 2009, courting the muslim vote, but failing as fortunately, they saw through him).

    I pity their children.

    I hoped he is now sued for defamation.

    Peace to all brothers,
    Aziz

  • Wanderer

    The ECF were complicit in these incidents of hate. It is ridiculous and unacceptable that they only started “taking the matter extremely seriously” AFTER the tournament and after multiple complaints (i.e. once the story hit the media). The ECF as an organisation should be investigated for this incident more seriously than the Islamophobic parents.

  • Ummer

    This is kinda close to home for me because I was a schools Chess player, and did a few national competitions.

    “On Wednesday the English Chess Federation issued a new statement saying that the Rahman family’s allegations were “unfounded”. … ‘… The investigation obtained statements from eye-witnesses. It concluded that the allegations of racist or Islamophobic abuse and of a physical attack are unfounded.’ ”

    “The report found that there was a disagreement amongst the families of the England team that resulted from complaints of perceived disruptive behaviour by individual children. There is no evidence that racism or religious intolerance played any part. The claims concerning provision of suitable food during the event are inconsistent with both the facts and the extensive efforts made by the tournament organisers, hotel management and ECF Head of Delegation to ensure that the requirements of all members of the England delegation were met.”

    It’s interesting that they’re not “British chess team racially abused in Austria”

  • Nabeel

    “The abuse allegedly began with snide remarks but intensified throughout the two-week competition, with one parent allegedly spitting at Mrs Contu and another allegedly grabbing Yousef by the chest until blood was drawn.”

    This just makes my blood boil. If this is how the parents are acting, I don’t want to imagine what kind of little demons they must be raising.

  • Isa

    @MrIslamAnswersBack: I agree with you, and I am a borderline pacifist 99.999% of the time; but there comes a time when you just have to step up to a bully.

  • http://the-case-for-islam.webs.com/ MrIslamAnswersBack

    Muslims I think you better start thinking about having another look at the advice brother Malcolm X gave to the victims of racism during the civil rights struggle. That was you better take a stand to protect yourself because no one else will do it for you.

  • Isa

    @Truth. Muslims are considered as non-Persons by many Western peoples, so from their perspective it doesn’t matter if they abuse these children, because after all, they’re not even real people – just punching bags (literally) to vent their frustration over a lost identity.

  • truth

    A parent abused another child parent. Where is this world heading to?

  • mindy1

    I thought that chess players were supposed to be the more rational and intellectual among us :(

Advertise Here
Advertise Here