Robert Spencer

|

Pamela Geller

|

Bat Ye'or

|

Brigitte Gabriel

|

Daniel Pipes

|

Debbie Schlussel

|

Walid Shoebat

|

Joe Kaufman

|

Wafa Sultan

|

Geert Wilders

|

The Nuclear Card

Russia: Punk Rockers Jailed for Mock Prayer Performance

Posted on 02 August 2012 by Ilisha

Veiled Pussy Riot Fan

A veiled protester holds up a sign which reads ‘свобоДЫ’ (Freedom) during a demonstration in support of the punk rock band ‘Pussy Riot,’ outside the Russian Embassy in Prague, on April 15, 2012.

What if a punk band was arrested for performing a “mock prayer” on the steps of a mosque in a Muslim country?

The loons would go wild, but this didn’t happen in a Muslim country, and it wasn’t a mosque. It happened in Russia, inside of an Orthodox Christian church. Months later, members of the band Pussy Riot are still in jail, charged with “hooliganism.”

What they did was pretty stupid and disrespectful but they should not be “denied bail” or face “seven years in jail.”

The Know-Nothing’s Guide to Pussy Riot, the Realest Punks Alive

by  Max Read

After enduring five months of delays and attracting worldwide attention, the Pussy Riot trial finally began in Moscow this week. But what is Pussy Riot? Why is it on trial? What is Moscow? All your questions will be answered here.

What is Pussy Riot?

Pussy Riot is a Russian punk collective founded in September of last year in the wake of Vladimir Putin’s announcement that he would seek election for a third presidential term. (Putin, currently the prime minister, stepped down from the presidency in 2008 due to limits on serving consecutive terms; the current president, Dmitri Medvedev, is a Putin ally.)

“[A]t that point,” Pussy Riot’s Serafima (members use pseudonyms) told Vice in February, “we realized that this country needs a militant, punk-feminist, street band that will rip through Moscow’s streets and squares, mobilize public energy against the evil crooks of the Putinist junta and enrich the Russian cultural and political opposition[.]“

Okay, but… what do they do?

I mean, what have punks ever done? Mostly the women of Pussy Riot wear colorful clothes and balaclavas and stage Situationist-style guerrilla performances in public spaces like the Red Square. It was one such performance — a “punk prayer” called “Our Lady, chase Putin out,” undertaken in Moscow’s Christ the Savior Cathedral — that got three of the group’s members in so much trouble.

What happened?

On February 21, Five Pussy Rioteers took to the church’s altar and performed a mock prayer, begging the Virgin Mary to chase Putin out of power. They lasted about 30 seconds before being removed by security guards, and the footage was later used in a music video, which you can see here.

That’s it? [Rolls eyes.]

Well, where the U.S. has successfully neutralized the protest possibilities of punk rock through a careful combination of commodification and fashionable cynicism, Russia doesn’t [mess] around: two weeks after the prayer, three women in Pussy Riot — Nadezhda Tolokonnikova, Mariya Alekhina and Yekaterina Samutsevich — were arrested and charged with hooliganism, which can carry a sentence of up to seven years. They’ve been languishing in jail since then, denied bail and waiting through several delays; two of the women are mothers and haven’t seen their young kids since the arrest.

…. Their lawyers say they’ve been denied food and sleep; today, a doctor had to be called when Alekhina became sick in court. The prosecutor is making all kinds of nutty accusations, according to The New Yorker‘s Masha Lipman:

In an interview, one said that the incident could “soon escalate into events comparable to the explosion of the twin towers on September 11th in America… It was proven that the act had been committed not by the American government or by the C.I.A. but by forces above them. For instance, all the employees of the shopping center” — the lawyer referred to the W.T.C. as torgovy tsentr, the Russian for “mall” — had been informed through secret masonic channels that they should not report to work on September 11th.” When the interviewer asked, “Do you mean that the Pussy Riot act and the terrorist attack in the U.S. were organized by the same people?,” the lawyers responded, “In the first instance it was a satanic group, and in the second it was the global government. But at the highest level both are connected-by Satan.” Who else?

Uh.

Yeah, the Orthodox Church is being unsurprisingly intense about this — the Orthodox Patriarch and other church leaders have roundly condemned them (“a sin that will be punished in this life and the next”) — and the government seems to be using the prosecution as a way to strengthen its alliance with the conservative church.

“Piety and faith for their own sake do not appear to be Putin’s concern, however,” Lipman writes. “Instead, the government is drawing on the traditionalist and anti-western attitudes of the Russian Orthodox Church as a way of cracking down on the regime’s liberal opponents.”

So what happens next?

The trial will last a couple of weeks. All three women have pleaded not guilty; at worst, they could be sentenced to seven years in prison…

Read the rest

  • http://www.youtube.com/user/GargamelGold?feature=mhee CriticalDragon1177

    @Ilisha

    Here’s more on this story, Pussy Riot, and Madonna. Apparently, she and some other American signers are standing up for them.

    Sorry about the articles rather vulgar title

    Why a Russian official called Madonna a moralizing slut
    http://feministing.com/2012/08/09/why-a-russian-official-called-madonna-a-moralizing-slut/?utm_source=twitterfeed&utm_medium=twitter

  • http://www.youtube.com/user/GargamelGold?feature=mhee CriticalDragon1177

    @Ilisha

    Speaking of Russia, and Musicians, here’s a recent story from Aljazeera, that might make another good What if they were Muslims. Parts of Russia have banned “promoting” homosexuality in public.

    Madonna to sing out on ‘gay propaganda’ law
    http://www.aljazeera.com/indepth/features/2012/08/20128783022294283.html

  • Pingback: Russia: Punk Rockers Jailed for Mock Prayer Performance | Islamophobia Today eNewspaper

  • Ilisha

    @Hellosnackbar

    Usually I wouldn’t post this comment since it’s off topic, and you’re a troll. However, I did broach honor killing in an earlier comment, so let me make an exception and respond. Of course this is a vile murder, and we condemn it.

    By the way, Muslims are not “Mohammedans,” and the use of this inaccurate and obsolete term puts your ignorance on display.

  • Hellosnackbar

    Here’s the Shafilea Ahmed case: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Murder_of_Shafilea_Ahmed
    Come on you Mohammedans ;let’s have your opinions!

  • Sarah Brown

    By chance I cast doubt (in passing) on the invocation of that particular authority by Spenser (in the context of the Shafilea Ahmed case in the UK) just this morning …

  • Ilisha

    @Sarah Brown

    “Don’t people think that if this was a false quote, or had been mistranslated, that fact would be all over the internet?

    Not necessarily. The loons are very well funded, and their minions are busy as bees, churning out far too many lies for us, or anyone else, to debunk them all:

    $42 Million From Seven Foundations Helped Fuel The Rise Of Islamophobia In America
    http://www.loonwatch.com/2011/08/42-million-from-seven-foundations-helped-fuel-the-rise-of-islamophobia-in-america/

    Hates sites still endlessly recycle the LIE that Reliance of the Travellor’s limitation on reciprocal justice means there is no punishment for a parent who kills a child in Islam. Leaving aside the fact the loons are greatly exaggerating the role of that 600 year old book, this assertion doesn’t pass even a cursory sniff test. It’s like saying because Canada doesn’t have the death penalty for murder, you’re allowed to murder people in Canada. In both cases, the perpetrator is punished by other means.

    Did that lie stop circulating because we debunked it? Certainly not. Here is a very recent example from Atlas Shrugs, published this month:

    http://atlasshrugs2000.typepad.com/atlas_shrugs/2012/08/islamic-honor-killing-in-marriage-courthouse-lawyer-murders-22-year-old-sister-in-india.html

    Incredible blatant barbarity. And why not? It’s holy. Here is more on the religious sanction of honor killings in Islam from one of the most important English-language sources for the content of Islamic law: Reliance of the Traveller: A Classic Manual of Islamic Sacred Law, certified by Al-Azhar University as a translation that “corresponds to the Arabic original and conforms to the practice and faith of the orthodox Sunni Community…”

    Endless repetition and doesn’t make a lie true, and that’s the case with MEMRI’s “translations” too. All sorts of falsehood passes for truth these days.

  • Sarah Brown

    But – I don’t want to make a point about MEMRI – I only want to make a point about Qaradawi. So – thanks Ilisha for acknowledging that this, if true, is awful. Don’t people think that if this was a false quote, or had been mistranslated, that fact would be all over the internet?

    I am reminded of the time I was warned off using Counterpunch as a source when raising some doubts about Benny Morris!

    https://engageonline.wordpress.com/2010/05/11/on-benny-morris-book-one-state-two-states-resolving-the-israelpalestine-conflict/

  • Ilisha

    @Sarah Brown

    “I don’t think it should be in any way difficult or disturbing to acknowledge that what Qaradawi said, if true, is utterly hateful.”

    I agree, if true.

    @JSB

    That seems like a reasonable assessment. Garibaldi’s link to sourcewatch was also quite informative, I think. As far as I’m concerned, since MEMRI is a site devoted to promoting fear and hatred through deception, it is reasonable to call it a “hate site,” though I’ll settle for simply saying it isn’t a credible source.

  • Just Stopping By

    I don’t know that much about MEMRI, but in perusing their site, two things hit me.

    First, there is clearly an attempt there not to show an even-handed or fair selection of articles from the Middle East, but to pick those that appear inflammatory.

    Second, I saw translations without links to the underlying articles. Maybe in some cases that is necessary because they articles don’t exist online, though I wonder why MEMRI can’t scan a copy and put that up as well. Unless there is some explanation as to why they can’t do so, I think that it’s a bit dodgy to not provide readers with an original so that those who can read the original can assess the translation on the spot.

  • http://www.loonwatch.com Garibaldi

    MEMRI is not only biased but has a hateful agenda in my opinion, to portray Islam and Muslims in a negative, terrorist light. They are notorious for faulty, decontextualized and at times plainly erroneous translations. I won’t say all of them are, but many are, and there have been several articles that have dealt with MEMRI’s agenda.

    It’s too bad that MEMRIWatch is no longer update, but that was a good site.

    http://memriwatch.wordpress.com/

    http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Middle_East_Media_Research_Institute#Issues_of_reliability_and_veracity

  • Sarah Brown

    I asked an Arabic speaker to check the translation for me. It is difficult to think of any context which would excuse this. ‘Hate site’ seems pretty strong, although MEMRI clearly has an agenda. I don’t think it should be in any way difficult or disturbing to acknowledge that what Qaradawi said, if true, is utterly hateful. To do so would in no way undermine the work of Loonwatch.

  • Ilisha

    @Sarah Brown

    MEMRI TV is an anti-Muslim hate site. I would dismiss any “translation” produced by them.

    I haven’t seen the original broadcast of the January 2009 sermon, but within the same Wikipedia article, he is quoted as saying:

    “There is no enmity between Muslims and Jews….Jews who believe in the authentic Torah are very close to Muslims.”

    I’m not defending Sheikh Yusuf al-Qaradawi. I haven’t researched his views extensively, but if I did, I wouldn’t take commentary and analysis from well known anti-Muslim hate sites.

  • Sarah Brown

    Sorry – meant to add link. I do not want to overstate the point I made – and it is possible that Danios was not at that point aware of the thing which always sticks in my mind about Qaradawi, as he (Danios) specifically refers to *Zionist* Jews.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yusuf_al-Qaradawi#Support_for_Adolf_Hitler_and_the_Holocaust

    When I blogged about this a while back I paired the Pussy Riot issue with intolerance for Islam within the ROC, or some strands of the ROC at least.

  • Proverb

    @ Haddock,

    What if they were Muslim?

    Ahhh well, Putin in fact commented on this issue point in the Russian media. In fact, Putin’s words were not contradicted by anyone for we all know he was correct on this point.

    The female Punks would have probably not lived long enough to be arrested and brought to trial, if they had done that in a mosque. Afterall, Muslims have slaughtered people over cartoons and the burning of a koran…

    What if they were Muslim? The world would be reporting on Muslim riots and the deaths of the female Punks. So, this article only points to the violence that prevails in the Muslim world, when one actually compares the Russian reaction with the common Islamic reaction.

    That was a spectacular own goal from you. Thank you for attempting to play.

  • Géji

    @Sarah Brown … “Perhaps ‘related to Islam’ wasn’t the best way of putting my point, as it related to an individual (Qaradawi) not Islam itself.”

    As Ilisha already said, the comments you quoted from the comment section underline the personal reflections of the author about the situation related in the article rather than from the article. But I’ll add that even so, I do not see the “underplaying” you seem to see. On the contrary I think the author even though as a personal note, quite clearly stated his objection to Mr Qaradawi statements, and which those are certainly by the way (as you stated yourself) neither reflective nor “related” to Islam, or even to the Muslim community, but has more to do with an individual stating his political sentiments, just like when Loonwatch writers post their exchanging opinions with us on the comment section isn’t necessarily verbatim from Loonwatch Site and articles.

  • KennethMoe

    “u r right dude quran teaches us to bomb airplains”

    If you are trying to be funny at the expense of Muslims you are failing. If you are trying to make an argument that has anything to do with what I just said you are failing horrendously.

Advertise Here
Advertise Here