Robert Spencer

|

Pamela Geller

|

Bat Ye'or

|

Brigitte Gabriel

|

Daniel Pipes

|

Debbie Schlussel

|

Walid Shoebat

|

Joe Kaufman

|

Wafa Sultan

|

Geert Wilders

|

The Nuclear Card

My Take: It’s Time for Islamophobic Evangelicals to Choose

Posted on 24 September 2012 by Emperor

An important step towards cross-faith understanding and standing up for justice; it starts by criticizing the extremists and bigots within your own faith tradition.

My Take: It’s time for Islamophobic evangelicals to choose

By Brian McLaren, Special to CNN

I was raised as an evangelical Christian in America, and any discussion of Christian-Jewish-Muslim relations around the world must include the phenomenon of American Islamophobia, for which large sectors of evangelical Christianity in America serve as a greenhouse.

At a time when U.S. embassies are being attacked and when people are getting killed over an offensive, adolescent and puerile film targeting Islam – beyond pathetic in its tawdriness – we must begin to own up to the reality of evangelical Islamaphobia.

Many of my own relatives receive and forward pious-sounding and alarm-bell-ringing e-mails that trumpet (IN LOTS OF CAPITAL LETTERS WITH EXCLAMATION POINTS!) the evils of Islam, that call their fellow evangelicals and charismatics to prayer and “spiritual warfare” against those alleged evils, and that often – truth be told – contain lots of downright lies.

For example, one recent e-mail claimed “Egyptian Christians in Grave Danger as Muslim Brotherhood Crucifies Opponents.”  Of course, that claim has been thoroughly debunked, but the sender’s website still (as of Friday) claims that the Muslim Brotherhood has “crucified those opposing” Egyptian President Mohamed Morsy “naked on trees in front of the presidential palace while abusing others.”

CNN’s Belief Blog: The faith angles behind the biggest stories

Many sincere and good-hearted evangelicals have never yet had a real Muslim friend, and now they probably never will because their minds have been so prejudiced by Islamophobic broadcasts on so-called Christian television and radio.

Janet Parshall, for example, a popular talk show host on the Moody Radio Network, frequently hosts Walid Shoebat, a Muslim-evangelical convert whose anti-Muslim claims, along with claims about his own biography, are frequently questioned.  John Hagee, a popular televangelist, also hosts Shoebat as an expert on Islam, as does the 700 Club.

Many Christian bookstores that (used to) sell my books, still sell books such as Paul Sperry’s “Infiltration: How Muslim Spies and Subversives Have Penetrated Washington” (Thomas Nelson, 2008). In so doing, they fuel conspiracy theories such as the ones U.S. Rep. Michele Bachmann, R-Minnesota, promoted earlier this year.

In recent days, we’ve seen how irresponsible Muslim media outlets used the tawdry 13-minute video created by a tiny handful of fringe Christian extremists to create a disgusting caricature of all Christians – and all Americans – in Muslim minds. But too few Americans realize how frequently American Christian media personalities in the U.S. similarly prejudice their hearers’ minds with mirror-image stereotypes of Muslims.

Ambassador’s killing shines light on Muslim sensitivities around Prophet Mohammed

Meanwhile, many who are pastors and leaders in evangelicalism hide their heads in the current issue of Christianity Today or World Magazine, acting as if the kinds of people who host Islamophobic sentiments swim in a tiny sidestream, not in the mainstream, of our common heritage. I wish that were true.

The events of this past week, if we let them, could mark a turning point – a hitting bottom, if you will – in the complicity of evangelicalism in Islamophobia. If enough evangelicals watch or try to watch the film trailer that has sparked such outrage in the Middle East, they may move beyond the tipping point.

I tried to watch it, but I couldn’t make it halfway to the 13-minute mark. Everything about it was tawdry, pathetic, even pornographic. All but the most fundamentalist believers from my evangelical Christian tribe who watch that video will be appalled and ashamed to be associated with it.

It is hate speech. It is no different from the anti-Semitic garbage that has been all too common in Western Christian history. It is sub-Christian – beneath the dignity of anyone with a functioning moral compass.

Islamophobic evangelical Christians – and the neo-conservative Catholics and even some Jewish folks who are their unlikely political bedfellows of late – must choose.

Will they press on in their current path, letting Islamophobia spread even further amongst them? Or will they stop, rethink and seek to a more charitable approach to our Muslim neighbors? Will they realize that evangelical religious identity is under assault, not by Shariah law, not by the liberal media, not by secular humanism from the outside, but by forces within the evangelical community that infect that religious identity with hostility?

If I could get one message through to my evangelical friends, it would be this: The greatest threat to evangelicalism is evangelicals who tolerate hate and who promote hate camouflaged as piety.

No one can serve two masters. You can’t serve God and greed, nor can you serve God and fear, nor God and hate.

The broad highway of us-them thinking and the offense-outrage-revenge reaction cycle leads to self-destruction. There is a better way, the way of Christ who, when reviled, did not revile in return, who when insulted, did not insult in return, and who taught his followers to love even those who define themselves as enemies.

Follow the CNN Belief Blog on Twitter

Yes, “they” – the tiny minority of Muslims who turn piety into violence – have big problems of their own. But the way of Christ requires all who claim to be Christians to examine our own eyes for planks before trying to perform first aid on the eyes of others. We must admit that we have our own tiny minority whose message and methods we have not firmly, unitedly and publicly repudiated and rejected.

To choose the way of Christ is not appeasement. It is not being a “sympathizer.”

The way of Christ is a gentle strength that transcends the vicious cycles of offense-outrage-revenge.

The opinions expressed in this commentary are solely those of Brian D. McLaren.

  • Just Stopping By

    @AJ: شكرا

  • http://Aayjay.wordpress.com AJ

    @JSB, well I am glad that you made it through Yom Kippur. G’mar Hatimah Tovah! :)

  • Just Stopping By

    @AJ: “Do the Jews not eat anything for 25 hours or are they permitted to drink and not eat? I mean in Ramadan, we eat a meal before sunrise and then not eat or drink anything until sunset. But those are not 25 hours – at the most perhaps 17 hours. I am wondering how do you fast for 25 hours or is something allowed?”

    For me, it was a bit over 26 hours this year. No food. No drink. No posting on LW.

    How do you do it? Perseverance. The body can do a lot if you have the right mentality.

  • http://aayjay.wordpress.com AJ

    Kit,

    That verse is for all times. We are still supposed to be friends.

  • FYI

    “Values” Voter Summit: Of Train Wrecks and Frankenstein’s Monsters
    September 12, 2012

    http://www.alternet.org/speakeasy/michaelweinstein/values-voter-summit-train-wrecks-and-frankensteins-monsters?page=entire
    Oh, the strange and sundry variety of intolerant Christian fundamentalist creatures that will migrate, blazing hatred in tow, to our nation’s capitol! Indeed, the Values Voter Summit is a sight to behold insofar as it offers a perverse glimpse into the freefalling degeneration of evangelical Christian fundamentalism in U.S. politics.

    As I’ve noted in the past, while the odious Fred Phelps and his bizarre gang of Westboro Baptist Church clowns (of “God Hates Fags” fame) can be considered a moth-eaten, chintzy carnival of sorts, the FRC is a virtual Cirque du Soleil of horrendous anti-gay, Islamophobic, fundamentalist Christian and unconstitutional lobbying. It’s not for nothing that the Southern Poverty Law Center has called the FRC a “hate group.” In addition to equating homosexuality with pedophilia, the FRC has defended world-class cretin Congressman Todd Akin’s stupefying misogyny exemplified by his notorious suggestion that so-called “legitimate rape” exists. More feared than respected among conservatives, the FRC has become a ghastly and grotesque edifice of Dominionism within American politics. In this crucial election year, the FRC conference is most assuredly something to watch, in the same manner as one would observe a train wreck in slow motion.

    The summit’s website depicts a radical evangelical festival resembling a sort of Christian Jihadi Convention. The summit will include a breakout session facilitated by the freshly appointed Executive Vice President of the FRC, retired Lieutenant General William Boykin, an infamous and utterly putrescent Islamophobe about whom I’ve written much . Among numerous other putrid statements, Boykin has scandalously suggested that Muslims’ civil rights “should not be protected under the First Amendment.” Now an “ordained minister,” this constitutional derelict fancies himself a sort of “Holy Warrior” in U.S. combat fatigues waging a perpetual battle against the forces of Satan – or, in his case, “demonic” Islamists spawned from Somali “principalities of darkness.” Boykin rounds out the Family Research Council’s relentless Islamophobic witch-hunt with his own John Rambo-esque war against domestic Muslims, whom he feels are intent to “destroy us as a Christian Army.” It’s no exaggeration to say that an evangelical fundamentalist Christian zeal that mirrors Al Qaeda’s Salafist-Jihadi fanaticism quite positively possesses Boykin.

    Boykin’s Islamophobia workshop will be co-facilitated by Kamal Saleem (a.k.a. Khodor Shami), a truly bizarre charlatan whose claim to fame is having perfected a fictionalized, shameful “ex-Muslim terrorist” shtick. Sound familiar? Indeed, Saleem is one of the infamous “Three Stooges” of Arab extraction , a troupe that also features Zachariah Anani and Walid Shoebat. The three claim to have been “Islamist terrorist” fighters, yet their CVs appear to be comprised of amateurish fabrications that would be perfect for a spoof film along the lines of The Naked Gun or Hot Shots. In fact, the stooges’ “terrorist” bona fides resemble Star Trek actor William Shatner’s qualifications to be an actual Starship Captain. Their expertise is isolated to a realm of pathetic cakewalking and self-ridicule before racist fundamentalist evangelicals, Christian Zionists, and Islamophobes. Finding steady employment in the fundamentalist media and conference circuit, Saleem also manages an enterprise known as “Koome Ministries,” whose claimed goal is to “expose the true agenda of [Muslims] who would deceive our nation and the free nations of the world.” The following outlandish statements rank among Saleem’s absolute worst:

  • Kit Cronebaugh

    ‎”" And thou wilt find the nearest of them in affection to those who believe (to be) those who say: Lo! We are Christians. That is because there are among them PRIESTS and MONKS, and because they are not proud.”

    The Koran, chapter 5 verses 82-83 called surrah almaeda”

    Therefore, we were friends in the beginning.

  • FYI

    Jai
    “”Considering the most well-known historical precedent of an individual falsely denying Jesus in public, perhaps Steve should have chosen “Judas” as a more appropriate username for himself.”"

    Judas sold out Jesus to the Romans who were looking to arrest him. He did not practice Christian taqiya which is something that the apostle Saul known as Paul who wrote the Bible, advised Christians to do. But this was much later, Saul didn’t even meet Jesus, yet he has had the most influence over Christianiyt. He taught that it’s cool, to lie and pretend to be the same as the group they infiltrate to convert them. They use deceptive techniques.

    Corinthians 9:19
    19 Though I am free and belong to no man, I make myself a slave to everyone, to win as many as possible. 20 To the Jews I became like a Jew, to win the Jews. To those under the law I became like one under the law (though I myself am not under the law), so as to win those under the law. 21 To those not having the law I became like one not having the law (though I am not free from God’s law but am under Christ’s law), so as to win those not having the law. 22 To the weak I became weak, to win the weak. I have become all things to all men so that by all possible means I might save some.

    In this day and age, only Evangelicals and some fanatic African fringe Churches do this sort of thing. American Christian fanatics backed by US military Bible nuts (yes, the US military is full of them) used this exact technique recently in Afghanistan, Iraq, Kurdistan, where they dressed and pretended to be Afghanis, Iraqis, Kurds, to convert them to Evangelism using aid. The American Blackwater group had an Evangelical head, who shared this belief. Recall, Abu Gharib, all of this did not happen in a vacuum. The US military has whole classes and battaliions of Evangelical fanatics taught to hate and kill muslims.

  • http://aayjay.wordpress.com AJ

    @Jai,

    Brilliant!

  • Arun

    Kudos to the writer of this piece, Brian Mclaren for being one sane Evangelical voice. May he be successful in his goals. Unfortunatly, Christians throughout history have themselves been the proof that it is impossible to follow what they say their Jesus taught. Gandhi once said, “I like your Jesus but I don’t like your Christians”.

    That was then, and since Christianity has reformed. Today though, Evangelical radicals are notorious for still fanning hate of many religions, not just Muslims. I’d venture, that since 9/11 they probably focused on Muslims simply because they see them as a bigger threat. But their intolerance towards Catholics, Jews, Hindus and even other Protestant Christian Churches is well known. Many of these fanatics also share links with Christian white nationalists like the Ku Klux Klan and Christian Identity movements which have racist nazi like beliefs.

    Anti semitism didn’t exist in India, Ceylon, until the Portugese, and British Christians colonised and Christianity took root. Today’s version of these intolerant and bigoted strands of Christianity are right wing Evangelicals. Liberal Evangelical churches have made efforts to counter this hate. In fact Christian military adventures were much more brutal than the Muslim ones which started in the seventh century, and for Hindu India, both the Muslim and the Christian subjugation was unwelcome.

    Keith
    ” Look what moral price the West has paid for embracing Jewish revolutionary thought.”

    I don’t think so. Like Helen Thomas, I maintain that the solution is for the occupier (Israeli) to leave the land he/she has stolen.

    I think this is incorrect because Crusades, and Christian colonisation and forced conversions and mass murder, (some of the more odious being Congo/Belgian USA/native Indian) were not revolutionary Jewish thought. I always find it strange when Christians say this, considering they claim to follow a Jew, (Jesus), so you could say, Christianity is Jewish revolutionary thought too. Helen Thomas’s comment bears no weight considering she herself is living on stolen land, I’d venture to say to her, “practice what you preach”and tell the Americans to return their stolen land to the native Indian descendents or their relatives and for herself to return to Lebanon, from where she is from, and colonising American descendents to return to Europe, like she is telling Israelis, then maybe she could be taken seriously. I find it puzzling when Christians tell Jews they are living on stolen land when almost every Christian country today is either stolen land obtained by forcible expansion, military intervention, forced conversion, genocide of non Christians and even Christians.

  • Jai

    Zakariya Ali Sher,

    [Chameleon to Steve:] “Stop inventing straw man arguments I am not making.”

    [Your own comment:] “Notice that Steve ignores everything else that I’ve said.”

    Steve has an extensive history of this pattern of behaviour.

    ”The fact is that Steve is TRYING to imply that Islam is inherently (and possibly uniquely) hostile towards the things that Christians value. This is an especially odd claim for a supposed atheist to make, since as an atheist we would assume Steve wouldn’t believe in Jesus, and certainly wouldn’t believe Jesus was the son of a non-existent God!”

    Indeed. Steve’s obsessive behaviour and his extreme touchiness about Islam’s denial of Jesus’s divinity is particularly bizarre for someone who claims that he’s not a Christian himself.

    There are only two plausible explanations:

    1. Steve is indeed an atheist but he’s cynically exploiting (and grossly distorting) Islam’s stance on Jesus in order to demonise Muslims and incite hatred against them. This is despite the fact that the hypocrite’s own alleged stance on Jesus is actually much, much worse and far more offensive to Christians. In fact, considering that Steve clearly believes that disagreeing with someone’s religious beliefs is exactly the same as insulting them, it means that Steve himself has been consciously and deliberately engaging in sadistic behaviour towards Christians by repeatedly posting comments on Loonwatch denying the existence of God and denying Jesus’s divinity.

    2. Steve is himself a fundamentalist Christian but has been falsely claiming to be an atheist in order to give his anti-Muslim statements the façade of neutrality and objectivity. He’s guilty of committing Robert Spencer’s falsified definition of “taqiyya”. Considering the most well-known historical precedent of an individual falsely denying Jesus in public, perhaps Steve should have chosen “Judas” as a more appropriate username for himself.

    Either way, he’s quite the sociopath.

  • Jai

    I see that Steve is continuing to obsessively play his sadistic mind-games on Loonwatch in order to feed his narcissistic need for attention from anonymous strangers on the internet. What a pathetic little man he is.

    Let’s cut to the chase:

    “I am saying that if muslims feel justified when somebody insults their concept of mohammed than surely christians can feel insulted when somebody insults their concept of jesus.”

    Disagreeing with Muslims’ concept of Mohammad (or Christians’ concept of Jesus) isn’t the same as “insulting” them. It depends entirely on how the disagreement is expressed and the motivations for expressing that disagreement.

    Exactly the same principle applies to non-Christians disagreeing with Christianity’s concept of Jesus, non-Hindus disagreeing with Hinduism’s concept of the Hindu deities, non-Sikhs disagreeing with Sikhism’s concept of the Sikh Gurus, non-Buddhists disagreeing with Buddhism’s concept of Buddha, and so on.

    Unless Steve believes that disagreeing with someone is exactly the same thing as insulting them, in which case Steve clearly has much bigger psychological problems.

    “I keep hearing that muslims revere jesus, they revere the jesus of islam, they don’t revere the jesus of christanity so to keep saying it as though there is some equivalence is pointless.”

    There is no “Jesus of Islam” or “Jesus of Christianity”. There is only the historical individual known as Jesus. It’s the same person, revered by both Muslims and Christians, even if they have different concepts of him.

    “Christians and Muslims revere somebody called jesus. The christian jesus is not the muslim jesus and the muslim jesus is not the christian jesus – any claims to the contrary are ridiculous.”

    Again, there is no “Christian Jesus” or “Muslim Jesus”, and it’s ridiculous to make such claims. There is only the historical individual known as Jesus, whom both Christians and Muslims regard as having a saintly personality due to his conduct towards human beings during his earthly lifetime and his humanitarian message of compassion, mercy and justice.

    “Of course I reject the divinity of jesus, I also reject the notion of jesus as a messenger of god and I reject the notion of a god. That, however, is beside the point.”

    On the contrary, the point is the following: Despite Steve’s obsessive efforts to promote the notion of some kind of inherent hostility (and ideological opposition) between Christianity and Islam, Steve’s own rejection of “the notion of Jesus as a messenger of God” and his rejection of “the notion of a God” is much, much more hostile to Christianity’s central tenets and much, much more “insulting” to Christians.

    The reason ?

    Because Muslims still revere the historical Jesus as an extremely important prophet and a great saintly figure, who was directly inspired by the same God as the deity described in Judaism and Christianity.

    By contrast, Steve, who (for an alleged non-Christian — or so he claims) is curiously fanatical about exploiting Islam’s denial of Jesus’s divinity as ammunition against Muslims, utterly rejects the very existence of God, with the logical implication that the historical Jesus (including the “Jesus of Christianity”, to use Steve’s own ill-considered term) was actually severely delusional at best and quite possibly a fraudulent liar at worst.

    Steve, as an alleged atheist, completely rejects the theological basis of Christianity’s central tenets. All of it. With particularly damning implications for Jesus most of all.

    So again: Whose stance is inherently far more hostile to Christianity’s central tenets ? Who is the real “enemy of Christianity and Christians” ?

    Steve or Muslims ?

    ““are you saying that Jews are insulting the Christian view of Jesus?”

    “Yes.”

    And there it is. The mask always drops in the end.

  • Ilisha

    @AJ

    I believe there’s a site overhaul or redesign underway. I’m not directly involved, so not sure of the time line. We have discussed some ideas for it, and I’m really looking forward to it myself.

  • http://aayjay.wordpress.com AJ

    @Ilisha,

    Oh, thanks – I didn’t know. I don’t know about others but I found Recent Comments helpful since the default tab is the first one and you have to click on the second tab to see comments. But in any case, now the “Related Sites” and the “Blogroll” seem redundant. Perhaps have something different in one of them?

  • Ilisha

    @AJ

    The admin said it was redundant because of the other comments widget above, second tab.

  • http://aayjay.wordpress.com AJ

    How come we don’t see the “Recent Comments” widget any more?

  • http://aayjay.wordpress.com AJ

    Steve says,

    “Unfortunately religious extremism is tolerated and nurtured around the world.”

    You don’t have a religion. What then propels your hate and extremism?

  • http://aayjay.wordpress.com AJ

    Do the Jews not eat anything for 25 hours or are they permitted to drink and not eat? I mean in Ramadan, we eat a meal before sunrise and then not eat or drink anything until sunset. But those are not 25 hours – at the most perhaps 17 hours. I am wondering how do you fast for 25 hours or is something allowed?

  • DrM

    stevie blunder carped :

    “DrM, you really are very amusing.”

    Not as amusing as your latest excuse of a reply, EDL troll. Feel free to insert a distractor about how upside painted swastikas could not possibly be the work of neo-Nazis.

  • FYI

    Steve
    What Muslims believe shouldn’t worry you, even if you don’t like it, any more than you beleiving that Muslims are going to hell if they don’t accept your ‘saviour’, Jesus as someone who will save them. You believe in the Christian belief that all must come to God via Christ as God don’t you? Well that would offend Muslims and Jews and others I suppose. So why are you offended at their rejection of your divine Jesus?

    Keith

    Jewish Voice for Peace have spoken out against Islamophobia. Why should their supporting Israel mean Loon Watch shouldn’t tout them?

    As for Israel/Palestine politics, which is not the purpose of this website, JVFP support the two state solution, and I believe compensation for Palestinian refugees to the new state of Palestine. This is the official position of most Arab and Muslim states and that of the Palestinians. I’d be very surprised if Loon Watch advocates otherwise. Oh and the ‘Jewish influence’ you speak of and your ‘anti-semitism’ taunt is kinda revealing. Hmmm

  • Steve

    DrM, you really are very amusing.

  • mindy1

    @Just stopping by, have a good fast :)

  • DrM

    stevie blunder blabbed :

    “DrM, your hatred of the west and christians is well known”

    Projecting again, eh EDL troll? Your hatred of religion, reason and your failed attempts at straw man arguments are well known. Most posters are on to your game, stevie…semantic nonsense, instigating Muslims against Christians and vice versa.
    My hatred of liars and hypocrites is well known, and westerners like you aren’t exempt. What do I see in you hypocrites, stevie? I see a misanthropes devoid of any values or ethics, bloated with arrogance and self-exaltation, incompetent, unproductive, emotionally and ethically bankrupt, and incapable to perform effectively and efficiently by themselves, thriving on human capital, wealth, and resources of other people, living in an unrealistic bubble, fooled and fueled by unethically controlled mainstream media.
    Christisn hypocrisy in the West is well known(if anyone can find some real Christians who are willing to speak out and wage war on usury, they can count on this Muslim as a supporter). But don’t feel left out stevie, I have just as much love for atheist fanatics, and their destructive secular ideals. Ah, what a glorious atheistic utopia it would would were people will only persecute and murder one another over land, money, resources, power, race, ethnicity and the biggest killer in human history, the ideology of nationality.
    You would not understand however – because you will have to be honest with yourself to undertand. That is something that is beyond you.

  • Just Stopping By

    @Susanna says, “Christianity is Jewish. It’s roots are in Judaism, Jesus was Jewish. We take the whole Bible, Old and New testaments, as the Word of God, that includes the Torah. Islam is antithetical to Christianity and Judaism, not only in denial that Jesus IS the Son of God made man for salvation, but in the Abrahamic Covenant to the Jewish people that Christians, by their faith in Yahweh are grafted into that promise as well.”

    I think I get to pull a bit of rank here. As a Jew, let me say that in terms of theology, Islam is a much closer to Judaism than Christianity is. Sure there are differences between Islam and Judaism, but those don’t rise to the basic theological view of who/what God is. So, while I would call Islam different than Judaism, I don’t think it rises to the level of antithetical the way that Christianity might.

    And, unless you are planning on fasting for 26 hours starting this evening, you don’t get to dispute me on that. :-)

Advertise Here
Advertise Here