Robert Spencer

|

Pamela Geller

|

Bat Ye'or

|

Brigitte Gabriel

|

Daniel Pipes

|

Debbie Schlussel

|

Walid Shoebat

|

Joe Kaufman

|

Wafa Sultan

|

Geert Wilders

|

The Nuclear Card

President Barack Obama Eases Sanctions on Burma Even as Violent Onslaught Against Rohingya Muslims Continues

Posted on 11 October 2012 by Garibaldi

The central mosque in Sittwe was torched by anti-Rohingya rioters.

President Barack Obama’s administration has moved to further ease sanctions on the Burmese government, easing a ban on imports,

Washington’s decision to ease a ban on imports from Myanmar won praise Thursday in the emerging Southeast Asian democracy, with a government official giving credit to both the country’s reformist president and opposition leader Aung San Suu Kyi.

This comes at a time when the Rohingya Muslims, considered one of the most oppressed peoples in the world are continuing to face daily violence.

Anti-Rohingya protests have been continuous in Western Burma, with the past several weeks seeing a wave of fresh protests and violence. Most significantly there are conflicting reports about which mosque was burnt down in Sittwe on Sunday, some reports say it was the 800 year old “Sawduro Bor Masjid” that was torched and burned to the ground while other sources are reporting that it was the 150 year old main mosque known as Jame-Mosque. The West-Burma-Bangladesh region is becoming increasingly unstable, as we are also now witnessing for the first time reprisal attacks in Bangladesh against Buddhists, fostering a dangerous climate that has the potential to become an unspeakable nightmarish zone of violence,

YANGON: Hundreds of Buddhist women protested on Wednesday in western Myanmar against the presence of stateless Rohingya Muslims in the violence-hit region, an organiser said.

The demonstrators urged the Organisation of the Islamic Conference to stop its assistance to Rohingya in Rakhine state, where tensions have been running high since deadly Buddhist-Muslim clashes broke out in June.

“We protested against the OIC and also Bengalis as we don’t want them on our soil,” organiser Nyo Aye told AFP by telephone from the state capital Sittwe.

Myanmar’s estimated 800,000 Rohingya are viewed as illegal immigrants by the government and by many Burmese, who refer to them as Bengalis.

The rally came a day after hundreds of monks took to the streets of Sittwe to protest against local Muslims and the OIC’s activities.

The tensions in Rakhine have spread to neighbouring Bangladesh, where police said last week they had arrested nearly 300 people in connection with a wave of violence targeting Buddhist homes and temples. afp

The Obama administration’s easing of sanctions on the Burmese government also comes at a time in which Human Rights researchers and activists are warning about the “permanent segregation of Rohingyas,” who are being herded into “temporary” refugee camps,

Following sectarian violence in the western Myanmar state of Rakhine in June, human rights researchers are now warning that the government appears to be attempting to permanently house parts of the stateless Muslim-minority Rohingya in “temporary” refugee camps, segregating them from the rest of the population.

“There has been no acknowledgement that people have to go home eventually – the solution appears to be that the Rohingya can simply live where they have come to be,” John Sifton, with Human Rights Watch (which released a related report in August), said in Washington on Tuesday. “Segregation has become the status quo.”

Aung Aung Oo, a Burmese national who has been reporting on the Rohingya crises since June for Salem-News discusses what it will take to restore communal harmony between Rakhine Buddhists and Rohingya Muslims, a harmony that existed for centuries,

To maintain communal harmony between these two ethnic groups, the restoration of the Rohingya’s rights is essential. Without it, the very idea of a peaceful community might be a legend.

The restoration of Rohingyan rights, i.e. citizenship is a fact which US deputy assistant secretary of the Bureau of Population, Refugees, and Migration has echoed as well in a speech to the Open Society Foundation and Refugree International, essentially saying that, ‘the lack of citizenship must be addressed for any long-term solution to the distress in the Rohingya community to dissipate.’

Related Articles:

BBC: Muslims Homes Razed in Burma’s Rakhine State

-An Open Letter from the Buddhist Community on Islamophobia

-Warrior Monks: The Untold Story of Buddhist Violence (I)

-Burmese Buddhists Attack Muslim Pilgrims, Killing 9

  • http://www.loonwatch.com Garibaldi

    I think most commenters have covered why we shouldn’t be easing import sanctions on Myanmar yet.

    Now we have “military exercises” between the USA and Myanmar. Pretty disgusting if you ask me. I had a sense this was going to happen:

    http://www.aljazeera.com/news/asia-pacific/2012/10/2012101910515790866.html

    It could prompt charges that Washington is moving too quickly in seeking to rehabilitate a military accused of continued human rights violations in ethnic regions such as Kachin State where tens of thousands of people have been displaced in 16 months of fighting.

    War crimes

    Refugees fled forced labour, killings, rape and torture by the Myanmar military, reported Human Rights Watch in June.

    “Burma’s military continues to commit war crimes and crimes against humanity. It is shocking that the United States would invite them to military exercises,” said Mark Farmaner, director of advocacy group Burma Campaign UK.

    The invitation follows a visit this week by a delegation led by Michael Posner, the US State Department’s top human rights official, to Naypyitaw, the capital of Myanmar, also known as Burma.

    The US team also included Vikram Singh, the deputy assistant secretary of the US Defense Department, and other US military officials.

    The talks on the Myanmar side were led by Aung Thaw, deputy minister for defence commodore .

    Myanmar state media reported that the “two sides held talks on levels and operations of defence institutions of Myanmar and US and exchanged views on future dialogue and bilateral cooperation”.

    US officials in Bangkok and Washington declined to comment.

    The invitation is another illustration of the Obama administration’s pivot this year from Iraq and Afghanistan to focus national security resources on the Asia-Pacific region.

  • Chameleon

    @Al,

    You say, “They [Al Qaeda] claim they do what they do due to Western imperialism and oppression, when it is they who do the oppressing. The difference between Al-Qaeda and the “Kafir” nations is that AQ act in the name of Allaah and the cause of Islaam; their actions are rooted in the quasi-Islamic interpretations of salafi scholars.”

    You just contradicted yourself, and yet you don’t realize it. Yes, Al Qaeda do what they do because of their perception of imperialism and oppression by the West (primarily the U.S.). But Islam is just a propaganda tool following upon this motivation. It is not the primary motivation itself. Even OBL admitted that he would have still launched the same attack on the U.S. if Islam never came to Arabia and he were still a pagan Arab! His entire “declaration of war on America” was worded based on the universally ethical principle of self-defense against oppression and persecution, with a particular emphasis on fighting against occupation of Muslim lands. His primary motives were overwhelmingly political, not religious.

  • http://aayjay.wordpress.com AJ

    @AI,

    Let’s just say if I am who you think I am, I would be sitting in my hometown of Charsadda, building mosques in my village and telling people how my “aunt” from abroad sends me money for investment. These poor people in the villages don’t even know what hit them. I am sure, they are the same types of civilians that get killed by drones because you know the “aunt” needs to keep sending money in so that these mosque builders can keep on impressing people with their wealth and can keep on buying their trust.

    Let’s just say that these elders of the villages have started to look for other jobs since the aunt may stop sending money in as Obama withdraws the troops in 2014. You, my friend, need to facilitate that.

    The sad part and the unknown truth is that these so called Muslim “elders’ have more blood on their hands than Obama may ever have.

    And no, I have never studied Al-Awlaki and I will never, insh’Allah, study Awlaki. He is not a terrorist but a (womanizing prostitute patronizing) paid stooge of the USA that was never a Muslim. Thanks God, Obama ended his saga.

  • Wanderer

    Poor Lord Pork is looking for attention but everyone is ignoring him because the adults are busy having a real debate. I believe he was asked to produce evidence?

  • Al

    @ AJ

    I’m sorry it took so long to get back to you, I was at my monday night Naqushbandi/Qadiri group Dhikr with my 90 year old Sheikh whom I affectionately call either “Uncle” or “Great Grandfather”. We chanted the shahada any did other goofy Sufi things to purify our hearts in remembrance of Allaah. ;P

    Not that you know what “type of mindset” I have, I can assure you that as I have for the past 20 years or so, I’ll continue to vote third party as the Republocrat plutocracy remains the same no matter who you vote for. Erosion of civil liberties and endless war for another four years!

    If there was a Muslim candidate, I’d vote for them. Barry Sotero sure lied about his campaign promises (and possibly his land of birth!) but he’s sure not a Muslim, so he doesn’t garner my support, that and drone-strikes with immense collateral damage of the human kind.

    Al-Qaeda considers themselves to be on the right path, and that’s what makes them dangerous. They claim they do what they do due to Western imperialism and oppression, when it is they who do the oppressing. The difference between Al-Qaeda and the “Kafir” nations is that AQ act in the name of Allaah and the cause of Islaam; their actions are rooted in the quasi-Islamic interpretations of salafi scholars.

    Br. Anwar was tortured at the bequest of the USA. That’s what radicalized him. I’m sure you have listened to his lectures or even owned some of his CDs at some point in time, he was even a frequent guest at the white house in his hayday.

    Br. Anjem “Andy” led a troubled life before his “awakening”; I wouldn’t venture so far as to say he’s not a Muslim (only salafis do that)but I will say he is a paid agitator, aimed at denigrating the Muslimeen in the eyes of westerners.

    You still haven’t addressed any of my evidence against obummer or the salafiun, so I gather those both are subjects you hold dear to your heart, I won’t ask you anymore; some people like to view the world through their rose colored glasses, I accept that you may be one of those people.

    At the Masjid tonight, as we ate briyani with our hands and drank chai out of styrofoam cups, the conversation shifted towards the differences of knowing Allaah with one’s intellect vs. knowing Him with one’s heart; intellectualizing offers a detached methodology of dealing with Islaam -but, don’t get me wrong, Islaam is indeed intellectual- while striving to know Allaah with one’s heart forms a connection between The Creator and the created…

  • http://aayjay.wordpress.com AJ

    @AI, If you really want to know what I think of people like Al-Awlaki and Chaudary etc. that perhaps you call “Salafis’ – I call them prostitute lovers/traffickers and porn lovers/beer drinkers but it’s considered not a popular viewpoint. The official viewpoint is that “they are radical Muslims striving in the name of Allah” ;)

  • http://aayjay.wordpress.com AJ

    @AI,

    I am curious who the people with your mindset voting for? I sure hope not Mitt Romney.

  • http://aayjay.wordpress.com AJ

    @AI,

    Al-Qaeda gets big time money for killing people. They are far, far away from Islam.

  • Al

    No AJ,

    The sad part is that instead of attempting to refute my claims, you deflect, hoping that no one will notice.

    Al-Qaida believes they are striving for the sake of Allah, do you deny this?

  • http://aayjay.wordpress.com AJ

    @AI,

    The worst part of your comment is that you have fallen for the Islamophobic mantra – that these terrorists commit terrorism for the sake of Islam.

  • Al

    AJ-

    you sound like an apologist! An apologist for taghoots and war-mongerers!
    But that’s part of the salafi creed, isn’t it? to patiently accept tyrannical rulers because that’s Allaah’s will, right?
    Mohammed Ibn Abdul-Wahhab saved Islaam from grave worship and other shirk in the peninsula, yet his students perverted his teachings and aligned with a Bedouin war lord who brought nothing to the downtrodden of Saudia, but plenty to his immediate circle. Fast forward to 2012 and the impoverished of Arabia are still marginalized and fed a state engineered version of Islaam to keep them calm and complacent. They patiently bear the burden of the “Kingdom” whose alliance isn’t to Islaam and the Muslims, but to the petrodollars and military support of the UnitedSnakes and IsraHell.

    Af/Pak and Somalia do indeed have groups within vying for power, and have been for quite some time, yet the influx of Wahabbis have shifted the battles from being for independence of colonialism and like minded entities, to offensive Jihad, of which -in case I’ve been misinformed- is forbidden Islamically!

    The CIA has a track record of working with the KSA and the ISI to radicalize the marginalized members of Af/Pak to wage jihad against the commies. The subsequent blowback of the arms, money, and wahabbis pooled into this region has been a militarized and well armed, semi-litterate, khwaraj class of mercenaries, causing turmoil in S/E Asia, the Horn of Africa, al-Maghrib, the South Philippine islands, etc.

    I’m all for predestination of marginalized people but when figures such as UBL and al-Zawaheri invoke salafi “scholars” to justify the targeting of civilians, one has to pause and wonder… Is this justification in the minds of the individuals, or does it stem from the scholars they adhere to?
    The second question one must ask is who funds these radicals and gives credence to their perverse understanding of the Qur’an?
    A: the same forces who sit upon gilded thrones of corruption, in seats of power resting on the backs of the downtrodden, sending militaries composed of plebiscite “true believers” to their demise in the name of defense budgets and airplane contracts; war is a business, and business is booming! People get rich off of armed conflict and nation building; the real war is not between the Muslims and the Kufaar or any other variant of that paradigm, but between the power-elite and the masses, Re: the “Arab Spring” which threw off the yolk of autocratic dictatorships propped up by the evil triumvirate of Israel, USA, and KSA.

    KSA especially is s**ting bricks because of this realization of freedom, and that is why they were so quick to send forces to Bahrain to martyr the revolutionaries as to avoid the same thing in their own country (and it will happen soon enough! Which side will you be on?).

    That said, I don’t hate or even dislike salafis, I just wish they would read things other than Bukhari and Muslim. KSA doesn’t have a monopoly on Islam, and roughly 1% of the worlds Muslims reside there, that makes well over a billion and a quarter of Muslims elsewhere in the world.
    Salafis like to quote the Hadith of the “73 sects and only one will get into Jennah” feeling that they are the rightly guided ones.
    Are they so certain though?
    Another Hadith says the almost same thing but it is only one sect that will go to the fire! The fact that Allaah judges us individually sort of negates both those Hadith; such is the problem of relying on Hadith the way salafis tend to.
    Salafis also are the ones who call for all the bogus stuff Islamophobes tout as true for all muslims, thus it is salafi reasoning that demonizes all muslims in the eyes of the average Joe American, RE: Anjum Choudary

    Barrack Obama and any other neo-con president since reagan is part of the greater problem, not any solution

  • http://aayjay.wordpress.com AJ

    @H. Torrance Griffin

    Agree on the “positive reenforcement to the Burmese” and the “quid-pro-quo over citizenship/civil protections for the Rohingya”. Absolutely!

    @AI

    I just noticed the “Khwaraj Salafi “reference. Ahhh….another Salafi hater! And then we wonder why Islamophobes are biased against Muslims when we are biased against ourselves as well.

  • http://aayjay.wordpress.com AJ

    @AI,

    You do know that place is involved in a war and there are all sorts of people with different allegiances involved in that region. You do realize that there is terrorism there. You do know that most of the targets chosen for drone attacks are chosen on the reports of CIA informants who are no one else but your brothers in Islam who get paid a lot of money for doing that. You do know that Obama wants to sack these stooges and bring his troops home. Anyway, I don’t have any more explaining to do to you since you do live in a world of black and white with a lot of misinformation and paranoia. I refuted quite a few of your links. Believe what you like to believe.

  • Al

    More benevolence and social justice from the Barry Sotero administration:
    http://www.presstv.ir/detail/2012/10/14/266646/us-drone-attack-kills-4-in-somalia/
    Quote: “The United States claims the CIA-run strikes are aimed at militants. But witness reports and figures offered by local authorities indicate the attacks have led to massive civilian deaths. ”

    Calling Muslims to vote for a man whose modus operandi is “shoot first, ask questions later” is sheer hypocrisy.
    Voting for a man who statistically http://www.aaj.tv/2012/09/drone-strikes-achieve-2-targets-terrorise-civilians-report/ values one Khwaraj Salafi over 49 Muslim civilians is a perverse to say the least.

    Muslims who value the word of Allaah and value humanity do not support murder, be it individual or state sanctioned. It is the Muslim who stands up to oppression on behalf of the oppressed everywhere. Oppression isn’t nuanced nor can we pick and choose who we support while turning a blind eye to another’s plight-

  • H. Torrance Griffin

    Sounds like a matter of tossing positive reenforcement to the Burmese junta over _any_ improvement (and yes quasi-honest elections count as such). But I think a bit of quid-pro-quo over citizenship/civil protections for the Rohingya is badly needed.

  • http://Aayjay.wordpress.com AJ

    @eslaporte, I didn’t mention government of Iran anywhere. When I mentioned NGOs in my original comment, I knew what NGO means- it’s not the govt. of Iran.

  • http://www.yellow-stars.com eslaporte

    AJ – “According to this release from the Treasury department, any NGO that had a 501(c)(3) status could have transferred up to $300,000 to Iran within the 45 day period. Food and medicine do not require a license anyway. This is cash that we are talking about.”

    First of all, “any NGO that had a 501(c)(3) status could have transferred up to $300,000 to Iran” – does not mean the government of Iran. Saying just “to Iran” does not tell us anything…it could be cash to do such things as pay rent for facilities or pay staff.

  • http://aayjay.wordpress.com AJ

    @Averroes’ Ghost,

    I could pose a similar question to you. If Obama can lift sanctions against many other countries without the involvement of an anti-Muslim sentiment why must we need to assume that if the country is Burma then Obama must be an Islamophobe? Is it your “prejudice” against Obama that you must make this deduction?

    @Eslaporte,

    According to this release from the Treasury department, any NGO that had a 501(c)(3) status could have transferred up to $300,000 to Iran within the 45 day period. Food and medicine do not require a license anyway. This is cash that we are talking about.

    http://www.treasury.gov/press-center/press-releases/Pages/tg1689.aspx

    PS @AG. I do LOVE Obama! Go Obama for the President of USA, 2012!

  • Averroes’ Ghost

    AJ.. your undying love of Obama is so clear you cant see the prejudice of what you say.

    somehow you think a list of other moves by OBama prove that he is right on this subject matter, that is a fallacy. he (could), be right about all those things but still be wrong about this, no?

    He should not lift imports to the states while this tragedy is occurring. How shameful.

  • http://www.yellow-stars.com eslaporte

    @AJ

    An NGO is a Non-Governmental Organization.
    So, what NGOs in Iran are you talking about?
    It is a GOOD thing to lift sanctions against NGOs who are providing earthquake relief. This is a decent and humanitarian thing to do!
    http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-19339067

  • http://www.yellow-stars.com eslaporte

    Growing economic problems in the former Yugoslavia is also part of the blame for the conflicts there in the 1990s. When people began to feel the effects of economic problems – they start to see the “Other” as “getting more than us.”

    The situation of the Rohingya Muslims shows us that human rights are a political football to be kicked around – and that Western nations are not really serious about human right for all humans.

    The United States uses human rights as both a political football and a whipping post against its rivals and enemies. European nations often follow (shamefully) the US lead in human rights hypocrisy. Also let me point out that the US also violates the rights of its own American people in the domestic sphere – and American “constitutional rights” are, in my view, at a lower standard than accepted legal standards for human rights in the international community among international institutions.

    This is US, which many of us know to be hypocritical on human rights at home an aboard. What is troublesome is that in early August, when there were even pictures of massacred Rohingya Muslims – the Netherlands foreign ministry (Uri Rosenthal) announced that the Dutch wanted to increase cooperation with Myanmar. What is very sad about this is that the Dutch used to lead the international community in activism for human rights. That has now changed to just following the US in human rights hypocrisy.

    Another sad change is that Dutch activism in the area of human rights is now limited to “activism for religious minorities living in predominantly Muslim countries.”

    ***Note: some of this “new Dutch human rights activism” now follows “Clash of civilizations” – of “clash” ideology – where “conflicts” along so-called “civilizational faultlines occur” (or are often provoked by Western politicians like Uri Rosenthal) and where especially Christians living in “Muslim” countries are “civilzational kin” who “must have their advocates.”

    If this sounds absurd – it is absurd – and “political leaders” like Uri Rosenthal have absurd ideas about human rights and religious freedom based of the equally absurd “clash of civilizations” ideology.

  • Lord Pork

    @AL:I was underthe Impression that as a MUSLIM you would know all that but here is the link.Please search under ‘Revealing the Truth’.After reading that,come back to me for more Information.

Advertise Here
Advertise Here