Robert Spencer

|

Pamela Geller

|

Bat Ye'or

|

Brigitte Gabriel

|

Daniel Pipes

|

Debbie Schlussel

|

Walid Shoebat

|

Joe Kaufman

|

Wafa Sultan

|

Geert Wilders

|

The Nuclear Card

Right-Wingers Would Be Shocked to Learn That Islam Has Been Part of American History Since Its Founding

Posted on 10 October 2012 by Garibaldi

Omar Ibn Said

The early presence of Muslims in the Americas is a favorite subject of mine that I constantly return to study, and Lynn Parramore’s contribution in this article is a great addition to the topic– on top of coming at very important time.

I believe that not only will right-wingers be shocked (their heads might explode) but many left-wingers and Muslims will also be surprised to learn about how Islam has been a part of American history for quite some time. (h/t:Critical Dragon)

Right-Wingers Would Be Shocked to Learn That Islam Has Been Part of American History Since Its Founding

Recently, just as turmoil in the Middle East erupted, New York straphangers were treated to hateful anti-Muslim billboards, courtesy of Pamela Geller, leader of “Stop Islamization of America.” The ads, which declared that radical Muslims are “savages” waging war on the civilized world, created a furor and resulted in widespread defacements (for a roundup, check out the Awl), the arrest of a journalist , and possible changes to the rules governing subway and bus advertisements that might incite violence.

Islamophobia is back with a vengeance. Geller, a self-appointed hate czar, catapulted herself to racist celebrity back in 2010 with shrill denouncements of an Islamic community center in Lower Manhattan near the site of the World Trade Center. Since then, her repeat warnings of Islam’s foreign threat to America have resonated powerfully in a post-9/11 world where violent protests in the Middle East over a crude anti-Muslim film have triggered a fresh wave of anxiety.

It would undoubtedly shock Geller and her Islamophobic buddies to know that Muslims have been in America for so long they could almost have formed a welcoming committee to the Daughters of the Revolution.

Consider this: Anthony “The Turk” Janszoon van Salee , son of the president of the Republic of Salé in Morocco, was among the earliest and richest settlers of Manhattan island, a devout Muslim, and the ancestor of Cornelius Vanderbilt, the Whitneys, Humphrey Bogart, and, according to family lore, Jacqueline Bouvier. That’s right: the Lady of Camelot apparently had a mixed-race Muslim as an ancestor! One of van Salee’s first properties was a farm in lower Manhattan acquired in 1638 located on the north side of the stockade along present-day Wall Street, just blocks from the Park Place Islamic center characterized by Geller as a foreign presence on sacred American soil. A defender of minorities, van Salee became the first settler of Brooklyn. Coney Island, which abutted his property, was known as “Turk’s Island” until the 19th century.

Muslims are feeling unwelcome in America today, but followers of Muhammed were living here before the arrival of English in Spanish-controlled Florida and French Louisiana, where slaves were imported from the Senegambia region of Africa, home to a large Muslim population.

Influenced by the tolerance of the Enlightenment, America’s founders considered Islam’s place in the new republic despite widespread fear of Barbary pirates and a sense of European rivalry with the Ottoman Empire. As befitting a student of law in a religiously diverse land, Thomas Jefferson purchased a Quran to learn about the Islamic legal code – the same Quran that was used in the swearing inof Muslim Keith Ellison to the U.S. Congress. In 1776, John Adams published “Thoughts on Government,” which praised the prophet Muhammad as a “sober inquirer after truth.” Ben Franklin set up a non-sectarian meeting house in Philadelphia, declaring in his autobiography that “even if the Mufti of Constantinople were to send a missionary to preach Mohammedanism to us, he would find a pulpit at his service.”

Tea Partiers occasionally know and distort these facts, but they are completely ignorant about another side of American Islam. Until recently, the study of the African transmission of Islam to America has been neglected, partly because materials are scarce, and partly because early observers were often ignorant of Islam or had reasons for downplaying the fact that God-fearing, literate people among the enslaved had to be written off as heathen and backwards in order to justify the institution.

And yet the numbers of enslaved Africans who were Muslims was significant: Conservative estimates put the number at 10 percent of all slaves, with some estimates running as high as 30 percent. A hodgepodge of sources –from plantation records to runaway slave advertisements to WPA interviews – show that Muslims went to great lengths to observe their religion; that Islam was a marker of status in the larger African American society; and that African American culture reflects the influence of early Muslims. On Sapelo Island, Georgia, for example, the congregation of the First African Baptist Church always prays to the east, the direction in which the church is pointed, and bodies are buried pointing to the east. The Nation of Islam may have been the 20th-century manifestation of a very ancient connection to a religion that had lived on in the South for centuries among African Amerians even though it was overtaken by Christianity. Historian Michael Gomez points out that Elijah Muhammad, born in 1898 in Georgia, grew up at a time when Islam may still have been practiced by African-born Muslims, and the children and grandchildren of early Muslims were likely aware of their Islamic heritage.

On plantations throughout the South, particularly in the early period of slavery, it would have been possible to see enslaved Africans with names like Mustapha and Fatima kneeling on prayer mats, their faces turned toward the rising sun. (Writing of “Arabic-Africans” along the coast of Georgia, Joel Chandler Harris called them “not the most numerous, but the most noticeable” type.) Some planters particularly sought slaves from Senegambia for their knowledge of rice cultivation, and some Southern slave owners considered Muslims superior to non-Muslims as workers, though others considered their education and literacy to be dangerous.

A few enslaved Muslims achieved notoriety, such as Bilali, a “driver” who managed a large plantation on Sapelo Island, Georgia and who, when called upon by his owner to defend the island against the British in 1813, gave a reply that revealed his status and religious pride: “I will answer for every Negro of the true faith, but not for the Christian dogs you own.” (Bilali went on to defend the plantation with a force of 80 armed slaves.) In Fayetteville, North Carolina, a jailed runaway slave from Charleston, South Carolina, astonished locals with his princely bearing and the beautiful signs he made on the wall, writing from right to left. Omar ibn Said, a Muslim scholar, was bought by the brother of the governor of the state, who was intrigued by this highly literate man who eventually wrote his autobiography in Arabic, the only slave to do so in captivity. His Arabic Bible, procured with the help of Francis Scott Key, can be seen today in the library of Davidson College.

Polls show that Americans remain unfamiliar with Islam, and according to the ACLU, anti-mosque activity has bubbled up in more than half of U.S. states in the last five years. Yet Islam is inextricably woven into the fabric of American history, from the distinctive service of Muslims in all American wars, including the Revolution, to the legacy of their descendents, which include notable figures. (Abolitionist Frederick Douglass changed his name from Frederick Bailey, and it is possible that the name “Bailey” is a form of the Arabic common name “Bilali.”)

Muslims wish to be seen as Americans, and a look at America’s Islamic roots proves that they have every right to be – even more, perhaps, than those who rail against them. It’s time to clarify the confusion about the role of Islam in early America and remind ourselves that far from being a foreign presence, Muslims have exerted an influence on American culture even greater than their numbers would suggest from the very beginning. The real foreign presence is Islamophobia, which is completley at odds with America’s founding principles.

For further information on America’s Islamic roots, see Allan D. Austin’s African Muslims in Antebellum America. Helpful articles include Michael Gomez’s “Muslims in Early America” published in the Journal of Southern History and Thomas Custis Parramore’s “Muslim Slave Aristocrats in North Carolina” published in the North Carolina Historical Review. I was aware of this history as a child because the last historian mentioned is my late father.

  • Sir David ( Illuminati membership number 5:32)

    Lamashtar
    Assuming that they can get planning permission for their mosque ;-)

    Sir David
    Angers
    France

  • Pingback: Right-Wingers Would Be Shocked to Learn That Islam Has Been Part of American History Since Its Founding | Spencer Watch

  • Lamashtar

    @Daniel

    Since when does France NOT say it is tolerant and nonracist? France has lots of Muslims who practice their religion all the time.

  • Michael Elwood

    @Daniel Ibn Zayd

    “I never said that it was ‘better’ elsewhere, but this becomes a strange argument to make, as if the status quo is something that just ‘is’, and we have no agency concerning it.”

    It’s not a strange argument to make. Think about it, what else can America be compared to if not other countries? Isn’t that the common sense comparison?

    “I happen to live in one of the most intolerant places on the planet, but I also see very clearly the economic and political incentives that drive this intolerance.

    “At the same time, there is also no giant statue in a harbor here promising this; there is no mythology here that makes it seem as if this is the norm when it is a lie. If there’s anything worse than intolerance, it is the hypocrisy of tolerance, as found in the U.S. I much preferred living in overtly racist France than deal with the glass ceilings of the U.S. Those who attempt to uphold this mythology become simply useful idiots for a dominant mode in decline.”

    Every country has a founding myth, including Lebanon. And though you may not buy the hype that your country is a pluralistic wonderland, others do:

    http://community.seattletimes.nwsource.com/archive/?date=20040822&slug=lebanon22

    American Muslims are aware of the disconnect between American ideals and American reality. And they have often criticized it:

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S77zUWqawag

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OO18F4aKGzQ

    But many American Muslims are also aware that the situation is often worse in other parts of the world.

    “In any case, before there were Christians, Jews, or Muslims in the New World there were entire nations of people there.”

    I know. I pointed that out to someone who referred to Europeans as Native Americans:

    “I hate to break it to you, Einstein, but Native Americans existed before 1776. The people you’re alluding to were the ‘foreigners’.”

    http://www.loonwatch.com/2012/01/illinois-joshua-scaggs-stabs-man-to-save-this-country/comment-page-1/#comment-127151

    I also pointed out that there are many American Muslims of Native ancestry:

    “Well, there are a lot of American Muslims of native ancestry today. Crow, who posts here at LW, is of native ancestry (if I’m not mistaken). Robert D. Crane, who served the Nixon administration, is part Cherokee. Jermaine Jackson has Cherokee ancestry on his mother’s side. And Harry Foster Dean was Pequot on his mother’s side. However, because they don’t fit the stereotypical image of ‘Indians’ (feather headdress, face paint and all), they aren’t widely recognized as being of native descent. And because they don’t fit the stereotypical image of Muslims (beard, turban and all) they’re not widely recognized as Muslims.

    “Historically, there was contact between Native Americans and Muslims. The Muslim, Estevanico, who accompanied Narvaez on his “expedition”, lived among the Native Americans in the mid 1500s. In 1540, Hernando de Soto kidnapped the Lady of Cofitachequi, a prominent Cherokee leader. But she escaped along with an African slave whom she married. I don’t know if that slave was a Muslim like Estevanico, but there was a lot of opportunities for Muslims and Native Americans to interact.

    “The pre-European contact between Native Americans is more difficult to ascertain. There was an account by a Syrian writer that the kings of Mali sent naval expeditions to explore the West. But they didn’t come back, and no one knows what happened to them.

    “According to Cherokee history, before they made contact with the Europeans, they were divided between monotheists (who worshiped the one God, called Yehowa in the Cherokee language) and polytheist (who worshipped a lot of things). According to this history, they were sent prophets like Aquahami and Wasi to teach them how to worship the one God.”

    http://www.loonwatch.com/2011/12/hate-blogger-robert-spencer-attacks-interfaith-leaders-imam-mohamed-magid-and-cardinal-theodore-mccarrick/#comment-126850

    And if you search the document for the Cherokee land lottery in the early 1800s, you’ll find a Muslim named Abdallah Swanson in it (use your computer’s search function and type in 286 Abdallah Swanson, 295th, Jasper.*).

    http://archive.org/stream/cherokeelandlott00smit/cherokeelandlott00smit_djvu.txt

    “To prefer to be a rich non-Muslim Westerner in the Gulf is a pretty disgusting thing to say, and only proves my point.”

    Isn’t it more disgusting that that is the reality in many Gulf countries?

    “The landed gentry that make up the so-called ‘Founding Fathers’ are loathsome all of them.”

    I disagree.

    “I’d much rather be a poor farmer who took part in Shays’ Rebellion, personally. At least I would not be a hypocrite, and I’d have my dignity.”

    I learned a long time ago that no one has a monopoly on hypocrisy. You can find it in all groups.

  • http://danielibnzayd.wordpress.com/ Daniel Ibn Zayd

    I never said that it was “better” elsewhere, but this becomes a strange argument to make, as if the status quo is something that just “is”, and we have no agency concerning it.

    I happen to live in one of the most intolerant places on the planet, but I also see very clearly the economic and political incentives that drive this intolerance.

    At the same time, there is also no giant statue in a harbor here promising this; there is no mythology here that makes it seem as if this is the norm when it is a lie. If there’s anything worse than intolerance, it is the hypocrisy of tolerance, as found in the U.S. I much preferred living in overtly racist France than deal with the glass ceilings of the U.S.

    Those who attempt to uphold this mythology become simply useful idiots for a dominant mode in decline. In any case, before there were Christians, Jews, or Muslims in the New World there were entire nations of people there.

    To prefer to be a rich non-Muslim Westerner in the Gulf is a pretty disgusting thing to say, and only proves my point. It completely ignores that the economic model we live under is imposed, and not a “fact of life”.

    The landed gentry that make up the so-called “Founding Fathers” are loathsome all of them. I’d much rather be a poor farmer who took part in Shays’ Rebellion, personally. At least I would not be a hypocrite, and I’d have my dignity.

  • Michael Elwood

    @Daniel Ibn Zayd

    “I hate to rain on the parade, but nothing in this article points to any kind of moral breakthrough regarding the United States, and it does not change facts on the ground for those who are currently being targeted for being Muslim in the country.”

    I don’t think that’s what the article was saying. It was simply pointing out that Muslims have been in America as long as their Christian and Jewish counterparts. This runs contrary to the Islamophobic narrative that Islam and Muslims are something strange and new. For example, Sam Bacile’s friend Morris Sadek wrote an article asking where are the Muslims in American history:

    http://www.bikyamasr.com/9870/morris-sadek-to-obama-where-are-the-muslims-in-american-history/

    And John Sununu once said that Obama needed to learn how to be an American:

    http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/07/17/john-sununu-obama_n_1679803.html

    The irony, as I pointed out in my previous post, is that these people aren’t American according to their own definition. Sadek was born in Egypt. And Sununu was born in Cuba (of Palestinian descent).

    “That wealth managed to outweigh religious markers is nothing new, and climbing the class ladder in the U.S. is just such an exercise: an attempt to remove oneself from the fray that is intolerance in the country; a ‘buying out’ from discrimination.”

    Isn’t that true in all countries, including the “Islamic” ones? I’d rather be a rich non-Muslim Westerner in the Gulf than a poor Muslim Indonesian.

    “This idea that there is such a thing as a ‘legal right’ to ‘be’ American in categorically denied by the Patriot Act, the deportation of immigrants and now adoptees, the questioning that is allowed in various States concerning one’s legal status in the country, and the renewed efforts of border patrol to question citizenship of those entering the country.”

    I agree. There is no right to be an American. North African countries treat illegal aliens from the south like crap, but illegal aliens from North Africa expect to be afforded rights reserved for legal residents of Europe and America.

    “That Thomas Jefferson had a Qur’an proves nothing; given the context of the times, including religious intolerance in the colonies, and the federal injunction that in fact protects this intolerance, as well as the Barbary Coast wars, it would just as much seem to be the precursor to trying to understand ‘The Arab Mind’.”

    I agree. Thomas Jefferson is my least favorite “Founding Father” (I prefer his nemesis Alexander Hamilton, or Benjamin Franklin). And his having a Quran doesn’t prove he had an enlightened view of Islam or Muslims. However, there were other founding fathers who did have an enlightened view of Islam and Muslims. For example, Benjamin Franklin wrote a satire of Thomas Jefferson’s view of slavery and Islam titled “Sidi Mehemet Ibrahim on the slave trade”. He also said, “even if the Mufti of Constantinople were to send a missionary to preach Mohammedanism to us, he would find a pulpit at his service”. And, of course, the Treaty of Tripoli says:

    As the Government of the United States of America is not, in any sense, founded on the Christian religion,—as it has in itself no character of enmity against the laws, religion, or tranquility, of Mussulmen [Muslims],—and as the said States never entered into any war or act of hostility against any Mahometan [Muslim] nation, it is declared by the parties that no pretext arising from religious opinions shall ever produce an interruption of the harmony existing between the two countries.

    “That one rich Moroccan settled in Manhattan, or that slaves were largely Muslim is taken as ‘evidence’ of tolerance just shows how desperate people are to see tolerance within Anglo-American society when the facts show it has never existed. We do ourselves no favor when we try to placate ourselves with this kind of disinformation.”

    Anthony Jansen Van Salee wasn’t Moroccan. He was born in Cartagena Spain. His father was a Dutch convert to Islam and his mother was a Mudejar of African and probably European descent. In 1624, he lived in what later became Morocco where his father was the president of the Sale Republic. In 1629, he lived for a short while near Amsterdam before immigrating to America in 1630. Ironically, it was intolerance in the “Islamic” world that probably led him to move to Amsterdam and then to New Amsterdam. Millions of Muslims like Anthony’s parents immigrated to the “Islamic” world trying to escape intolerance in Western Europe only to find it there too. They were discriminated against because they spoke European languages and wore European clothes. And their practice of Islam was deemed unorthodox. The Muslims in Sale followed the Quran’s command to handle their affairs democratically [42:38 and 3:159]. They elected the most capable person to be their leader. But the “orthodox” insisted that leadership was the prerogative of the Quraysh. Shortly after Anthony immigrated to America, the Sale Republic was conquered by the Moroccan sultan Mulay ar-Rashid (who’s only justification for rule was that he was supposedly a descendant of Muhammad). These “Alawites” still lord it over Morocco to this day.

    And, again, I don’t think the article was arguing that Anthony was evidence of tolerance in America. But it was simply saying that Muslims have been here for as long as their Christian and Jewish counterparts.

  • Sir David ( Illuminati membership number 5:32)

    Daniel
    Tolerance means different things to many people . I am not aware of any society that has managed to be compleatly tolerant of everyone.Although I am happy to be corrected .
    I feel mankind as a whole moves forward generally with steps, back and forword like a drunken dancer. Forward being towards more tolerance of minorities .

    Sir David

  • Géji

    Daniel Ibn Zayd,

    “That Thomas Jefferson had a Qur’an proves nothing”

    Totally agree, but it seems to be the ‘venting’ point they can afford American Muslims, sad.

  • http://danielibnzayd.wordpress.com/ Daniel Ibn Zayd

    I hate to rain on the parade, but nothing in this article points to any kind of moral breakthrough regarding the United States, and it does not change facts on the ground for those who are currently being targeted for being Muslim in the country.

    That wealth managed to outweigh religious markers is nothing new, and climbing the class ladder in the U.S. is just such an exercise: an attempt to remove oneself from the fray that is intolerance in the country; a “buying out” from discrimination.

    This idea that there is such a thing as a “legal right” to “be” American in categorically denied by the Patriot Act, the deportation of immigrants and now adoptees, the questioning that is allowed in various States concerning one’s legal status in the country, and the renewed efforts of border patrol to question citizenship of those entering the country.

    That Thomas Jefferson had a Qur’an proves nothing; given the context of the times, including religious intolerance in the colonies, and the federal injunction that in fact protects this intolerance, as well as the Barbary Coast wars, it would just as much seem to be the precursor to trying to understand “The Arab Mind”.

    That one rich Moroccan settled in Manhattan, or that slaves were largely Muslim is taken as “evidence” of tolerance just shows how desperate people are to see tolerance within Anglo-American society when the facts show it has never existed. We do ourselves no favor when we try to placate ourselves with this kind of disinformation.

    “Limits of tolerance” do not equate to “freedom”. Speaking as someone who has left all of that behind, I am not fooled.

  • mjasghar

    Revisionism is a key part of popular education and often has a racial or cultural bias – quite simply the texts on which school texts are based don’t go looking for this info or purposefully ignore it
    Part of this is cos most historians get into their speciality because of a passion for it and that leads them to look for sources that reinforce their views
    It’s a fact that goes unreported that at the time of the settlement of the north of America there was a purging of Arabic texts in European universities – often lead by Protestant clergy – in order to give an illusion that there was a straight progression from the Greek roman knowledge to the renaissance with no Arabic contribution and that propaganda is still there to see in the faux Roman Greek architecture and classical education

  • http://www.wmonline.com BuddhaShrink

    Another great “Anti-Loon” post from Loonwatch. Bravo!

    Don’t expect Islamophobes to embrace knowledge. Knowledge and bigotry don’t mix very well.

  • http://Aayjay.wordpress.com AJ

    If the roots of Islam in America were not to run deep, Muslims that are immigrants to this country (people like me) have been invited to come and become a part of this country with all their rights protected. The Muslims who are not immigrants already exist here and should have their rights protected. The point is that Muslims that live in America (most if not all) are legal citizens of the USA just like Geller is and she and her team have no right to harm them or take away their legal rights that USA has promised them and given them. If I am unwelcome to the USA, please do inform me. Don’t take me in, don’t hire Muslims from abroad on H1 visas, don’t run green card lottery schemes and don’t start trampling on their rights.

  • Michael Elwood

    I find it interesting that many Islamophobes embrace a conception of what it means to be an American that many of them can’t live up to. The forefathers of many American Muslims like Keith Ellison had been in America for centuries when the forefathers of Islamophobes like Pamela Geller were just stepping off the gangplanks on Ellis Island in the 1900s.

    I remember Keith Ellison pointing out that he traces his roots in America back to 1742. And I remember Kelly Wentworth and Melissa Robinon, who founded the American Islamic Fellowship, pointing out that their forefathers were American revolutionaries. And Lewis Arquette was a descendant of Meriwether Lewis (of Lewis and Clark fame). As the article rightly points out, the roots of American Muslims run deep.

  • Nevermore

    A good article, but I can’t believe they left out the greatest irony of Islamophobes saying that Islam ‘isn’t part of the USA’: the fact that a frieze in the Supreme Court’s building has a depiction of Muhammad on it!

    http://i76.photobucket.com/albums/j9/cfibackup/North-Wall.jpg

  • http://www.youtube.com/user/GargamelGold CriticalDragon1177

    @Garibaldi

    You’re Welcome.

  • Pingback: Right-Wingers Would Be Shocked to Learn That Islam Has Been Part of American History Since Its Founding | Islamophobia Today eNewspaper

  • Garibaldi

    Thanks for the tip Critical. I actually saw it before you sent the link, but you deserver a hat tip for sure.

  • http://www.youtube.com/user/GargamelGold CriticalDragon1177

    @Garibaldi

    I just sent this same article to loon watch via email the other day.

  • mindy1

    How very interesting-I had heard that Islam came here with slavery, but I had no idea it was the religion of such a prominant person. Good to know :D

Advertise Here
Advertise Here