Top Menu

Nazism and Narendra Modi: The ideological influence on India’s next Prime Minister

Modi_Hitler

Original guest post

by Jai Singh

Further to the previous detailed Loonwatch article about Narendra Modi and the rise of India’s neo-fascist Far-Right, some more facts have surfaced. Readers may be particularly interested in the following:

1. According to Outlook India and Forbes India, the colour photo at the top of this article was taken at a meeting of the paramilitary ultranationalist “Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh” (“RSS”) near Ahmedabad in Gujarat, India in September 2009. Narendra Modi has been an active member of the RSS for the entirety of his political career, and can be seen openly performing a modified Nazi salute alongside a number of his fellow RSS members.

The nature of that salute and the uniforms worn by the RSS members in the photo is not a coincidence. As discussed in the main part of this article further below, the RSS’s core ideology is explicitly and directly influenced by Hitler and Third Reich-era Nazism.

2. Narendra Modi is currently predicted to become 1.2 billion-population, nuclear-armed India’s next Prime Minister. He is campaigning as a member of the Bharatiya Janata Party (“BJP”), which is effectively the political wing of the RSS. In fact, a BJP spokesperson even recently described the RSS as the “ideological fountainhead” of the BJP.

3. A Caravan magazine article from 2012 comprehensively details Narendra Modi’s career trajectory, from his early membership of the RSS, to his eventual involvement with the BJP, to his current role as Chief Minister of India’s Gujarat state. The article includes extensive information on Modi’s specific political manouverings during the course of his career; it is very revealing. As the article also mentions, India’s then-Prime Minister Atal Bihari Vaypayee wanted to remove Modi as Gujarat’s Chief Minister after the anti-Muslim riots in Gujarat in 2002. Vajpayee even publicly admonished Modi for his sectarian and bigoted attitudes.

The article also mentions the following fact: In late 2001, during the tenure of the previous BJP Chief Minister of Gujarat, Modi complained to the senior BJP leadership in Delhi that the CM was “interested only in development, but not advancing the stated goals of Hindutva [Hindu Nationalism]”. This certainly adds weight to suspicions that Modi’s current newfound public emphasis on his alleged interest in “development” may actually be a Trojan Horse for a far more dangerous agenda.

4. The New York Times have recently published an informative article summarising the timeline of the Gujarat 2002 riots and the subsequent sequence of events involving Narendra Modi.

5. The BJP’s recently-released 2014 election manifesto includes a declaration that a Modi national government would reconsider India’s “no first strike” nuclear weapons policy, which was originally implemented by Atal Bihari Vajpayee during the previous BJP government. The Hindu have subsequently confirmed the following: In 1999, the RSS’s mouthpiece Organiser actually tried to convince then-Prime Minister Vajpayee to launch a nuclear attack on Pakistan. Addressing the following directly to Vajpayee, the RSS stated: “Arise, Atal Behari! Who knows if fate has destined you to be the author of the final chapter of this long story. For what have we manufactured bombs? For what have we exercised the nuclear option?“. Vajpayee obviously ignored the RSS’s belligerent statements.

The Hindu’s article also contains details on India and Pakistan’s respective nuclear arsenals, including India’s current plans to significantly increase its number of nuclear warheads. The RSS leadership have publicly backed Narendra Modi as their choice for India’s Prime Minister and simultaneously reiterated that Modi is an RSS activist, and the RSS as a whole have been heavily involved in supporting Modi’s election campaign.

6. The Economist recently published a lead article in which the magazine has formally refused to endorse Narendra Modi as a suitable Prime Minister for India. Amol Rajan, the Indian-born editor of the The Independent has also personally written an article condemning Modi. Furthermore, The Times has published an article warning that Modi will cause huge problems both domestically and internationally; the start of the article also notes Modi’s similarity to Hitler.

7. The Guardian recently published an open letter signed by very senior British lawyers, senior Indian-origin academics at Harvard and the London School of Economics, and a number of famous Indian-origin writers and artists condemning Narendra Modi and warning about the dangers he poses for India. Multiple British Indian academics have written similar letters to The Guardian.

8. The Independent recently published an open letter signed by more than 70 academics (mostly British Indians) at multiple universities in the UK, condemning Narendra Modi and warning about the dangerous ramifications of Modi achieving power in India.

9. Approximately 60 leading figures from India’s Bollywood film industry have signed an open letter warning about the dangers of voting for Narendra Modi. Hundreds of Indian civil rights groups have also mobilised at the grassroots level across India, with the aims of opposing Modi and a possible “communal [sectarian] takeover” of the country, providing a “strong and viable opposition to the forces of fascism at the national level”, and “safeguarding [Indian] democracy and the Indian Constitution”.

10. Referring to Narendra Modi’s role in the Gujarat 2002 riots, many of his apologists and supporters are claiming that he has been “given a clean chit” (ie. exonerated) by India’s Supreme Court, based on the report of the Supreme Court-appointed Special Investigation Team (“SIT”). However, this claim is completely false. Not only has the Supreme Court accused Modi of being a “modern-day Nero” at the very least, but the SIT’s report can be read in full online here. Amongst other things, the SIT report confirmed that Modi’s Gujarat state government is guilty of destroying a huge amount of incriminating evidence, including completely destroying the records of police communications and government meetings during the riots. The SIT report also confirmed multiple incidents where Modi’s conduct was divisive and prejudiced against Gujarat’s Muslim population; as Gujarat’s Chief Minister, Modi was therefore in violation of his constitutional duty to protect the life and property of every citizen of Gujarat state.

Equally damningly, the SIT report confirmed that Modi’s Gujarat state government assigned an unusual number of public prosecutors involved with the RSS and VHP to cases against people accused of perpetrating the anti-Muslim riots. There have been relatively few convictions compared to the actual number of rioters. Bear in mind that the RSS and VHP were among the main ringleaders of the violence.

Also note that the SIT report confirmed that (a) Modi claimed to have been unaware of the first massacre during the riots (at the Gulbarg Society area of Ahmedabad) for as long as 5 hours after the atrocity; Modi specifically claimed that he only heard about it during a meeting at his house that evening, (b) there were numerous communications between police officers during the course of the siege and subsequent massacre, and (c) Modi was praised for holding a series of meetings with police officers throughout the day in order to continuously monitor the violence. Readers will note the glaring contradiction in this narrative and can draw their own conclusions about the implications.

Furthermore, the Supreme Court also appointed an amicus curiae. Based on the SIT’s own findings, the senior Supreme Court lawyer and former Additional Solicitor General & Vice-President of the Supreme Court Bar Association has recommended that Modi should be put on trial and has concluded that there is indeed sufficient evidence to prosecute Modi on multiple criminal charges, including: (a) Promoting enmity on grounds of religion, (b) Making assertions prejudicial to national integration, (c) Being a public servant disobeying the law, with intent to cause injury to people, and (d) Making statements creating or promoting enmity and hatred. Full details via the Times of India and Tehelka. According to Indian law, guilty verdicts on all these charges would result in Modi being sentenced to up to 10 years in prison.

A case can of course also be made for prosecuting Modi via the International Criminal Court at The Hague and putting him on trial there.

Readers here in the West may be interested to know that multiple British citizens of Indian origin were also murdered by the rioters; a number of British Members of Parliament have correspondingly confirmed their support for prosecuting Modi and continuing to ban him from the UK “irrespective of the results of the upcoming Indian elections until he has been brought to account for his actions in fermenting racial and religious violence and bigotry”.

11. It is worth noting the following fact regarding the attack against the train carrying Hindu pilgrims in 2002, which ostensibly caused the anti-Muslim riots: The people responsible for the attack have never actually been identified. Despite the fact that there was absolutely no evidence of the identities of the perpetrators, at the time Narendra Modi promptly issued a press release declaring “This is not a mere communal event but a one-sided collective terrorist attack by one community [ie. the entire Muslim population]”.

Furthermore, in a foretaste of the depths of barbarity to come, Modi also took the following actions: Instead of treating the victims and their families with respect by handing over the bodies to the grieving relatives, like some twisted medieval king Modi decided to let the VHP publicly parade the burnt, mutilated corpses through the streets of the city of Ahmedabad. Full details via the Indian Express and Kafila.

12. Anti-Muslim riots in Gujarat rapidly ensued. The previous Loonwatch article on Narendra Modi included extensive details on a number of these massacres (readers are strongly advised to familiarise themselves with that article if they have not done so already), but it is worth summarising the following incident too: The first location attacked was the Gulbarg Housing Society, a residential area in Ahmedabad whose inhabitants were mostly upper-middle-class Muslims. One of these properties was owned by Ehsan Jafri, who also happened to be a former Member of Parliament for the Congress party; many of Jafri’s neighbours along with Muslims from nearby areas had gathered at his house too, since it was expected that Jafri’s status as a veteran MP would give them safety. A huge baying mob had gathered outside the housing society, armed with swords, petrol bombs and cycle chains. After they broke into the complex, they proceeded to slaughter 69 of the inhabitants, at least 35 of whom were burned alive. Women were also raped and then killed. Children were not spared either.

Ehsan Jafri himself made numerous phone calls asking for help, contacting Gujarat’s Director-General of Police, Ahmedabad’s Police Commissioner, Gujarat state’s Chief Secretary, and dozens of others. No assistance ever came. Ultimately, Jafri even directly phoned Modi. As confirmed by Caravan and The Telegraph, far from offering assistance, Modi responded by verbally abusing Jafri, and even taunted him by expressing surprise that Jafri was still alive. It was at this point that Jafri turned to his family members and told them that there was no hope of rescue. When the killers finally reached Jafri, they stripped him of his clothes, took him outside, beat him to the ground, and publicly paraded the 72-year-old man naked. They also repeatedly tried to force Jafri to sing Hindu prayers; when he refused, they beat him with swords and incrementally cut off his fingers, hands and legs. The dying & dismembered Ehsan Jafri was then thrown onto a burning wooden pyre and burned alive.

13. Investigative journalists conducted an interview with one of Ehsan Jafri’s killers; an English-language transcript of that interview is available here. Jafri’s horrific murder occurred in full sight of his now-75-year-old wife, who was watching from a balcony; she is still fighting for justice.

14. Referring to the Gujarat riots as a whole, The Guardian confirmed that some of the murderers actually poured chemicals on the victims in order to ensure that their flesh was completely burned off. Furthermore, The Guardian’s own correspondent in India at the time personally witnessed local policemen actively co-ordinating attacks against ordinary Muslims, accompanying the perpetrators as they torched village fields and shooting at the Muslim farmers who tried to stop them.

15. It is worth noting that Gujarat’s state police is under the jurisdiction of Amit Shah, who is Gujarat’s Home Minister and Narendra Modi’s right-hand-man. Like Modi, Shah also has an extensive history of involvement with the RSS. India’s English-language NDTV news channel recently speculated that Shah will be India’s Deputy Prime Minister in a Modi national government. Shah is currently being prosecuted on multiple charges of murder, the illegal surveillance of ordinary Indian citizens, and being the head of an extortion syndicate.

16. Estimates of the number of people killed during the anti-Muslim riots range from 1000-2000. Approximately 200,000 people were also displaced. Narendra Modi’s Gujarat state government refused to relocate the Muslim victims of the riots; Modi even disparagingly described their refugee camps as “baby-making factories”. Furthermore, in an echo of Jewish ghettos in Nazi-occupied Europe, areas of Gujarat with large Muslim populations are now increasingly becoming isolated sites of poverty and deprivation; basic state infrastructure such as water, roads and sewage systems are not being extended to them; in some cases, large garbage dumps of rotting (and potentially toxic & dangerous) waste material from multiple nearby hospitals have been placed near these populations. The New York Times has confirmed this in a detailed article about Ahmedabad’s largest Muslim ghetto, containing 400,000 people.

17. The Indian filmmaker Rakesh Sharma has created an acclaimed documentary about the Gujarat riots and their aftermath, titled Final Solution. The full 2.5 hour film is available online via Youtube here. It specifically draws accurate parallels with political developments in Nazi Germany in the early/mid-1930s. Sharma is currently involved in a high-profile argument with the Bollywood actor Anupam Kher, as the latter was a member of the censor board committee that previously banned Sharma’s film in India; it is worth noting that Kher’s wife [the actress Kirron Kher] is currently campaigning as a BJP politician and is therefore allied to Narendra Modi.

18. India’s total Muslim population is 170 million; the country’s total Christian population is approximately 30 million. It is not just Muslims who are the primary targets of “Hindu Nationalist” extremists; as documented in the main part of this article below, specifically the section discussing the RSS’s core ideology, Christians are also at risk. In fact, as discussed in the previous Loonwatch article and in much more detail in Caravan magazine, Narendra Modi is the main political patron of Swami Aseemanand, a senior RSS leader who was responsible for anti-Christian riots involving mass-murder, forced conversions to Hinduism, the destruction of dozens of churches, and the rape of nuns. Aseemanand is also on record as admitting that the RSS leadership personally authorised a series of terrorist attacks across India, deliberately targeting innocent Muslims for mass-murder.

19. Readers are strongly advised to read this excellent article in The Hindu by Dr Nissim Mannathukkaren, an Associate Professor at a Canadian university. The article eloquently summarises the core moral issues of the situation as a whole, including the spurious nature of the arguments used by Narendra Modi’s apologists; as Dr Mannathukkaren writes in the final paragraph of his article, “Fascism is in the making when economics and development are amputated from ethics and an overarching conception of human good, and violence against minorities becomes banal”.

Furthermore, Cambridge University’s Dr Priyamvada Gopal has written a very good article in The Guardian which succinctly discusses many of the facts that the previous Loonwatch article on Modi also highlighted.

20. Referring to his role in the Gujarat riots, Narendra Modi recently declared “If I am guilty, hang me in the street”. Ironically, this was indeed what eventually happened to one of Modi and the RSS’s ideological predecessors, the Italian fascist dictator Mussolini. Furthermore, Modi also recently declared in a speech that “A government that cannot protect its own people should not stay in power even for a minute”; considering what happened in Gujarat in 2002 under Modi’s own state government, readers will note the hypocrisy.

At the end of the Guardian article mentioned in #19, Dr Priyamvada Gopal proposed that Western governments should terminate relations with a Modi national government if he wins the election in India. There are of course arguments both for and against the feasibility and practicality of such measures; it is also possible that realpolitik will force Modi to moderate his stance one he is Prime Minister (due to foreign trade/diplomatic ties, or if the BJP has to form a coalition with other Indian parties). Nevertheless, Western governments, intelligence agencies and business leaders should certainly be apprised of the true ideology of a Modi regime. For the international public record, these facts will therefore be reiterated and expanded below.

******************************************************************

”HINDUTVA”/“HINDU NATIONALISM”, NAZISM, NARENDRA MODI AND THE RSS

Via The Independent:

Hindu fundamentalism, also called Hindutva, is driven by a trio of organisations in India called the Sangh Parivar – the family. The RSS is an ultra-conservative group that demands unflinching patriotism and preservation of Hindu culture; the VHP is their religious arm; the BJP is the political arm and India’s main opposition party. There are smaller offshoots too including a violent paramilitary wing called the Bajrang Dal and the hardline Shiv Sena party in Mumbai whose founder adored Hitler.

“Hindu nationalism is built on the idea that India is a Hindu majoritarian nation, with Muslims and Christians cast as the minority, ‘other’,” Rahul Verma, a journalist and researcher on the subject, says. He says Hindu nationalism in recent years has fed off the Islamophobic, post-9/11 “Muslim terrorist” narrative.

Chetan Bhatt, the director at the Centre for the Study of Human Rights at the London School of Economics, has also spent years studying this movement. “Narendra Modi has been an activist for the Hindu far-right paramilitary RSS and its affiliates for the entirety of his political life. He remains committed to the supremacist ideology of Hindutva which says that India should be an exclusive Hindu nation state in which minorities are treated as second-class citizens or worse.”

1. V.D. SAVARKAR AND “HINDUTVA”

Savarkar (1883-1966) coined the term “Hinduvta”, ie. Hindu Nationalism. Narendra Modi openly describes himself as a “Hindu Nationalist”. Savakar wrote numerous propaganda texts promoting this ideology and has been one of its most influential figures. Savarkar was an atheist, which possibly explains why Hindutva is stripped of Hinduism’s admirable pluralistic religious ideals and ethical principles.

Savarkar was also one of the leaders of the Hindu Mahasabha, a Far-Right Indian political party that multiple senior RSS founders were also heavily involved with. The party’s core ideology is essentially the same as that of the RSS.

The Hindu Mahasabha did not actively support agitations against British rule in India. Under the leadership of Mahatma Gandhi, the mainstream Indian independence movement led several nationwide campaigns of non-violent civil disobedience; the Hindu Mahasabha refused to endorse any of these campaigns and participated in the legislative councils established by the British, which were otherwise boycotted by Gandhi’s movement and most of the Indian population.

Many readers will be aware of the following fact: In 1948, a year after India’s independence, a former member of the RSS murdered Gandhi, primarily due to the latter’s desire for Hindu-Muslim unity and his opposition to anti-Muslim bigotry. (Gandhi was also staunchly opposed to Nazism and fascism). Furthermore, during the 1960s, a formal judicial investigation in India (known as the Kapur Commission) concluded that Savarkar had been part of the conspiracy to kill Gandhi; the assassins had even personally visited Savarkar shortly beforehand, who blessed them “Be successful and return”. All of the assassins were prominent members of the Hindu Mahasabha.

Savarkar is on record as repeatedly endorsing Hitler, the Nazis, and their treatment of religious minorities. Examples of Savarkar’s statements are listed below.

(a) Praises Hitler, Nazism and Fascism:

[‘Speech on India’s Foreign Policy’, Poona, 3.11.1938, quoted in “Veer Savarkar’s Whirlwind Propaganda”, A.S. Bhinde, Bombay, 1941, page 51-52] “Hitler knows better than Pandit [Jawaharlal] Nehru does what suits Germany best. The very fact that Germany or Italy has so wonderfully recovered and grown as powerful as never before at the touch of the Nazi or Fascist magical wand is enough to prove that those political ‘isms’ were the most congenial tonics their health demanded…Pandit Nehru went out of his way when he took sides in the name of all Indians against Germany and Italy. Pandit Nehru might claim to express the Congress section in India at the most. But it should be made clear to the German, Italian or Japanese public that [tens of millions] of Hindu Sanghatanists in India who neither Pandit Nehru nor Congress represents cherish no ill-will towards Germany or Italy or Japan or any other country in the world simply because they had chosen a form of Government or constitutional policy why they thought suited best and contributed most to their national solidarity and strength.”

[Savarkar, speech in 1940]: “There is no reason to suppose that Hitler must be a human monster because he passes off as a Nazi…..Nazism proved undeniably the savior of Germany under the set of circumstances Germany was placed in.”

(b) Praises expansionist Nazi Germany and multiple aspects of Nazi ideology:

After Nazi Germany’s invasion of Czechoslovakia in March 1939, Savarkar’s Hindu Mahasabha (1) explicitly adopted a pro-Nazi stance and (2) explicitly drew parallels between Hindutva and Nazism’s “Aryan” cult.

[‘Speech on India’s Foreign Policy’, Poona, 1938, quoted in “Veer Savarkar’s Whirlwind Propaganda”, A.S. Bhinde, Bombay, 1941, page 53] ”Germany was perfectly justified in uniting the Austrian and Sudeten Germans under the German flag…The fact is that when Germany was weak, they [the British] partitioned [her] piecemeal. Now that Germany is strong, why should she not strike to unite all Germans and consolidate them into a pan-German State and realise the political dream which millions of German people have cherished.”

[Via M. Casolari, Hindutva’s foreign tie-up in the 1930s: archival evidence] In 1939, Savarkar’s Hindu Mahasabha celebrated Germany’s ‘solemn revival of Aryan culture, the glorification of the Swastika, her patronage of Vedic learning, and the ardent championship of the tradition of Indo-Germanic civilisation’.

[Direct quote from the Hindu Mahasabha spokesman’s speech in 1939] “Germany’s solemn idea of the revival of the Aryan culture, the glorification of the Swastika, her patronage of Vedic learning and the ardent championship of the tradition of Indo-Germanic civilization are welcomed by the religious and sensible Hindus of India with a jubilant hope. Only a few Socialists headed by Pundit J. Nehru have created a bubble of resentment against the present government of Germany, but their activities are far from having any significance in India. The vain imprecations of Mahatma Gandhi against Germany’s indispensable vigour in matters of internal policy obtain but little regard in so far as they are uttered by a man who has always betrayed and confused the country with affected mysticism. Germany’s crusade against the enemies of Aryan culture will bring all the Aryan nations of the world to their senses and awaken the Indian Hindus for the restoration of their lost glory.”

[Via C. Jaffrelot, “The Hindu Nationalist Movement in Indian Politics”, Hurst, London, 1996, pages 51-52] The Nazi newspaper “Vokischer Beobachter” reported on Savarkar’s speeches in exchange for the promotion of Germany’s anti-semitic policies in India.

[Via M. Casolari, ‘Hindutva’s foreign tie-up in the 1930s: archival evidence’] This resulted in Savarkar receiving a copy of [Hitler’s autobiography] Mein Kampf from Germany.

(c) Duplicates Nazi concept of a “Fatherland”:

[From Savarkar’s propaganda book Hindutva or Who is a Hindu] “The Aryans who settled in India at the dawn of history already formed a nation, now embodied in the Hindus…..Hindus are bound together not only by the love they bear to a common Fatherland and by the common blood that courses through their veins and keeps our hearts throbbing and our affection warm but also by the of the common homage we pay to our great civilization, our Hindu culture.”

(d) Explicitly compares Indian Hindus and Muslims to Germans and Jews:

[Savarkar speaking at the 20th session of the Hindu Mahasabha, held in Nagpur in 1938] “If you call it an Indian Nation it is merely an English synonym for the Hindu Nation. To us Hindus, Hindustan and India mean one and the same thing. We are Indians because we are Hindus and vice versa…It is absurd to call us a community in India. The Germans are the nation in Germany and the Jews a community…..Even so the Hindus are the nation in India – in Hindustan, and the Muslim minority a community”

[Savarkar speaking at the 21st session of the Hindu Mahasabha, held in Calcutta in 1939] “Today we Hindus from Kashmir to Madras and Sindh to Assam will be a nation by ourselves – while the Indian Muslims are on the whole more inclined to identify themselves and their interests with Muslims outside India than Hindus who live next door, like Jews in Germany.”

(e) Explicitly states that Indian Muslims should be treated the way Nazis treated German Jews:

[Via V.D. Savarkar, “Hindu Rashtra Darshan”, G. Khare, Bombay, 1949, page 65] “If they [Indian Muslims] grow stronger they can play the part of Sudeten Germans alright. But if we Hindus in India grow stronger in time these Muslim friends of the League type will have to play the part of German-Jews instead. We Hindus have taught the Shakas and the Huns already to play that part pretty well. So it is no use bandying words till the test comes. The taste of the pudding is in its eating.”

(f) Explicitly advocates the “Two Nation Theory”, reiterates parallels with Germany and Jews:

[Savarkar presiding over the 19th Hindu Mahasabha in 1937] “I warn the Hindus that the Mohammedans are likely to prove dangerous to our Hindu Nation… India cannot be assumed today to be a Unitarian and homogenous nation, but on the contrary there are two nations in the main: the Hindus and the Muslims in India.”

[Savarkar, 15 August 1943, confirmed by the “Indian Annual Register” 1943 vol.2 page 10] “I have no quarrel with Mr Jinnah’s two-nation theory. We, Hindus, are a nation by ourselves and it is a historical fact that Hindus and Muslims are two nations.”

[Savarkar presiding over the 20th Hindu Mahasabha in 1938] “The original political sin, which our Hindu Congressites…committed at the beginning of the Indian National Congress movement and are persistently committing still of running after the mirage of a territorial Indian Nation and of seeking to kill as an impediment in that fruitless pursuit the lifegrowth of an organic Hindu Nation.….We Hindus are a Nation by ourselves because religious, racial, cultural and historical affinities bind us intimately into a homogenous nation.”

[Savarkar, October 1938] “A nation is formed by a majority living therein. What did the Jews do in Germany? They being in minority were driven out from Germany.”

[Savarkar, July 1939] “Nationality did not depend so much on a common geographical area as on unity of thought, religion, language and culture. For this reason the Germans and the Jews could not be regarded as a nation.”

(g) Denigrates historical Hindu warrior codes of chivalry towards women and explicitly states that Hindu men should rape Muslim women:

[From Savarkar’s propaganda book The Six Glorious Epochs of Indian History, specifically the chapter “Hindu Chivalry Towards Enemy Women”] “The Muslim women never feared retribution or punishment at the hands of any Hindu for their heinous crime. They [Hindus] had a perverted idea of woman-chivalry…..Muslim women were sure that even in the thick of battles and in the confusion wrought just after then neither the victor Hindu Chiefs, nor any of their common soldiers, nor would any civilian ever touch their hair. For ‘albeit enemies and atrocious, they were women’ ! Hence, even when they were taken prisoner in battles the Muslim women — royal ladies as also the commonest slaves — were invariably sent back safe and sound to their respective families ! Such incidents were common enough in those times. And this act was glorified by the Hindus as their chivalry towards the enemy women and the generosity of their religion !

…..The souls of…..millions of aggrieved [Hindu] women might have perhaps said, ‘Do not forget, O, Your Majesty, Chhatrapati Shivaji Maharaj [the 17th Century Maratha leader]…the unutterable atrocities and oppression and outrage and committed on us by the Sultans and Muslim noblemen and thousands of others, big and small. Let those Sultans and their peers take a fright that in the event of a Hindu victory our molestation and detestable lot shall be avenged on the Muslim women. Once they are haunted with this dreadful apprehension that Muslim women, too, stand in the same predicament in case the Hindus win, the future Muslim conquerors will never dare think of such molestation of Hindu women…..It was the suicidal Hindu idea of chivalry to women which saved the Muslim women…..Their womanhood became their shield…..But because of the then prevalent perverted religious ideas about chivalry to women, which ultimately proved highly detrimental to the Hindu community, neither Shivaji Maharaj nor Chimaji Appa could do such wrongs to the Muslim women.

(h) Continues denigrating historical Hindu chivalry towards Muslim women, explicitly states that Muslim women should be forcibly converted to Hinduism:

[From Savarkar’s propaganda book “The Six Glorious Epochs of Indian History”, specifically the chapter “Hindu Chivalry Towards Enemy Women”] “Still worse was the ridiculous idea, which the Hindus of those times entertained, that it was a sin to convert a Muslim woman to Hinduism…..Naturally, even in the midst of a Hindu community and the Hindu state they were secure against any attempt by the Hindus at abducting them or their forcible conversion to Hinduism. Exceptions however were very rare.

Under these circumstances, the Muslim feminine class was left seraphically free from any chastisement or penalty for their share of the crimes perpetrated against the Hindu woman-world…..”

(i) Denigrates Buddhism’s principle of universal brotherhood:

[From Savarkar’s propaganda book Essentials of Hindutva, specifically the chapter “Buddhism – a universal religion”] “Buddhism had made the first and yet the greatest attempt to propagate a universal religion…..As long as the whole world was red in tooth and claw and the national and racial distinction so strong as to make men brutal, so long if India had to live at all a life whether spiritual or political according to the right of her soul, she must not lose the strength born of national and racial cohesion. So the [Hindu] leaders of thought and action grew sick of repeating the [Buddhist] mumbos and jumbos of universal brotherhood…..

In the previous chapter, Savarkar had already disparagingly referred to what he called “the mealy-mouthed formulas of Ahimsa [non-violence] and universal brotherhood”.

(j) Promotes collaboration with British colonial authorities, refuses to support mainstream Indian independence movement:

Savarkar was originally involved in activities opposing the British colonial rule of India; he primarily advocated violent revolution and assassinations. After a member of Savarkar’s revolutionary group killed a British official, British authorities arrested and jailed Savarkar, sentencing him to life imprisonment in the Andaman Islands. It was during his incarceration that Savarkar wrote his “Hindutva” treatise (in the early 1920s), which unequivocally depicted Muslims as the primary enemy.

Within a year of his imprisonment, Savarkar also repeatedly contacted British authorities, appealing for clemency; for example, in a sycophantic letter dated November 1913, Savarkar wrote the following:

[Savarkar] “If the government in their manifold beneficence and mercy release me, I for one cannot be but the staunchest advocate of constitutional progress and loyalty to the English government which is the foremost condition of that progress…..Moreover, my conversion to the constitutional line would bring back all those misled young men in India and abroad who were once looking up to me as their guide…..The Mighty alone can afford to be merciful and therefore where else can the prodigal son return but to the parental doors of the government?”

From his incarceration onwards, the primary targets of Savarkar’s hostility were Indian Muslims, not the British colonial authorities who had actually imprisoned him and who were continuing to rule India. After Savarkar’s early release in 1924, he never participated again in any aspect of the Indian independence movement.

In fact, in October 1939, as a leader of the Hindu Mahasabha, Savarkar personally met the British Viceroy Lord Linlithgow and explicitly offered to collaborate with the British colonial authorities. Linlithgow spoke positively about the matter:

[Linlithgow] “The situation, [Savarkar] said, was that His Majesty’s Government must now turn to the Hindus and work with their support…..Our interests were now the same and we must work together. Even though now the most moderate of men, he had himself been in the past the adherent of a revolutionary party … But now that our interests were so closely bound together the essential thing was for Hinduism and Great Britain to be friends, and the old antagonism was no longer necessary. The Hindu Mahasabha, he went on to say, favoured an unambiguous undertaking of Dominion Status at the end of the war [as opposed to India’s full independence]”

The mainstream “Quit India” movement was launched in 1942; its leaders included Gandhi, Nehru and Sardar Patel. At the time, when Gandhi asked Indians to resign from government jobs with the British colonial authorities as part of the independence movement’s campaign of non-violent non-cooperation, Savarkar ordered his followers to continue collaborating with the British:

[Savarkar] “I issue this definite instruction to all Hindu Sanghatanists in general holding any post or position of vantage in the government services, should stick to them and continue to perform their regular duties.”

To quote this article in Frontline (part of The Hindu media group): To summarise, Savarkar started out as a revolutionary, abjectly renounced his principles in the Andamans, refused to join his fellow prisoners in their struggle there, stayed away from all anti-British activities after his release from prison, and, with his virulent anti-Muslim campaign, ended up helping the British in their policy of “divide and rule”.

And, of course, Savarkar was also one of the ringleaders of the cabal that murdered Mahatma Gandhi.

(k) Savarkar and betrayal:

In a speech directed at India’s royalty, Savarkar made the following statement:

[Via “Savarkar Commemoration Volume, page 82] “But anyone who might have actively betrayed the trust of the people, disowned his fathers, and debased his blood, by arraying himself against the Mother – he shall be crushed to dust and ashes, and shall be looked upon as a helot, a bastard, and a renegade.”

Considering the information comprehensively documented above, readers can draw their own conclusions about the extent to which Savarkar’s diatribe inadvertently applies to himself.

(l) Narendra Modi repeatedly praises Savarkar:

As of 29 May 2013, Narendra Modi’s official website has displayed an article praising Savarkar, which quotes Modi describing Savarkar as a “heroic man”, a “worshipper of weapons” and a “worshipper of sacred texts”. Along with some imaginative claims about Savarkar’s alleged contribution to India’s freedom struggle against British imperialism, the article highlights the fact that Modi “paid tributes” to Savarkar on the latter’s “130th birth anniversary on 28th May 2013” at the Gujarat Vibhan Sabha [Gujarat Legislative Assembly] at the state capital of Gandhinagar (Modi’s website has publicised photos here). The article also includes audio footage of a speech of Modi “going back almost two decades, where he talks about the phenomenon Veer Savarkar was”.

2. THE RASHTRIYA SWAYAMSEVAK SANGH (“RSS”)

Via the Delhi-based British historian William Dalrymple, writing in the New York Review of Books in 2005:

…..the RSS was founded in direct imitation of European fascist movements. Like its 1930s models, it still sponsors daily parades in khaki uniforms and requires militaristic salutes; in fact, the RSS salute differs from that of the Nazis only in the angle of the forearm, which is held horizontally over the chest. The RSS aims to create a corps of dedicated paramilitary zealots who will bring about a revival of what it sees as the lost Hindu golden age of national strength and purity. The BJP, the Hindu nationalist party which ruled India from 1999 until last May, was founded as the political wing of the RSS, and most senior BJP figures hold posts in both organizations. The BJP is certainly much more moderate than the RSS—like the Likud in Israel, the BJP is a party which embraces a wide spectrum of right-wing opinion, ranging from mildly conservative free marketeers to raving ultra-nationalists. But both organizations believe, as the centerpiece of their ideology, that India is in essence a Hindu nation and that the minorities may live in India only if they acknowledge this.

The RSS publicly claims to have approximately 5-6 million members. However, The Guardian recently reported that the RSS actually has 40 million members in India. The organisation has at least 50,000 branches across the country, with meetings held daily. The RSS also has approximately 100 affiliate organisations. Furthermore, Bloomberg recently confirmed that the RSS is running a network of 18,000 schools across India.

Although the RSS’s core ideology was initially influenced by Italian Fascism, it was subsequently heavily influenced by Hitler and Third Reich-era Nazism. Readers will be aware that there is a specific term describing such organisations & individuals.

The RSS as an organisation had precisely zero involvement in India’s struggle for independence from British colonial rule. For all their jingoistic claims of “nationalism”, “patriotism” and “opposition to foreigners”, the RSS did absolutely nothing to free India during that period.

Furthermore, “nationalism”, particularly the RSS’s definition of the concept, is of course a foreign import from 19th and 20th Century Europe; the RSS’s Nazi-inspired salutes, uniforms, ideological aspects etc are also foreign imports to India. Readers will note the hypocrisy.

Only male Hindus are allowed to join the RSS. Ever since its founding in 1925, the RSS has repeatedly carried out acts of violence against Muslims throughout India, including involvement in the rapes and massacres during the Gujarat 2002 riots. As discussed earlier, the RSS has also (1) been involved in the mass-murder, rape and forced conversions of Christians, and (2) been exposed by one of its own leaders as being responsible for multiple terrorist attacks deliberately targeting innocent Muslims across India. In 2004, the RSS was designated a terrorist organisation by the Terrorism Research Center.

There are direct implications for Western countries too. As confirmed by the Financial Times, the UK’s Channel 4 News, Outlook India, the human rights group Awaaz, and most recently by The Independent, the RSS has been using front organisations here in the West to promote its propaganda in the United States and the United Kingdom. These front organisations have also been diverting millions of dollars of donations from ordinary Hindus intended for charitable humanitarian causes (including major crises involving Muslim and Christian victims in India) and using the money to finance the RSS’s extremist activities in India instead.

Details on the RSS’s key founders, leaders, and core ideology are listed below.

B.S Moonje, RSS co-founder and mentor of the RSS’s first leader:

(a) Claims India should have a dictator like Hitler, promotes need to systematically promote this propaganda:

[Via M. Casolari, Hindutva’s foreign tie-up in the 1930s: archival evidence] “…..unless we have our own swaraj [self-rule] with a Hindu as a dictator like Shivaji of old or Mussolini or Hitler of present day Italy and Germany…But this does not mean that we have to sit with folded hands until some such dictator arises in India. We should formulate a scientific scheme and carry on propaganda for it.

(b) Personally visits Mussolini and multiple fascist institutions in Italy in 1931, claims Hindus need a similar fascist movement throughout India in the form of the RSS:

[Via M. Casolari, ‘Hindutva’s foreign tie-up in the 1930s: archival evidence’] “The Balilla institutions [which organised military training and the fascist ideological indoctrination of young Italian boys] and the conception of the whole organization have appealed to me the most…The whole organization is conceived by Mussolini for the military regeneration of Italy. Italians, by nature appear ease-loving and non-martial, like the Indians generally. They have cultivated, like Indians, the work of peace and neglected the cultivation of the art of war. Mussolini saw the essential weakness of his country and conceived the idea of the Balilla organization…The idea of fascism vividly brings out the conception of unity amongst people…India and particularly Hindu India need some such institution for the military regeneration of the Hindus…Our institution, the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh [RSS] of Nagpur, under [the RSS’s first leader and former Hindu Mahasabha member] Dr Hedgewar is of this kind, though quite independently conceived. I shall spend the rest of my life developing and extending this institution of Dr Hedgewar all throughout Maharashtra and other provinces.”

…..The Italy visit inspired Moonje to promote these ideas among Hindus in Maharashtra and begin the organization of Hindu youth movements based on this fascist model. This included a conference on Fascism and Mussolini’s political thought in 1934, presided by RSS founder K.B. Hedgewar and at which Moonje spoke.

[Moonje quoted in an interview with “The Mahratta”, 12 April 1931] “Leaders should imitate the youth movement of Germany and the Balilla and Fascist organizations of Italy. I think they are eminently suited for introduction in India, adapting them to suit the special conditions. I have been very much impressed by these movements and I have seen their activities with my own eyes in all details.”

(c) Promotes violence, fascism and perpetual war:

[Moone’s “Preface to the Scheme of the Central Hindu Military Society and its Military School”] “This training is meant for qualifying and fitting our boys for the game of killing masses of men with the ambition of winning victory with the best possible causalities (sic) of dead and wounded while causing the utmost possible to the adversary.”

[Quotes from Mussolini’s “Doctrine of Fascism” in Moone’s “Preface to the Scheme of the Central Hindu Military Society and its Military School”] “I absolutely disbelieve in perpetual peace which is detrimental and negative to the fundamental virtues of man, which only by struggle reveal themselves in the light of the sun. … War alone brings up to its highest tension all human energy and puts the stamp of nobility upon the peoples who have the courage to meet it. … Fascism believes neither in the possibility nor the utility of perpetual peace. It thus repudiates the doctrine of pacifism, which is born of renunciation of the struggle and an act of cowardice in the face of sacrifice.”

M.S. Golwalkar, the RSS’s second leader and its major ideological influence:

The core ideology of the RSS is heavily based on the writings of Golwalkar (1906-1973), specifically his book We or Our Nationhood Defined and the follow-up Bunch of Thoughts. The full text of both books is currently available online in English here and here. Golwalkar wrote the first book in 1938, when RSS founder K.B. Hedgewar appointed him RSS General Secretary. Golwalkar’s second book was published in 1966. Golwalkar never retracted any of these statements, not even after the horrors of the Holocaust.

(i) Extracts from We or Our Nationhood Defined:

(a) Promotes explicitly racial Far-Right propaganda. Claims a “Nation” is based on 5 indivisible factors: Race, Religion, Culture, Language and Geography; claims Race and Religion are the dominant factors for the RSS:

”the idea contained in the word Nation is a compound of five distinct factors fused into one indissoluble whole the famous five “Unities” – Geographical (country), Racial (Race), Religious (Religion), cultural (Culture) and linguistic (language).”

”It is superfluous to emphasis the importance of Racial Unity in the Nation idea. A Race is a hereditary Society having common customs, common language, common memories of glory or disaster; in short, it is a population with a common origin under one culture. Such a race is by far the important ingredient of a Nation. Even if there be people of a foreign origin, they must have become assimilated into the body of the mother race and inextricably fused into it. They should have become one with the original national race, not only in its economic and political life, but also in its religion, culture and language, for otherwise such foreign races may be considered, under certain circumstances, at best members of a common state for political purposes; but they can never form part and parcel of the National body. If the mother race is destroyed either by destruction of the persons composing it or by loss of the principle of its existence, its religion and culture, the nation itself comes to an end. We will not seek to prove this axiomatic truth, that the Race is the body of the Nation, and that with its fall, the Nation ceases to exist.”

“Where religion does not form a distinguishing factor, culture together with the other necessary constituents of the Nation idea become the important point in the making up of individual Nationality. On the other hand in Hindusthan [India], religion is an all-absorbing entity. Based as it is on the unshakable foundations of a sound philosophy of life (as indeed Religion ought to be), it has become eternally woven into the life of the Race, and forms, as it were, its very Soul. With us, every action in life, individual, social or political, is a command of Religion. We make war or peace, engage in arts and crafts, amass wealth and give it away, indeed we are born and we die-all in accord with religious injunctions. Naturally, therefore, we are what our great Religion has made us. Our Race-spirit is a child of our Religion and so with us. Culture is but a product of our all-comprehensive Religion, a part of its body and not distinguishable from it.”

“Ever since that evil day, when Moslems first landed in Hindusthan, right up to the present moment, the Hindu Nation has been gallantly fighting on to shake off the despoilers. . . . The Race Spirit has been awakening.”

(b) Contempt for educated Hindus:

“This ‘educated’ class of Hindus became in truth slaves of the English, as the late Dr S.V Ketkar has aptly described them. They had cut their traces, lost their footing in the National past, and become deculturized, denationalized people. But they also formed the bulk of the ‘Congress’ and found no difficulty in eagerly gulping down the extra-ordinary absurdity, that their country was not theirs, but belonged to strangers and enemies of their Race equally with them.”

(c) Opposition to inclusive, pluralistic democracy and territory-based nationality:

“The idea was spread that for the first time the people were going to live a National life, the Nation in the land naturally was composed of all those who happened to reside therein and that all these people were to unite on a common ‘National’ platform and win back ‘freedom’ by ‘Constitutional means’. Wrong notions of democracy strengthened the view and we began to class ourselves with our old invaders and foes under the outlandish name – Indian – and tried to win them over to join hands with us in our struggle. The result of this poison is too well known. We have allowed ourselves to be duped into believing our foes to be our friends and with our hands are undermining true Nationality.”

(d) Claims non-Hindus in India “deserve no privileges, not even citizen’s rights”:

“There are only two courses open to the foreign elements [non-Hindus], either to merge themselves in the national race and adopt its culture, or to live at its mercy so long as the national race may allow them to do so and to quit the country at the sweet will of the national race. That is the only sound view on the minorities problem. That is the only logical and correct solution.”

“All those not belonging to the national, i.e. Hindu race, Religion, Culture and Language, naturally fall out of the pale of real ‘National’ life. We repeat: in Hindusthan, the land of the Hindus, lives and should live the Hindu Nation – satisfying all the five essential requirements of the scientific nation concept of the modern world. Consequently only those movements are truly ‘National’ as aim at re-building, revitalizing and emancipating from its present stupor, the Hindu Nation. Those only are nationalist patriots, who, with the aspiration to glorify the Hindu race and Nation next to their heart, are prompted into activity and strive to achieve that goal. All others are either traitors and enemies to the National cause, or, to take a charitable view, idiots.

The foreign races in Hindusthan must either adopt the Hindu culture and language, must learn to respect and hold in reverence Hindu religion, must entertain no idea but those of the glorification of the Hindu race and culture, i.e., of the Hindu nation and must loose their separate existence to merge in the Hindu race, or may stay in the country, wholly subordinated to the Hindu Nation, claiming nothing, deserving no privileges, far less any preferential treatment — not even citizen’s rights. There is, at least, should be, no other course for them to adopt. We are an old nation; let us deal, as old nations ought to and do deal, with the foreign races, who have chosen to live in our country.”

(e) Glorifies Nazi Germany and the persecution of Germany’s Jews, states that India should duplicate Hitler’s treatment of minority populations:

“To keep up the purity of the Race and its culture, Germany shocked the world by her purging the country of the Semitic Races — the Jews. Race pride at its highest has been manifested here. Germany has also shown how well nigh impossible it is for Races and cultures, having differences going to the root, to be assimilated into one united whole, a good lesson for us in Hindusthan to learn and profit by.”

“To be brief, all the five constituents of the Nation Idea have been boldly vindicated in modern Germany and that too, today in the actual present, when we can for ourselves see and study them, as they manifest themselves in their relative importance.”

(ii) Extracts from Bunch of Thoughts:

(a) Misrepresents and slanders Judaism, Christianity and Islam:

“In all those Semitic religions-Judaism, Christianity and Islam-a single way of worship is prescribed for all. Those creeds have but one prophet, one scripture and one God, other than whom there is no path of salvation for the human soul. It requires no great intelligence to see the absurdity of such a proposition.”

(b) Claims Hindus are differentiated from other religious groups before birth:

“Some wise men of today tell us that no man is born as Hindu or Muslim or Christian but as a simple human being. This may be true about others. But for a Hindu, he gets the first “samskar” when he is still in the mother’s womb, and the last when his body is consigned to the flames. There are sixteen “samaskars” for the Hindu which make him what he is. In fact, we are Hindus even before we emerge from the womb of our mother. We are therefore born as Hindus. About the others, they are born to this world as simple unnamed human beings and later on, either circumcised or baptized, they become Muslims or Christians.”

(c) Claims RSS aims to reconvert Indian Muslims and Christians:

“Everybody knows that only a handful of Muslims came here as enemies and invaders. So, also, only a few foreign Christian missionaries came here. Now the Muslims and Christians have enormously grown in number…..it is our duty to call these our forlorn brothers, suffering under religious slavery for centuries, back to their ancestral home…..come back and identity themselves with their ancestral Hindu way of life in dress, customs, performing marriage ceremonies and funeral rites and such other things.”

“There are some people who claim that they have achieved unity of Hindus, Muslims, Christians and all others on the political and economic plane. But why limit the oneness only there? Why not make it more wide and more comprehensive so as to fuse them all in the Hindu way of life, in our dharma and take them back as lost brothers? To those who speak of unity on the political and economic plane, we say that we stand not only for political and economic unity but also for cultural and religious unity.”

(d) Rejects Indian nationality of all Indian non-Hindus:

“They forgot that here was already a full-fledged ancient nation of the Hindus and the various communities which were living in the country were here either as guests, the Jews and Parsis, or as invaders, the Muslims and Christians. They never faced the question how all such heterogeneous groups could be called as children of the soil merely because, by an accident, they happened to reside in a common territory under the rule of a common enemy.”

(e) Reiterates opposition to territory-based nationality and Gandhi’s principle of Hindu-Muslim unity:

“Most of the tragedies and evils that have overtaken our country during the last few decades and are even today corroding our national life are its direct outcome…..In their phantom chase of achieving new unity and new nationality, our [Congress] leaders raised the slogan of ‘Hindu-Muslim unity’…..The first thing they preached was that our nationality could not be called Hindu, that even our land could not be called by its traditional name Hindusthan, as that would have offended the Muslim. The name ‘India’ given by the British was accepted. Taking that name, the ‘new nation’ was called the ‘Indian Nation’. And the Hindu was asked to rename himself as ‘Indian’.

But here, we had leaders who were, as if, pledged to sap all manliness from their own people. However, this is not a mere accident of history. This leadership only came as a bitter climax of the despicable tribe of so many of our ancestors who during the past twelve hundred years sold their national honour and freedom to foreigners, and joined hands with the inveterate enemies of our country [read: “Muslims”] and our religion in cutting the throats of their own kith and kin to gratify their personal egoism, selfishness and rivalry. No wonder nemesis overtook such a people in the form of such a self-destructive leadership.”

(f) Further examples of bigotry towards Muslims:

“They had come here as invaders. They were conceiving themselves as conquerors and rulers here for the last twelve hundred years. That complex was still in their mind. History has recorded that their antagonism was not merely political. Had it been so, they could have been won over in a very short time. But it was so deep-rooted that whatever we believed in, the Muslim was wholly hostile to it. If we worship in the temple, he would desecrate it. If we carry on bhajans and car festivals, that would irritate him. If we worship cow, he would like to eat it. If we glorify woman as a symbol of sacred motherhood, he would like to molest her. He was tooth and nail opposed to our way of life in all aspects – religious, cultural, social, etc. He had imbibed that hostility to the very core.”

(g) Further examples of bigotry towards Christians:

“So far as the Christians are concerned, to a superficial observer they appear not only quite harmless but as the very embodiment of compassion and love for humanity! Their speeches abound in words like ‘service’ and ‘human salvation’ as though they are specially deputed by the Almighty to uplift humanity! They run schools and colleges, hospitals and orphanages. The people of our country, simple and innocent as they are, are taken in by all these things. But what is the real and ulterior motive of Christians in pouring [tens of millions] of rupees in all these activities?

…..the missionary who spoke next bluntly said, “If we had been prompted to do all this by mere humanitarian considerations, why should we have come all the way here? Why should we have spent so much money? We are here for only one reason and that is to increase number of followers of our Lord Jesus Christ.” They are very clear about it.

Towards that end they feel that any tactics, however foul, is fair. The various surreptitious and mean tactics they employ for conversion are all too well known.

….. What does all this mean? It means that all the people in this country should be converted to Christianity. That is, their hereditary religion, philosophy, culture and way of life should be demolished and they should become absorbed in a world federation of Christianity.

….. Even St. Paul, the great disciple of Christ, has said, as quoted by Lokamanya Tilak in his Gita Rahasya, “How can it be a sin if by uttering falsehood I add to Your (God’s) Glory?”

….. Such is the role of Christian gentlemen residing in our land today, out to demolish not only the religious and social fabric of our life but also to establish political domination in various pockets and if possible all over the land. Such has been, in fact, their role wherever they have stepped-all under the alluring grab of bringing peace and brotherhood to mankind under the angelic wings of Jesus Christ. Jesus had called upon his followers to give their all to the poor, the ignorant and the downtrodden. But what have his followers done in practice? Wherever they have gone, they have proved to be not ‘blood-givers’ but ‘bloodsuckers’?

….. So long as the Christians here indulge in such activities and consider themselves as agents of the international movement for the spread of Christianity, and refuse to offer their first loyalty to the land of their birth and behave as true children of the heritage and culture of their ancestors, they will remain here as hostiles.”

(iii) RSS agenda is to “hold an empire without becoming emperor”:

Extract from The RSS and the BJP: A Division of Labour, by A.G. Noorani (further information here):

Golwalkar had bared the RSS’s ambitions and technique as far back as 1949: “If the Congress completely disintegrates and anarchy rules the country and there is nobody to take over…..we may sacrifice part of our normal cultural activities and accept the responsibility.” Asked point blank “Is it a fact that the Sangh plans to capture power?”, he replied: “We have kept before ourselves the ideal of Bhagwan Shri Krishna who held a big empire under his thumb but refused to become an emperor himself”. Or, as Rajendra Singh [4th RSS leader] and Bhaurao Deoras [RSS activist and brother of the 3rd RSS leader] said in Para 38 of their Application, ‘The RSS desires to dominate the world by cultural conquest by a great process of true national regeneration’. The ideal can be fully realized if the BJP, kept under the RSS thumb, captures power as the ‘national alternative.’

Interestingly, the British had, after careful deliberation, made sound assessment of the RSS. A circular sent by the Home Department of the Government of India to the Bihar government (No. F 201/44 Ests. Dated March 16, 1944) said: “After a protracted consideration of the question in which the Governments of the C.E. and Berar and Bombay were also consulted, as the organization was strongest there, it was decided that the RSS was a politico-commercial organization which concentrated on the formation of a militant body on fascist lines….”

The word fascist was aptly chosen. As Donald E. Smith says in his classic “India as a Secular State” (1963): “The leader principle, the stress on militarism, the doctrine of racial-cultural superiority, ultra-nationalism infused with religious idealism, the use of symbols of past greatness, the emphasis on national solidarity, the exclusion of religious or ethnic minorities from the nation-concept — all of these features of the RSS are highly reminiscent of fascist movements in Europe.”

A.G. Noorani also writes:

So brutally candid is “We or Our Nationhood Defined” that a desperate attempt was made by the RSS to distance itself from it – the RSS claimed that the book was merely an English translation of the Marathi work “Rashtra Meemansa” by Babarao G.D. Savarkar, brother of V. D. Savarkar. However, in his Preface to “We or Our Nationhood Defined” dated March 22, 1939, Golwalkar described “Rashtra Meemansa” as ‘one of my chief sources of inspiration and help. An English translation of this is due to be shortly out [sic].

Rajendra Singh and Bhaurao Deoras made an authoritative statement on that book in Para 10 of their 1978 application: ‘With a view to give a scientific base to propagate the idea India being (sic) historically from time immemorial a Hindu Nation, late Shri M.S. Golwalkar had written a book entitled, “We or Our Nationhood Defined”,’ In Para 7 they ‘placed on record’ his book “Bunch of Thoughts” (1966) in order ‘to clarify and understand the true purpose, the exact nature, the ambit and scope of the RSS work… and its activities.’

The RSS appeal thus affirmed the continuing validity and relevance of Golwalkar’s writings, specifically of those two books.

3. HITLER’S VIEWS ON INDIANS

The RSS’s deliberate emulation of various aspects of Nazism is particularly ironic considering what the racist white supremacist Hitler actually thought of Indians, including the British colonial rule of India. The relevant Wikipedia page has an accurate and fully-referenced summary, which is quoted verbatim as follows:

Hitler’s views on India were disparaging. He considered the British colonial rule of the subcontinent as an exemplary one and intended the German rule in the occupied East to resemble it. Hitler thought little of the Indian independence movement, declaring the freedom fighters of being racially inferior “Asiatic jugglers”. As early as 1930 he spoke of the Indian freedom movement as the rebellion of the “lower Indian race against the superior English Nordic race”, and that the British were free to deal with any subversive Indian activists as they liked. In 1937 he told the British Foreign Secretary Lord Halifax that the British should “shoot Gandhi, and if this doesn’t suffice to reduce them to submission, shoot a dozen leading members of the Congress, and if that doesn’t suffice shoot 200, and so on, as you make it clear that you mean business.” During the same discussion Hitler reportedly told Halifax that one of his favorite films was The Lives of a Bengal Lancer, because it depicted a handful of “superior race” Britons holding sway over an entire continent.

******************************************************************

FURTHER INFORMATION

(a) As discussed above, May 2014 will be the date when RSS member & “Hindutva”/“Hindu Nationalism” proponent Narendra Modi will probably become India’s next Prime Minister. May 2014 is also the 50th anniversary of the death of Jawaharlal Nehru, who was one of Mahatma Gandhi’s closest friends & allies, a senior leader of the mainstream Indian independence movement, and independent India’s first Prime Minister. Depending on one’s perspective, the timing is either an interesting coincidence or it tragically symbolises what is about to occur.

(b) The information in this article should not be exploited by anyone to denigrate India & Indians in general, Hindus en masse or the religion of Hinduism as a whole; both as a Sikh and as an individual, I have a zero-tolerance policy towards racial & religious bigotry, regardless of the source and regardless of the target.

(c) For interested readers and for future reference, contact details for the International Criminal Court at The Hague are available here. Details on atrocities which the ICC defines as crimes against humanity are available here. It is also worth noting that the United Nations Security Council has adopted multiple resolutions during the past decade in which it has reaffirmed its responsibility to protect people from genocide, ethnic cleansing and crimes against humanity; furthermore, one of these resolutions also states that rape and other forms of sexual violence can constitute crimes against humanity or “a constitutive act with respect to genocide”.

(d) Contact details for the US Department of State are available here. The US Department of State’s Twitter address is @StateDept.

(e) Contact details for US Secretary of State John Kerry are available here. John Kerry’s Twitter address is @JohnKerry.

(f) Democratic Congressman Keith Ellison and Republican Congressman Joe Pitts have been leading American bipartisan efforts to oppose Narendra Modi. They have jointly introduced a bipartisan Congressional resolution urging the US Government to continue denying a visa to Modi on the grounds of religious freedom violations. They have also jointly introduced a bipartisan Congressional resolution on the protection of religious minorities in India, which includes calls for specific actions to be taken by the US State Department; the complete text of the resolution is available in PDF form online here.

Congressman Keith Ellison’s Twitter address is @keithellison. Congressman Joe Pitts’s Twitter address is @RepJoePitts.

(g) Contact details for the British Government’s Foreign and Commonwealth Office are available here. The FCO’s Twitter address is @foreignoffice.

(h) The Twitter address of Baroness Sayeeda Warsi, Senior Minister of State at the Foreign and Commonwealth Office and Minister for Faith and Communities, is @SayeedaWarsi.

(i) Contact details for the British Government’s Home Office are available here. The Home Office’s Twitter address is @ukhomeoffice.

(j) The Twitter address of Keith Vaz, Chairman of the British Government’s Home Affairs Select Committee, is @Keith_VazMP.

, , , , , , , , , , ,

  • Way to go in spinning my words…I used 0.1% as an example only, in response to your ‘scientific-experiment’s-anomalies’ claim. It wasn’t, as you said, based on any survey or actual statistical data, but just an instance. You bring in Ahmadiyya Muslims of Pakistan, who constitute of about 5 million faithfuls in population there and follow a very specified and defined way of religion; and deem fit to compare it with the ‘fair number of names’ (seven) which you have provided so far.
    I have nothing new to add, just that your original question (in first post) was how such names fit in with this article. I sincerely think it wasn’t the right question to ask. This article is about RSS and its influence on Narendra Modi, based on relevant news sources, data and other reports and such facts. If anyone has any problem with this article, be they Muslims, non Muslims, celebrities or not, it doesn’t really matter; they are more than welcome to counter it or point any objections. So far I haven’t seen any. Forget the handful of Muslims who defend Modi, the point is, do you deny the claims of this article? If you don’t, then you automatically reject any contrasting views, coming from any quarters or group. If however you find this article faulty, then obviously you will reject and ignore the views shared by majority of Muslims and loonwatchers here, and side with the pro Modi camp. Neutral or a unique view of your own is also possible. But your question that ‘IF this article is true, then why SOME Muslim still support Modi’ is pretty ordinary. You are not really taking any stand and willing to fire from some one else’s shoulder. That is not going to serve any purpose in the long run, the answer you are going to get is that they are the exceptions, probably opportunists, or maybe they don’t know all the facts. You can never prove either claim – for obvious reasons. I guess then, it all boils down to this – what is your opinion with regards to this article?

  • Aditya Iyer

    I am glad you find my comments poetic.Hope it brightened up your cup of tea. I re-iterate the names(I have named a fair number) and not the only name(although I understand Salim Khan’s info would be more easily available due to his Bollywood connect). Their thoughts and articles are there for everyone to see. Does this mean all follow this line of thought? Of course not nor do I claim it is the case. But to the best of my understanding these voices need to be heard and not be dismissed as being the voice of a mere 0.1% technicality (when there is no way to prove this number too!). By merely dismissing it in such a manner you loose the opportunity to reflect.Not for a minute do I think the words of these names are gospel. But saying it is only a 0.1% view and to be dis-regarded isn’t healthy. In Pakistan this mistake has already happened resulting in a constitutional amendment that denies Ahemadis as Muslim. (The only Nodel laureate from Pakistan Abdus Salam is from the Ahemadi community and not even one of my Pakistani friends have even heard of him!) As much as I agree with the fears expressed in major narrative I am re-iterating the alternate views shouldn’t be disregarded and placed as facts for what they are worth.

  • I don’t think I am, in all sincerity, being arrogant. I just don’t think that I need to focus on what some colorful celebrities of our time think or do, when I happen to be in touch with common people who actually had first hand view of the riots, and were actually present there and affected (like myself in ’92 riots). I know what there opinions are, and what they feel, who they blame and who they despise. You give me names of few people who now support Modi, and want me to research on them? No thanks. You are more than welcome to write a thesis on Mr. Salim Khan and the likes, but that would prove nothing, as long as, I again say – such people happen to be a part of an almost non-existent minority.
    I like it though, how you are focusing on the word ‘opportunist’ only, when I have clearly maintained that MAYBE they genuinely support Modi, and maybe not. I am not dismissing anyone’s opinion as being false or fraud, my point is that it is pretty normal, that such exceptional opinion you can find in any group involving Homo-sapiens.
    As for your (almost poetic) claim that in scientific experiment we should study the anomalies or abnormal item with extra care, well I daresay, in anthropology (which deals with the study of Human beings), if such anomalies form hardly 0.1% statistically, you may ignore and move forward (or just provide a footnote).

  • Aditya Iyer

    I think you are making a mistake in dismissing the names I mentioned as ‘licking boots/opportunist’ without any proof. Some of the names I mentioned particularly have been writing professorial quality material for a long time. I am afraid you are being intellectually arrogant in sweeping aside any outliers to the rule. Like in any scientific experiment you really understand the behavior of a system by studying the anomalies. As much as this article calls the Hindus to reflect on their choices(to alarming level I must add), by sweeping aside the names I have mentioned you are denying the Muslim community of a chance to look within and honestly understand why these people are swimming against the tide. If it’s proved there is some ulterior motive, fair enough these people are exposed but otherwise the Muslims will loose a golden chance to reflect within (of which the Muslim community has entertained very few so far).

  • “All I ask for is proof that the names I mentioned have some ulterior motive” I am no god, I do not know what the intentions of the few names you mentioned are. Maybe they do genuinely believe in Modi, or maybe its just opportunism. The point I am trying to make is, it doesn’t really matter, considering, I repeat for the third time, they are the exceptions and almost non existent when compared with the views of majority of Muslims. Neither should you, as (again) there are exceptions and opportunist in every group. (As I gave the example of Black KKK members and Muslims Zionists, etc) What exactly is the big deal when Salim Khan opens an Urdu website for Modi? Or if Irfan Pathan licks his boot? I will be truly interested when common Muslim’s perception about Modi start changing. Fat chance though.
    Also you are wrong when you include whole of BJP in your argument. Its not about BJP, it is about Modi. This article focuses on the PM hopeful Modi, and the influence he enjoys from Nazi inspired RSS.
    (Gujarat voting for Modi, including Muslims, I covered in the long answer I wrote to SSM. You really need to scroll a bit).

  • Look, your original argument appeared to be that “some Muslim support Modi, so the given analysis in the article is inaccurate”. I just pointed that there are opportunists and exceptions everywhere, and gave you some example. (I used the word “exceptions” also, meaning people with opinion contrary to those shared by majority). If I write an article on tattoo and say that Muslims don’t get tattooed, you can’t point that ‘hey, Saif Ali Khan has tattoo!’ Or If I say that Muslims don’t drink alcohol or bow to idol, you can’t say ‘but Salman Khan do all that!’ The reason being, I am speaking generally, and not focusing on the exceptions which may be present for whatever reason, opportunism or not.
    Now I ask you, is it not true that Muslims who support Modi form only a tiny minority? And that the majority of Secular and Muslims in this country truly despise him?

  • Friend of Bosnia

    Indeed.

  • dreamdayz01

    Search for “Black KKK members” in Youtube.
    Search for “Sikh guy hating India”.
    Also search for “Muslim Zionists”.
    That’s right, this world is full of opportunists and there is an exception to everything. Probably that is why the majority of Muslim, and Secular minded people in India don’t support Modi.
    You can check my (long) post below (in reply to SSM) for similar question you may not be ‘able to answer yourself’.

  • Rights

    Well, fine, a database may have been named “Al-Qaida.” But I think Al-Qaida or Al-Qaeda the organization headed by OBL is a different matter. I didn’t check the link. But I have no idea what your point here is.

  • Rights

    You’re joking. What did she say about Taliban? I didn’t even hear the word Taliban. I am pretty sure you’re confusing Mujahideen with Taliban. The two are not synonymous or interchangeable.

    The US, like Pakistan, played a central role in training, arming, and funding the Mujahideen. Saudi Arabia and many other nations also provided funding. If anyone created the Mujahideen, first and foremost it was the Afghans themselves – after all it was their country under occupation – and then Pakistan. The US did not need to create a force of people that was already there and all too willing and ready to fight. In fact the US didn’t even engage in a significant way until about two years after the Soviets moved in. Nevertheless, the two pivotal countries in defeating the Soviets were Pakistan and the US. But the actual fighters were largely Afghans themselves. All others were a minority.

    In fact, Hillary Clinton is making exactly the points that I made above in response to your post: that the US all too readily disengaged from the region once the Soviets left; that this disengagement proved detrimental not only to the region, but also to the US; that instead of working with Pakistan to resolve the very serious reality on the ground after the Soviets left, the US enacted sanctions against Pakistan. And obviously she is saying all this to show that the US policy makers were wrong in abandoning the region, and that the US should not adopt such policies yet again.

  • Aditya Iyer

    Assuming all this is true but a different question that I am not able to answer to myself. I am a close observer of Indian politics skimming deeper than everyday news. Some of the people openly supporting Modi are Asifa Khan, MJ Akbar, Saleem Mohammed Baghaad(who recently won a municipal corporation election on a ticket from Modi’s party), Zafar sareshwala a Bori Muslim businessman, Joe D’Cruz a writer in South in India language Tamil. They have all made no qualms in supporting Modi. How will these facts fit in with your analysis?

  • Tanveer Khan

    There’s no such thing as too much information. XD

  • JD

    .RSS stands for “national volunteer corps” blah blah blah

    Sure man but so does the Taliban , Al- Quida , Hamas. Heck 90% of Hamas activities revolve around “social, welfare, cultural, and
    educational activities”. Social services include running relief
    programs and funding schools, orphanages, mosques, healthcare clinics, soup kitchens, and sports leagues. They also help people in time of need that does not make them Mother Theressa or less bunch of aholes that kill people.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hamas#Social_welfare

    2. EDL has a token Hindu division and one Muslim member they like to parade around to the media . It does not make them less of bunch of Skin Heads ( see picture below )

    3. Not true Please read

    http://hindu.com/2003/06/13/stories/2003061300371000.htm

    It was just a way to make brownie points with ” The people” for future use next Election.

    3.

    4.The report from the National Human Rights Commission of India(NHRC)
    concluded that the attacks had been premeditated, that state government
    officials were complicit and that there was evidence of police not
    acting during the assaults on Muslims. The report also made mention of
    the BJP and Modi in “Promoting the attitudes of racial supremacy, racial hatred and the legacy of Nazism
    through his governments support of school textbooks in which Nazism is
    glorified”. The US state department also found “that Modi revised high
    school textbooks to describe Hitler’s ‘charismatic personality’ and the
    ‘achievements of Nazism’.

    5.Good now please debunk 2,000 Muslims deaths There instances of rape, children being burned alive, and widespread looting and destruction of property.

    I wait……

  • JD

    birds of a feather flock together

  • JD

    If this was a site that bashes anyone religion race skin color sex preference I would never be here . Please show in this article or the one done in the past that bashes hindu . Your response is same as Zionists crying antisemitism ( hate for a religion) when someone points out Israel ( a country ) war crimes.

    No one here is bashing Hindu’s or Indians. We are just pointing out the fact that the a Hindu version of the taliban political party is about to take power in India. This org has a long history of hate for muslims christians . They have also made comments about nuking Pakistan. If they win it could lead to alot of problems in India for the muslim and Christian minority.
    If we would turn back time and Loonwatch was around when the Taliban was about to take power I or someone else here would post a article about them.

  • JD

    The Muslim Brotherhood a bigger stronger super secret org then the Illuminates of Thanateros and the Hare Club for Men

  • Friend of Bosnia

    Yes. Thanks for sharing.

  • Rights

    “The Taliban and AlQaeda were created by the US to fight against Russia.”

    No they were not. Taliban became a significant political force after the Soviets left Afghanistan, and after the US pulled its aid plug, and after the Pressler Amendment became active on grounds that the President (Bush) could not certify that Pakistan was not building the atomic bomb. Just to remind, the Pressler Amendment, named after senator Larry Pressler (1979-1997; R-SD), was a Pakistan-specific law whose supposed aim was to control nuclear weapons. The law resulted in severe sanctions against Pakistan, and only Pakistan. The US played no active role in creating the Taliban.

    As for Al-Qaeda, the organization derived from Osama bin Laden’s own views and outlook on World affairs, notably vis-a-vis the US and Muslim nations, but generally the West and the Muslim nations. OBL’s was useful to the US in that he fought against the Soviets. But the US did not create the grand terrorist that OBL became, nor did the US create his organization, Al-Qaeda. If OBL was useful to the US, then he was manifold more useful to Afghanistan and Pakistan, namely in the sense that he, like so many other fighters, fought to liberate Afghanistan.

    One might of course that the US policy makers could have played smart so that the Taliban and Al-Qaeda may have been completely restricted in their scope and powers, maybe even altogether prevented from coming into existence. I think there is a case to be made that America’s sudden exit and abandonment of the area facilitated these groups rise.

  • Friend of Bosnia

    Great! I’m saving that.

  • Friend of Bosnia

    Supporters of those fascists here are using exactly the same arguments as Greater Serb fascist propagandists do; in fact those RSS fiends do the sam ethings the cetniks did in Bosnia in WWII and 19925-95. And then, look at Burma.
    The problem with reactionaries of all kinds is that they are so deluded by a mythological past in which everything was better, and which they must resurrect: be itthe Hindutva fascists dreaming if the times of King Ashoka (who was Buddhist btw.), the cetniks dreaming of the empire of the Nemanjids, the Salafists dreaming of Medina in our Prophet’s (saws) time, and no, it was not at all like they dream it), be it Putin and his followers dreaming of Stalin’s Soviet Union around 1948 (kind of; to be honest he hasn’t called for genocide up to now) and to get that back they think they must rewrite history, by committing social engineering, destruction, culturicide, or in the worst case, genocide.
    I’m not interested in engaging in a discussion with such fiends. There are people around who can’t be talked to reasonably. They undertstand only the language they themselves use. That of violence. They should be given a dose of their own medicine.
    Also, they try to defend and justify what cannot be defended and justified. They are hypocrites. When they feel their opponents are favored in any way, they cry “what’s good for the goose is good for the gander” (like, ‘if Bosnia gets independent from Yugoslavia, then the Bosnian Serbs have the right to get independent from Bosmnia and join Serbia, or Crimea to join Russia). When they themselves see their position compromised in any way, they say “Quod licet Jovi non licet bovi” (what Jupiter is entitled to do, an ox is not entitled to do; like Serbs and Russians have the right to intervene on behalf of their people also in neighboring countries, also with military force, while Ukrainians and Bosnianns have no right to sovereignty and independence).
    Sikhs, Christians, Jews, Jains, Buddhists , beware, after the RSS have finished off the Muslims (or maybe even before) they will come for you next.

  • Tanveer Khan

    I contemplated burning it but considered that a bit too extreme, so I tore it up instead. I do not want my backside harmed by BNP dye.

  • Friend of Bosnia

    Not very comfortable to use I presume, but even so, …

  • Tanveer Khan

    I kinda tore it up and threw it away a few hours ago…

  • Tanveer Khan

    Oh dear.

  • Pingback: Surprising Convergence | oogenhand()

Powered by Loon Watchers