Top Menu

Are Muslims Rapists?

Hatred against Jews and hatred against Muslims have a lot in common. One thing in particular is that throughout history Jews and Muslims have been accused of being rapists. The Nazis in the 30’s were well known for their claim that Jewish men seek to rape “Aryan women and small girls” to “make Europe more Jewish.” The myth that all Jewish men are rapists is still being spread among antisemites. Today Muslims are victims of this slander as well.

The internet is filled with claims that Muslims rape women. The website close to President Donald Trump, Breitbart, is no exception to that. Breitbart often claims that Muslim men are sexual perverts that just want to rape women.

Milo Yiannopoulos, senior editor at Breitbart, stated;

Women will suffer terrible sexual atrocities at the hands of Muslims, but they will survive these encounters most of the time.  Muslims want to violate women, not kill them.”

A lie that is often repeated will be accepted as the “Truth” by many in the end. So too with the lies of Breitbart.”Muslim Rape Crisis“, “Muslim Rape Gang Leader“, “Muslim Gang Rapists are Springing Up Everywhere“, “Islamic Rape Gangs“, “Muslim Child Rape“, etc etc…

Jewish and Muslim “Rape-culture”

By now you might ask whether a Muslim has ever raped a woman? Of course there are individual Muslim rapists, as there are Jewish rapists, rapists among Trump supporters, among farmers, Americans, Christians, Russians, carpenters and stamp collectors.  But if you claim that Muslims, Jews, Trump supporters or Christians  are rapists you are spreading a dangerous lie. You are implying that ALL are criminals.

According to Breitbart there is a “Muslim Rape Culture.” The Nazis spread the same lies about Jews in the 30’s, as Breitbart does today in respect to Muslims, and claimed that there was such a thing as “Jewish Rape Culture.” The German magazine Der Sturmer was especially famous for spreading these kinds of slanders.

In the picture below, from Der Sturmer,  you can see the satanic Jewish snake that is raping a woman, and in the background you can see the Talmud.

Antisemitism Germany 5

The Nazis claimed that the Jewish Talmud allowed marriages between adult men and children. It was claimed that Jews were pedophiles and that it had its origin in the religion. If you wonder where the myth that all Muslims are pedophiles comes from, or slanders about the prophet Mohammad and Aisha, you should look at the antisemitic roots of these slanders.


“Jewish Defamation of the Blood,” that is the headline of this issue of Der Sturmer. In the bottom of the page it says that “The Jews are our disgrace”.


The Nazis took real rape, committed by individuals that happened to be Jews, mixed it with lies and fabricated stories about “rape.” The example below is from Der Sturmer 1927. According to the article, an American Jew raped a German woman in Ohio. “Defamation of the Race in America” is the headline. The implied message is that “all Jews are like that.”

By claiming that Jews were rapists and by giving “evidence” about this the Nazis whipped up hatred against Jews in Germany. Truth was replaced by “alternative facts.”


In the Nuremberg trials after World War 2 it was established that the lie that a “Jewish Rape Culture” existed was one of the crimes against humanity the Nazis committed. In Nuremberg this quote from Der Sturmer 1933 was put forward as one of the evidences of the Nazi crimes.

“One single cohabitation of a Jew with an Aryan woman is sufficient to poison her blood forever. Together with the alien albumen she has absorbed the alien soul…. Now we know why the Jew uses every artifice of seduction in order to ravish German girls at as early an age as possible; why the Jewish doctor rapes his patients while they were under anaesthetic. He wants the German girl and the German woman to absorb the alien sperm of the Jew. She is never again to bear German children… The author and abettor of such action is the Jew. He has been aware of the secrets of the race question for centuries, and therefore plans systematically the annihilation of the nations which are superior to him. Science and authorities are his instruments for the enforcing of pseudo-science and the concealment of truth.”(M-20).

But are Muslims rapists?

Of course no. The question is stupid. Are all Christian rapists? Are Americans rapists?

The lie is easy to expose. They claim that all people belonging to a group are guilty of real or invented crimes that a few persons in the group might, or might not, have committed. That is hatred, that is racism!

, , , , , , , ,

  • Pingback: Dubai court upholds death sentence for child rapist-killer | RiyadhVision()

  • Khizer


    He did? I guess they had a falling out, and that’s probably why he hates Muslims so much (stupid reason to hate a whole community of people, but I guess it’s a reason atleast).

  • As I said, Muslim women can work, but it’s CHARITY, not an obligation. The obligation is with the man.

    In an ideal Islamic society, women have a choice. Being FORCED to work, even though I don’t want to, doesn’t feel like autonomy to me.

  • Heather Rose

    Maintenance, as you call it, comes with a cost – autonomy. But, as a Westerner, I am more individualistic than communal? It sounds like a control issue, & whoever controls the purse strings is in control & not subject to the charity or goodwill of others. It’s complex. No doubt!

  • Viredae

    For a good primer on the PROPER way to interpret Hadith (something ISIS seems more than happy to ignore), Jonathan AC Brown is an excellent resource:

  • No, I’m definitely NOT saying there is “gender equality” in Islamic law. That is a modern Western concept, and one which I reject.

    Men and women are not exactly the same, and therefore do not have exactly the same rights and responsibilities.

    For example, in Islam, a woman has a RIGHT to maintenance. A man has a RESPONSIBILITY to provide maintenance. That is not equality. If a woman works, it is considered charity, whereas a man who works is fulfilling his obligation to his family. I don’t see any way to frame that as “gender equality.”

    Personally, I never wanted to be herded into cubical prison. I was, of course, because I live in the feminist-designed West. I don’t feel this burden is a “privilege.” When it comes to having work to earn an income, I don’t want to “gender equality.” I want the privilege granted to women under Islamic doctrine. 🙂

  • Heather Rose

    That’s interesting. So, are you saying there is equality under the Islamic law between men & women? Why is that not reflected more in Muslim countries? I also understand the USA is not a perfect paradigm for equality between the sexes, but it frames the basis of my understanding. One thing is sure, our judicial system does not take rape very seriously. I’ve heard of weekends in jail, half are never even prosecuted, & victim-blaming is the norm.

  • AJ

    I have lived in Saudi Arabia. I can call a taxi driver and drive with him ALL ALONE. There are no laws that prevent women from leaving their houses alone. You are confusing women needing a mehrem for Umrah and Hajj. You are also confusing women and men unrelated to each other being in confined spaces – that is there is no dating. Women in Saudi Arabia step out of the house all alone all the time. You do realize that’s how they mostly spend time – i.e. Malls.

    Please stop giving out info about KSA that’s incorrect.

  • Amie

    I never read ISIS propaganda, but of course they will rely on hadiths. Hadiths are man made, full of contradiction, many absurdities and some lies. Yet, even those who don’t belong to the terror group use Hadiths to opress people. Again, like Saudi dynasty. I refuse to add Arabia to the Saudi because it would legitimize their claim that the country is in the family possession. I think Arabs are oppressed by Saudi dictatorship, they propagate the most extreme practice of Islam and do not allow human rights.

  • Amie

    Well, women who are raped in Saudi still are likely to get punished due to laws that prohibit women from leaving houses alone. Woman is assumed to be promiscuous if she gets raped. Not unheard of in Saudi to still lash people even if they are victims.

  • GaribaldiOfLoonwatch

    Glad folks were able to answer your follow up question. There is actually an interesting case study I would urge you to read by Asifa Quraishi-Landes if you are interested in this issue: Her Honor: An Islamic Critique of the Rape Laws of Pakistan from a Woman-Sensitive Perspective

  • GaribaldiOfLoonwatch

    I know a few Saudi women who have described the deplorable oppression they have faced. It made me really sad that this was done and perpetuated in the name of Islam.

  • I have a few minutes free, so I want to talk about this concept of a woman’s testimony being “worth” half that of a man.

    There is no indication that requiring more than one witness has anything to do with “worth.” For example, I have signed many contracts here in secular America that require TWO witnesses. There is no indication that the “worth” of either person’s signature is in question. It is simply a matter or fortifying the testimony with more than one witness.

    It’s reasonable to interpret some of the Old Testament as disallowing ANY testimony from women. In Islam women are allowed to testify, and the “two women” requirement only applies in certain matters–not across the board.

    The reason is that most women traditionally had little knowledge of business and economic affairs and were subject to possible coercion.

    Even in modern times, I look at my grandma, who was a homemaker her entire life and never even put in charge of paying bills. She had no idea about financial and economic matters. I have elderly relatives who still pray for the economy to improve because they don’t understand that it is largely based on decisions made by human beings–not a natural phenomenon like the weather!

    Now if older people living in rural areas today have such limited knowledge, what about people 1400 years ago? And in particular, women how mostly played a traditional role in the household?

    But let’s say, for the sake of argument, that woman had sufficient knowledge in business and economic affairs. There is still the fact that MOST women were entitled to maintenance and were dependent on men financially. As such, could a woman testify freely without risking compromise of her bread and butter? She was freed of pressure under such circumstances by the requirement of an additional testimony.

    Her testimony in realms where these factors did not have so much weight, the requirement did not apply. As for today, we must look to contemporary scholars, some of whom say this sort of thing no longer applies. In the modern West women are no longer entitled to maintenance from men and have been herded into the workforce, depending on their own means to support themselves. They’re trained equally in matters of business and finance, so a reasonable argument is that this simply no longer applies.

    Although it seems these days, bigots who run web sites like Jihad Watch are self-styled “experts” on Islamic jurisprudence, their “rulings” are not valid for Muslims. They consistently choose the interpretations most at odds with modern, secular views, and them promote them as the ONLY interpretation because it serves their agenda to do so. The implication that a woman’s testimony on ALL matters is “worth” only half that of a man is their frame. And it’s easy to see why.

  • Khizer

    Yeah I know, the ‘hardcore’ alt-right like the Daily Stormer HATE him. He still however shares many of their beliefs.

    I consider him a ‘soft’ alt-righter, an alt-righter who doesn’t believe typical anti-Semitic and homophobic ideas like most nazis do, but embraces all the other terrible aspects of the alt-right such as racism, stupid racialist ‘scientific’ theories, anti-immigration, extremely anti-femenist, xenophobia, etc. they leave out the anti-Semitic and homophobic rhetoric since that shit is mostly unacceptable in the developed West. The Daily Stormer are ‘hardcore’ nazis who embrace all the terrible rhetoric of the alt-right.

Powered by Loon Watchers