Top Menu

Milo Yiannopoulos, Defends Paedophila and Hates Gays

Milo Yiannopoulos, senior editor at Breitbart, defends Paedophilia! His claim to be Conservative champion of homosexual rights is untrue. He is NOT. He wants the gays to “get back in the closet”, he hates trans-people and defends paedophilia.

An account called the Reagan Battalion on Twitter revealed today that Milo defends paedophilia. He believes it is “ok” to have sex with 13 year olds.

“You know people are messy and complex and actually, in the homosexual world particularly. Some of those relationships between younger boys and older men, that sort of coming of age relationships.”… The relationships with those with older men have helped those young boys discover who they are. And give them security and safety, provide them with love and reliable and sort of a rock.”

When questioned if he means sex with children he answers, no, only with “sexually mature” young people like “13-year olds,”

“You’re misunderstanding what pedophilia means. Paedophilia is not a sexual attraction to somebody 13-years old who is sexually mature. Paedophilia is attraction to children who have not reached puberty. Pedophilia is a attraction to people who don’t have functioning sex organs yet. Who have not gone through puberty. Who are too young to be able to understand. That is not what we are talking about…”

Quotes are taken from here.

He claims that it is not paedophilia for an adult to have sex with 13 year olds. He somehow believes they are “sexually mature.” But that is what it is: paedophilia.

The original dialogue can be found on youtube: here! In full. The part where he talks about sex with 13 year olds starts at 58:30. The quote on 13-year olds is found at 1:05:05. This not the first time, he has been quite consistent in this opinion having defended adult sex with 13-14 year olds on other occassions.


But don’t make the mistake of believing that the fact that he is for sexual relations between boys and adults mean that he is for homosexual rights. He is not! And… VERY few homosexuals defend paedophila!

Lets look at the claim that Milo is somehow an advocate for HBTQ-rights. He is homosexual, but that does not prevent him from hating Gays almost as much as he hates Muslims.

Milo does not only want to kick out Muslims from the U.S.A, he believes that Homosexuals should be deprived of their rights too, so that America can fight Muslims (!), by breeding more children.

The Muslims are breeding like rabbits and having a lot of children, while the Western world is having fewer children. Therefore gay men, that are intellectually superior (!),  should “get back into the closet,” marry women and, help save Western civilization against the Muslim threat. That is how Milo views the world.

He believes that the 1950s, when homosexuals were jailed and persecuted in the Western world, was a good time, when Homosexuals were “in the closet.” Milos even defend the Russian homophobic president Vladimir Putin by stating that he is right when banning homosexuals.

Online photo blogs from San Francisco’s notorious Folsom Street Fair will do nothing to dispel Vladimir Putin’s hunch that the west has become a decadent mess. Frankly, I would have been less ashamed to be gay in the days when being gay was something to be ashamed of. Gays were classier when they were worried about being queer-bashed.

Children with two dads or two moms have a “cruel” childhood. “Children raised in gay households are more likely to suffer mental problems” and lesbians “are famous for kicking the shit out of each other.” Hardly a positive view of homosexuality.

An example

Lets look at one of the articles Milo has written.

The endless celebration and mollycoddling of homosexuals in the media has transformed the genteel, camp rightsists of the 1950s into brash, glitter-drenched Pride queens. If for no other reasons than manners and aesthetics, we ought to think about shoving the next generation back into Narnia…

In in the 1950s, gay men would “live a lie,” get married and have kids. They’d let off steam in dark rooms and bathhouses. That’s not happening any more: the gay rights movement has liberated queens from societal expectations, so they shack up with their boyfriends and either don’t have children, or adopt…

When I express views like this, I’m sometimes called a reactionary. People say I want to go back to the 50s. And they’re right…  Forcing gays back into the closet also solves the problem of what happens to children when they have two dads or two moms. Children raised in gay households are more likely to suffer mental problems, more likely to end up gay themselves and, if raised by lesbians, almost certain to witness domestic abuse.

So the good news is?

The good news is that gay rights are in the minority, globally speaking. China, India and most of all Russia proudly celebrate the importance of the nuclear family.

You can hardly blame them. Online photo blogs from San Francisco’s notorious Folsom Street Fair will do nothing to dispel Vladimir Putin’s hunch that the west has become a decadent mess. Frankly, I would have been less ashamed to be gay in the days when being gay was something to be ashamed of. Gays were classier when they were worried about being queer-bashed.

It’s also worth considering the fact that the entire Muslim world is virulently homophobic, so men there continue to reproduce like rabbits….

I hate to exaggerate, but you might say that the future of the West sort of depends on us faggots leaping back in the closet and churning out a few kids.

Freedom to choose?

Muslims should be kicked out of the U.S.A and persecuted, homosexuals should return into the closet and queers should be “bashed.” There is no homophobia or racism against Muslims in the U.S.A. But paedophilia with 13 year olds should be legal. That is how Milo views the world.

Milo often attacks Muslims for being homophobic. But he NEVER attacks his own church, the Catholic Church. Quite the opposite, he claims Christians, as “opposed” to Muslims, are compassionate to homosexuals.

What does that tell us about Milo Yiannopoulos?

Well, Milo believes there is no homophobia any longer in the USA and gets so angry when he hear people speak about it that it makes him want to go out and “bash queers”(2:40). The gentle loving gay “bashing” homosexual Milo? Donald Trump and Steve Bannon have strange friends, indeed!

, , , , , ,

  • Jekyll

    Reza is doing a fine job embarrassing himself

  • Bodhidharma


  • Crysus Bu


    My Brother with all due respect this isn’t considered paedophilia (strictly speaking). Milo is write when he clarifies a common misconception in regards to age of consent and age of sexual awareness & maturity. Most people reach puberty at ages of 12 to 15. The average age of menarche for young women is 12. Only a few decades ago it was absolutely legal to engage in consensual sexual relationships after the age of 13 in many states across America and nations across Europe. This was an absolutely normal practise among most pre “modern” societies. In fact the earlier the contract (in marriage) the better. Consummation coincided with parental consent and physical sexual maturity.

    Paedophilia is the exclusive sexual attraction towards prepubescent children. This is commonly misunderstood.

    From Wiki:
    “In traditional societies, the age of consent for a sexual union was a matter for the family to decide, or a tribal custom. In most cases, this coincided with signs of puberty, menstruation for a woman and pubic hair for a man.” (Bullough, Vern. “Encyclopedia of Children and Childhood in History and Society”.

    I hope this helps 🙂

    Jazakallah khair

  • Don’t flatter yourself. I’m busy because I’m going on vacation, not because I need an excuse to get away from your dazzling arguments. I answered effortlessly.

  • kizza88

    Lovely day to you too… apologies for making you think about things more than you wanted

  • Allah made the laws exactly as they need to be. At the time, puberty and sound mind where set as a minimum 1400 years ago. Nowhere in the Qur’an does it set an upper limit. It doesn’t say, “you must marry girls before they reach the age of 10.” So there’s no reason people can’t set ages that are appropriate for the time and place.

    The beauty of Shariah is that it’s flexible enough to change over time, and across circumstances.

    Now, I have things to do. Given the tone of these “questions,” I doubt your sincerity, and thus don’t see a reason to spend more time with you, especially on a day like today, when I’m busy.

    I don’t know if you are a very young person. I would guess you are, but in any case, I recommend you read up on history and try to gain a foothold. Read books, not the Internet. And if you don’t want to do that, then maybe you should consider not making comments that tie in historical concepts, because you’re putting your ignorance on display. I don’t know why you would do that willfully.

    Take care, and have a lovely day. 🙂

  • Yes. I’m not an expert, but I think an older man having sex with a 13 year old boy is pederasty, not pedophilia.

    I don’t agree that it’s morally okay. Not at all, but then isn’t that a judgement call? A more concrete argument is that it’s against the law. I think Milo should respect the law, which is in place to protect young people.

  • CowabungaCreeper

    The Quran’s benchmark was ‘an age of sound reason’ in any case.

  • No, puberty wasn’t the benchmark set by Muhammad. It was the benchmark of the entire ancient world, as is also evidenced in other sources, including the Bible:

    Most religions, over history, influenced the marriageable age. For example, Christian ecclesiastical law forbade marriage of a girl before the age of puberty.[28] Hindu vedic scriptures mandated the age of a girl’s marriage to be adulthood which they defined as three years after the onset of puberty.[29] Jewish scholars and rabbis strongly discouraged marriages before the onset of puberty,[21] but at the same time, in exceptional cases, girls ages 3 through 12 (the legal age of consent according to halakha) might be given in marriage by her father.

    Arbitrary age of consent is a modern concept, and until recently, it was set relatively low even in much of the West:

    Throughout the 19th century, women seldom successfully brought rape charges against their white assailants if they did not have an impeccable record of chastity. Proof of full resistance was critical. In many states, the age of consent was 10.


    Over the course of American history, the most commonly observed age of consent was 10 years. In 1880, 37 states had an age of consent of 10 years while 10 states kept an age of consent at 12, and Delaware maintained its age of consent at seven years, having lowered it from 10 in 1871

    As for marriage, even today, the legal age in some states int he US is low, relative to the Muslim-majority countries in the article I posted previously:

    Fixating on the age of Aisha 1400 years ago seems to reflect an ignorance of basic history. Or perhaps a feeble attempt to justify hatred of Islam?

    In any case, Islam forbids men having sex with men at any age, so obviously Milo having sex with a 13 year old boy is not sanctioned by Islamic doctrine.

    Interestingly, it might be fully sanctioned in the US, now that we have gay marriage. If in a state like New Hampshire where the age of marriage with permission is still 13 for girls and 14 for boys (, perhaps Milo can find himself a sweet, young “husband”?

  • Joey Sanders

    Article: Bill Maher, who took credit for the downfall of Milo Yiannopoulos, has also defended adult sex with children,amp.html

Powered by Loon Watchers