Top Menu

The “Jew Killing Hadith” And The Myth of An Antisemitic Genocide In Muslim Scripture

via. Huffington Post, By Yaqeen Institute

How an apocalyptic tradition played into the hands of anti-Jewish and anti-Muslim hatemongers

A Jordanian cleric visiting Canada recently misleadingly cited a hadith without context or explanation, which rightly triggered condemnations from the Muslim community as well as numerous headlines around the world. A hadith is an oral report transmitted from the Prophet Muhammad, and can be incredibly complex as one needs to evaluate all the chains of transmission of a particular statement recorded in a hadith in order to arrive at an appropriate conclusion of what the particular hadith is actually talking about. In this case, a single phrase was cited, one describing rocks and trees calling out to Muslims, “There is a Jew behind me, come and kill him.”

This is not the first time that this text has been used to foment anti-Semitic sentiment within the Muslim community. Muslim leaders and scholars must forcefully denounce such rhetoric and clarify Islam’s unequivocal condemnation of all forms of anti-semitism, racism, discrimination, and xenophobia. Of course, Islamophobes pounced on the opportunity to trigger alarm bells and generate a new wave of propaganda accusing Muslims of genocidal ambitions towards Jews, and to claim that Islam is inherently anti-Semitic and a threat to Western civilization.

Explanation of the misquoted hadith

A story about a supernatural apocalyptic battle between good and evil

When we look up different narrations of the Hadith in question, we find out that the phrase being quoted is actually part of a larger narrative in the genre of eschatology (the part of theology dealing with the end times and the Day of Judgment), describing the return of Jesus and the apocalyptic battle between Jesus and the Dajjal (Antichrist). [1] In this battle that will take place between the armies of Jesus and the Dajjal, several miracles are said to occur including that the Dajjal will melt when Jesus sees him, and that inanimate rocks and trees will speak and identify soldiers of the Dajjal (Sunan Ibn Majah 4077).

This is a story about a battle between two groups of soldiers involved in war, one side of which is clearly unjust; it does not refer to innocent civilians. And it’s not actually a battle about ‘Muslims versus Jews’! As a matter of fact, Muslims believe that all righteous Christians, Jews, and Muslims will be following Jesus after he returns (Qur’an 4:159), while misguided Christians, Jews, and Muslims will be following the Dajjal. Indeed, other Hadith demonstrate that many of the Dajjal’s forces will actually be deviant Muslims (Sunan Ibn Majah 179).[2]

Jews are amongst the good guys in the Muslim apocalypse

Moreover, the vast majority of Jews will NOT be followers of the Dajjal, as hadith commentary describe that the Dajjal’s followers will come from only two out of the twelve Israelite tribes, while most Jews will be righteous folk amongst the forces of good uniting with virtuous Christians and Muslims (Fayd al-Bari, Anwar Shah Kashmiri, 4/197). [3] After all, the Dajjal will be a murderous dictator who claims to be God, an anathema to all followers of the Abrahamic tradition as well as to all people of conscience.

Muslims do not believe that rocks and trees will be pointing out random innocent bystanders, but rather soldiers of the Dajjal – combatants who are themselves involved in killing innocent people. It is about these specific combatants in the Antichrist army that rocks and trees will say, “There is one hiding behind me, come and slay him!” The religious identity of the Dajjal’s soldiers includes evildoers from all backgrounds (including misguided Muslims). Other variants of the hadith state that the rocks and trees will simply say, “Here is a rejector of truth hiding behind me!” (Musnad Ahmad 3546), and do not use the word “Jew” to describe them.

Therefore, this hadith describes a future battle between warriors and can only occur after the return of Jesus; in no way can this hadith be interpreted as a prescription to go out and harm civilians or peaceful members of any faith community. The Qur’an explicitly condemns violence against civilians and non-combatants, stating “Whoever kills a soul it is as if he has slain all humanity,” (5:32) and, “So if they withdraw and do not fight you, and offer you peace, then God gives you no way against them,” (4:90). War is only permitted in defense against aggression or to aid the oppressed, as in the case of Jesus fighting against the Dajjal’s forces.

The question of Anti-Semitism and the Armageddon

All three Abrahamic faiths (Islam, Christianity and Judaism) have well-established traditions about a prophesied Messiah who will engage in a battle against the forces of evil in the end times, whether it be the return of Christ who will battle all the nations of the earth, or the coming of the Masiach ben Yossef who will destroy the Edomites and enemies of Israel. [4] All three groups have had to explicate these esoteric eschatological passages in order to steer clear of antagonism towards other communities. In 2012, A DNC County Chairman resigned after he said, “The Christians just want us to be there so we can be slaughtered and converted and bring on the second coming of Jesus Christ.” [5]The Bible describes the Armageddon in painful terms regarding the enemies of Christ/Israel (See: Zechariah 14:12). [6] It’s necessary for people of all faiths to not allow their texts about the end times to be hijacked in a way that validates hateful speech or actions in the present. All Abrahamic faiths have eschatological teachings that are esoteric and require careful critical interpretation. The mainstream leaders of all faith communities have consistently emphasized tolerance and respect for others.

Islam denounces all forms of anti-Semitism and racism

The Prophet Muhammad taught his companions to respect people of all faith backgrounds and to care for everyone. He said, “Donate in charity to people of all faiths” (Musannaf Ibn Abi Shaybah 3/177) [7] and he personally used to donate money regularly to sponsor a Jewish family in his community. [8] When the Prophet saw the funeral procession of a Jew passing by, he stood up out of respect. When some companions pointed out that the deceased was not Muslim, he rebuked them stating, “Is it not a human soul?” (Sahih Bukhari 1250). The lesson here is to respect all humanity. Some Jews converted to Islam and yet others, like the Rabbi Mukhayriq, continued to practice Judaism and still remained on good terms with the Prophet (Seerah Ibn Hisham 1/518). Even when the Prophet passed away, he had his armor mortgaged to a Jewish person (Sahih Bukhari 2759), a narration that shows he maintained good relations with Jews until his death. As the Qur’an says, “(God) instructs you to deal kindly and justly with anyone who has not fought you for your faith or driven you out of your homes: God loves the just,” (60:8). According to Al-Tabari, one of the earliest commentators, this verse encourages good relations with “all the sects, creeds, and religions,” (Tafsir al-Tabari 60:8). These Qur’anic teachings have inspired Muslims throughout the ages. During World War II, the Grand Mosque in Paris rescued Jews fleeing the Nazis and provided them with a safe haven and means of escape. This is the legacy that Muslims must recall and revive.

In addition to respecting other faiths, Islam prohibits harming others and places great emphasis on Muslims maintaining positive relationships with those outside the faith. The Prophet Muhammad issued a stark warning about persecuting others, “Whoever harms a non-Muslim at peace with us will never smell the fragrance of paradise, although its fragrance can be found a distance of forty years of travel,” (Sahih Bukhari 6516). On the Day of Judgment, the Prophet himself will argue on behalf of persecuted non-Muslims and against the Muslims who persecuted them, “If anyone wrongs a non-Muslim at peace with us, violates his rights, burdens him with more work than he is able to do, or takes something from him without his consent, then I will be his advocate on the Day of Resurrection.” (Sunan Abi Dawud 3052). This stunning indictment should make any Muslim think twice before hurting anyone.

Yaqeen Institute will be releasing a full research paper studying the relationship between Muslims and Jews during the lifetime of Prophet Muhammad and during Islamic history by the end of April 2017.

[1] Fath al-Bari by Ibn Hajar al-’Aqsalani, Sharh Sahih Muslim by al-Nawawi, Umdatul-Qari by Badr al-Deen al-’Ayni.

[2] T​his narration states that he will emerge from the deviant group known as the Khawarij (Sunan Ibn Majah 179), and according to commentaries on Ibn Majah, he will emerge at the head of a great army (“jaysh al-adheem”) of Khawarij (Shuruh Sunan Ibn Majah, edited by Raed Sabri Ibn Abi Ulfah). Another narration ​(​Sahih Bukhari 1881) states that he will be joined by the inhabitants of Makkah and Madinah who are Munafiqeen – those who outwardly claim to be Muslim but whose insincerity in faith will be evident once they join forces with the Dajjal.

[3] Fayd al-Bari explains, “This is only about the Jews whom Jesus is fighting against, namely those in the armies of Dajjal.” In fact, if Dajjal is followed by a cult of seventy thousand wearing green shawls this amounts to less than 0.5% of the global population, a tiny fraction.

[4] “Appendix II – Mashiach in Jewish Law by Rabbi Dr. J. Immanuel Schochet, from his book “Mashiach – the Messianic Era in Jewish Law” on Chabad.org. Dr. Schochet writes, “Interestingly enough, according to Pirkei deR. Eliezer ch. 28 (in non-censored versions), the Ishmaelites (Arabs) will be the final kingdom to be defeated by Mashiach.” http://www.chabad.org/library/moshiach/article_cdo/aid/101747/jewish/Appendix-II.htm#footnote6a101747

[5] http://americanvision.org/6370/christians-just-want-jews-slaughtered-and-converted/

[6] http://biblehub.com/zechariah/14-12.htm

[7] Musannaf ibn Abi Shaybah, and Silsilah al-Saheehah vol 6, p628. Arabic: ( تصدقوا على أهل الأديان كلها)

[8] Kitab al-Amwal, Abu Ubayd al-Qasim ibn Sallam d224H, pp727-728, Dar alShuruq 1989​. Arabic: ( عن سعيد بن المسيب أن رسول الله صلى الله عليه وسلم تصدق على أهل بيت من اليهود بصدقة ، فهي تجري عليهم ​).

Guest Authors:

Dr. Nazir Khan is a Research Director at Yaqeen Institute for Islamic Research. He is also an Imam and member of the Manitoba Fiqh Committee. He holds an ijaazah in theology, Quran and Hadith and is the founder ofSpiritualPerception.org

Imam Omar Suleiman is the Founder and President of the Yaqeen Institute for Islamic Research, and an Adjunct Professor of Islamic Studies in the Graduate Liberal Studies Program at SMU (Southern Methodist University). He is also the Resident Scholar at Valley Ranch Islamic Center and Co-Chair of Faith Forward Dallas at Thanks-Giving Square.

Justin Parrott is a Research Fellow at Yaqeen Institute for Islamic Research. He holds a BA in Physics, English from Otterbein University. He also holds a MLIS from Kent State University and a MRes in Islamic Studies in progress from University of Wales. He currently serves at NYU in Abu Dhabi.

, , , , , , , , , , , , ,

  • Yes, I linked to your previous comment where you appeared to support Zionism with scripture. Nevertheless, if you want to distance yourself from that evil political ideology, I’m happy to accept that.

  • S.Philips

    this link take me to this same current page itself……pl check..

  • S.Philips

    i have nothing to do with so called Zionism. Zionism if my understanding is correct, is slightly more than 100 yrs old movement.

    What I wrote is from eternal word of the Living God, Jehovah, God of Abraham, God of Issac and God of Israel. And those words are recorded 1000 s of years ago.

    One thing I am sure…Jehovah God is God Almighty, and He lives for ever and ever. His words are unchanging.

    I simply quoted those words. Full implications of His word, He alone knows.

  • What you wrote in that last comment has little with the discussion at all as far as I can tell. But I didn’t expect your comments to make sense, once you indicated you’re a Zionist.

    I don’t buy that a Zionist can “love” the Palestinian people. Not for a minute. To believe they should be relentlessly abused and dispossessed of their land to make way for a racist colonial Jewish ethnocracy is about as far away from “love” as one can possibly get.

    I’d as soon believe a Nazi who claimed to “love” Jews.

    I prefer open hatred to this kind of dark-hearted, insincere, and corrupt version of “love.”

  • S.Philips

    I quoted from Bible…nothing to do with Zionism. I love Palestinian people…They need to get fair deal.

  • S.Philips

    As per Jewish scholars, “since she has been defiled, not in general, since she is permitted to remarry, but specifically as regards relations with her first husband.”

    I was pointing out one of clear contradiction between Bible and Quran. Bible claims Jehovah God of Bible as an unchanging God. What was ABOMINATION to him during Mose’s time, how can it be acceptable and within limits after around 2000 years? Can Jehovah God change His very nature during a period of 2000 years?

    Another contradiction is about marriage in heaven:-

    See what Jesus told about marriage in heaven

    Matthew 22

    23On that day some Sadducees (who say there is no resurrection) came to Jesus and questioned Him, 24 asking, “Teacher, Moses said, ‘IF A MAN DIES HAVING NO CHILDREN, HIS BROTHER AS NEXT OF KIN SHALL MARRY HIS WIFE, AND RAISE UP CHILDREN FOR HIS BROTHER.’ 25“Now there were seven brothers with us; and the first married and died, and having no children left his wife to his brother; 26 so also the second, and the third, down to the seventh. 27“Last of all, the woman died. 28“In the resurrection, therefore, whose wife of the seven will she be? For they all had married her.”

    29 But Jesus answered and said to them, “You are mistaken, not understanding the Scriptures nor the power of God. 30“For in the resurrection they neither marry nor are given in marriage, but are like angels in heaven. 31“But regarding the resurrection of the dead, have you not read what was spoken to you by God: 32‘I AM THE GOD OF ABRAHAM, AND THE GOD OF ISAAC, AND THE GOD OF JACOB’? He is not the God of the dead but of the living.” 33 When the crowds heard this, they were astonished at His teaching.

  • Ajay Kumar

    As a neutral observer, and only an interested student at best, I seem to get the impression that you are contradicting your own implied argument that the Bible is superior to the Quran.

    Your post is too long for me to get at but one item stands out. You quote that a woman can get defiled according to the Bible but not according to the Quran.

    If what you state is true then does not that make the Bible an abomination to women and therefore to humanity? And the Quran more equitable to both man and woman?

    How then does a woman get defiled according to the Bible but not according to the Quran as you seem to imply? I may have not have understood you clearly, so can you verify this for me?

  • Zionism is a mental illness.

  • S.Philips

    Ilisha, Bible and Quran are different, from different sources. For Example, i give below the Divorce Laws as per Bible and Quran.

    DIVORCE LAW IN BIBLE AND QURAN – SAME GOD, CONTRADICTORY LAWS?

    Deuteronomy 24 American Standard Version (ASV)

    24 When a man taketh a wife, and marrieth her, then it shall be, if she find no favor in his eyes, because he hath found some unseemly thing in her, that he shall write her a bill of divorcement, and give it in her hand, and send her out of his house. 2 And when she is departed out of his house, she may go and be another man’s wife. 3 And if the latter husband hate her, and write her a bill of divorcement, and give it in her hand, and send her out of his house; or if the latter husband die, who took her to be his wife; 4 her former husband, who sent her away, may not take her again to be his wife, after that she is defiled; for that is abomination before Jehovah: and thou shalt not cause the land to sin, which Jehovah thy God giveth thee for an inheritance.

    Jeremiah 3 American Standard Version (ASV)

    3 [a]They say, If a man put away his wife, and she go from him, and become another man’s, will he return unto her again? will not that land be greatly polluted? But thou hast played the harlot with many lovers; [b]yet return again to me, saith Jehovah. 2 Lift up thine eyes unto the bare heights, and see; where hast thou not been lain with? By the ways hast thou sat for them, as an Arabian in the wilderness; and thou hast polluted the land with thy whoredoms and with thy wickedness.

    Qur’an (2:229, 2:230):

    “Divorce is twice. Then, either keep [her] in an acceptable manner or release [her] with good treatment. And it is not lawful for you to take anything of what you have given them unless both fear that they will not be able to keep [within] the limits of Allah . But if you fear that they will not keep [within] the limits of Allah , then there is no blame upon either of them concerning that by which she ransoms herself. These are the limits of Allah , so do not transgress them. And whoever transgresses the limits of Allah – it is those who are the wrongdoers.”[2]
    “And if he has divorced her [for the third time], then she is not lawful to him afterward until [after] she marries a husband other than him. And if the latter husband divorces her [or dies], there is no blame upon the woman and her former husband for returning to each other if they think that they can keep [within] the limits of Allah . These are the limits of Allah , which He makes clear to a people who know.”[3]

    What is ‘ABOMINATION’ to God of Bible is perfectly acceptable and within limits for God of Quran!

  • I quoted from the Bible too. Read it and understand.

    Apart from that, I have nothing more to day. I have a policy of not engaging Zionists. I talk ABOUT them to sane people.

  • S.Philips

    What i quoted is from Bible. All Bible versions says same thing. Remember it was written through Musa Nabhi around BC 1425, nearly 2000 yrs before Islam’s Prophet or Quran.

    Which means you need to be careful to reject it outright. Both Bible and Quran cannot be true at a time. Either Bible or Quran!

    Cyrus Scofield is not the author of Bible. He made certain commentaries. All his opinions need not be correct.

    You can read various versions of Bible at following site and cross check yourself.

    https://www.biblegateway.com/

    You wrote “The notion God is a racist real estate agent who issued an exclusive, permanent land deed to Jews is laughable.”.
    Whatever the world says God is beyond that. He don’t act based on human public opinion, but as per his sovereign will. It is not Jehovah God who will act as per humanity’s will, but it is for humanity to fall in line with His will.

  • There may be contradictions in secondary sources, but there are no contradictions in the Qu’ran, the highest authority in Islam, your snide remarks notwithstanding.

  • Ajay Kumar

    Hmmm! Interesting…

  • Ajay Kumar

    The contradictions in Islam are most amusing, fairy tales and fantasy, wishful thinking. You nailed it.

  • I don’t agree that the Bible promotes Zionism. That’s Cyrus Scofield talking, not God.

    The notion God is a racist real estate agent who issued an exclusive, permanent land deed to Jews is laughable. I’m surprised Christians could be duped into believing something so evil and idiotic

    The Bible clearly says though shalt not steal and thou shalt not murder, and in order to ethnic cleanse Palestine and erect a Jewish state by force, there needed to be a lot of theft and murder. The whole project I’d predicted o land theft and genocide. What sort of “Christian” supports that?

    Do you research and realize this is a lie.

  • S.Philips

    Israel – Bible Prophecies

    Jehovah God’s Promise to Abraham.

    The promise was first made to Abraham (Genesis 15:18-21), then confirmed to his son Isaac (Genesis 26:3), and then to Isaac’s son Jacob (Genesis 28:13),Abraham’s grandson. The promised land was described in terms of the territory from the River of Egypt to the Euphrates river (Exodus 23:31).

    Question: “What is the land that God promised to Israel?” Answer: In regards to the land that God has promised Israel, Genesis 15:18 declares to Abraham, “To your descendants I give this land, from the river of Egypt to the great river, the Euphrates.” God later confirms this promise to Abraham’s son Isaac and Isaac’s son Jacob (whose name was later changed to Israel). When the Israelites were about to invade the Promised Land, God reiterated the land promise, as recorded in Joshua 1:4, “Your territory will extend from the desert to Lebanon, and from the great river, the Euphrates—all the Hittite country—to the Great Sea on the west.” According to Genesis 15:18 and Joshua 1:4, the land God gave to Israel included everything from the Nile River in Egypt to Lebanon (south to north) and everything from the Mediterranean Sea to the Euphrates River (west to east).
    So, what land has God stated belongs to Israel? All of the land modern Israel currently possesses, plus all of the land of the Palestinians (the West Bank and Gaza), plus some of Egypt and Syria, plus all of Jordan, plus some of Saudi Arabia and Iraq. Israel currently possesses only a fraction of the land God has promised.

    I will plant Israel in their own land, never again to be uprooted from the land I have given them”
    ~ Amos 9:15

    Deuteronomy 28– this bible chapter cautioned ancient Israel through Moses(Musa) that they will be scattered among nations of the world if they disobey Thorah. Which literally fulfilled in history.
    Also Deuteronomy 30 foretold that they will be brought back from ends of the earth back to the land promised to their forefathers.
    Also please see Ezekiel 36,Ezekiel 37.

    Ezekiel 38,Ezekiel 39 refers to Gog Magog War, future war against Israel. Read the out come of this future war, yourself.

  • Israel is the reason Muslims and Jews are not living together in peace.

  • S.Philips

    One day i was discussing with a Muslim friend and colleague of me, regarding Palestinian issue. I asked him why is it so difficult for Jews and Muslims to live together in peace, since Islam is almost a copy of Judaism. That day he did not say anything in reply. However, next day he gave me few pages,which included the Hadith of ‘rocks and trees calling out to Muslims, “There is a Jew behind me, come and kill him.”’

    It is so deeply embedded in Muslim psych. I dot know what impact your article will create in such people. Most of them will reject it outright.

    However it can impact non Muslims to have a more favorable view of Islam, whether your interpretation is correct one or not. Good luck!

  • Awesome

    To prove antisemitism is a part of Islam, the usual references always appear: what happened to the Jewish tribes in Medina and of course this one: an eschatological war between Muslim and Jewish factions. Ironically, what is almost never cited in this regard is the Qur’an itself.

  • Awesome

    A few clarifications please.
    1. You wrote:
    “When some companions pointed out that the deceased was not Muslim, he rebuked them stating, “Is it not a human soul?” (Sahih Bukhari 1250). The lesson here is to respect all humanity.”

    And in Sahih al-Bukhari 1249, 1250
    Narrated Abu Sa`id:
    The women requested the Prophet, “Please fix a day for us.” So the Prophet (ﷺ) preached to them and said, “A woman whose three children died would be screened from the Hell Fire by them,” Hearing that, a woman asked, “If two died?” The Prophet (ﷺ) replied, “Even two (would screen her from the (Hell) Fire. ” And Abu Huraira added, “Those children should be below the age of puberty. “

    The actual reference appears to be “Sahih Bukhari 1312, 1313”

    2. You wrote:
    “Even when the Prophet passed away, he had his armor mortgaged to a Jewish person (Sahih Bukhari 2759), a narration that shows he maintained good relations with Jews until his death.”

    And in Sahih al-Bukhari 2759
    Narrated Ibn `Abbas:
    Some people claim that the order in the above Verse is cancelled, by Allah, it is not cancelled, but the people have stopped acting on it. There are two kinds of guardians (who are in charge of the inheritance): One is that who inherits; such a person should give (of what he inherits to the relatives, the orphans and the needy, etc.), the other is that who does not inherit (e.g. the guardian of the orphans): such a person should speak kindly and say (to those who are present at the time of distribution), “I can not give it to you (as the wealth belongs to the orphans).

    There are several possible references to this hadith:

    Sahih Bukhari 2916
    Sahih Bukhari 4467
    Sahih Bukhari, Book 16, No. 2438(English)/2532(Arabic)
    Sahih Bukhari, Book 16, No. 2439(English)/2533(Arabic)

    3. You wrote:
    “Prophet Muhammad issued a stark warning about persecuting others, “Whoever harms a non-Muslim at peace with us will never smell the fragrance of paradise, although its fragrance can be found a distance of forty years of travel,” (Sahih Bukhari 6516).”

    And in Sahih al-Bukhari 6516
    Narrated `Aisha:
    The Prophet (ﷺ) said, “Do not abuse the dead, for they have reached the result of what they have done.”

    Am I searching your quoted Hadiths in a wrong manner? Kindly clarify. Thanks.

    The actual reference appears to be “Sahih Bukhari 6914”

    I don’t think anyone is searching wrong. It may just be a variation in how ahadith are numbered in certain collections.

  • Truth Seeker

    A few clarifications please.
    1. You wrote:
    “When some companions pointed out that the deceased was not Muslim, he rebuked them stating, “Is it not a human soul?” (Sahih Bukhari 1250). The lesson here is to respect all humanity.”

    And in Sahih al-Bukhari 1249, 1250
    Narrated Abu Sa`id:
    The women requested the Prophet, “Please fix a day for us.” So the Prophet (ﷺ) preached to them and said, “A woman whose three children died would be screened from the Hell Fire by them,” Hearing that, a woman asked, “If two died?” The Prophet (ﷺ) replied, “Even two (would screen her from the (Hell) Fire. ” And Abu Huraira added, “Those children should be below the age of puberty. ”

    2. You wrote:
    “Even when the Prophet passed away, he had his armor mortgaged to a Jewish person (Sahih Bukhari 2759), a narration that shows he maintained good relations with Jews until his death.”

    And in Sahih al-Bukhari 2759
    Narrated Ibn `Abbas:
    Some people claim that the order in the above Verse is cancelled, by Allah, it is not cancelled, but the people have stopped acting on it. There are two kinds of guardians (who are in charge of the inheritance): One is that who inherits; such a person should give (of what he inherits to the relatives, the orphans and the needy, etc.), the other is that who does not inherit (e.g. the guardian of the orphans): such a person should speak kindly and say (to those who are present at the time of distribution), “I can not give it to you (as the wealth belongs to the orphans).

    3. You wrote:
    “Prophet Muhammad issued a stark warning about persecuting others, “Whoever harms a non-Muslim at peace with us will never smell the fragrance of paradise, although its fragrance can be found a distance of forty years of travel,” (Sahih Bukhari 6516).”

    And in Sahih al-Bukhari 6516
    Narrated `Aisha:
    The Prophet (ﷺ) said, “Do not abuse the dead, for they have reached the result of what they have done.”

    Am I searching your quoted Hadiths in a wrong manner? Kindly clarify. Thanks.

  • Bill

    Here’s a useful little article from Wikipedia:

    Contextomy
    Contextomy refers to the selective excerpting of words from their original linguistic context in a way that distorts the source’s intended meaning, a practice commonly referred to as “quoting out of context”. The problem here is not the removal of a quote from its original context per se (as all quotes are), but to the quoter’s decision to exclude from the excerpt certain nearby phrases or sentences (which become “context” by virtue of the exclusion) that serve to clarify the intentions behind the selected words. Comparing this practice to surgical excision, journalist Milton Mayer coined the term “contextomy” to describe its use by Julius Streicher, editor of the infamous Nazi broadsheet Der Stürmer in Weimar-era Germany. To arouse anti-semitic sentiments among the weekly’s working class Christian readership, Streicher regularly published truncated quotations from Talmudic texts that, in their shortened form, appear to advocate greed, slavery, and ritualistic murder. Although rarely employed to this malicious extreme, contextomy is a common method of misrepresentation in contemporary mass media, and studies have demonstrated that the effects of this misrepresentation can linger even after the audience is exposed to the original, in context, quote.

    I’ve cited it many times, but I do have to disagree with one line. “Although rarely employed to this malicious extreme…”? I think that line may have been written in a more innocent age, perhaps twenty years ago.

  • mindy1

    So basically, just like in Judaism and Christianity, context is important. The texts of all three faiths have misquoted so many times to justify the worst acts people can do 🙁 this was very informative.

  • GaribaldiOfLoonwatch

    I found this to be an excellent rejoinder to all those who employ this hadith for their own ends, whether it be Muslims who due to what is going on in Palestine or Islamophobes who use it in an attempt to tarnish Islam as inherently antisemitic.

Powered by Loon Watchers