“Scholar” Robert Spencer seemed to be shocked that any sort of violence would be the end result of his constant barrage that Islam is associated with violence and terror. In a recent post, Spencer claims:
There was just one problem with all this: the attacker was a Leftist employee of an organization that has gone on record as favoring the mosque. So whatever may have been his motivation in attacking this cab driver, one thing that almost certainly wasn’t motivating him was rage over the Islamic supremacist mega-mosque at Ground Zero.
And even if he were motivated by rage against the mosque, what would that have to do with us? Absolutely nothing. We are working on peaceful protests against the mosque, and trying to raise awareness among the American people about who is behind this effort and what its significance is. We have never advocated or condoned any violence or vigilantism — unlike the mosque’s own leader Imam Feisal Abdul Rauf, who refuses to condemn the bloodthirsty jihad terror group Hamas. We are not responsible by any conceivable stretch of the imagination for everything any given opponent of the mosque does.
Robert Spencer claims he has never “advocated or condoned any violence or vigilantism.” Yet, he promoted a genocidal video on his website, produced by a group responsible for ethnic violence against Muslims. He has alsoÂ supported the call for the annihilation of Pakistan. In addition, Spencer wrote in his book on p.224:
The situation in Europe has grown quite grave, and something must be done. It may be that the world needs a new Crusade, though of a kind different from those led by Richard the Lionhearted and Godfrey of Bouillon. We have seen in this book that the Crusades were primarily an act of defense against the encroachment of Islam. In that senseÂ a new Crusade is not only possible but desirable.
YouÂ remember the Crusades: where Raymond d’Aguiliers wrote:
Piles of heads, hands, and feet were to be seen in the streets of the city. It was necessary to pick one’s way over the bodies of men and horses. But these were small matters compared to what happened at the Temple of Solomon, a place where religious services are ordinarily chanted. What happened there? If I tell the truth, it will exceed your powers of belief. So let it suffice to say this much, at least, that in the Temple and porch of Solomon, men rode in blood up to their knees and bridle reins. Indeed, it was a just and splendid judgment of God that this place should be filled with the blood of the unbelievers, since it had suffered so long from their blasphemies.
And all the while,Â Spencer has constantly asserted that Islam and Muslims are all about “jihad,” war, terror, and violence. And anyone who says otherwise is lying to you. Look at what he said to Mark Jacobson:
â€œMuslims are the first immigrant group that has ever come to this country with a ready-made model of society and government they believe to be superior to what we have here,â€? Spencer told me. The thinking was clear to anyone who took the trouble to study the plan, the blogger and author of Stealth Jihad contended. â€œMuhammad said, â€˜When you meet the unbelievers, invite them to accept Islam; if they refuse, offer them the dhimmaâ€”second-class statusâ€”and, if they refuse that, go to war with them.â€™ Thatâ€™s it. Conversion, subjugation, or war. Three steps. Conversion, subjugation, or war â€¦ Thatâ€™s what Muhammad said. And in chapter 33, verse 21 of the Koran, it says Muhammad is the excellent example for the Muslim, you ask any Muslim and theyâ€™ll tell you that: That is nonnegotiable, what Muhammad said goes, and thatâ€™s not some hijacker extremist Islam, thatâ€™s mainstream â€¦ This is how it is, you donâ€™t need a bomb. I donâ€™t think Feisal is ever going to blow anything up, because thatâ€™s not his game; his game is a societal, cultural penetrationâ€‰â€¦â€‰â€?
Notice that he lumps all Muslims together. No nuance; no qualification; no recognition of the reality of the world. No. “Muslims” in general. And if you keep saying things like this over, and over, and over, and over – like Spencer does – then eventually someone is going to put 1 and 1 together.
On late August 24th he hailed Sharifâ€™s cab. Enright greeted Sharif with â€œAssalamu Alaikum.â€? A flattered Sharif responded. Enright asked Sharif how his Ramadan was going, and a compliant Sharif explained it was going well. Enright then gave Sharif a hint of what was coming by proceeding to ridicule Sharifâ€™s faith.
At the end of the ride, before stepping out of the cab, Enright then left Sharif a little piece of â€œfreedom fighting:â€?
â€œThis is the checkpoint motherfuckerâ€? and â€œI have to bring you down motherfucker,â€? shouted Enright. The New York Times reports that Enright then â€œwithdrew a Leatherman knife and reaching through the opening in the plastic divider, slashed Mr. Sharifâ€™s throat. When Mr. Sharif turned, he said, Mr. Enright stabbed him in his face, on his arm and on his thumbs.â€? Mr. Sharif pleaded: â€œI beg of you, donâ€™t kill me. I worked so hard, I have a family.â€?
Now, of course, Mr. Enright did not say, “Robert Spencer made me do it,” and so Spencer can innocently deny that he has anything to do with this and another acts of anti-Muslim violence.Â Yet it interesting that Robert Spencer doesnâ€™t distance Islam as he distances himself from anti-Muslim violence. He continually searches for bad news about Muslims and then ties it to all of Islam, using his â€œcut and paste scholarshipâ€? to do it. Yet, he is shocked to find that people will logically link anti-Muslim violence to his rhetoric. Are you kidding, Mr. Spencer?
Whatâ€™s worse, he seems to suggest that the attack on the Muslim cabbie was somehow â€œmade upâ€?:
Was this attack on a Muslim cab driver in New York yet another faked hate crime designed to tar opponents of Islamic supremacism as bigoted people who are fomenting hate? It cannot be ruled out. I hope that New York investigators are honest enough and brave enough to say so if that turns out to be the case.
Are you kidding, Mr. Spencer? So, this whole attack was a fabrication? The Muslim cabbie and Michael Enright got together and conspired to fake this attack? Including the numerous injuries to his neck, fingers, throat, and shoulder? His pleas to the attacker to spare his life a sham? Was this also â€œtaqiyyaâ€??
How low can Robert Spencer stoop?