Top Menu

All the World’s a Stage: Civil War and Western Dominance in Egypt

General Abdel Fatah al-Sisi

General Abdel Fatah al-Sisi: ‘His coup has since been revealed in all its glory, a spectacle meticulously choreographed and staged.’ Photograph: Jim Watson/AP


by Ilisha

General Abdel Fatah al-Sisi chose the same day Muslims achieved their historic victory at the Battle of Badr, the 17th day of Ramadan, to essentially invite civil war in Egypt.

As details emerge, it is becoming increasingly clear that Egypt’s military coup was carefully staged and choreographed by the Egyptian deep state and backed by Western imperial powers, including their Arab puppet regimes. Quite apart from my own strong criticism of the MB’s ideology and their terrible year in power (a topic for a forthcoming article) it is clear to me that Egypt’s fledgling democracy was hijacked, Hollywood movie style.

From the Guardian:

(full disclosure: written by MB spokesman Gehad Al-Haddad)

It is not often that the international community gets ample notice and an invitation to stop atrocities before they begin. This is precisely what happened earlier this week in Egypt.

General Abdel Fatah al-Sisi, leader of the coup-that’s-not-a-coup, gave a speech that has to be read as paving the way for a bloody campaign of repression.

It must be recalled that Sisi’s coup has since been revealed in all its glory, a spectacle meticulously choreographed and staged, in production since at least last November.

Since the coup it has emerged that the leaders of the armed forces had been meeting regularly with key opposition figures in the months before; that leading Mubarak-appointees on the constitutional court were involved; that financing and logistical support for the “grassroots” movement against Mohamed Morsi came from the opposition’s Naguib Sawiris; that the governments of the United Arab Emirates and Saudi Arabia provided aid that promptly materialised upon the ouster of Morsi; that Mohamed ElBaradei, leader of the National Salvation Front, had sought the support of western governments; and that US secretary of defence Chuck Hagel was in contact with Sisi in the days leading up to the coup.

We have also witnessed the miraculous disappearance overnight of fuel and electricity shortages, the equally miraculous return of law enforcement to the streets, and the emergence of key Mubarak regime figures, now representing roughly a third of the interim cabinet.

It has also become clear that the key to the entire affair – the participation of “millions” in anti-Morsi protests – is at best an exaggeration and at worst a piece of cinematic production involving the collaboration of an Egyptian movie director and military aerial photography. In contrast to the 18 days it took the army to step in in 2011, Sisi in this case issued an ultimatum on the first day of protests and followed through with the coup three days later.

The upshot of all of this is that when Sisi calls on all Egyptians to rally “in every public square”, and when the general characterises these forthcoming rallies as a “mandate” to fight “violence and terrorism” this has to be seen as paving the way for more military action.

The end game is not very difficult to see. Sisi has already given the world a taste of what he is willing to do when officers opened fire on peaceful protesters during morning prayers. There were at least 50 dead on the spot, possibly as many as a 100 in total.

The violence has continued sporadically since then. And while most news outlets conservatively label the violence as “clashes” between anti-Morsi and pro-Morsi factions, the inescapable facts are that all the deaths have been among those protesting the coup and calling for the return of Egypt’s hijacked democracy and that many of these deaths have come at the hands of non-uniformed state agents.

So when the general invokes the codewords of confronting “violence and terrorism” reasonable people should expect violence. And it is violence that is being marketed primarily to a western audience using familiar catchphrases and explicitly urging Sisi’s supporters to “show the world” that the military and the police are “authorised” to do just that.

The people who have rallied to the cause of restoring Egypt’s democracy have held a sit-in in Rabaa al-Adawiya, one of Cairo’s largest squares, away from Tahrir Square, which was the centre of anti-Morsi rallies. They have largely avoided Tahrir in order to avoid precipitating any confrontation between civilians. They have carefully organised their marches to avoid instigating violence. And they have been consistently the victims, not perpetrators, of violence.

By recklessly calling on “Egyptians” to protest in “all the public squares” the general is inviting a civil war. If he gets his civil war he will use the clashes as the pretext to widen the campaign of violent repression against anyone that opposes the coup. If the people do not oblige, media outlets – fully under military control since the 3 July coup – have already begun to accuse the Muslim Brotherhood of responsibility for every act of violence from Sinai to Cairo. And to “confront terrorism” the general will authorise deadly force against the people of Egypt….

It should come as no surprise the Egyptian military has adopted the rhetoric of the so-called “War on Terror,” which translates into an endless blank check to employ violence against anyone who dares to resist the US-backed military regime. If the coup really represented the will of the Egyptian people, as some Western pundits contend, why must it be held in place by force? If the goal is democracy, why aren’t fresh elections a top priority?

According to Western calculus, a regime is worthy of support to the extent it capitulates to Western interests. “Islamists” are welcome, as long as they serve as Western puppets which to a large degree Morsi and the MB were willing to do.

The real enemy is genuine democracy, because a government, Islamic or secular, that really serves the interests of the Egyptian people will not serve the interests of the Western imperial powers.

Despite all the paranoid rhetoric about “Islamists” supposedly “seizing” power, the West has never hesitated to support the authoritarian regime in Saudi Arabia, and other puppet regimes in the Gulf. In fact, Saudi Arabia was a key partner in orchestrating the coup against Morsi, who won the presidency through free and fair elections.

report from the Egyptian Centre for Media Studies and Public Opinion suggests that most people in Egypt are opposed to the removal of President Mohamed Morsi from office. Elaborate theatrics cannot hide the fact the US-backed Egyptian military has swooped in to thwart democracy in favor of the status quo.

Islamophobia has always served as a handy cover for Western military intervention all over the world. The Western imperial powers side with Muslims or against Muslims, depending on what best serves their short-term interests. In Egypt, the current narrative is that the Egyptian military rescued Egyptian democracy from the clutches of evil “Islamists” who “seized” power and were radically going to change Egypt’s identity. The real goal was to ensure that Egypt remains ripe for Western dominance and plunder.

, , , , , , ,

  • Pingback: Islamophobe Politicians in Egypt: Praise Egyptian Military’s Crackdown | Islamophobia Today eNewspaper()

  • TheZodiacComments

    “Then you definitely don’t support democracy.”

    I do support democracy, but being democratically elected doesn’t make one good. If supporting a coup against an autocrat is against democracy, then the Portuguese Coup of 1974, for one example was anti-democratic 😛

    A recall vote should have been allowed though, I agree.

  • TheZodiacComments

    I admittedly think the coup was a good thing, and I think this piece from a Muslim Brotherhood member appears to distort many of the observed facts about the growing civil movement and protests against Morsi that had been building up for months:

    The fact is, millions of Egyptians had been protesting and demanding Morsi resign for months, who was moving in an autocratic and increasingly violent direction, so the military saw the writing on the wall and got rid of him. I definitely support the ousting and removal of Islamic fundamentalist movements from power.

  • Nizar Qalb

    Why are you still trying?

  • Nizar Qalb

    You said no one self identified… I proved it wrong.
    The MB is a HUGE group… they are also Muslims… and self identify as Islamists…. end of story. You sure have a derogatory view towards the Muslim Brotherhood…

    I am done, as I agreed to be with our friendly editor above.

  • Chameleon_X

    More tu quoque fallacy nonsense, and more unsupported claims about the level of support and usage of this word amongst Muslims.

Powered by Loon Watchers