Top Menu

IDF Sniper David D. Ovadia Admits to Killing 13 Children in Gaza, Says, “Your Next Fucking Muslims” (Updated)

These are real war crimes we are talking about people. Horrific:

David_Ovadia

Counter Current News

An Instagram post by an Israel Defense Forces sniper boasts of murdering 13 Gazan children in one day. An IDF Combat Engineering Corps Soldier, specifically, David D. Ovadia posed with a Barrett .50 caliber sniper rifle.

Ovadia posted his comments on the Instagram account of Palestinian Sherrii ElKaderi.

The image was quickly screen captured in case Ovadia came to his senses and realized that he could be prosecuted for his admission of war crimes. It is unclear and perhaps unlikely that the Barrett was used in the commission of such crimes, as this weapon is usually reserved for the best of the best marksmen. In any event, Ovadia is in active deployment and openly confesses to killing Gazan civilian children. While not specifying what weapon he used, the posting of himself with the .50 caliber rifle was obviously meant to be visually intimidating to Palestinians.

In the mean time, while more information is gathered on Ovadia, the “hacktivist” group “Anonymous” took control of his Instagram account, deleting it entirely. For “good measure” Anonymous sources said that they hacked the websites of the Mossad intelligence agency in Israel “for the brave IDF Sniper”, in reference to Ovadia. By 11:30, they had taken down the Israeli Ministry of Defense as well, and similarly attributed it as a response to Ovadia’s confessions.

If you agree that Ovadia’s admission of war crimes against Gazan children needs to be FRONT PAGE NEWS, share this with someone you know who cares!

UPDATE:

There is a dispute over the authenticity of the post. According to IBTimesUK:

IBTimes UK was unable to independently verify whether the messages were written by Ovadia or not.

“However, some people argued they are fake.

“Someone took a real soldier’s [David Ovadia] FB photos & created fake social media accounts,” said Twitter user Lahav Harkov, who writes for the Jerusalem Post.

Sparking outcry, Ovadia is alleged to have written: “I killed 13 children today and you are next f*****g Muslims go to hell b*****s.” 

Shortly after the message was posted, Ovadia’s account was made private. 

In the same picture posted on Instagram, available through social media search engine Lakako, another tagline reads: “Stop running u gonna die anyway.”

Hundreds took to social media to vent their outrage as the Palestinian death toll continues to rise in the ongoing Gaza-Israel crisis. Some netizens accused Ovada of committing war crimes.”

, , , , , , , , , , ,

  • Bruno Coro Niembro

    Not really. You see, there is a fundamental flaw in the pro-Israeli nazi trash who arguments things like this: if Hamas really doesn’t care about killing their own civilians, what would the IDF soldiers use them as human shields, among them 9 years old kids?

    Not to talk about all these deranged settlers who take their kids with them in occupied territory, eh?

    Secondly, it is truly a wonder how a… being… like you seriously considers himself to be best than a nazi. A waste of precious oxygen in any case.

  • Bruno Coro Niembro
  • Bruno Coro Niembro

    Awesome. Do you really believe this bullshit??

    Maybe the soldiers who used a 9 and 11 years old Palestinian kid as a human shield were being satirical too??

  • Just_Stopping_By

    “There is no such thing as ‘too young to be a terrorist.'”

    There is no such thing as “too old to write something incredibly stupid.” You really believe that a child under a year old could be a terrorist?

    Look at the chart here and tell me how you could believe that any of those in the 0-4 year age group could possibly be terrorists. http://www.nytimes.com/2014/08/06/world/middleeast/civilian-or-not-new-fight-in-tallying-the-dead-from-the-gaza-conflict.html?_r=0

  • Tanveer ¯_(ツ)_/¯ Khan

    I do hope that Hamas fighters somehow catch you and fire a Qassam rocket up your ass. That would be funny.

  • Joe

    Should have been more. They were either voluntarily being human shields to protect terrorists, or were already terrorists themselves. There is no such thing as ‘too young to be a terrorist.’

  • Awesome

    The first and most important question I have is, Do you believe in Israel’s right to exist as a nation?
    —-

    – I would acknowledge Israel as having nationhood status as long as it were not at the unwilling expense of anyone else and it had defined borders. Anything short of that, and it has no legitimate claim to nationhood status. It may be categorized as a “colony” or a “plantation”, but not a nation-state.

    Also, existence isn’t a right. It is something that either is, or is not, regardless of who acknowledges what.

    —-
    Israel agreed to two state solutions with “defined borders” for 40 years that PLO and Arab League Leaders rejected. it was only after 1967 that Israel adopted it’s policies of “Fuck Palestine” in reaction to 3 countries invading at once with the intentions of “pushing them into the sea”. If you want to talk about reactionary policies then you can point at Palestinians first.
    —-

    – In fact, after the 1949 armistice agreement, it was only Israel that was the aggressor in virtually every conflict that they were involved in, and that includes the wars in 1956 and in 1967.

    The fact of the matter is that Israel was created through the Balfour Declaration and the British Mandate for Palestine, which has always been designed to disenfranchise the native Palestinians, who have been living there for thousands of years.

    In the early 20th century, the Palestinians wanted a nation-state of their own just like everyone else. At that time, the Palestinians were duped into thinking that they would gain, or become part of, an independent Arab state with the end of the Ottoman Empire. When they realized they were getting shafted, they attempted a revolt in the 1930s, which the British occupiers managed to shut down. They even attempted to compromise, and tried to accept a partition plan. However, between the Peel Commission and the 1947 UN Partition Plan, neither was a just, acceptable partition plan, and the Palestinians rejected both.

    The final partition plan (the 1947 UN Partition Plan) gave the Palestinians (who constituted 68% of Palestine’s population) only 45% of the land, which the Palestinians rejected (as any sensible person would). The British soon withdrew and the Jewish immigrants declared their “State of Israel” while ethnically cleansing the Palestinians. Neighboring Arab countries, compromised by corruption, disunity, threats and embargoes, made a half-hearted attempt to protect the lands allocated to the Palestinians by the partition plan in the 1948 Arab-Israeli War. They inevitably lost, and the 1949 armistice gave Palestinians only 20% of the land (i.e. Gaza and the West Bank).

    Israel’s continued aggression eventually resulted in the 1956 war and the 1967 war, in which it annexed even more Palestinian territory. Today, as in the past, Israel offers the Palestinians nothing besides death and oppression, and doesn’t even consider deals or agreements that are even remotely fair or just to the Palestinians. The only ones who were ever “pushed into the sea” were the Palestinians (quite literally in fact) in Acre back in 1948.

    —-
    However it’s been 50 years and polls suggest both Palestinians and Israelis are tired of this war. It’s the governments of both territories that seem to believe that one cannot exist while the other does. Israelis, Arabs and Palestinians are all hurt by their governments intentions to destroy each other.
    —-

    – It is more specifically the Israeli government and its sponsors that want war, because Israel’s existence depends on it, as do the profit margins of its sponsors. If there were peace and justice then there would be no Israel, because Israel defines its existence on conflict. Its sponsors would also lose a key component in their long-term goal of destabilizing the region. Ultimately, Israel needs a “bogeyman” even more than the US does.

    Israel is a racist apartheid, rogue, welfare-state run by zealous non-Semitic bigots, terrorists and war criminals, who build racial colonies on top of stolen land, and practice ethnic cleansing as well as almost every human vice under the sun that you can think of, and whose existence is predicated on perpetual conflict for perpetual profits for the American military-industrial complex.

    —-
    The Palestinian Authority is willing to talk peace. Hamas is not. Israel is constantly in a state of war and therefore elects wartime leaders. If there can be an extended peace for just a short time then maybe they will elect leaders that are more apt to extend an olive branch as opposed to a sword.
    —–

    – Hamas is also willing to talk peace, but the problem is that Israel’s idea of “peace” is where they are allowed to do whatever they want against the Palestinians with impunity while no one is allowed to do anything against them. Since no one with any sense would ever agree to such a thing, then the conflict continues, which is what Israel wants anyway.

    —-
    But that’s just me being optimistic. Realistically, Israel will either committ an even greater atrocity of overthrowing an elected government and actually occupying the territory and not this half assed occupation. Or Israel will lose international support and be vulnerable to whatever intentions their neighbors have toward them, ie: actual genocide
    —–

    – Realistically, Israel is going to continue to do what they have been doing since their statehood was declared – perpetuate conflict and instability in Palestine and the rest of the region, while expanding their dominance. However, such a state is ultimately unsustainable, and is either going to have to change its status quo or dissolve.

    The “State of Israel” is:

    – a relic of British colonialism
    – dependent on conflict for survival
    – a cash-cow for the American military-industrial complex
    – the “trojan horse” for hastening Armageddon to Zionist Christians
    – the Jewish-exclusive homeland to Zionist Jews
    – an abomination to Orthodox Jews
    – an enemy to the Arabs and Muslims in general
    – a scourge on, as well as an embarrassment for, humanity

    It had an unpleasant beginning, continues to be unpleasant, and so it’s inevitable end is likely going to be unpleasant as well.

  • George Dixon Adams

    They did withdraw from the Gaza Strip in 2005. They also evacuated 5 settlements in the West Bank. Hamas was elected over Fatah and broke the Unity Government between the West Bank and Gaza. Fatah was expelled from Gaza after infighting broke out. And then Hamas started firing rockets at Israel. The “fool me once” addage comes to mind.

    And again up until the 1967 6 day war Israel did accept several different proposals for a two state Solution including the 1949 Armistice Agreement. Which was rejected by PLO and Arab League Leadership. It wasn’t until after Israel won and seized land from Jordan and Egypt that the Palestinian representatives started favoring the 1949 armistice lines. And even then there was heavy aggression from Arab States that lead to the popular Election of the far right Israeli Likud party.

    As far as stealing land goes a larger portion than is readily admitted to of the settlements were purchased from Palestinians, which is a capital crime in the West Bank and Gaza. So, let’s say I’m Palestinian and I sell my land for more than I could to any of my fellow Palestinians to an Israeli. Do I A: Happily admit to selling my land and face life in prison or B: accuse Jews of stealing it and move improve my monetary situation surreptitiously?

    History has proven to be a hard thing to overcome for the Israeli government. Terrorist attacks and rocket fire in recent history and all out war declared on them 50 years past. The Palestinians had a chance in 2005, things were moving forward with peace talks and Israel was removing itself from their territories. They elected an internationally recognized terrorist organization as their governing body, who’s declared aim was to annihilate Israel. This brings us to the present day situation.

    No side is blameless in this conflict. Israel is definitely not but every time there has been an opportunity for peace it has been shot down by one or another of the parties. If you want to blame it solely on Israel that is your mistake to make and will just allow for the continuation of conflict between the two people’s. If one side feels it’s been more harmed by the other there will always be a reason for fighting.

  • Awesome

    Hamas is only a reaction to Israel’s policies. They are neither the source of those policies, nor were they around when Israel adopted such policies in the first place. Today, as in the past, Israel offers the Palestinians nothing besides death and oppression, while demanding to be recognized as a state, when it still refuses to define its own borders (a general requirement for nation-state status). Hamas is only a symptom of the problem while Israel remains the primary cause of it. You cannot solve the problem while only addressing the symptom(s), as the primary cause must also be addressed if the problem is to be solved.

    Just recently, Israel announced plans to annex 4 square kilometers in the occupied West Bank, and as long as Israel continues to engage in such counterproductive activities without defining its own borders, then a true, lasting peace deal can never be achieved.

  • 1DrM

    As fake as your lunatic claims to Palestine, Zionist troll?

  • 1DrM

    Says the Zionist troll.

  • George Dixon Adams

    Fake

  • George Dixon Adams

    His heart being in the right place is to want Israel wiped of the face of the earth? Seems a little hypocritical when accusing them of being genocidal don’t you think?

  • George Dixon Adams

    He was being Facetious.

  • Friend of Bosnia

    But of course, I’m not the first one to come to this conclusion.

  • Awesome

    I agree, and while they may view themselves as such, the other side of this is that their rulers know that they can only survive as a pretend “nation-state” as long as they are engaged in conflict. If the Palestinians go, then they would either have to find another group of poor people to fight with and abuse, or they would be screwed. In terms of the Crusaders, you could almost say that Israel is basically the second Crusader state only with a different religion.

  • Awesome

    I find it interesting, yet disturbing that the people who accept this Instagram post as undoubtedly true seem to have a hatred for not, just one Jewish person, not a group, but ALL people of the Jewish race. Come on, do you really believe ANY soldier would personally risk charges of a war crime of this magnitude, let alone bring shame and dishonor to their nation and comrades (trained soldiers, especially a highly trained sniper, don’t have those types lapses in judgment).
    —-

    – What is interesting is that you think that those who consider this instagram to be genuine must have some hatred for all Jewish people, as if there is absolutely no other reason anyone would consider such an instagram to be genuine. It doesn’t occur to you that perhaps the reason people are so quick to consider this, might be because of the widespread hatred and genocidal sentiments and intent that Israelis and the IOF have against the Palestinians? Or the fact that this is actually demonstrated by the actions of the Israelis and the IOF against the Palestinians?

    It is laughable to expect that any Israeli soldier would be held accountable for a war crime, when almost everything Israel has done against the Palestinians is a war crime, which even the UN recognizes.

    According to the Geneva convention:

    – Destroying civilian infrastructure is a war crime
    – The indiscriminate or disproportionate use of force is a war crime

    – Collective punishment for the acts of a few is a war crime

    – Targeting civilians is a war crime

    And Israel does all of those things and more. The only thing that Israel doesn’t like about its war crimes is when they are broadcasted to the rest of the world and rightfully condemned. In terms of war crimes, Israel’s approach isn’t much different from that of a lot of other countries. So, it ultimately doesn’t matter if the instagram is genuine or not, because given everything else, it might as well have been. It wouldn’t be a shame and dishonor to his nation and comrades, when it’s virtually an unofficial state policy for them.

    —–
    I also find it interesting that this is an anonymous Internet story, what is the name of the reputable journalist who broke this story? This alleged story woefully lacks the earmarks of a professional, reputable journalist. What it DOES have the distinct appearance of is “propaganda”. If there was an actual David D. Ovadia, and the image was actually sent through his Instagram account, it could has easily been a matter of his account being hacked, and the imaged forged, and deliberately sent to a “Palestinian” to have the desired affect as propaganda.

    Without proof of the story or the identity of the person who first reported this, (so their alleged story can be verified) in my opinion, it qualifies 100% as nothing more than hate promoting propaganda. If you can provide the identity of the reputable journalist who authored this alleged story, please provide it and I will consider changing my opinion. Otherwise, if you have initially accepted this as truth, maybe it is YOU who should consider changing your opinion.
    —-

    – It is interesting how important you think any of this is in the larger context of the situation. Do you really think it matters that much if the story is real or fake when the underlying reality it portrays is still true? Journalistic integrity is one thing, but let’s not miss the bigger picture here.

    —-
    BTW, those here who have mentioned that civilians have been killed, did you know that Israelis attempt to warn the Palestinian people in an area they are going to strike, prior to the actual attack? They use leaflets, radio, phone calls, etc., to try and limit or eliminate civilian casualties. Yes, they do.
    —–

    – Everyone is (or should be) aware of Israel’s attempt to warn the Palestinians before hand, as it is one of Israel’s many acts of cruelty against the Palestinians. The warning messages are only 30 seconds to a few minutes beforehand, encouraging them to rush outside into the streets where the trigger-happy IOF ground forces are practically shooting at anything that moves. It’s hard to imagine how effective those warning messages are at limiting or eliminating civilian casualties, as it seems like it would do just the opposite. It also seems a little paradoxical for the IOF to send messages to people in a building, as there doesn’t seem to be much of a point to blowing up an abandoned building.

    What would be the content of those warning messages anyway? “We, the IDF, are about to blow up the building that you are in, so if you don’t want to be caught in the explosion, then you have 30 seconds/a few minutes to evacuate to the outside where we can actually see you when we kill you”? What a joke.

    —-
    However, Hamas has this cowardly strategy of using it’s own people as a shield. The equivalent to when the police show up to apprehend a criminal and he grabs a woman or child and holds them in front of himself to keep the police from harming him, and if they do make an attempt to get him, the hostage/shield is in harms way. In the case of Hamas, however, they know that when there are civilian casualties, or injuries, they can capitalize on it to their advantage. Another quite effective propaganda tool. It’s not a new strategy and it’s not difficult to identify unless you just don’t want to see it.
    —–

    Fighting back from civilian areas against an invading army is a standard, required tactic in warfare when there are no other options for fighting back. It would be absurd for any government to only attack the invaders from outside of its civilian territory. The “human shield” argument only works if there are other locations to attack from. Gaza is an open-air prison under Israeli occupation, so unfortunately there is no other way for its fighters to fight back against the IOF. It’s a strategy of necessity not cowardice.

    Also, the analogy you provided is inaccurate. The situation is more akin to a situation where the warden of a prison frequently has the prison guards go cell to cell, brutalizing the prisoners indiscriminately while always claiming it is in response to a random prisoner spitting in a prison guard’s face, while never bothering take any action against the actual prisoners responsible.

    If all Israel cared about was its so-called “self-dense” then they could have easily singled out the individuals engaged in hostilities and arrested them. So clearly, defense is not their concern.

    —–
    There was a time in history when there was no such thing as a surgical strike. In WWII, Korea, and even in Vietnam carpet bombing was used and it killed enemy soldiers, civilians, and even your own troops and their allies were killed sometimes. One of the many reasons it is said that, “War is hell.”
    —–

    In fact, there is still no such thing as a “surgical strike” for a lot of military factions today who either can’t afford it or are prevented from having it. Those who have that capability and deliberately choose not to use it are worse than those who do not have that capability at all and don’t use it. Just because a “surgical strike” wasn’t possible in the past or are beyond the capabilities of some military factions today, is not an excuse to not use it at all for those who have that capability.

    It may be that “war is hell”, but there are still things in war that aren’t acceptable. Desertion? Treachery? Mutiny? Should these things get a pass because “war is hell”? If not, then why should the targeting of civilians get a pass because “war is hell”?

    Ultimately, warring factions are going to fight with whatever they can. Some have expensive military forces to throw around, while others only have cheap, homemade weapons and the element of surprise. When the former fights, it’s a “war”, when the latter fights, its “terrorism”. As it has been stated:

    “Terrorism is the war of the poor, and war is the terrorism of the rich.” – Peter Ustinov

  • Friend of Bosnia

    Of course.

  • Bruno Coro Niembro

    Do you know about the IDF druze soldier who was promoted after shooting a 13 years old schoolgirl, Joe?

  • Bruno Coro Niembro

    Joe:

    1. Were the four children at the beach used as human shields or warned aobut the attack? Were the Palestinians at the UN schools used as human shields or warned about the attack? And a long etc?
    2. Fearing to be trialed for warcrimes??? This is nonsense. When was a Israeli trialed for war crimes? When two IDF soldiers used a 9 years old as a human shield, they weren’t even sent to prison. This human waste knows it won’t be punished, and that’s why they don’t care about what they put on Internet. That’s why they also posted pics such as this one:

  • Bruno Coro Niembro

    This should be updated. There is no doubt whatsoever about the authenticity of this. The only thing that happened is that human trash removed the pic due to the backlash he received.

  • Friend of Bosnia

    And it’s the same false arguments genocidals always say to justify genocide. In Paleestine, in Bosnia, in Rwanda, in Burma, it’s always the same old same old.
    And it’s always everybody else’s fault if they don’t admit how faultless and justified the genocidals are in committing genocide.

Powered by Loon Watchers