Top Menu

Pamela Geller of AtlasShrugs: Bus Ads Inspired by Ayn Rand’s Racist Views of Arabs and Muslims?

 SIOA, Geller and Spencer’s ad campaign

“If you mean whose side should we be on: Israel or the Arabs? I would certainly say Israel because it’s the advanced, technological, civilized country amidst a group of almost totally primitive savagesAyn Rand (1979, The Donahue Show)

Pamela Geller so adores the “objectivist philosopher” and author Ayn Rand that she gave her blog the name Atlas Shrugs, in homage to Rand’s book “Atlas Shrugged.” Is it then a coincidence that her most recent hate campaign contained the text: “In any war between the civilized man and the savage, support the civilized man.”? Geller’s chosen description almost exactly parallels Ayn Rand’s statement regarding the conflict in Palestine, with the exception that she cowardly omitted who she intends by “savage.” As you can see from the quote above Rand described the conflict as one between “civilized” Israelis and the “savage” Palestinians and Arabs.

There is no doubt in my mind that in light of these facts the AtlasShrugs/SIOA/JihadWatch ad campaign is a racist and Islamophobic one. So far the ad campaign has run in New York and is running on buses in San Francisco. New York’s transit authority (MTA) initially refused to run the ads, Geller sued and won on free speech grounds. San Francisco has admitted that it fears being tied up in litigation and has decided to allow the ads even though they contradict its policy on “political advertisements.”


This is not Geller’s first foray into bigoted advertising campaigns.

The looniest blogger ever is a big fan of advertising her bigotry and hate of Islam, Muslims and Arabs on buses, taxis and other forms of transportation across the United States. Previously, Geller and Spencer teamed up for an advertisement campaign that claimed the pretense of helping those who want to “Leave Islam,” but weren’t able to out of “fear.” In reality, her message was not one of help but hatred, as was well covered. Geller’s aim was to defame American Muslims as an oppressive community that was secretly holding an untold number of former Muslims who want to leave Islam hostage.

These bigoted endeavors are generally attempts to gain publicity by Geller, but just ignoring her will not do–not this time.

Geller and Spencer’s recent ad campaign in the name of their hate group SIOA portrays Israel as “civilized” and its critics as “jihadists” and “savages.” The campaign is in response to advertisements that call on US citizens to tell Congress to stop sending aid to Israel, such as this one:

Melrose Walnut r

I believe this to be a worthy message and agree with it, but even if you don’t, even if you disagree with this advertisement on political grounds, to react as Geller and her ilk have is abominable. In characteristically hyperventilating and loony verbiage Geller and Spencer consider such advertisements to be not only “anti-Israel” (which they aren’t) but “anti-Semitic” and “genocidal!” Such a dilution and abuse of the very serious term “anti-Semite” should not only be condemned but countered by all those who expose bigotry, especially national Jewish organizations.

Geller claims that her ads are not about hate, and that the “savages” she is talking about are “suicide bombers,”

Because any targeting of innocent civilians is savagery. Mothers and children on a bus are targeted, and that is savagery. Kidnapping and murdering is savagery. The U.S. does not conduct war that way, and neither does Israel [this is a lie, which we have proven over and over–Ed.]. Now, there is sometimes the accidental death of civilians, which is far different than the targeting of innocent civilians.

The truth is Geller isn’t referring only to suicide bombers. She is putting forward a type of double-speak. Geller is reaffirming Ayn Rand’s racist position on Israel-Palestine, this is why the language is so similar between the two.

You will never hear Geller condemn Rand. I hope Geller gets questioned about this striking parallel between her ad and her hero and idol, Ayn Rand’s words:

(h/t: magicredpil)

A local ABC affiliate in San Francisco has some good coverage on the ad campaign and reaction from  residents and San Francisco’s city transportation (Muni), Geller makes a cameo as well:

There is a petition calling for the ads to be stopped. They seem to have a good case considering the fact that Geller’s ads are steeped in implicit racism and bigotry against a whole people and community.

UPDATE: A direct quote from Ayn Rand that is nearly identical to the words on Geller and Spencer’s Bus Ads  (h/t: BelievingAtheist).

“The Arabs are one of the least developed cultures. They are typically nomads. Their culture is primitive, and they resent Israel because it’s the sole beachhead of modern science and civilization on their continent. WHEN YOU HAVE CIVILIZED MEN FIGHTING SAVAGES, YOU SUPPORT THE CIVILIZED MEN, no matter who they are.”

, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

  • Pingback: Donating to win hearts and minds | The Western Muslim Magazine()

  • Pingback: Exclusive: Reverend Deacon Robert Spencer of Our Lady of the Cedars Church | Spencer Watch()

  • Pingback: LoonWatch: “#MyJihad” Brings Out Anti-Muslim Rage Amongst Hypocritical Islamophobic Warmongers | CAIR-Chicago()

  • Pingback: “#MyJihad” Brings Out Anti-Muslim Rage Amongst Hypocritical Islamophobic Warmongers | Islamophobia Today eNewspaper()

  • Pingback: Yes, the “Savage” Ads Are Offensive: Welcome to a Free Society « hadeeqa bi amreeka()

  • pateriot

    The biggest problem with Ayn Rand is that she has the balls to speak the truth when it comes to Muslims. We have become so accustomed to tiptoeing around the elephant in our living room and being PC that we can’t even recognize the truth. Buddhists, Hindus, Zoastrians, Shintos, Christians, Jews, etc, are not attacking us and acting like barbaric savages. That seems to be almost exclusively a Muslim characteristic. This is not isolated cases but is pretty much universal to Islamics wherever they live around the World.

    Where it is true that most Muslims are decent people who want to live in peace, it is equally true that the vast majority of terrorism is committed by Muslims around the World. Some of it is directed to the West and Western values, while others are directed towards each other. There are Islamic societies that are less oppressive and barbaric but they must also guard against the oppression and violent tactics of the Islamics that threaten to oppress them.

    I am no fan of Israel. I think that they have take advantage and completely outmaneuvered a less sophisticated society (Palestinians) to force them out of power and out of their lands. The religious arrogance of many Israelis is also hard to take. However, the statement, “In any war between the civilized man and the savages, support the civilized man”, has more than a little validity to it.

    The Islamic culture that surrounds them is extremely misogynistic where women are treated little better than dogs, repressive to the point of oppression, hate-filled and unforgiving (an eye for an eye and a tooth for a tooth), violent, and yes… savage! Children are put in parades with suicide belts and the murder of innocents is wildly celebrated.

    As much as I would like to be sympathetic to the plight of the Palestinian people, I find it next to impossible because of the barbarism inherent to their Islamic culture.

  • Pingback: USA – You don’t get much sicker than this! Pamela Geller – SICK F#CK « consciousshift2012()

  • I actually am beginning to have another outlook on the Arab mind, especially after reading this new blog that I found written by an Palestinian-Muslim… who doesn’t look like a savage and seems pretty civilized to me. Its insightful, intriguing, and funny. Doesn’t sound too bad for a literate savage.

Powered by Loon Watchers