Top Menu

A Refutation of Robert Spencer’s Attack on Prof. Akbar Ahmed


Rev. Deacon Robert Spencer‘s hatred of Islam and Muslims is quite evident by his consistent efforts to demonize every single Muslim who has some sort of impact on society.

His recent conspiratorial gaze and hatred has been directed at Prof. Akbar Ahmed, a well-regarded scholar and activist for peace and interfaith co-operation–anathema to Rev. Deacon Spencer.


by Craig Considine

Robert Spencer, the administrator of the blog JihadWatch, is known for painting all Muslims as extremists. In a recent post titled “AKBAR AHMED, ADVOCATE OF ‘DIALOGUE,’ CLAIMS ‘ISLAMOPHOBES’ ARE ‘LINKING ISLAM TO VIOLENCE, TERRORISM AND INTOLERANCE,” Spencer argues that PROFESSOR AHMED, the Ibn Khaldun Chair of Islamic Studies at American University in Washington, DC, is “disingenuous” in promoting interfaith dialogue and interested in converting non-Muslims to Islam. Spencer also calls him an “Islamic supremacist” and likens him to SAYYID QUTB, the 20th century Muslim extremist.

To refute Spencer’s accusations, I will look to the example of Professor Ahmed and his relationships with non-Muslims, through which he promotes interfaith dialogue. In doing so, I prove that he is a leading Muslim figure in the fight against religious extremism and that not all Muslims are extremists, as Spencer claims.

I am a Roman Catholic student and assistant to Professor Ahmed, who is like a father to me. He does not treat me differently for being Catholic because he sees Christians and Muslims as equal members of the Abrahamic family. In 2008, Professor Ahmed and his wife had dinner at our family home in suburban Boston. Over Italian food, he shared with my mother, a Roman Catholic and Italian American, several stories of his childhood days in Pakistan. He was educated by Christians at Forman Christian College in Lahore and at Burn Hall in Abbottabad, which was run by Roman Catholic priests. Touching upon these experiences in the recent New York Times article “PAKISTAN’S PERSECUTED CHRISTIANS,” Professor Ahmed wrote: “We loved and respected our Christian teachers, and they us. We never doubted that harmony and cooperation between faith groups were not only possible, but also completely normal. It was the reality of our lives.” Religious tolerance was built into Professor Ahmed’s life from his earliest days, which is why he is naturally inclined to speak and write about how Muslims and non-Muslims can coexist.

Professor Akbar Ahmed (right) celebrating Christmas with Christians in Pakistan.

Professor Ahmed has also risked his own life in trying to build bridges between his Muslim and Christian friends in Pakistan. In December 2013, he gave a lecture at Forman Christian College, despite the police warning that the Pakistani Taliban had dispatched bombers to the city as an act of revenge for the killing of a former Pakistani Taliban leader. Professor Ahmed’s lecture titled “BUILDING BRIDGES OVER TROUBLED WATERS” demanded that Muslims be more tolerant of Christianity and other non-Muslim faiths in Pakistan. By supporting the rights of non-Muslims, he advocates for religious freedom and equality in a country which is rife with discrimination and persecution.

Developing friendships with Christian leaders has always been a priority for Professor Ahmed. After the events of September 11th, 2001, he befriended former BISHOP JOHN CHANE of the Washington National Cathedral, with whom he co-authored an article with him in 2010 titled “CHRISTIANS SENSELESSLY TORMENTED BY EXTREMISTS IN MUSLIM WORLD.” Professor Ahmed and Bishop Chane called for Muslims to “think of Jesus, so highly revered and loved by both Christians and Muslims,” as a way of building respect and harmony among followers of Christianity and Islam. Instead of supporting Muslims who attack Christians, Professor Ahmed challenges them on how persecuting non-Muslims is contrary to Prophet Muhammad’s philosophy on tolerance.

Professors Judea Pearl and Akbar Ahmed

Alongside his relationships with Christian friends, Professor Ahmed has also developed a powerful friendship with PROFESSOR JUDEA PEARL, a Jew and father of Daniel Pearl, the Wall Street journalist who was murdered by Muslim extremists in Karachi, Pakistan in 2002. One year later, the American Jewish Committee invited Professors Ahmed and Pearl to lead a nation-wide public dialogue on the divisions between Muslims and Jews. In 2006, they were among the recipients of the first annual Purpose Prize “in recognition of [their] simple, yet innovative approach to solving one of society’s most pressing problems.” Professor Ahmed collaborated with Professor Pearl in order to carve the path for Jewish and Muslim understanding and to promote the dialogue between, and not the clash of, civilizations.

Read the rest…

, , , , , ,

  • Pingback: Articles « Craig Considine()

  • The greenmantle

    Quite a few nutters joining in on the blog now. Its amusing that they unwittingly show what a bunch of sad types the haters are , beyond parody

    Sir David

  • The greenmantle

    and who sould turn up up on the Blog but our old sparing parntner Living engine . He is suggesting all the old tropes about Loonwatch I suggested people make their own desisions after reading here .
    Its like oldtimes . He is still an islamaphobic idiot .

    Sir David

  • Pingback: A refute of Robert Spencer’s post on Professor Akbar Ahmed | Craig Considine()

  • Jekyll

    Boogeyman boogeyman…create the enemy, justify the violence, or justify violence by creating the enemy.

  • SarahAB

    Yes. We have not been in touch recently, but I used to be acquainted with his daughter who was also very committed to interfaith dialogue and wrote a fascinating study of Pashtun women.

  • Rights

    Akbar Ahmed’s work is about building bridges of mutual understanding, tolerance, and acceptance. Spencer’s work is also about building bridges, but of a different sort – hatred, intolerance, bigotry, and prejudice. What a difference in the two men’s contribution to humanity!

  • Pingback: Articles | Craig Considine()

  • The greenmantle

    Well said . Also the Prof is a real academic and Spencer isn’t 🙂
    I also went on to the origional post and mentioned that we had cross posted it here . I think we should do more of that sort of stuff to spread the word we are here .
    Sir David

  • Pingback: A Refutation of Robert Spencer’s Attack on Prof. Akbar Ahmed | Spencer Watch()

  • Just_Stopping_By

    It’s not a surprise that Spencer is desperate to attempt to discredit. Prof. Akbar Ahmed. Prof. Ahmed is a living example of one of Spencer’s worst nightmares: a real-live Muslim who disproves the Islamophobic fantasy that one cannot be both a genuine Muslim and a genuine believer in peace and interfaith dialogue.

    The world would be a better place if more people of all religions shared Prof. Ahmed’s outlook.

  • Ahmed

    True. Extremists like Spencer are ridiculously hypocrital when it comes to extremism. They attempt to smear all muslims as extremists but are willing to pay no heed to their own extremists.

  • wjshelton

    He is so labeled by [expletive deleted] who are so blinded by hatred that they cannot see anything other than what is projected by their very own biases.

  • mindy1

    He sounds like the kind of person I would love to have an interfaith dialouge with. How does such a nice person get branded as an extremist?

Powered by Loon Watchers