“Muslims always play the double strategem of threatening violence whilst claiming victim status.”

Really? You Islamophobes say the same things again and again. Firstly, “Muslims” implies that all 1.5 billion Muslims are doing this, which is untrue as the vast majority lead happy lives. They are not threatening violence nor believe themselves to be the victims of anything. A minority feels that they are under attack by some big Zionist-Crusader Alliance (their words, not mine) and respond to that with some terrorism.

“Muslims don’t like democracy. When they enter a democratic country, they immediately undermine it.”

Lies. Pure Lies. Is it pure coincidence that nearly all Muslim countries are democracies, that the majority of the world’s Muslim population lives happily under democratic rule, that countless Muslim scholars and mujtahids and alims and muftis and Imams have supported democracy. Some even believe that the early Islamic government, which was run with a parliament called the Shura to be an early democracy. Many Islamic scholars have also said that through ijtihad, or reasoning, it is perfectly Islamic to pass down the Khilafah’s powers to a parliament.

“Any faith which mandates unequal status under law for certain groups within society is not compatible with secular democracy.”

Absolutely. Good thing Islam isn’t one of those faiths. Of course with the general state of ignorance in Islamic countries its not unusual to see religious minorities abused but Islam does believe in religious tolerance. Please click on the links on the side of this site such as “Constitution of Medina”, “Caliph”, “Young Ottomans” and the “Objectives Resolution of 1949″.

“so called faith.”

What else is it then. Let me guess, you’re going to say its political system or a cult etc. It is the consensus of the main religious scholars that Islam is a faith and an important one with 1.5 billion followers.

Perhaps the biggest load of crap to spew out of Spencer’s mouth….yet.

The question in the item if Spencer was always going to come out in the open like this or was it because of his association with the other hate-for-profiteers is for me most certainly the former.

I support the theory that some old philosophers have espoused that all forms of radicalism must ultimately follow three “rules”. Thus Spencer simply “has to”.

Those three rules are:

1) The lie. That the posture or agenda being radical is unacceptable and thus they must lie as well as lie to cover-up the agenda if hidden.
2) To promote that lie further (since they can never back down) they must sell-it through abuse of context (which is what my blog blootstellen is focusing on). The abuse of context is done becuase at some point they must attempt to challenge criics by making the “lie” look legitimate.
3) They must assume the target audience are stupid. Well, they are telling a lie and trying very hard to say it is true. It also, by default, takes on the arrogant form of them assuming they know what the audience needs and should know.

Spencer has crossed the line of no return, he is unable to backtrack and thus steps further on to cover-up and push the line (the lie) further on. He has hinted and backed others that have tried the “Obama is a Muslim” line and so ultimately he must confirm that view as well.

The assumption that the audience is stupid backfired (face it most of America, GB and Europe ignored him and his friends) and more and more it returns to the same captured audience of the faithful far-right, he has to play to that audience – and that is the group that “wants to believe” that Obama is a Muslim.

We can also see, from the press, that Gellar (and thus Spencer, Fitzgerald and others) are again attempting to have a go at making their audience the general public, by re-inventing themselves as part of the “human rights” community and avoiding claiming to be anti-jihadists. The “lie” is still the same, the abuse of context will continue with the same shameless spin and they again assume that the public are stupid and will presume that a new name means different people and views. I find that last one rather like a fraudster moving towns and re-inventing a new name to continue scamming.

Donny (blootstellen)

FYI: The American Muslim has a great piece where they compile a lot of stuff on Spencer from different sources. The pile just gets bigger and bigger.

http://www.theamericanmuslim.org/tam.php/features/articles/the_politically_incorrect_guide_to_robert_spencer/0018064