What are Sam Harris’ motives?

What are Sam Harris’ motives?
Sam Harris lost a debate and doesn’t want it to be heard because it is too “boring.”
Sam Harris says he’d vote for ‘dangerously deluded religious imbecile’ Ben Carson over Noam Chomsky, and prefers Cristian refugees over Muslim refugees.
The mask falls: the coalition of Ayaan supporters who abet and provide cover for her hate against Muslims and Islam.
Another week, another half-hilarious, half-tragic Richard Dawkins meltdown on Twitter.
Richard Dawkins gets a taste of his own medicine. And Osama Bin Laden has won.
With disregard for Malala’s faith and actual opinions, the atheist thinker uses her to continue his anti-Muslim war.
The tahafut (incoherence) of Neo-Scientism.
You’ll note how, in Fry’s formulation, Islam the faith becomes “them”, the Muslims. And Muslims are then equated with murder and misogyny. A clearer expression of mindless bigotry would be difficult to find.
Richard Dawkins statements have little to do with speaking the truth and more about picking out which minorities it is still safe to bash.
Greenwald slams Maher for his self-righteous pontification on the so-called “unique violence” of Muslims.
Jai Singh dissects Dawkins deep anti-Muslim animus.
Sam Harris whines that he’s been “unfairly” treated again.