Robert Spencer

|

Pamela Geller

|

Bat Ye'or

|

Brigitte Gabriel

|

Daniel Pipes

|

Debbie Schlussel

|

Walid Shoebat

|

Joe Kaufman

|

Wafa Sultan

|

Geert Wilders

|

The Nuclear Card

PolitiFact: Most Muslim countries allow churches, synagogues

Posted on 07 October 2010 by Garibaldi

PolitiFact: Most Muslim countries allow churches, synagogues

The statement

In most Muslim countries, “We can’t have a church. We’re not able to build synagogues. It’s forbidden.”

Franklin Graham, Sunday, on ABC’sThis Week

The ruling

On ABC’s This Week, host Christiane Amanpour held a town hall debate on whether Americans should fear Islam. Naturally, the so-called Ground Zero mosque came up. She asked the Rev. Franklin Graham about his comments after 9-11 that Islam is a “very evil and very wicked” religion, and that prompted this response:

“I understand what the Muslims want to do in America,” said Graham. The push for mosques is driven by a desire to “convert as many Americans as they can to Islam,” he said. “I just don’t have the freedom to do this in most Muslim countries. We can’t have a church. We’re not able to build synagogues. It’s forbidden.”

We spoke to experts on religion and government in Muslim countries. The consensus: There are churches and/or synagogues in almost every Muslim country.

Ibrahim Hooper, a spokesman for the Council on American-Islamic relations, said Graham was incorrect. “There are lots of Christian churches and synagogues in Egypt, Lebanon, Syria, Iraq, Iran, Turkey, Jordan, Indonesia, Qatar, Kuwait. … If you go to any number of so-called Muslim countries you will see thriving Christian and Jewish populations.” One member of the Iranian Parliament is Jewish, Hooper noted. “The only one where you don’t see it, where you can’t have a Christian church or synagogue is Saudi Arabia,” Hooper said.

The cities of Mecca and Medina in Saudi Arabia are the two holiest cities in Islam, said Akbar S. Ahmed, chair of Islamic Studies at American University. So no churches or synagogues are allowed there. He compared them to the Vatican.

Graham was speaking in the context of Muslims building mosques in order to convert people to Islam, and on that point, he is on firmer ground.

A 2007 Council on Foreign Relations “backgrounder” on religious conversion and sharia law said, “Conversion by Muslims to other faiths is forbidden under most interpretations of sharia and converts are considered apostates” sometimes regarded as treason and punishable by death. Experts told us there was an ongoing debate in Islam about this question.

In sum, we think Graham erred when he said that in most Muslim countries, “We can’t have a church. We’re not able to build synagogues. It’s forbidden.” That’s demonstrably false. The construction of churches is not forbidden in most Muslim countries, only Saudi Arabia. And so, on balance, we rate Graham’s comment False.

Edited for print. For more, go to PolitiFact.com.

  • Qasim

    the racism against christians in pakistan aises from racism against muslims by rich hindus before partition new churches are built like the f8 church in islamabad and a church whose name i forgot in rawalpindi and countless small churches which look like ordinary buildings except for a wooden cross on door christians and muslims mostly live in peace tension are 90% of the economical not religous and besides 4% of islamabad population is christian

  • Tarig

    Clearly for countries like Pakistan, Saudi Arabia, the Maldives and the Sudan, Islamic law is the problem.

    How about you tell that to my Coptic Sudanese friend, he doesn’t seem to have a problem going to his Church in the center of Khartoum, right on the banks of the river Nile, some of the most expensive land in the world! There is no issue with religious freedom in Sudan, contrary to what you may all seem to assume, I lived and studied there and this is not the case. Christians get extra days off for religious holidays depending on whether they are copts or catholics (Whilst Muslims have to work and/or go to school mind you), and are free to worship as they please, in their own chruches throughout the capital and all main cities and towns. The issue in Sudan isn’t and has never been religion, the issue in Sudan is all the liquid gold under the ground that everyone wants for their own! It’s money, nothing more, nothing less! Something that the powers that be can’t let slip through their hands. They don’t care about the people of Sudan, we’re nothing to them, and neither do you Bob! They care about us just as much as they care about the 3 million plus rotting in the DRC, or the millions that have died in Rwanda, sierra leone, indonesia, throughout south america, all under the watch of people who claim to be fighting ‘for freedom’! It’s all BS, and if you actually believe what you talk about little bobby Spencer, and your not just in it for the same reason as the majority, i.e. money, then I truly pity you!

  • Pingback: Majority should protect minority, not belittle them in true Democracy « Dr Ko Ko Gyi’s Blog

  • muhammad ‘abd-al haqq

    @JihadBob

    “Don’t worry, I’ll help make this ‘thorny’ issue easier on you.

    If the Koran and Sunnah are a source for legislation in a Muslim majority country, then that nation is an Islamic state.

    That would include so-called ‘moderate’ nations such as Egypt and Jordan.”

    FALSE! i have already thoroughly refuted your bogus claim about Islamic states and exposed your argument as both subjective and fallacious. To be more precise if your comment read “If the Koran and Sunnah are the ONLY source of guidance for legislation in a Muslim majority country, then that nation is an Islamic state” i could agree with you. Do you see what a difference a few words make? All muslim majority states, with the exception of a few(you know which ones) utilize non Islamic legal codes. And the governments that purport to be Islamic(ie have Shariah as the guiding principle of FIQH) have unIslamic forms of government. Nice try.

    Allahu A’lam

  • Cynic

    You’re over-simplifying the issue JihadBob, which shows your gross ignorance. US law is derived from the Bible. Does that mean that the US is a Christian state? Really Bob?

    inb4 JihadBob and his butthurt rant on the fact that Christianity and the United States were used in the same sentence.

  • JihadBob

    No, a more preferable definition might be fundamentalist states, which would encompass military dictatorships like the Taliban in Afghanistan, the Wahhabi monarchy in Saudi Arabia, and the unrecognized fundamentalist state in Somalia. And those are about the only three fundamentalist states in the ENTIRE Muslim world!

    Don’t worry, I’ll help make this ‘thorny’ issue easier on you.

    If the Koran and Sunnah are a source for legislation in a Muslim majority country, then that nation is an Islamic state.

    That would include so-called ‘moderate’ nations such as Egypt and Jordan.

    Anyways, glad I could help.

  • Awesome

    @ George Carty

    That’s the point I was making.

  • Cynic

    @ Jack

    I’ve been living in Malaysia for the past 3 years, and you’re absolutely right about the Convent schools. The tolerance in this country has really impressed me to say the least.

  • Jack Cope

    I agree entirely a m malik, I’ve heard that a lot, here in Malaysia it is the same and the Convent schools are very popular with Muslims. Can I turn that into a blog post? My email is the.strangers.blog@gmail.com . It’s a good story and shows Pakistan in a good true light :-)

Advertise Here
Advertise Here