Top Menu

Alaska: Why is anti-Muslim Hater Pamela Geller Allowed in front of Legislature?

I would ask Alaska to keep Pamela, but one more crazy lady  is just too much to wish upon a state. Pamela “kookoo for Cocoa Puffs” Geller is bragging that she will be testifying in favor of an anti-Sharia’ bill in Alaska where the Mooslim hordes are around100-200 strong. Don’t-chya-know the Mooslims had the temerity to open up Alaska’s first mosque a few months ago!!

Pamela writes,

Heads up — I will be testifying  in favor of anti-sharia legislation, HB88 Alaska on Wednesday the 30th at 1 PM AST (that’s 2 PM West coast and 5 PM East coast). Tune in to the live feed at: http://www.alaskalegislature.tv/

Use Of Foreign Law Sponsored by Rep. Carl Gatto Co-Sponsors: Rep. Bob Lynn, Rep. Wes Keller

Alaskan legislators are not only misguided in their choice of Geller as a speaker but they are complicit in her hate because they are essentially giving validity to a person and her organization (SIOA) that has been labeled a hate group by the SPLC.

Instead of focusing on real threats to Alaska, like Global Warming, or Separatists and militants (five of which were arrested for attempting to kidnap and murder state troopers), officials are battling the good old fight against non-existing threats.

Nice way to deflect from real problems plaguing Alaska!

, , , , , , , , , , ,

  • Nur Alia,

    There is no need to feel like you are articulating a far fetched conspiracy theory. After all, what is more likely, that 2% of the US population will overthrow the US government and forcefully impose “Shari’ah Law” on the rest, or that the 2% of the population that controls the lion’s share of the world’s wealth will do anything to maintain their hegemony?

    “ban Islamic jurisprudence, and not affect any other religous practice in its doing in a nation like America.”

    However I think that these loons fully intend to affect Islamic religious practice.

    The Islamophobesphere has always consisted of the unlikely marriage of Big Money and Islamophobic Loons.

    Because of things like democracy and the Constitution, Islamophobes know that they cannot try to eradicate Islam except through underhanded methods.

    Big Money cannot come right out and say that it is the financial principles of Shari’ah it wishes to eradicate so they fund blanket anti-Shari’ah Laws. And the Islamophobic Loons who are on their payroll intend that practicing Islam becomes a crime.

    Some may think that banning Shari’ah is really a reaction to a fear of certain practices labelled as Shari’ah becoming part of US legal system, but without the radical(and violent) overthrow that this would necessitate, their fears are unfounded.The foot soldiers of this camp may not know it, but their leaders know banning Sharia’h is an attempt to ban Islam.

    If anti-Shari’ah is ultimately successful, both groups will be satisfied.

    May Allah protect us from their schemes.

    Allahu A’lam
    ———————————

    “This sacred knowledge shall be borne by reliable authorities from each generation, who will preserve it from the distortions of extremists, the plans of the corrupt and the false explanations of the ignorant.” (Narrated mursal by Al-Bayhaqi in Kitab al-Madkhal on the authority of Ibrahim bin ‘Abd al-Rahman al-’Udhri.)

  • corey

    and yet they will insist that he wasn’t born in america even if the birth certificate itself talked and told them its authentic and he was born in Hawaii.

  • Khushboo

    ^Comments about Obama’s “early life and upbringing is so ridiculous! Obama wouldn’t have become President if he wasn’t born in the US, thus, birth certificate was shown already. We’ve also seen his earlier pictures of him in the US. Then again, we have idiots who don’t think Hawaii is a state. lol

  • Cynic

    @jacque

    This is her updated ‘disclaimer’:

    UPDATE: The “Atlas says that Barack Obama is Malcolm X’s love child” charge has gone viral among leftards and lizards. The only problem with it is that it is false. I am not the author of this post, and I posted it because the writer did a spectacular job documenting Obama’s many connections with the Far Left. The Malcolm X claim is one minor part of this story, and was of interest to me principally as part of the writer’s documentation that Stanley Ann Dunham could not have been where the Obama camp says she was at various times. I do not believe that Barack Obama is Malcolm X’s love child, and never did — but there remain many, many unanswered questions about his early life and upbringing.

    Honestly, it’s understandable how she could be so hateful to Muslims. I mean, check out the seething hatred she has for her fellow Americans of different views. It isn’t a surprise that she hates people with different views who, more often than not, look different.

  • Marwan

    Actually Nura, you are exactly on the money (No pun intended!) with your analysis of the situation regarding the fear of Islamic Banking.

    I have read about this extensively and it would appear that fear of a free banking system may indeed be motivating right wing organisations to support theses self-styled experts and loony right wing senators in their “crusade” to ban Sharia Law. In the process of course they care little for any hatred and paranoia that is stirred up by these toons!!

  • jacque

    @Cynic…I remember reading that article on her website when it was posted. There was no author listed and, as you say, no disclaimers stating anything were anywhere in the article.

    So, if she did not write the article, she was plagiarizing someone else’s work. That would mean she is not ethical. If she did write the article, then that means she is just downright nuts. Either way, her credibility is shot. What does that say about the Alaskan legislature and all the news shows (mainly on Fox) that give her a podium to spread her untrue message?

  • Cynic

    @jacque

    Apparently it wasn’t her who wrote the Malcolm X article…or so she says. It begs the question, why the hell are you hosting that article on your website without any disclaimers to show that you are against it? I think the answer is obvious.

  • jacque

    Poor Pamela. She’s not going to be able to wear her bikinis in Alaska at this time of the year. Must be difficult times for her.

    This is a woman who once stated that President Obama was Malcolm X’s illegitimate child. She was not joking. The tone of her post was very serious.

    How this woman is allowed to be given credibility, by being called up to testify at this hearing, is absolutely nuts.

  • Pingback: Alaska: Why is anti-Muslim Hater Pamela Geller Allowed in front of Legislature? | Islamophobia Today eNewspaper()

  • Solid Snake

    Hey the reality is that Money$$$$$ moves everything. Nur you might be right. They are scared that if their evil scheming ways are stopped more people will get opportunities to succeed in life. Thus less money for them also might lead to a smaller divide between poor and rich leading to more people living healthier with better education which might lead to more people not falling for propaganda to go to war which leads to less money for weapons manufacturers and the rest of the fat cats. whoaa thats one slippery slope lol but who knows they might just be crazy

  • Nur Alia

    I asked some people here in Malaysia what could possibly be behind this western point of view that they can ban Islamic jurisprudence, and not affect any other religous practice in its doing in a nation like America.

    It seems, even the Muslims are being fooled. If you really think about it, the ONLY part of Islamic jurisprudence that can be enforced without impact on any other part of everyday western life in a free nation is banking and finance.

    This may sound far fetched…that the utimate motive here could be to pre empt any attempt to introduce Islamic style banking in America, disquised as these kinds of laws that Pam Geller supports.

    I doubt that she or any of the loons are smart enough to think of this on thier own, however, they are funded by people who all seem to have alternative motives.

    Just think about it. I am just putting it on the forum as a thought, topic, or whatever.

  • Carter

    Only 100-200 mooslims in Ak.? Only took 19 to bring down WTC. 1 is too many. People ARE listening to Geller and Spencer. Death to islam!

  • Mosizzle

    Alaska? Will the Mooslim invasion never end?

    They previously had the loony David Yerushalmi as a witness who seems to be providing the template for them to follow. So far, no one has attempted to use Yerushalmi’s exact proposal which would actually ban Islam.

    “adherence to Islam as a Muslim is prima facie evidence of an act in support of the overthrow of the US Government through the abrogation, destruction, or violation of the US Constitution and the imposition of Shari’a on the American People.”

  • Daniel

    Mindy–sadly, far too many.

  • mindy1

    Who on earth takes her seriously??? 😯

  • corey

    yay Pamela geller alaska is saved what would we ever do without people like her to spread paranoia and bigotry about an entire people.

Powered by Loon Watchers