Top Menu

Muslim Scholars Issue Fatwa Declaring No Conflict Between Islamic Law And U.S. Constitution

President Obama hosts Iftar dinner at White House for American Muslims during Ramadan.

President Obama hosts Iftar dinner at White House for American Muslims during Ramadan.

Muslim Scholars Issue Fatwa Declaring No Conflict Between Islamic Law And U.S. Constitution

Islamic scholars tired of conservative charges that Muslims in the United States constitute a radical fifth column bent on subverting American values and obligated by their religion to launch jihadist terror attacks are fighting back by issuing a fatwa.

The Islamic religious ruling, a “Resolution On Being Faithful Muslims and Loyal Americans,” is a response to what its authors call “erroneous perceptions and Islamophobic propaganda” that has built up for a decade following the 9/11 attacks and subsequent terrorist plots by adherents of al-Qaida and other extremist groups. It was issued in Virginia late last month by the Fiqh Council of North America (FCNA), a group of Islamic scholars who meet several times a year to draft opinions on issues of concern to American Muslims.

“As a body of Islamic scholars, we the members of FCNA believe that it is false and misleading to suggest that there is a contradiction between being faithful Muslims committed to God (Allah) and being loyal American citizens,” the fatwa declared.

“Islamic teachings require respect of the laws of the land where Muslims live as minorities, including the Constitution and the Bill of Rights, so long as there is no conflict with Muslims’ obligation for obedience to God. We do not see any such conflict with the U.S. Constitution and Bill of Rights. The primacy of obedience to God is a commonly held position of many practicing Jews and Christians as well.”

Muslims make up less than 1 percent of the nation, according to the Pew Forum on Religion & Public Life, yet the fast-growing community has been a constant target of right-wing groups. From protests against the so-called “ground zero mosque,” to efforts in more than a dozen states to ban Sharia lawin courts, to recent Capitol Hill hearings on Islamic radicalization that brought comparisons to McCarthyism, Muslims have had to assert their loyalty.

And that troubles members of the Los Angeles Police Department, who in recent years have been at the forefront in building bridges to the Muslims in order to combat radicalization and enlist the community in the fight against terrorism.

Los Angeles Police Chief Charlie Beck and other law enforcement officials will attend a meeting Thursday at the Islamic Center of Reseda to talk about the new fatwa as part of his department’s Muslim Community Forum. Muzammil Siddiqi, director of religious affairs of The Islamic Society of Orange County and the president of the Fiqh Council of North America, will be on hand to discuss the origins of the fatwa.

For many non-Muslims, perhaps the best-known fatwa was the one against authorSalman Rushdie for his book “The Satanic Verses.” Iran’s Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini declared it blasphemous and called for Rushdie’s death.

This new decree might face a warmer welcome.

“We’re always fighting two sides of extremism. There’s the violent ideological side and the neo-conservative side that is creating hate campaigns against American Muslims …which is a bunch of BS,” said Michael Downing, commander of the LAPD’s Counter Terrorism and Criminal Intelligence Bureau. “The majority of American Muslims are as patriotic as you and I. This declaration says it is not a conflict to be a faithful Muslim and loyal American.”

, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

  • Garibaldi

    This conversation is going NOWHERE. Discussing some MSJD in long-winded debates is ridiculous guys.

    @MSJD Shaykh, you can have any title appended to your name that you like. However, this discussion is at its end. You don’t like the Fiqh Council and think they hold no authority, OK, that’s fine, others believe they do, that is fine as well. Beating this ad nauseum is not going to fly, hence the end of this discussion. Feel free to comment on other articles. —Garibaldi

    Comment by Danios: AJ, I have read your input and, after contemplating it, I have restored MSJD’s last comment. On my part, I apologize if I caused offense. I have zero tolerance for bullying and I don’t think we should partake in cyber-bullying. That’s even more reason to end the conversation here.

  • AJ

    Okay the guy has given himself a degree. So what? It doesn’t warrant bullying him like a school child because he is strange.

    Here is a video of him from his website:

    http://www.krem.com/video?id=128047573&sec=550262

    I really like this guy. Shaykh, keep on fighting Springdale to let you keep homeless in your shed.

  • Shaykh al-Hajj Dawud Ahmad, M.S.J.D.

    Garibaldi replaced what I wrote, asking Danios what evidence he had for the false assertion that “al-hijaz = Shaykh al-Hajj Dawud Ahmad, M.S.J.D.,” with a message of his own to me:

    @Shaykh, the IP address for Hijaz and you match. Unless you got your child or wife to comment then it was most definitely you. This whole conversation is verging on the absurd. -Garibaldi

    It has been absurd from the beginning. Your suspicions and assumptions have led you into exposing your own weaknesses. The enemies of humanity will note those and play on them.

    First, let me give you a little introduction. “al-Hijaz” should be “al-Hijazi.” This brother’s tribal lineage runs back to the Sahaba. His family has been muslim for fourteen centuries, American for five generations, and well-established.

    You’ve slandered him on the basis of assumptions made through your technical incompetence, accusing him of complicity in deception. This is not the conduct of muslims, it is a habit of jahiliyyah.

    When he’s here on the campus, he connects to our institutional network and his IP address will show up as our gateway address, 207.224.112.150 ~ gateway for our network of static IP addresses. That’s what will show up with mine, unless my laptop’s static address ~ currently 207.224.112.148 ~ gets sent. 207.224.112.150 leads to our internal NAT routers, each with static IP addresses. Depending on whether al-Hijazi is connecting with his laptop (with an ethernet or wireless connection) or his iPhone (with a wireless connection), his local DHCP address will vary among our internal subnets, but servers outside our gateway will not see the local address.

    When he’s not connected through our networks, an IP address from another range will appear in your logs ~ not from the 207.224.112.144 block. You can find several in your logs, if you know what you’re doing. It’s another case of “job title” does not indicate “competency.”

    House addresses may show up as 207.224.112.145 through .149, but normally will appear as .150 ~ the network device at 207.224.112.150 routes incoming packets to the requesting device through switches and routers. Connections from any of our other facilities, whether ethernet or wireless, will show either the gateway address or a router address.

    You need to check your logs again. When he’s not on the campus, a different IP address will appear in your logs.

    Now that we may be approaching the end of this absurd diversion into those four letters that I quite legitimately append to my name, as an information for those who know what it means for those particular letters to be displayed (which some of you obviously do not), what do you think of the idea of discussing the topic of this article, the so-called “fatwa” of the rather unpopular Fiqh Council of the Islamic Society of North America, successor to the Muslim Students Association that was co-opted by the Saudis less than a year after it was formed?

    Or do any of you remember that far back?

Powered by Loon Watchers