Robert Spencer

|

Pamela Geller

|

Bat Ye'or

|

Brigitte Gabriel

|

Daniel Pipes

|

Debbie Schlussel

|

Walid Shoebat

|

Joe Kaufman

|

Wafa Sultan

|

Geert Wilders

|

The Nuclear Card

“Zombie Muhammad” Strikes Again

Posted on 18 July 2012 by Ilisha

Zombie Muhammad

Controversy broke out last February after a Pennsylvania judge, citing insufficient evidence, dismissed a harassment against a Muslim man who allegedly “attacked” an atheist marching in a Halloween parade as “Zombie Muhammad.”

Zombie Muhammad turned out to be Ernest Perce V, the director of the Pennsylvania chapter of American Atheists. Though the American Humanist Association (also an atheist organization) carried a more balance account of the incident, the controversy quickly went viral all across the looniverse, with sensational headlines and baseless claims the judge was a Muslim (he wasn’t), and that he applied Islamic Law in the case (he didn’t). They also claimed the judge had denied Zombie Muhammad’s right to free speech, scolding him and saying:

Before you start mocking someone else’s religion you may want to find out a little bit more about it. That makes you look like a doofus…

Here in our society, we have a constitution that gives us many rights, specifically, First Amendment rights. It’s unfortunate that some people use the First Amendment to deliberately provoke others. I don’t think that’s what our forefathers really intended. I think our forefathers intended that we use the First Amendment so that we can speak our mind, not to piss off other people and other cultures, which is what you did.

I don’t think you’re aware, sir, there’s a big difference between how Americans practice Christianity – uh, I understand you’re an atheist. But, see, Islam is not just a religion, it’s their culture, their culture. It’s their very essence, their very being. They pray five times a day towards Mecca. To be a good Muslim, before you die, you have to make a pilgrimage to Mecca unless you are otherwise told you cannot because you are too ill, too elderly, whatever. But you must make the attempt…

Then what you have done is you’ve completely trashed their essence, their being. They find it very, very, very offensive. I’m a Muslim, I find it offensive. [Unintelligble] aside was very offensive.

But you have that right, but you’re way outside your bounds on First Amendment rights.

Read the full story: Pennsylvania “Sharia Court”: Loons Jump the Gun AGAIN on Ginned up “Legal Jihad”.

However, Perce was by no means deterred from expressing his right to free speech. In fact, he’s now planing to publicly whip and flog a Quran to protest the “Year of Religious Diversity,” and he’s invited fellow atheists and Christians to join him:

American Atheists state director to desecrate Quran if state House doesn’t drop “Year of Religious Diversity” resolution

The director of the state chapter of American Atheists plans to desecrate the Quran when the state House of Representatives reconvenes in September if the House doesn’t drop its “Year of Religious Diversity” resolution under consideration in its State Government Committee.

Ernest Perce V, who recently was under fire for a controversial Harrisburg billboard he designed and paid for protesting the “Year of the Bible” resolution the House adopted this year, said he plans to whip, or flog, the Quran in the Capitiol Rotunda at noon on Sept. 24 should the House not agree to nullify the resolution before it reconvenes from summer recess that day.

Even though Perce heads the state American Atheists organization, he is staging this protest individually and not under the American Atheists umbrella.

Like the Year of the Bible resolution adopted in January, Perce said the Year of Religious Diversity resolution, or House Resolution 771, illegally intertwines religion and state.

The Year of the Bible resolution is being challenged in federal court by the Freedom From Religion Foundation.

Perce, who also was at the center of a recent court case after he said he was attacked during the Mechanicsburg Halloween parade for marching in the parade dressed as “Zombie Muhammad,” said he takes issue with the resolution specifically because of a subsection that refers to the Bible, Quran and other religious books.

According to HR 771, “these revered books impart great wisdom and beauty to believers and are appreciated and respected by nonbelievers as well.”

Perce said he plans to thrash the Quran with a nine-tail whip 85 times and a single whip six times to protest the resolution’s number.

“I am a nonbeliever and for (the House) to assume we respect these books is asinine,” Perce, a Harrisburg resident, said. “I will let other atheists come with me (to protest). I want Christians to lash the Quran, too.”

Read the Rest

Although many atheists pride themselves on rational skepticism and their supposedly evidence-based conclusions, An Atheist’s Guide to Mohammedanism published on the American Atheists national website is filled with factual inaccuracies and drips with overt hatred and hostility. The invitation to Christians, traditional targets of contempt and ridicule, to join Perce in bashing the Quran is an interesting new development, and perhaps another sign that Islam is the new favorite target of militant atheism.

  • http://thepenofawanderingstranger.com/personal Jack Cope

    Ilisha, I did an article on that very topic called ‘Failure to be Outraged’ for Al Arabiya though I forget if it was published or not. If you want to compare notes then I have a reasonable list of such occurrences culled from the web somewhere on one of my hard-drives, just email me at the.strangers.blog@gmail.com and I’ll find it. If not, there are hundreds if not thousands of examples but I’d suggest looking at it from the view of how Muslims in the ‘Muslim World’ react to this crap.

  • http://thepenofawanderingstranger.com/personal Jack Cope

    ProphetofTolerance, may we take it that you agree with the rest of my statement?

    Anyway, there are Christian groups in the UK at least that are advocating to have age old Blasphemy laws enforced. Besides, as I said they really don’t need to make a fuss to ‘defend’ Christianity since they have so much power already. For example another, CARE, runs programs to get its supporters into intern positions in high up places, lots end up working for MPs. Again, do you think a Muslim group could do that? Damn, remember the fuss over the Muslim interns that were apparently taking over the White House!

    If you wish to talk to us then by all means do, just don’t bring up the age old talking points and not defend them when they are questioned. We are quite open you know.

  • ProphetofTolerance

    Plus they really don’t need to shout and scream in the street as they have the influence. ‘Christian’ (note the commas) lobbying groups for example, many with quite horrible agendas, wield huge power in ‘western’ governments the world over.

    Yeah, because there aren’t laws in Muslim nations (or Europe) protecting the religious sensibilities of Muslims.

    And I’m unaware of any Christian lobbying group that has managed to curtail anyone’s First Amendment right to mock or ridicule Christianity in the United States – so much for their so-called “existence”.

  • Pingback: Who is the biggest loser? A person who loves God or who hates Him? « Musings of a Muslim Pakistani American Mom in Riyadh

  • DrM

    breaking wind said :

    “The part I don’t understand and perhaps someone can enlighten me is if Allah is all powerful and knowing why is it that he needs lowly humans to defend him? If over a billion people believe in islam how can it be destroyed or damaged by someone speaking ill against it? Is it that fragile?”

    Typical shallow, sarcastic “talking point” built on false premise. Who argued that Allah(swt) is in need of assistance from human beings? Allah(swt) needs nothing and His Deen can’t be harmed by the actions of scum. However no true Muslim will stand by and allow the Deen to be mocked and disrespected. Surely spitting in your face won’t kill you, but it will upset you. The question is why do you secular and atheist fanatics engage in such lowly, childish and pedestrian behavior to begin with? It’s because you can’t engage Muslims intellectually and resort to school yard antics to get attention and pretend to be free speech martyrs. You’re looking for conflict. I’d like to see you throwbacks outside of a Church in Detroit calling worshipers n****** while in blackface eating from a bucket of fried chicken, none of which is illegal but just for the sake of “freedom of speech.” Or better yet picket a synagogue mocking the Holocaust.
    The part I don’t understand is how stupid, disingenuous, and malicious degenerate provocateurs expect anything but a negative reaction. It shows that they weren’t raised right, lacking morals, manners and just plain common sense.

  • http://aayjay.wordpress.com AJ

    Hey Ernest,

    Could we have a change of venue for you please? How about you convene at Deera Square in Riyadh on September 24 instead of Capitol Rotunda? We could all witness you uhhh…flogging the Quran.

  • Sarah Brown

    Ilisha – I don’t think I saw the thread here at the time, no. I do indeed remember reading about some horrible threats against the judge from people angered by his verdict.

    @AJ – I can think of no good reason to burn a Qur’an (though I’m not saying one shouldn’t be able to do so) but I do object to the fact that publishers and broadcasters sometimes seem to feel they have to self-censor when it comes to images of Muhammad. I am not saying this is all the fault of Muslims, many of whom would either support freedom of expression, or at least not oppose it – and certainly not react violently.

  • Ilisha

    @JSB

    I’ve had that article in draft for months. So many worthy topics, so little time!

  • Just Stopping By

    @Ilisha: I understand that moderation can delay comments, so I was not complaining as much as pointing that issue for windsofchange.

    I want to say again that I really like your idea for a post about provocations that failed to elicit a reaction. The fact that people would be so willing to stage anti-Islam protests or put up signs saying things like “Islam is of the Devil” (an actual bigoted sign) says a lot about whether they really expect a violent reaction.

  • Ilisha

    @Jack Cope

    Nice post. I’m glad someone else joined.

    @JSB

    Glad to see you here as well.

    Sometimes edit-related comments are left pending by one moderator so another, usually the author of the article in question, will see them and can make the updates. We don’t all read all of the approved comments, but every moderator sees what is left pending for the most part.

    Also, all of us have jobs, families, school, etc., and we don’t always get to spend the time we would like editing meticulously. Thank you so much for your help, which we really do appreciate.

  • http://aayjay.wordpress.com AJ

    Frankly, I am quite tired of all these buffoons who having nothing better to do than to either draw Muhammad or mock him or burn a Quran or desecrate it or mock something else related to Islam. It just shows how much Islam bothers them or how much they are scared of it or what miserably obsessed creatures they are. In times like these, I really like Saudi Arabia – enough said!

  • Just Stopping By

    @windsofchange: “Why does this site censor non offensive viewpoints that contradict the arguments of certain comments?”

    I think you may be confusing some of the delays in moderation with censorship. It is of course a bit annoying when you post something and it does not appear immediately, but that is true with any moderated forum.

    I have on occasion (perhaps too often?) contradicted comments and postings. And while I have seen a few delays, I believe that my comments have all eventually been posted and all those criticizing an article have been responded to by the author. (For the record, a few of my comments noting factual corrections were edited to note that I had proposed a correction while the actual correction was dropped from my comment but incorporated into the article.)

    @Ilisha: “There have been many provocations that failed to provoke, but obviously, they don’t garner much attention. I’ve been planning a piece about this topic for some time, this discussion has convinced me it’s long overdue.”

    That would be an excellent piece! I look forward to it. (South Park is sort of an example: there was an image of Muhammad in an episode that no one responded to. However, a potential image in a later episode caused what might best be called fear of a potential response and outrage from one very small group. As for whether South Park meant to provoke, well, I don’t think they attempted to provoke Muslims any more than they attempt to provoke, well, everyone.)

  • http://thepenofawanderingstranger.com/personal Jack Cope

    windsofchange, I’ll do your last paragraph if you don’t mind as it seems addressed at the world at large.

    ‘The comment by Iftkhar is unfortunately just a comment that seems to go largely unheaded. I am still hoping someone can tell me why it is that some muslims feel the need to use violence to “protect ” islam against words and pictures used by its detractors?’

    There are over 1.6 billion of us, I think the world would know if we decided to go apeshit. As it is, most do actually sit back and say ‘so what?’ when confronted with this crap. All you ever hear about are the noisy buggers.

    ‘I recall a couple of years ago a demonstration in Londo with muslims holding placards that read “kill those who insult Islam” and “behead those who insult the prophet”.’

    Ah, a case point on how Muslims are portrayed in the world… care to name how many people turned up at that little protest/publicity stunt? About 40 if I recall correctly yet we see those stupid publicity seeking idiots photographs just about everywhere.

    ‘What about the repeated attempts on the Jyllands Posten in Denmark?’

    Many a publisher has been attacked or otherwise for publishing something that pissed someone off somewhere, again, it is seldom reported as these ones were. And by ‘repeated attacks’ do you mean ‘two’? Again, lets be realistic here.

    ‘Why are mainstream muslims not doing more to disassociate this hateful speech and actions from the peaceful teaching of islam.’

    We do, you just don’t listen. I don’t blame you for that; sadly the way that Muslims are portrayed in the mainstream ignores most Muslims. Again, back to the example that 40 guys with inflammatory placards can get their message all over the world. If I went out with a bunch of Muslims on a peaceful march for world peace etc I would;

    a) perhaps get on the local evening news

    b) be portrayed as part of a Muslamic Alliance (TM) plot to take over the world by disrupting traffic.

    People have made up their minds about Muslims, we can’t win.

    ‘I mean when was the last time you heard a catholic call for the dismemberment of someone who defames christ or the pope?’

    It happens a fair bit but again, no one really pays attention, though a lot of the noise surrounding the Pope is other Christians saying the Pope is the antichrist and suchlike, including those who identify as Catholics. Been going on for centuries.

    Plus they really don’t need to shout and scream in the street as they have the influence. ‘Christian’ (note the commas) lobbying groups for example, many with quite horrible agendas, wield huge power in ‘western’ governments the world over. Heck, do you think we’ll ever see a non-Christian in the White House or Number 10?

    I think your comment just shows how a lot of the world sadly views Muslims. We aren’t like that you know, do talk to us, we don’t bite ;-)

Advertise Here
Advertise Here