This is the tactic of projection. If you have something vile and hateful to say, and you know that most people are opposed to vile and hateful things, you accuse your *opponents* of being vile and hateful, thereby shifting the focus from yourself to your opponents – even though you, yourself, are okay with vile and hateful things. This then turns reality on its head and makes it seem like your vile and hateful remarks are actually good and true remarks, while your opponents are the evil and bad people.

Take the following article, “‘Anti-Fascism’ is the New Fascism”, for example.
http://www.cesc.net/radicalweb/scholars/rankin/ar2.html

The Orwellian title alone is mind-boggling. But this quote from it demonstrates the inversion of reality this tactic creates.

“Like evangelicals, anti-fascists seek to liberate by a combination of moral pressure and legal force. Anti-fascism is, however, a radical secular ideology that allows no possibility of repentance or absolution. The evangelical Protestants who joined temperance or anti-vice campaigns were often oppressive and insensitive, but their zeal was frequently held in check by a concern for individual souls. Anti-fascists, by contrast, have no such concerns. They seek to save communities, by changing their collective consciousness or forcing them to conform. Their ideology allows for no concern for individuals, except for attack or denunciation. This contempt for the individual, the white, male worker in particular, allows the anti-fascist to reconcile two contradictory demands – for civil disobedience (including violence) and for the massive extension of state power.”

So, you see, Anti-Fascism is the “real” fascism because it has “contempt” for the “white male worker.” And what was the full name of the Nazi Party in Germany? The Nationalist Socialist German Workers Party. And who was eligible to be a member of said Party? “White/Aryan” people, with an emphasis on males; hence, a “white male worker.” But the way this article is worded, it depicts the anti-fascists of being the real mean guys, while simultaneously depicting “white male workers” of somehow being the *victims* of said anti-fascism. And if anti-fascists are the bad guys, then the good guys are whom? Fascists, perhaps?

This explains why anyone who defends Arabs, Palestinians, and/or Muslims are decried as “anti-Semites” by this Islamophobic campaign. Considering that Arabs are Semites themselves, it is absurd that they could be anti-Semites on a technical basis alone. But part of the campaign is to depict only Jews as being Semites, therefore only hatred against Jews as Antisemitic. But as already stated, this is factually untrue. So what they really mean is that anyone who defends Arabs, Palestinians, and/or Muslims are anti-Jewish. But then that would mean any Jewish person who rises to said defensive, is anti-Self or anti-their-own-Person. Another illogical fallacy.

Furthermore, as has been demonstrated on this site time and again, much of the “Old Right” who was publicly virulently anti-Jewish in the past, has “toned down” or otherwise replaced their rhetoric with anti-Muslim diatribes. They still hate Jews, but they realize it is easier to transfer everything they hate about Jews onto Muslims due to the political climate of the country, while still getting their point across. And it works, frighteningly so. While most Americans would think it absurd that the Jews were planning to take over America because Butterball sold a few Kosher turkeys, or if Campbells made some Kosher soup, by replacing the word “Jew” with “Muslim”, the script is flipped and many people don’t think the rhetoric is that horrible. If there is another holocaust (and I pray that it never, ever happens) in the West, this time as the Final Solution for Muslims, perhaps people will be more sensitive to Islamophobia, just as they are sensitive to Antisemitism and immediately recognize it for what it is, without making excuses for it.

These nuts will do anything for money. There’s a word for that.

As more and more truth comes out about political Zionism, the more rediculous people like Frank Gaffney sound.

Mr Gaffney and other loons are using the ‘easy target’ strategy (which happen to be Muslims) to protect political Zionism from being exposed as a parasite.

People are, more and more, as they read, hear, and watch the truth unfold, and have more access to it, can recall it if they need, and have more opinions and voices added to the mix, beginning to seperate political Zionism from Israel (the state) and Jews.

Hating Muslims and Islam is simply another stradegy to hold the bunker mindset that the people of Israel have, and the mindless drone support, to hold on to the ideology of Zionism as something good.

However, the truth is winning, and Gaffney and his minions are losing the war of ideas…because today, you can only lie to those who want to be lied to.

Frank Gaffney, in referring to the SPLC as anti-Semitic, has a problem: The Anti-Defamation League also thinks that Frank Gaffney is a Loon.

Regarding why the SPLC designates some groups as hate groups and some extremists like Frank Gaffney as dangerous: Today’s Huffingpost.com has a worthwhile blog to read: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/michelango-signorile/tony-perkins-family-research-council_b_1806481.html