Robert Spencer

|

Pamela Geller

|

Bat Ye'or

|

Brigitte Gabriel

|

Daniel Pipes

|

Debbie Schlussel

|

Walid Shoebat

|

Joe Kaufman

|

Wafa Sultan

|

Geert Wilders

|

The Nuclear Card

Abenob Nakoula Bassely, the Man Behind the Muhammad Movie

Posted on 13 September 2012 by Garibaldi

Actress Cindy Lee Garcia was deceived by Abenob Nakouly Bassely

CNN reports that the man behind the “Innocence of Muslims” movie is likely not an “Israeli real estate developer” by the name of Sam Bacile, but instead as some speculated an Egyptian Copt by the name Abenob Nakoula Bassely. I indicated in my feature that there were doubts about who Bacile actually was and also updated the story reflecting that Israel has no knowledge of a citizen by the name of Sam Bacile.

by Moni Basu (CNN)

Some time in the summer, a small theater in Los Angeles screened a movie to which hardly anyone came.

It was a clunky film filled with scenes in a desert and in tents. The characters were cartoonish; the dialogue gauche.

The actors who’d responded to a July 2011 casting call thought they were making an adventure film set 2,000 years ago called “Desert Warrior.” That’s how Backstage magazine and other acting publications described it.

The American-made movie, it turns out, was hardly an innocent Arabian Desert action flick.

Instead, the movie, backed by hardcore anti-Islam groups in the United States, is a tome on Islam as fraud. In trailers posted on YouTube in July, viewers saw this: scene after scene of the Prophet Mohammed portrayed as a womanizer, buffoon, ruthless killer and child molester.

Islam forbids all depictions of Mohammed, let alone insulting ones.

Staff and crew of film that ridiculed Muslims say they were ‘grossly misled’

The Muslim world erupted in rage.

Protesters aired their anti-American anger in Egypt, Yemen, Tunisia, Morocco, Sudan, Iran and in the Palestinian territories. They came after violent mobsattacked the U.S. Consulate in the Libyan city of Benghazi leaving the ambassador and three other Americans dead.

But as outrage spread, the film’s origins still remained murky. Whose idea was it? Who financed it?

At the heart of the mystery was the filmmaker himself, a man identified in the casting call as Sam Bassiel, on the call sheet as Sam Bassil and reported at first by news outlets as Sam Bacile.

By Thursday, as new details emerged, it was becoming apparent that Bacile was probably not the producer’s real name.

In an interview with The Wall Street Journal, the filmmaker identified himself as Sam Bacile and said he was a 52-year-old Israeli-American real estate developer from California.

But Israel’s Foreign Ministry said there was no record of a Sam Bacile with Israeli citizenship.

“This guy is totally anonymous. At this point, no one can confirm he holds Israeli citizenship, and even if he did we are not involved,” ministry spokesman Yigal Palmor said.

CNN has been unable to contact anyone named Sam Bacile and cannot verify the information reported in the Journal.

A search by CNN of public records related to Bacile came up empty. A search of entertainment records turned up no previous mention of a Sam Bacile, and the directors and writers guilds had no listing for him.

A production staff member who worked on the film in its initial stages told CNN that an entirely different name was filed on the paperwork for the Screen Actors Guild: Abenob Nakoula Bassely.

He believed the filmmaker was a Coptic Christian and when the two spoke on the phone during production, the filmmaker said he was in Alexandria, Egypt, raising money for the film. There has been a long history of animosity between Muslims and the minority Copts in Egypt.

Another staffer who worked on the film said he knew the producer as Sam Bassil. That’s how he signed a personal check to pay staff.

The staffer said he was “99% positive” that Sam Bassil was not Jewish. He had quite a few religious pieces in his house, including images of the Madonna.

He was married with two children — the daughter helped during production and even brought in lunch on a few occasions, the staffer said.

Neither staffer wanted to be identified for security reasons.

Six things to know about the attack

In his interview with the Wall Street Journal, the filmmaker characterized his movie, now called “Innocence of Muslims,” as “a political effort to call attention to the hypocrisies of Islam.”

“Islam is a cancer,” he said. “The movie is a political movie. It’s not a religious movie.”

An actress in the film, who asked not to be identified, told CNN that the original script did not include a Prophet Mohammed character. She said she and other actors complained that their lines had been changed.

She said she spoke Wednesday with the producer.

“He said he wrote the script because he wants the Muslims to quit killing,” she said. “I had no idea he was doing all this.”

She described the movie’s repercussions as a “nightmare,” given the outrage and deaths, and she regretted having a role. She said she was angry and hurt by the lies.

The 79 other cast and crew members said they were “grossly misled” about the film’s intent.

YouTube restricts video access over Libyan violence

“The entire cast and crew are extremely upset and feel taken advantage of by the producer,” they said in a statement.

They said they were “shocked by the drastic rewrites of the script and lies that were told to all involved. We are deeply saddened by the tragedies that have occurred.”

The actress said that the character of Mohammed in the movie was named George when it was shot, and that after production wrapped she returned and read other lines that may have been dubbed into the piece.

A member of the production staff who worked on the film and has a copy of the original script corroborated the woman’s account. There was no mention of Mohammed or Islam, the crew member said.

The filmmaker told the Wall Street Journal that he was backed by Jewish donors, who contributed $5 million to make the film. Based on the trailer, however, the cartoonish movie appears to have been produced on a low budget.

Anti-Muslim activist Steve Klein, who said he was a script consultant for the movie, said the filmmaker told him his idea was to make a film that would reveal “facts, evidence and proof” about the Prophet Mohammed to people he perceived as radical Muslims.

Klein said the movie was called “Innocence of Bin Laden.”

“Our intent was to reach out to the small minority of very dangerous people in California and try to shock them into understanding how dangerous Islam is,” Klein said.

“We knew that it was going to cause some friction, if anybody paid attention to it,” he said.

But when Klein went to the screening in the Los Angeles theater, no one was there.

“It was a bust, a wash,” he said.

Killing shines light on Muslim sensitivities around Prophet Mohammed

But a while later, the trailers were online. They were segments focusing on the Prophet Mohammed and posted under the title, “Innocence of Mohammed.”

The trailers were translated into Egyptian dialects of Arabic, the New York Times reported. Egyptian television aired certain segments.

And the fury erupted.

Klein told CNN Wednesday that Sam Bacile was in hiding.

“He’s very depressed, and he’s upset,” Klein said. “I talked to him this morning, and he said that he was very concerned for what happened to the ambassador.”

The Atlantic later quoted Klein as saying that Sam Bacile was a pseudonym. He said he did not know Bacile’s real name.

Klein is known in Southern California for his vocal opposition to the construction of a mosque in Temecula, southeast of Los Angeles, in 2010. He heads up Concerned Citizens for the First Amendment, a group that contends Islam is a threat to American freedom.

The Southern Poverty Law Center, which tracks hate groups, says Klein, a former Marine and Vietnam veteran, helped train militant Christian fundamentalists prepare for war.

The movie got even more notice after it was promoted by anti-Islam activists, including Egyptian-born Coptic Christian Morris Sadek and Terry Jones, the Florida pastor whose Quran-burning last year sparked deadly riots in Afghanistan.

Jones said he had been contacted to help distribute the film.

“The film is not intended to insult the Muslim community, but it is intended to reveal truths about Mohammed that are possibly not widely known,” Jones said in a statement.

“It is very clear that God did not influence him (Mohammed) in the writings of the Quran,” said Jones, who went on to blame Muslims’ fear of criticism for the protests, rather than the film.

Gen. Martin Dempsey, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, called Jones to ask him to withdraw his support for the film, said Col. David Lapan, Dempsey’s spokesman.

“Jones’ support of the film risks causing more violence and death,” Lapan said.

That fear mounted as anger raged in the Muslim world and especially as Friday, Islam’s day of religious observance, fast approached.

Reaction to anti-Islam film fuels debate on free speech versus hate speech

  • Pingback: Anti-Islam film: the Coptic Brotherhood « Pyramidion

  • Chris34

    The same people that are behind 9/11, the people that made up the reason to go to war, are the people creating things like this movie to cause more trouble and to enrage people so that the media can have a field day , it’s all a part of their plan, we are all being played for idiots, they are getting both sides to fight while they just pull the strings. I encourage people to watch “Aaron Russo on new world order”

  • Ilisha

    @FYI

    The admin is looking into this and we hope to have it resolved soon.

  • FYI

    Something wrong, the comments don’t load. Could someone explain why this happens. I’m non technical, so don’t give all the geeky tips, about cookies and browsers and what not.

  • FYI

    Actress in anti-Islamic video sues Youtube, filmmaker

    Woman says she’s victim of fraud, invasion of privacy

    http://www.wlwt.com/news/national/Actress-in-anti-Islamic-video-sues-Youtube-filmmaker/-/9837944/16669248/-/e9jp89/-/index.html#ixzz26zwqqZ47

    In an interview with CNN, Garcia said she spoke with the producer after the unrest began.

    “He said he wrote the script because he wants the Muslims to quit killing,” Garcia said. “I had no idea he was doing all this.”

    Last week, Garcia told CNN she had been unaware that her voice was dubbed but the lawsuit alleges even further voice-over alternations of her on-camera dialogue.”

    The producers’ representations that he “intended to make an ‘adventure film’ and that plaintiff would be depicted as a concerned mother, were false,” the suit claims. “Defendant … made an anti-Islam propaganda film, in which plaintiff is falsely made to appear to accuse the founder of the Islamic religion of being a sexual deviant and child molester,” the suit says.

    On Wednesday, 79 cast and crew members released a statement saying they were “extremely upset and feel taken advantage of by the producer.”

    They said they were “shocked by the drastic rewrites of the script and lies that were told to all involved. We are deeply saddened by the tragedies that have occurred.”

    The lawsuit seeks compensatory and punitive damages against Nakoula for invasion of privacy, fraud, negligence, and the intentional infliction of emotional distress. “Ms. Garcia has lost her job, her privacy, and has suffered extreme distress over Nakoula’s acts,” according to the lawsuit.

  • Steve

    @Bosechand, “they say that denial of the holocaust has legal ramifications but disrespect of Islam does not”

    The holocaust is an historical fact. The veracity of islam is unproven.

    “I assume that saying bad things about the Torah or Moses/Abraham would be treated no differently than this movie?”

    You can say what you like about the Torah, moses and abraham. You can’t insult the dead and the torah is just ancient folk tales and some crazy laws.

  • Steve

    “Once again we see the clear proof that the loyalty of Christians in Egypt goes first for America, that has been the story for tens of years.”

    How did you come to that conclusion?

    “Now they all cry worlf because we were successful cicking them out of Egypt and stripping them off all their possessions.”

    How nice.

    “proves that they are the first to betray us as Egyptians.”

    Who is this they?

  • Bosechand

    You know it’s strange. I took a look at the trailer of the movie; it is insulting for sure but it is also terrible. It reminded me of of the plot of a movie ‘gentleman broncos’ in terms of production values.

    Anyway, I just got done watching a news discussion show on a mainstream tv channel (din news and the show is called beyond headlines). It had 6 Muslim religious scholars and a couple of regular commenters. The shocking thing that I found was that 3 or 4 openly called for the killing of the movie maker as a foregone onclusion and a religious duty and no one disagreed with that comment or advised a softer stance.

    And this on a mainstream channel with some more literate or worldly scholars. It scares me o think what is being brewed in the minds of the people in neighbourhood mosques which are headed by far less temperate and illiterate mullahs.

    My advice is for paki Americans to take someone to court in the us and have an earnest legal discussion on freedom of speech and it’s boundaries.

    Another thing that I would love feedback on is what Pakistanis use as n example of double standards. They say that denial of the holocaust has legal ramifications but disrespect of Islam does not. Am I correct in drawing a distinction between this and speaking against the Jewish holy book? I assume that saying bad things about the Torah or Moses/Abraham would be treated no differently than this movie?

  • Pingback: Onschuld. Over een film en onrusten | wltrrr

  • Derick1259

    I’m all for freedom of speech, however just because your free to say anything, doesn’t it’s not allowed to have any consequences. That’s the thing all the supporters of the movie forgets. What did they think, they weren’t going to get any backlash for what they are doing?

    Freedom of Speech comes packaged with the right to be stupid, and that’s fine, because that’s libertarianism.

    And no I’m not calling for deaths to the makers of the movie, I’m just saying – It’s everyone elses right to simply be angry.

Advertise Here
Advertise Here