Top Menu

Why is Rand Paul running Muslim-baiting attack ads?

Why is Rand Paul running Muslim-baiting attack ads?

The senator’s fear-mongering isn’t just morally repugnant. It’s completely at odds with his libertarian principles

By , Salon.com

Kentucky Republican Sen. Rand Paul has worked hard to distance himself from his party’s hawkish foreign policy, carefully cultivating an image as libertarian hero that may one day carry on the legacy — and potentially presidential ambitions — of his father, Rep. Ron Paul. He goes out of his way to criticize his party’s foreign policy, writing an Op-Ed on CNN.com last week attacking Mitt Romney’s “bellicose[ness]” in the Middle East during the debate. Paul has railed against military interventionism, vowed to cut the defense budget, called for a reduction in military bases overseas and otherwise alienated himself from the party’s powerful neoconservative wing as much as possible.

But there’s one area where Paul’s self-described libertarian freedom agenda is trumped by the ugliest type of neoconservative fear-mongering: Muslim-baiting. RandPAC, Paul’s political committee, is spending hundreds of thousands of dollars attacking three Democratic senators for voting for foreign aid to Muslim countries. Paul introduced a bill to cut off foreign aid to Egypt, Pakistan and Libya. While there are some totally valid arguments supporting his bill, instead of making them, the commercials go for the nastiest attack possible, essentially accusing Sens. Joe Manchin of West Virginia, Bill Nelson of Florida and Sherrod Brown of Ohio of siding with jihadis and terrorists over Americans.

“Instead of putting hard-working West Virginians first, you voted to send billions of taxpayer dollars to nations where they shout ‘death to America,’ kill our Ambassador and allow radical Islamists to burn our embassies,” a petition on the RandPAC website accompanying the Manchin ad reads. “As one of your constituents, I demand that you start putting the interest of American taxpayers above those of Anti-American regimes and radical jihadists overseas.”

The ad was vicious enough that Republican Sen. Lindsey Graham crossed party lines to defend Manchin. “I’m sorry that my colleague Sen. Rand Paul felt that he needed to get involved and has gotten involved,” Graham said on a conference call with reporters. That comment drew a quick rebuke from Paul, who accused Graham of “supporting a Democrat in a general election.”

But there seems to be a pattern here: When Muslims come into the picture, Paul’s laissez-faire politics go out the window. Paul — whose championship of private-property rights has led him to oppose even the Americans With Disability Act — didn’t support the right of Muslims to build an Islamic community center in lower Manhattan near ground zero. Instead, he said Muslims should contribute the money that would have been used to build the mosque to the 9/11 victims’ memorial fund.

What’s more, Paul, who proposed legislation to curb what he saw as the TSA’s overly invasive powers to pat down fliers, admonished the agency last year for its unwillingness to profile people based on their background. In 2010, he reversed his stance on the prison camp at Guantanamo Bay, going from opposing it to saying, “Foreign terrorists do not deserve the protections of our Constitution … These thugs should stand before military tribunals and be kept off American soil. I will always fight to keep Kentucky safe and that starts with cracking down on our enemies.”

In May of last year, Paul, who adamantly opposes the Patriot Act as a terrible violation of civil liberties, called for keeping tabs on foreign students from the Middle East. “Let’s say we have 100,000 exchange students from the Middle East — I want to know where they are, how long they’ve been here, if they’ve overstayed their welcome, whether they’re in school,” he said in a radio interview.

Even worse, in the same interview, the senator — who touts himself as a strong defender of free speech — called for imprisoning or deporting people who attend radical Islamic speeches. “It wouldn’t be that they are Islamic. But if someone is attending speeches from someone who is promoting the violent overthrow of our government, that’s really an offense that we should be going after — they should be deported or put in prison,” Paul said.

Paul’s father was true enough to his libertarian ideals to stand up to Rep. Michele Bachmann’s Muslim witch hunt. The son never did.

, , , , , , ,

  • Pingback: Drones, Dearborn and the Killing of Muslims | Islamophobia Today eNewspaper

  • Pingback: Drones, Dearborn and the Killing of Muslims | Puccaso

  • Pingback: Drones, Dearborn and the Killing of Muslims | අපෙන් news

  • http://muhammadsblog.wordpress.com Muhammad

    I don’t think we could say he’s anti-Islamic because he wants to cut foreign on Muslim countries because that’s not true, he wants to cut all foreign aid. However, the other reasons all seem valid, which is why I think I was never able to completely trust Rand Paul the same way as his father, Ron Paul.

  • Taxpayer

    The apple, it seems, is falling far from the tree. I donated lots of money and time to Ron Paul in both 2007/8 and 2011/12. I would’ve been willing to do the same for Rand in 2016 or 2020, but between the Muslim-baiting, the Romney endorsement, the Iran sanctions vote, and the Gitmo flip-flop, Rand has shot himself in the foot enough times that I’m going to keep my distance.

    A pity – I had hopes. Gary Johnson 2012 (and 2016) for me.

  • Haddock

    Rand Paul has been attempting to mainstream himself within the Republican Party for months. This is just another example of that. Even one of the Paul’s most ardent supporters, the conspiracy-theorist Alex Jones, released a long video pleading with the father and son to stay true to their “libertarian” values.

  • http://twitter.com/Raza_inc Razainc

    @ Zakariya Ali Sher what worries me about that is how far is he willing to go to make sure Muslims have another justice system in US and have less rights one thing I have noticed about the libertarian movement is there is a strand of libertarians who one could call neocon-libertarians who want a hawkish foreign policy believe in giving the government police state powers and they usally tout the mantra liberty for all except Muslims

  • Zakariya Ali Sher

    Cutting off aid for Egypt, Pakistan and Libya might be consistent with Libertarian ideology; I believe they want to cut off ALL government aid, even to Israel! I however, the rest of it seems extremely anti-Muslim even by Republican standards. It’s hard to say how much of it is genuine. I can’t help but wonder if he isn’t doing this BECAUSE the ignorant masses are more likely to support him. We’ve already seen that kind of shameless demagoguery from Michelle Bachman, Newt Gingrich, Rudolph Giuliani, Herman Cain, and various other Republican frontrunners. One of the biggest things that I think hurt his father was the fact that his father didn’t want a war with Iran. For some reason, that seemed to infuriate the GOP. Even when compared with Paul’s other (fairly radical) Libertarian views. Perhaps he thinks he can gain more traction by pandering to the Islamophobia lobby. Sadly, he might even be right.

  • Reynardine

    It’s like this: The father’s a wit, so the son is a half-wit.

  • Heinz Catsup

    Like father, like son… I wish such words could hold true for Rand but, sadly, they don’t.

  • mindy1

    He sounds as though he could have been an interesting candidate, but for those ads :(

  • http://twitter.com/Raza_inc Razainc

    That’s one of the few reasons I can’t support the younger Rand Paul, Ron Paul fought hard against xenophobia against Muslims especially when it he was in the republican debates , he has also called Islam one of the great religions, Rand how ever seems to be another neocon but still better than most of the senator’s (thats Democrat and Republican)

Powered by Loon Watchers