Robert Spencer

|

Pamela Geller

|

Bat Ye'or

|

Brigitte Gabriel

|

Daniel Pipes

|

Debbie Schlussel

|

Walid Shoebat

|

Joe Kaufman

|

Wafa Sultan

|

Geert Wilders

|

The Nuclear Card

WND Still Promoting Debunked “Obama Wears Muslim Ring” Conspiracy

Posted on 14 October 2012 by Emperor

World Net Daily relying on discredited Pamela Geller Conspiracies? Whodathunkit?

A good piece by Richard Bartholomew on this nonsense.:

WND Still Promoting Debunked “Obama Wears Muslim Ring” Conspiracy

Barth’s Notes

Last week, WND‘s Jerome Corsi put forward the conspiracy theory that Barack Obama wears a ring engraved in Arabic with the words “In the Name of Allah”, the [first] part of the Muslim declaration of faith or Shahada [ed. "In the Name of Allah" is not the first part of the testimony of faith]. The theory relied on an image blown up to such an extent that it was seriously blurred, although Snopes has since published a large and very clear photo which should have put the whole non-story to bed. Snopes judges the story to be “probably false” rather than just “false”, but it is obvious that the supposed Arabic inscription is simply a loop pattern. It’s not in the least amenable to any other interpretation.

However, although that should have been the end of the matter, WND and Corsi have ploughed on regardless with follow-up articles, and the story remains a banner headline on the WND homepage. They have even managed to prompt a short piece in a Turkish newspaper.

Corsi writes:

Joel Gilbert, who was first to conclude that the ring bears the Shahada, has issued a detailed analysis he prepared with the assistance of Yousef Shehadeh, a native Arabic speaker from Nazareth who studied Arabic for 13 years in the Holy Land and now works as a graphic artist in Los Angeles.

Gilbert, who has studied Arabic himself, told WND he sent close-up photographs of the ring to Shehadeh “cold,” without offering any opinion, and asked Shehadeh to evaluate them.

Shehadeh replied to him that the script on Obama’s ring is Arabic, and it is the first part of the Islamic declaration of faith.

You’ll note that that link is dead; Gilbert appears to have lost confidence in his “detailed analysis”, and he’s also taken down a YouTube video on the subject. Gilbert featured on this blog a couple of weeks ago; he heads a Bob Dylan tribute band, and he recently produced a documentary claiming that Frank Marshall Davis was Obama’s father and that Ann Dunham had appeared in pornographic magazines. Gilbert also describes himself as an “Islamic history scholar”, although he appears to be basing this claim on his undergraduate studies in the 1980s.

A couple of individuals who have set themselves up as experts on the dangers of Islam staked their credibility on agreeing with Gilbert’s claim:

Staffers in Jordan with William J. Murray’s Religious Freedom Coalition also believe the ring, which Obama wore on his wedding-ring finger for at least a decade before he married Michelle Robinson, pays homage to Allah.

The Amman staffers said they have seen other rings like it.

Egyptian-born Islamic scholar Mark A. Gabriel, Ph,D., as well as a native-Arabic speaker employed by WND who has provided translations of critical Arabic statements, believe the ring is Islamic. A Duke professor interviewed by Glenn Beck’s TheBlaze.com news service also confirmed their conclusion.

Given that Obama’s ring comes from Indonesia, it’s not clear why Murray’s “Amman staffers” would see a special resemblance to rings in Jordan.

The “Duke professor” wisely kept his name “off the record”. William Murray has also featured on this blog previously: last year, he took part in the “Constitution or Sharia” conference in Nashville, at which speakers included the likes of Christian Concern’s Paul Diamond. Gabriel, meanwhile, is Founder and President” of the Union of Former Muslims, and the author of Culture Clash: Islam’s War on America.

Also more or less on board was Andrew Bostom, who declared that Corsi’s and Gabriel’s evidence “appear to be” sound, as was Pamela Geller:

She said Obama’s “anti-freedom, pro-jihad foreign policy has given the global jihad a new lease on death, and clearly he is happy about that, as this ring indicates.”

Robert Spencer, meanwhile, was slightly more cautious:

[Spencer] said that should the ring on Obama’s finger prove to include an inscription of an Islamic prayer, it could explain his foreign policy attitudes and actions regarding freedom in the Middle East.

Other sites, meanwhile, have suggested that the ring shows that Obama is “married to Allah”. This is not a concept that is found in normative Islam.

Oddly, one person who was unimpressed was Glenn Beck’s End-Times prophet Joel Richardson:

Joel Richardson… said he was skeptical that there was an Arabic script on the ring, which he has not examined personally.

What a shame that Richardson wasn’t similarly sceptical when his associate Walid Shoebat  claimed that the Arabic contours of “In the Name of Allah” are present in the Biblical Greek for “666″. Arabic letters seem to be particularly amendable to this kind of “reading in”: some Muslims themselves have sometimes claimed to have found the words “In the Name of Allah” present in natural phenomena.

Snopes also raises the point that

One might also consider the incongruity that a politician who has long been dealing with (and denying) rumors that he is a Muslim would openly wear a symbol demonstrating those rumors to be true.

Actually, I doubt very much that Obama himself spends time “dealing with” such a rumour, but there’s an implied further element in the conspiracy: perhaps Obama is secretly signalling his Muslim allegiance to other Muslims, who are collectively keeping it to themselves. Hence we recently saw discredited fake “ex-terrorist” Kamal Saleem explain to Frank Gaffney that when Obama recites the pledge of allegiance  he holds his hand in a special way that shows he is really performing an Islamic prayer. In 2009, WND‘s Joseph Farah claimed that Obama had made a speech “in code” to the Muslim world in which he conveyed a promise to revive and continue Hitler’s Holocaust (no, really).

WND Still Promoting Debunked “Obama Wears Muslim Ring” Conspiracy

  • leia

    yes, foreign policy & the government, and really evil ppl aside, i think the ordinary American people are awesome :)

  • Ilisha

    @leia

    I agree. I love the republic, but despise the empire and all that goes with it. Arrogance, greed, and moral bankruptcy are a lethal combination.

    @AJ

    Makes sense. I do want a balance of those three things, and I’m not satisfied with shallow assertions of boldness.

    Your comment ties in well, I think, with what JSB wrote. Those who simply want the emotional appeal of a strong leader aren’t thinking things through. It’s fine to be bold when what you’re doing is morally and strategically sound, but a potential disaster when it’s immoral and foolish.

    I like the quote from Adalai Stevenson. Wasn’t he the one who also said there’s no point in being a public servant if you can’t serve the public? I don’t have time to look it up, but I think I was disenchanted with politics by then.

    Romney and Sheldon Adelson….further evidence of his lack of character and integrity:

    http://www.nytimes.com/2012/08/17/opinion/in-thrall-to-sheldon-adelson.html

  • leia

    * i am not an expert, my opinion is my own

  • leia

    @llisha i must say i agree with you on America and apologizing. Its an issue that’s been on my mind a lot whenever US foreign policy is mentioned.
    I think it has a far broader reach, and far deeper consequences, than simply being the moral thing to do.
    Case to point: The US has and continues to fund authoritarian regimes in the ME. Saudi Arabia for example where the US knowing that the monarchy has serious issues, knowing that most of the money will go into their pocket, continues to purchase oil from them. on the other hand the US govt has the audacity to criticize the more extreme forms of society that appear as a direct consequence of the monarchy using religion to subdue the masses.(this is a complicated issue tho and i’m not an expert)
    Certain Americans speak in arrogant tones about the arab spring. there is a voice, we the US will help you on condition blah blah you uphold high democratic ideals blahblah your society has been backward so long you need to changeblah By not apologizing the US puts all blame, responsibility on the other side. although its true that Blame of All Misfortunes is equally shared, not apologizing enables America to jump onto the next opportunity. guilt, responsibility free.
    btw looking at the bigger picture, ever since Obama announced that the US will now look East there has been increasing disruption over certain islands here in Asia. although being ‘the other’ for many Americans is painful for my fellow muslims and i and has consequences, lets end it here. Don’t make Asians, chinese, japanese, koreans, vietnamese,etc the next other.

  • Just Stopping By

    @Solid Snake:

    Okay, I think we have pretty much exhausted this thread.

    I’ll end my bit by saying that I hope you do take me up on the offer; I actually suggested in my last message that you find someone finicky, but it may be tough to find someone as finicky and as willing to point as errors as I am, so I am happy to take up the burden. In fact, I’d be honored.

    Just don’t wait until the last minute, especially given your crowded schedule. Since you are studying and working, it doesn’t seem like you will have to explain how you used your time, but it’s easier to recognize and fill any holes in your résumé early rather than as you are about to submit it.

  • Solid Snake

    @JSB

    Thanks for the advice JSB. And you don’t have to apologize, I welcome this type of constructive criticism.I really appreciate it. And of course I am always willing to learn from others and my mistakes. I might even take you up on that offer in the future :)

    PS Loonwatch I have now stopped receiving all updates, including the subscribe to thread email.

  • http://aayjay.wordpress.com AJ

    @Ilisha,

    I don’t know about politics but in engineering management, we were given a test to measure our A, B and Cs. A is for analytical skills, B is for boldness and C is for caring. In each question, if you chose an answer which had a very high B component then the A and C would go down so that the net sum would stay a 100%. Now, I was with a group of all male engineers – we all took the test and answered a number of questions. When the results came up, most of the men had very high A’s which was kind of expected for engineers who would be too analytical. In my case, I had equal proportions of A, B and C. Initially, I was worried that I had a bad combination but it turned out that for perfect leaders As, Bs and Cs had to have equal percentages. So perhaps sometimes the situation asks for a relatively bolder (rather than caring or analytical) decision and sometimes for a higher caring decision, etc.

    I think it might be the same for political leaders too – As, Bs and Cs should be in proportion. I think Obama would have that ;) Romney probably has a high B and zero A and zero C.

  • Ilisha

    @AJ

    That’s possible. But the broad appeal still surprises me.

    Another thing that is interesting to me is that Romney is supposed to appeal to conservatives, many of whom claim to be religious. Yet many of these same people champion policies of greed (often against their own interests) and arrogance, both of which are in direct opposition to Christianity and other major religions. Even so, they still sometimes call themselves “values voters.” What values?

    I definitely don’t have my finger on the pulse of the American electorate, and it’s good I’m not a politician–I would no doubt be a dismal failure.

  • http://aayjay.wordpress.com AJ

    @Ilisha, the arrogance perhaps appeals to the men and the emotional side to the women.

Advertise Here
Advertise Here