Top Menu

Islamophobes Spencer and Greenfield Push Fabricated Mohammad Al-Arifi Fatwa Story

Mohammad Al-Arifi

Mohammad Al-Arifi

I want to hat tip Rookie who first alerted us to the story about a fabricated fatwa that allegedly gave Syrian rebels permission to engage in “intercourse marriage/gang rape,” the fabricated fatwa was attributed to a Saudi preacher by the name of Mohammad Al-Arifi.

Robert Spencer was pushing the false story on his JihadWatch and made a grudging update to the story quite some time after it was revealed to be fabricated in which he couldn’t help but take a dig at Shi’a Muslims.

Daniel Greenfield, premiere Genocide-inciter at David Horowitz’s FrontPageRag also published an article on the fabricated fatwa that attempts to paint it as real. Greenfield’s article has no update and in fact was headed with an incendiary picture from an older hoax being pushed by Islamophobes regarding a supposed “mass pedophilia wedding” in Gaza in 2009.

Greenfield titled this picture: “Hamas Muslim Child Brides“:

Hamas-Muslim-Child-Brides

I debunked this absurd hoax back in August of 2009 in the article, Anti-Muslim Blogosphere Runs Amuck: Forced to Eat Crow. Clearly, Greenfield wasn’t phased and continues to push this lie despite it being debunked  over three years ago.

AlterNet, which it self was fooled but had the decency to apologize for its mistake has the full story on the fabricated fatwa:

Exhibit A in How an Islamophobic Meme Can Spread Like Wildfire Across the Internet

January 2, 2013  |  Editor’s note: On January 2, AlterNet was one of several outlets that published what turned out to be an article based on a false report. We would like to apologize to our readers for the error.

On January 2nd, the story of a Saudi Sheikh issuing a fatwa that condoned ‘intercourse marriage’ or gang rape in Syria exploded over the internet.

According to various sources, Sheikh Mohammad Al-Arifi had stated that foreign fighters in Syria had the right to engage in short term marriages to satisfy their sexual desires and boost their determination to fight against the Assad regime. Syrian girls and women from age 14 upwards were considered fair game and apparently secured their own place in heaven if they participated in these ‘intercourse marriages’.

By the evening a simple Google search of the words, ‘Saudi Sheikh’ , Syrian, and ‘women’ brought up some 5 million references and at least 3 pages of links to articles spreading the news. Not surprisingly there was immediate online uproar too, though as one commentator put it, much of the discussion was about whether these arranged temporary marriages technically constituted ‘rape’. This in itself is worrying.

There was also skepticism from many quarters about the veracity of the report, particularly among savvy Mideast experts.  Rightly so. The story, much like the one a few months ago about Egyptian Islamist MPs proposing laws that permitted sex with a deceased spouse up to 6 hours after his/her death, turned out to be a gross lie.  Sheikh Al-Arifi has issued a denial via his Facebook page. Over the next few days, the various websites and media outlets that spread the story will no doubt issue their retractions. But the story also raises many questions.  For starters, where did it come from? AlterNet inadvertently picked it up from the overtly anti-Islamic Clarion Fund site. Others pointed to the Iranian regime backed Press TV as the primary source on December 31 2012.  But the earliest English language reporting comes on December 29 from an obscure YouTube news site called Eretz Zen, tagged as a YouTube channel by a “secular Syrian opposed to having [his] country turned into a Taliban-like state.”

What’s extraordinary and depressing is that a slew of websites picked up the story and ran with it, some claiming legitimacy because the other had posted it and clearly no one bothered to do some basic fact checking. Arguably this is just the nature of the net and minute by minute news updates. The story was too sensational to give up. But one would imagine that if a similar story emerged about a Christian cleric or a Rabbi, someone, somewhere would have paused before posting it. Sadly, in the case of stories about Muslim clerics or Islamists the same red flags don’t seem to apply.

Perhaps western journalists are so ignorant of Islam and the cultures in the Middle East that they are willing to believe anything. It’s nothing new — after all Western notions of the East were always immured in sexual decadence and the allure of harems. That was a trademark of the patronizing Orientalism of the past. Today we have a phobic version of Orientalism — expecting and only seeing and reporting the bad and the ugly.

Read the rest…

, , , , , , , , , , , ,

  • http://www.loonwatch.com/ Ilisha

    Why would anyone listen to a discredited buffoon like Tarek Fatah? He hates Muslims.

    Sure, he claims he is a Muslim. Maybe he is and maybe not, but either way, it changes nothing. It’s not as if Sally Hemmings wasn’t black.

  • Tanveer Khan

    Just you wait until im 50…

  • Leftwing_Muslim_Alliance

    I had not heard of this chap before maybe sarah had not either . If you knew about him before in a good light you would be less inclined to believe this hoax .
    This is the internet and they are all sorts of “games ” going on out there
    Sir David

  • golden izanagi

    oh please if anyone has a kick ass beard its this guy http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vHf8iZW3eg8

  • Solid Snake

    Oh and I think western journalists do not fact check stories involving outrageous claims about Muslims because there are no negative consequences to be faced from misreporting about Muslims or Arabs. Their reputation remains as it is in the eyes of the majority of the Western readers. They don’t lose readership, they don’t face lawsuits, nothing. If a journalist were to recklessly publish an outrageous claim of this scale against a prominent political figure, or Non Muslim religious figure in the West they would undoubtedly face some type of consequence. Whether it is loss of readership, tarnishing of reputation, questioning the quality of the paper, etc etc. While I think those are all proper responses to lousy journalism and misreporting, I just wish people react that way when it is about Muslims. A paper or website should be held to journalistic standards no matter who they are reporting about.

  • Solid Snake

    You have to admit, the guy has a nice beard.

  • Pingback: » Islamophobes Spencer and Greenfield Push Fabricated Mohammad …()

  • mindy1

    Sadly, some people will believe anything that confirms their biases-even if it’s false :(

  • http://www.loonwatch.com/ Ilisha

    Thanks for acknowledging this story was fake. Loons lie, often shamelessly. Keep watching with a skeptical eye, and it will become obvious.

  • http://twitter.com/CriticalDragon1 CriticalDragon1177

    Sarah AB is not a racist, and I don’t think she wanted to believe it.

  • GaribaldiOfLoonwatch

    On what basis does it seem uncertain? Arifi himself has come out and said it is a fake! What you should be asking is on what basis is it true.

  • Pingback: Saudi fatwa may be a forgery « oogenhand()

  • Arab Atheist

    The story spread quickly because anything you say about Muslims is believable. The story already exists in people’s minds and the report is just one more “confirmation” of what “we” know about “them”. It reminds me of how many Middle Easterners are quick to associate everything horrible with Israel (not that I want to defend this colonizer “state”).

  • http://twitter.com/CriticalDragon1 CriticalDragon1177

    I had believed the original Alternet story. After Rookie had corrected me, which I have to thank him for, I also, noticed that Vicious Babushka over at Little Green Footballs had also found out about this and posted the same story over there. Which is very good news.

    http://littlegreenfootballs.com/page/292180_How_an_Islamophobic_Meme_Can_S

    Hopefully some people will see this and will never make the mistake of listening to those stupid “counter jihad” like I once did.

Powered by Loon Watchers