Top Menu

Raw Story: Muslim-hating activist names Jon Stewart ‘most disgusting Jew on the planet’

Daily-Show-host-Jon-Stewart-on-CNN-on-Nov.-4-2014-CNN-800x430

Pamela Geller has mostly shriveled into irrelevance. Occasionally she bellows for attention by trying to top her last fit of crazy. Her most recent desperate plea for attention has her taking aim at the venerable Jon Stewart, describing him as “the most disgusting Jew on the planet.”

Wow. Geller sounds like an anti-Semite.

Raw Story, By Travis Gettys

An anti-Muslim conservative activist turned her attention to Jon Stewart and the generation he helped influence in an angry, poo-flinging column.

Pam Gellar suggested the Millennial Generation adopt as its symbol the smiling “poo” emoticon to symbolize what she believes is America’s moral decay.

She said in a column published Monday at World Net Daily that public schools had produced “goose-steppers like the Hitler Youth” who were violently imposing their “leftist/Islamic agenda.”

“Intellectually, young Americans are the most docile conformists, no matter how vocally and self-righteously they declare themselves free,” Gellar said.

She said American culture was “ugly as poo,” filled with gory television shows and violent, misogynist music – except for Pharrell’s upbeat hit, “Happy,” which she complained was used to protest police brutality during an Oscars performance.

“Happiness is a state of non-contradictory joy,” Gellar quoted from John Galt’s speech in Rand’s “Atlas Shrugged,” but she doesn’t recognize that quality in American culture.

“The left has worked so hard to make us miserable, and it has succeeded,” she sniffed.

“American traitor Edward Snowden got an Oscar; American hero Chris Kyle got the middle finger,” Gellar said. “Even the traitorous far-left journalist Glenn Greenwald got an Oscars shout-out. Of course Hollywood would reward vicious traitors. There was no way the Hollywood establishment was going to give an Oscar to Clint Eastwood after he so delightfully skewered Obama’s empty chair. And their disdain for Americanism and the military is infused in everything they churn out.”

She singled out “Daily Show” host Jon Stewart as particularly disdainful of America, after he mocked the standing ovation given Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu after his speech in Congress as the “longest blowjob a Jewish man has ever received.”

Gellar said Stewart should be given the “Most Disgusting Jew on the Planet Award.”

She continued, describing Stewart as a “vicious traitor, smug and self-righteous, (who) has long been working for the other side under the guise of comedy. Vile. Jon Stewart defines self-loathing Jew. But that’s not enough. He means to take us down with him.”

Read the entire article…

, , , , , , , , ,

  • Fred

    Ms. Geller is laughing all the way to the bank with the money she made from her books.

  • Capt. JB Hennessy

    That’s already happened three times, that is why they both confused.

  • Capt. JB Hennessy

    She has an inferiority complex the only man who finds her attractive is Robert Spencer and he hasn’t had an erection in decades. Not even if he goes to bed with a belly full of water does he wake up stiff.

  • Capt. JB Hennessy

    “And their disdain for Americanism and the military”

    I have disdain for the military. As a former soldier I can tell the military’s job is to take a perfectly healthy, intelligent and somewhat tolerable human being and destroy him/her. The military eradicates your personality before it even becomes a personality and gives you theirs which isn’t a personality but a blank stare.

    However the military is the greatest organization in the history of great organizations. You can wake up 05:00 hrs and shine your boots without even knowing it. That is how wonderful that organization is.

  • Jekyll

    Xir morse code version no doubt

  • Tanveer ¯_(ツ)_/¯ Khan

    – …. . -. / ..- … . / .- / — — .-. … . / -.-. — -.. . / – .-. .- -. … .-.. .- – — .-. –..– / ..-. — — .-..

  • Kataro Quasinzki

    But isn’t that true about other languages, including English with its dialects and accents? (Irish, Scottish, cockney, posh, etc) also Canada, Venezuela and Norway export oil too, yet no extreme censorship, virulent puritanism or ghoulish penology there?

  • HSkol

    Well, I guess that would technically be not speaking. It doesn’t even really seem to be an utterance – unless, that is, it’s somehow pronounceable.

  • George Carty

    I think other factors holding back the Arab world are diglossia (IIRC the dialects are as distant from fusHa as the Romance languages are from Latin) and the tremendously distorting influence of oil export revenues.

  • Kataro Quasinzki

    Many European languages are also more gendered too than, let’s say, English (that’s why I said that it’s not necessarily misogynistic) Das ist meine oma, das ist mein opa
    los camioneros, las terminas

  • Tanveer ¯_(ツ)_/¯ Khan

    … – — .–. / – .- .-.. -.- .. -. –. / – — / — .

  • George Carty

    Good point – if Semitic languages were the issue, then Israeli Jews would be more sexist than Iranians or Pakistanis (who speak Indo-European languages)

  • Kataro Quasinzki

    I think misogyny precedes – reversed causal chain – the more gendered language – which is not necessarily misogynistic (also everybody is oppressed there; it’s just that women are more so)

    You once mentioned cousin marriage and blood-bound clans, I think this is a major factor too. While Europeans for instance rallied only behind language, class and religion; Paternalism, jealousy, family honor, etc never really took hold (and they’re lucky for that)

    I think West Asia and Arabs generally sorely need a revolution of a seismic or even catastrophic scale. There’s a KSA progressive, Fozan al-Harbi, who summed it up nicely: “The problem is the swamp [of tyranny], we must drain it before worrying about the mosquito”.

    There’s simply a lot on their plate:
    1) They occupy the center of the world’s land mass (very strategic, so they either be predators or preys, no middle ground) invaders and imperialists never gave them a time to take a breath.

    2) History isn’t on their side, there has never been an instance of extended and successive progressive rule; or even a lasting culture of hedonism on the popular level (e.g. Ancient Rome and Greece) hence, the authoritarian and puritannical order continued unabated.
    Modern political organization and adminstration (unions, courts, separtion of powers, etc) still remain challenging and even alien there.

    3) Also Arabs have no history of rooted and loyal bureaucrats – unlike India and present-day Iran – who love their countries and have less complex forms of identity; Arabs have always relied on wars of conquests (scavenging) and tribal loyalty to survive; once the modern world presented itself; it was simply too late to recover; powerful outside authoritarians – European colonists and Ottomans, not to mention the “discovery” of the Americas and the Cape of Good Hope that pretty much decimated Arabs’ once-superior prowess – were just more than they could reckon with; so local rulers found it much easier to align with or even serve those power players than tending to their homelands, which in turn, led to the deterioration of political thought and “healthy” nationalism; a crisis worsened by simultaneously fearing powerful outsiders while also relying on them for sustainability.

    Of course there’s more, but those in my view are the main causes of Arab strandedness and languishment.

  • Jekyll

    Thank You

  • Tanveer ¯_(ツ)_/¯ Khan

    I don’t know what the word “harresing”means but I will honour your request. We will never speak again.

  • George Carty

    What do you make of the argument that Middle Eastern cultures are so sexist because Semitic languages are more thoroughly gendered (in verb conjugations for example) than European ones?

  • Jekyll

    Please stop harresing me and just leave me alone.

Powered by Loon Watchers