Top Menu

Robert Spencer: Loonwatch, One-half of the Leftist-Mooslim Alliance

Robert Spencer with loon Pamela Geller

Robert Spencer with loon Pamela Geller

Loonwatchers, it seems the big bad blogger himself, Robert Spencer, is beginning to worry about our little blog over on Jihad Watch (hat tip: Mallorcaman). In a blog titled, Daily Kos Sides with Islamic Supremacists Who Want to Extinguish Free Speech and Oppress Women and Non-Muslims (how many stereotypes can you fit in a single title?), Spencer targets Daily Kos contributor Devon Moore who has written comments on our site previously and has linked to us on his site.

Spencer’s post is interesting both for what Spencer writes as well as the comments which end up proving the depths to which Spencer has sunk. I don’t know if Spencer is giddy at the mere fact that he received some mention on Daily Kos or if he is truly fuming in his traditional, up-tight and conspiratorial way that “stealth jihad” is being perpetuated under the guise of some dreaded and fanciful “leftist-Mooslim” alliance. There is probably an element of both in his paranoia, but as in his attempt to pick a fight with Bassiouni it looks as though it is more of the conspiracy card.

The title itself is quite perplexing and makes bold the fact that Spencer has a penchant not only for melodrama (to stroke his ego) but also misinformation. Whenever anyone disagrees with Spencer or disputes his claims (and the list of people is ever increasing) he takes it personally, and reacts with violently worded blog posts that sling innuendo to-and-fro.

The question is: why is it that Spencer can dish out the criticism but is unable to take it? Is it the hallmark of an objective scholar to think that he or she is above any criticism? That everyone outside of the choir he sings to is wrong and part of some Leftist-Mooslim alliance? The ALA is wrong? Muslim scholar and International Law expert Cherif Bassiouni is wrong? Chicago activist Ahmed Rehab is wrong? Islamic scholar Carl Ernst is wrong? Islamic scholar John Esposito is wrong? Former Prime Minister Benazir Bhutto is wrong? Religious scholar Karen Armstrong is wrong? Islamic scholar Khaleel Mohammed is wrong? Academic historian Ivan Jablonka is wrong? Journalist and neo-Con Stephen Shwartz is wrong? Conservative ex-boyfriend of Ann Coulter Dinesh D’Souza is wrong? Spencer’s former friend Charles Johnson is wrong? Blogger and columnist for Commentary Magazine Kejda Gjermani is wrong? The list goes on and on.

Of course, the plain truth is that all of these diverse individuals are neither wrong or incorrect but they are on to something: Spencer is not an objective scholar, he is not in fact very scholarly, in fact he traffics in some of the oldest and well abused stereotypes about Islam and Muslims out there, while all at the same time putting up a front that he is objective and part of the elite vanguard safe-guarding Western values such as freedom of religion and free speech.

This methodology of Spencer is belied by the fact that he takes umbrage at other people expressing their right to free speech which is exactly what Devon Moore did. He stated his opinion (one shared by many), yet according to Spencer what he did was the equivalent to teaming up with “Islamic Supremacists who want to extinguish free speech and oppress women and non-Muslims.” Say what?

Spencer really should go through our website, especially the articles relating to him. He will see that all we do is report the facts — his instances of Islamophobia and anti-Muslimism. Like when he joined the genocidal Facebook group which called for the reconquista of modern day Turkey and its transformation through ethnic cleansing of the whole peninsula; driving out its Muslim Turkish inhabitants and replacing them with Christians.

Malkin's Book

Malkin's Book

We don’t have time to go through a detailed list of the odious friends and individuals of a very anti-Muslim bent that Spencer calls allies, but they include: Michelle Malkin of In Defense of Internment fame, Geert Wilders a neo-Fascist European politician (though Spencer thinks he is not a “genuine” neo-fascist) who wants to ban the Qur’an, Muslim immigration and deny religious freedom to Muslims, Serge Trifkovic one of the leaders of the Bosnian Serbs during the ethnic cleansing of Bosnian Muslims, the Gates of Vienna website which advocates an end to Muslim immigration and the dominance of the original indigenous White Europeans, and more. One day we will list all his buddies but just this small oeuvre should be a chilling reminder of who Spencer is: a biased, self proclaimed scholar who does not view Islam from a dispassionate and objective lens.

Spencer’s blog post also reveals a bit more of the strange world he inhabits. He writes,  first quoting Devon Moore,

The anti-Muslims cover a wide spectrum though most can be found slithering in the Right-Wing. They range from academics such as Daniel Pipes, self-declared scholars like Robert Spencer and his JihadWatch, to open racists such as Debbie Schlussel, Pamela Geller and the blog Gates of Vienna.

“Open racists”? When the Left can’t argue (which is most of the time), they smear and lie. Schlussel and Geller are freedom fighters, warriors for human rights. Only to a Leftist would that be “racist.” They are not open racists or closet racists or any kind of racists.

Moore made the incontrovertible point that Pamela Geller and Debbie Schlussel are racists, he could have also added loony extremists. Yet, according to Spencer, Debbie Schlussel and Pamela Geller are “freedom fighters” and “warriors for human rights.”

Pamela Geller, you may recall is one of the bloggers who initiated and pushed (and still is pushing) the Birther conspiracy about Barack Obama. That Barack Obama was born in Kenya, and that he is a secret Muslim subverting America through Jihad. She also “uncovered” somehow that Barack Obama was the illegitimate son of Malcolm X. This is what her WikiAnswer page has to say about her,

Pam Geller’s blog has earned her a spot in the Conservative limelight. She frequently attacks Barack Obama, pushing and originating conspiracy theories that include: Obama is a secret Muslim, Obama is not American, Obama is the illegitimate son of Malcolm X, Obama is an anti-Semite. She writes in an August 1st blog about Obama’s travel to Pakistan in the 80’s, “I think he went for the drugs and came back with jihad.”

Debbie Schlussel

Debbie Schlussel

The other “freedom fighter” for Spencer is that delightful, if deranged blogger known as Debbie Schlussel. She gives us so much fodder that there should be a website devoted exclusively to her. Debbie Schlussel was the one who proclaimed after the Virginia Tech Massacre that the shooter was a Muslim, and when early reports came out that he was Asian, she wrote that “Pakis are considered Asian” and that the attack could have been “part of a co-ordinated terrorist plot by Pakistanis.” Even when it was revealed that the shooter was a Korean she persisted with her story that he could have been a secret Muslim. Not too long ago she was on the record making a genocidal joke about Palestinians, while writing about clashes between rival Palestinian forces which left six dead Schlussel stated, “As we say in lawyer jokes, that’s a start. Six down, a few million to go.”

Now with friends like those can we really take Robert Spencer seriously? Especially when he gives these crazies ringing endorsements as “freedom fighters” and “warriors for human rights.” It seems even some of his followers are a little queasy about his endorsement, one commenter on JihadWatch, JoeChill writes,

Sorry, Mr. Spencer–you make some excellent points, but Debbie Schlussel is a highly disturbed woman. Granted, the idiots at Kos don’t like her, but even a broken clock, etc.

Schlussel initially suggested that the VA Tech shooter was a Muslim (he wasn’t). She claims that one of the 9/11 victims, Jon Schlissel, was a “cousin” of hers (based on the idea that someone with a similar name had the same ancestor a few centuries ago) and she repeatedly attacks those she disagrees with by making unsubstantiated claims, or, more often, lies.

I agree with you that Islamic jihadists and those who follow Sharia law are little more than brutal thugs who are trying to remake the world into their own twisted image. But Schlussel’s pretty twisted herself, even though she opposes them. If conservative writers are guardians of the Constitution, Schlussel is a rabid German Shepherd. By espousing her, you weaken your otherwise excellent column.

Posted by: JoeChill at August 25, 2009 4:35 PM

It would be wise for Robert Spencer to take this advice from JoeChill, he should retract his endorsement of the racist Debbie Schlussel, apologize for it, condemn her and distance himself from her. Then he should do the same with Pamela Geller. That way he might be on the road to rehabilitating his image as an apologist for fascism and an endorser of racists, instead of boohooing about a fictitious “Leftist-Mooslim” alliance.

, , , , , , , , , , , ,

  • Pingback: The New Anti-Semitism: Phyllis Chesler | elcidharth()

  • Kirook

    @Antiislamist (Really? Who uses that as a handle?!) I’d like to direct you here:

    You may be surprised…

  • Kirook

    @Mohsen el-Guindy Please, do not use this kind of language on our site, it only gives Spencer and his ilk more “evidence” that we are in some way linked to radical Islam, Hamas, the Muslim Brotherhood, terrorism, jihad or whatever his Islamic bogeyman of the week is.

  • Kirook

    Why do people come to Loonwatch and post the very ideas we are trying to refute in the comments section? I don’t “apologize for radical Islam” on JihadWatch, please don’t be racist/Islamophobic/whatever on Loonwatch.

  • Under the title “My words to Robert Spencer” I wrote an article in my website “” showuing the divine penalties that would touch the attackers of Islam and Muslims. I hope Robert Spencer could read it in order to understand what is in store for him.

  • Dawood

    @Shazad: It’s all about the Benjamins.

  • shazad

    Has Robert Spencer refuted hes own books on islam. by writing a new book called Did Muhammad Exist.. This cleary shows that he does not believe what he writes.

  • JT

    DailyMan, if what you think about taqiyya is true then every single person is suspect. What makes you think that Robert Spencer isn’t secretly a Muslim and practicing taqiyya by telling you lies about Islam that are so ridiculous that people reject them and fall straight into the arms of the alternative — Islam. He had it all planned out, that sneaky Muslim!

    Please read this, before the ridiculous nature of Islamophobia destroys you:

  • dailyman

    I find this site and its futile efforts at damage control utterly predictable. Muslim terror attacks and their supporting texts in the Koran are difficult to justify. That muslims have given themselves license to lie when they feel themselves or their ideology threatened makes anything they have to say, ie. this site for instance, hugely suspect. Robert Spencer’s qualifications or writing aren’t the issue, the issue is islam and those who use it to justify violence. Articles like this are utterly transparent when it tries to change the focus.

  • Sir David : Man on a phone with a french spell check

    I would suggest Frederick that you look up ” ironey ” in a dictionary.
    ( thats the book with all the words in )
    Let us know what you find , if anything
    We can get to words you obviously find difficult like truth later.
    Dont worry these lessons are free.

  • fredrick

    I love this website and its entertaining efforts to counter the truth about the (not so) covert muslim ambition to establish Sharia worldwide. This place rocks!

  • Sir David ( Illuminati membership number 5:32) Warning Contains Irony

    Are we talking about the same Robert Spencer ?
    The evidence would indecate not .

  • Franczeska

    “katlike”? In that your brain is about the same size as that of the average domesticated feline?

  • corey

    maybe you will change your tune when you read he recently came to the defense of websites that celebrated mosque burnings, and raved about how they want to kill muslims or that a few years ago he joined a facebook group that wanted to do an ethinic cleansing of muslims in turkey you know for human rights.

  • TheBig-T


  • TheBig-T

    we are not promoting to attack Spencer, we are just exposing his hypocrisy and his so call “Scholarly” credentials, if you support Spencer, that’s fine, but we are telling people to thing before blindly accepting anything from Spencer

  • @Katlike

    If you really don’t know why Loon Watch attacks Spencer, you A) don’t know much about Robert Spencer, or B) you have no idea what Loon Watch is all about.

  • katlike

    I love Robert Spencer, he is such an awesome, intelligent, even tempered person. I don’t understand why this website promotes hatred against him, his articles and live debates are spot on. He is the type of man who will give you the shirt off his back if you needed it, we need more men like Robert in this world.

  • Who represents a religion ? Good Christians represent Christianity, and good Muslims represent Islam.George Bush, the idiotic butcher does not represent Christianity; and the bloody killer Osama bin Laden does not represent Islam. Robert Spencer and his Pamela reflect nothing but ignorance, bigotry, and blind venom. Period.

Powered by Loon Watchers