Robert Spencer

|

Pamela Geller

|

Bat Ye'or

|

Brigitte Gabriel

|

Daniel Pipes

|

Debbie Schlussel

|

Walid Shoebat

|

Joe Kaufman

|

Wafa Sultan

|

Geert Wilders

|

The Nuclear Card

Tag Archive | "Eric Allen Bell"

Tags: , , , , , , , ,

JihadWatch Zombie Eric Allen Bell Returns and Adds Antisemitism to the Islamophobia

Posted on 20 February 2013 by Garibaldi

Eric_Allen_Bell_Jamie_Glazov

The “Glazov gangbangers”

by Garibaldi

Eric Allen Bell (aka Eric Edborg), who has been mostly silent over the past few months, (no doubt taking a “sabbatical” from his self-proclaimed “jihad against jihad” again), returned to the looniverse of hatemongering and kooky conspiracy theories.

This time Bell is relishing in antisemitism and putting forward ideas picked straight out of the Protocols of the Elders of Zion.

Bell got into it with some of his assumedly now “former” Facebook followers. Bell tells “Clark Banner” that he is just speaking truth to power, exposing the social taboo surrounding “Jewish control of banking and media,”

EAB jew conspiracy #1

Bell clearly doesn’t know what conspiracy theories are either, they are not simply “theories without evidence.” What he is referring to is just one category of the obvious phony and fake conspiracies that exist. Usually conspiracy theories are based on some evidence, though such evidence varies in degree of reliability, factualness and the way it is framed and contextualized to create a narrative.

Bell also believes the Oscars are part of a Jewish supremacist conspiracy,

EAB jew conspiracy #3

“Erick Morgan” used to “look up to” the old bigot Eric Allen Bell when he railed against Muslims being intellectually and genetically inferior and called for the nuking of Muslim holy places but now he finds Bell repulsive:

EAB jew conspiracy #4

This protege of Rev. Deacon Robert Spencer has exposed himself to have some very kooky and racist beliefs not only about people of Muslim background and the religion of Islam but also about Jews and Judaism. Will we hear swift condemnations from Rev. Deacon Robert Spencer and Pamela Geller who hailed Bell as a former “liberal” who saw the light of “Counterjihad?” Aren’t they embarrassed and ashamed of supporting and allying with someone who supports this vile antisemitic nonsense?

Don’t hold your breathe. They will likely continue their strategy of pretending such views aren’t held by their friend.

Related:

-Eric Allen Bell discovers that ‘Jewish supremacists’ control the media and the banks

Comments (56)

Tags: , , , , , , , , ,

Chicken Hawk Eric Allen Bell: NUKE THE KABA

Posted on 31 October 2012 by Garibaldi

"Can I haz cheeeezeburger?"

Eric Allen Bell‘s genocidal predilections are already well known, we’ve covered his calls to nuke, bomb and destroy before.

Here’s one more for the record. I’m not a fan of the oppressive and repressive Saudi regime, but calling for the nuking of Saudi Arabia is just…loony.

Clearly Bell’s off the meds again:

Bell offers the caveat that the US should give all humans enough warning to leave and then proceed with the nuking. What happens Bell when the “humans” don’t want to leave? Just nuke ‘em anyway, right? What about wildlife and nature? Nuke ‘em anyway, right?

Comments (85)

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

WorldNetDaily: Bastion of the Paranoid

Posted on 31 October 2012 by Garibaldi

by Garibaldi

WorldNetDaily (WND), the one stop news site for the delusional Far-Right Christian fringe is an amalgamation of the dopiest, Armageddon prophesying doomsayers and anti-Freedom voices in the blog looniverse today. Websites such as RightWingWatch and MediaMatters have copiously done the thankless job of documenting their absurdities, including surreal, borderline advocacy of Christian theocracy and wild conspiracy theories about everything under the sun.

Pamela Geller‘s screeds are regularly published on WND, if you go to the site today, her “exclusive” feature article is about Russell Brand being a Jihadist.  Yes, you read that right, she’s saying Russell Brand=Jihadist.

Apparently Geller was on Russell Brand’s talk show, Brand X (airing Nov. 1st on FX) where he implied she was a racist and told her she was a MILF (Mothers I’d Like to F***). Did Geller expect that she would be taken as a serious guest on a comedy talk show when 1.) she is a JOKE, and 2.) everyone is familiar with Brand’s style of humor? Geller went on Brand’s show because she is an attention-monger who believes “any publicity is good publicity.” It was a desperate attempt to garner some pop coverage. Geller’s over-inflated ego tells her that she’s some sort of radical chic icon who deserves international stardom, considering the backlash directed at Brand by her and her right-wing buddies’ articles she had a horrible experience. We’ll have to tune-in to be exactly sure.

Alongside Geller today, WND also has “exclusive” featured articles asking that question sure to be on everyone’s mind, “Was ‘Frankenstorm’ Another ‘Harbinger?,’” the main thrust of which centers on whether or not Hurricane Sandy was,

another reenactment of an ancient mystery described in the book of Isaiah, chapter 9, verse 10?

For hundreds of thousands of Americans, this calamity brings to mind the bestselling Christian book of 2012 and the No. 1 faith movie of the year.

The rank and file of these warriors of God are already hawking a book/movie on the back of Hurricane Sandy’s destruction, while also embarrassing believers by framing God for the devastation on the East Coast.

Recently, WND has published columnists who advocate a curtailment of Freedom of Speech and Expression. WND columnist Erik Rush wants liberals and journalists brought up on charges of sedition for treason, all in order to ‘defend freedom,’ (h/t: CriticalDragon)

WorldNetDaily columnist Erik Rush writes that the government should prosecute liberals and members of the press… in order to defend freedom, of course. He accuses journalists of “treasonous collusion” with the Obama administration and said the Founders would have wanted journalists to be “found guilty of high crimes.” “Trials for treason and the requisite sentences would apply,” Rush says, “and I would have no qualms about seeing such sentences executed, no matter how severe.” He claims that progressives’ “seditious, anti-American” speech is “excepted from protection under the First Amendment,” hoping that “the political disenfranchisement of liberals, progressives, socialists and Marxists can begin in earnest, and in the open.”

These words echo the opinions of those other stalwart WND columnists Pamela Geller and Robert Spencer, who equally want Muslims in America who practice Islam to be charged with “sedition.”

So much for their vaunted love and respect for the US Constitution, but of course we knew this all along.

Recently, genocide supporting JihadWatch zombie Eric Allen Bell (aka Eric Edborg) was profiled in a puff profile in WND titled “Counter-jihad filmmaker refuses to be silenced.” It is unclear who is trying to silence the blubbering Bell, his calls for the destruction of Muslims and Islam is everyday fare, but his false tale of conversion from “liberalism to conservatism” is still being trumpeted by the far right. The article, written by a self-described conservative Christian who goes by the pen name Marisa Martin includes a jab at Loonwatch,

For instance, he [Bell] claims that the watchdog site “Loonwatch.com” is a terrorist spin control network, while I always thought they were just crazy.

Good to know Ms. Martin reads us, I guess. Of course Bell’s weak blog diary has been not only debunked but exposed for the slanderous spin article it is by a plethora of commenters, right and left. Not only that but Bell was banned by the Daily Kos community for being a hatefilled racist and an Islamophobe, i.e. an all around bigot.

In Ms. Martin’s mind we are the “crazy” ones because we debunk the divisive forces of hate that want to undermine freedom, peace and liberty, and expose the genocidal racists whom she ever so fondly profiles in her WND articles!

Comments (21)

Tags: , , , , , , , ,

Eric Allen Bell: “Zero Tolerance – DESTROY ISLAM”

Posted on 18 October 2012 by Emperor

"Can I haz cheeeezeburger?"

JihadWatch Zombie Eric Allen Bell (aka Eric Edborg) calls for Muslims to  be excluded from all the “free countries” in the world. Does he have a list of “free countries” in the world? Surely countries that battled Western colonialists and their imperial puppets will be counted as “free”, right?

In a height of irony he forwards his strange ideas about “freedom” only extending to the groups of his ‘choosing.’ He wants to create a test by which Muslims are questioned about Islam, and if they refuse to denounce it are “sent back home.”

Hmmm…I wonder who else advocated such positions? Oh yeah, the Conquistadores who decided to expel all Muslims and Jews from Andalucia, and the Spanish Church, who during the Inquisition burned at the stake, tortured and otherwise killed and or expelled secret Muslims and Jews, known as Moriscos and Marranos.

Of course such sentiments are in the spirit of Bell’s teacher, the self-described Crusader enthusiast and wannabe-Consquitador Robert Spencer, who has expressed his love of the Crusades in writing as well as his desire to annihilate the Turks and recapture “Anatolia” and “Constantinople” for Christianity by joining a Facebook group that advocated such positions.

Eric Allen Bell’s Accusations Typical of Islamophobic Spin Machine – updated 10/13/12

by Sheila Musaji (TheAmericanMuslim) 

On 10/11, Bell posted an article Zero Tolerance – DESTROY ISLAM.  In this truly disgusting screed, he makes the impassioned plea:

…  We cannot wait for some elected leader to get it and do the right thing. They are mostly weak. They are more interested in focus groups than following their moral intuition or even protecting the Constitution. As the saying goes, “When the people lead, the leaders will follow”.  It is the moral responsibility of all free and civilized people to fight tyranny and to end it. And no political system is more tyrannical than Islam. Followers of such an evil political ideology should not be admitted into any free country in the world – and those who refuse to denounce it must be sent back home.  We must end the tyranny of Islam. We must destroy Islam. We must end Sharia in our time. We must absolutely destroy Islam absolutely – and leave the free world a better place for generations to come.Islam appeals to the darkest qualities in the human psyche.  Freedom seeks to evolve. And that which seeks to undermine our evolution must be moved out of the way - by any means necessary.

This is as close as an individual can come to calling for genocide or violent action, and yet possibly remain within the letter of the law. It is hateful, and completely savage.

Comments (29)

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Eric Allen Bell: JihadWatch Zombie Still Obsessed with Obliterating Mecca

Posted on 01 September 2012 by Emperor

The increasingly unstable Eric Allen Bell (aka Eric Edborg) isn’t backing down from his calls to destroy Mecca. His genocidal predilections are endless. Last week I covered his cutesy attempt at fanning the flames of his Islamophobic followers fanatical anti-Muslim hate.

Now Bell is at it again, the chicken hawk wants the US military to hover over the Ka’ba and remove it.

Bell, having taken notice of the fact that his deluded hate-mongering is well known, gives his followers an empty warning, telling them to be careful of what hate they say because evil Obama-Mooslim-Brotherhood-Hamas-AlQaeda-linked-CAIR is watching:

Clearly Bell doesn’t know the meaning of “contradiction.”

As hollow a disclaimer as you will ever read, Bell who is extra-vigilante to ban those who oppose his hate goes ahead and leaves comments such as these up from Kim Bruce:

or James Garner:

You can check the thread out yourself and see all the other calls for nuking and killing, it would take a long time for us to load all of the screenshots.

Comments (27)

Tags: , , , , , , , , , ,

Open Thread Sunday: JihadWatch Zombie Eric Allen Bell Curious About the “Pros” and “Cons” of Nukin’ Mecca

Posted on 26 August 2012 by Emperor

"Can I haz cheeeezeburger?"

Every now and then an anti-Muslim Islamophobe wonders about the exigency of nuking Mecca and or Medina when he really means to want to destroy the sacred cities. To destroy Mecca and Medina has been an ardent desire of Islamophobes for centuries, harking back to at least the Crusades, if not earlier.

In a recent manifestation of such desire we have Jihadwatch zombie Eric Allen Bell (aka Eric Edborg) masking a call to nuke Mecca in a “question.” Who actually wonders about the “pros” and “cons” of “nuking Mecca” except someone who actually wants to do it?

Notice the lovely responses from those in Bell’s little echo chamber of hate. Bell didn’t repudiate any of these gung-ho nuke Mecca advocates. Most people responded by either saying such a move would not be practical or in fact coming to realize that Bell had gone “too far this time.” Many of these comments were deleted by Bell.

A significant chunk of comments actually looked something like the following however:

It seems clear to me that Bell has always had some sort of deep seated hatred and antipathy towards the “other.” One doesn’t wake up suddenly and ponder the merits of nuking the holy city of one of the oldest and largest religions in the world unless there is something deeply wrong with you.

Comments (84)

Tags: , , , , , , , , ,

Islamophobes of Murfreesboro Fail: Islamic Center Opens

Posted on 13 August 2012 by Emperor

After more than two years of loony anti-Muslim hate the Islamic Center of Murfreesboro was finally able to open its doors to worshippers. The hate brigades were largely silent with the exception of one sole protester and disgraced blogger Eric Allen Bell (Eric Edborg) soliciting donations to keep the “fight” against “Muslims” alive.

After a Struggle, Mosque Opens in Tennessee

(NewYorkTimes)

MURFREESBORO, Tenn. — The worshipers bowed low, their heads touching the freshly laid carpet, as the new mosque filled with echoes of exultation.

“God, thank you for the ability to worship here today,” said Remziya Suleyman, 27. “Thank you, thank you.”

After years of threats, attacks and court action, the Islamic Center of Murfreesboro’s new mosque opened its doors Friday, allowing 300 people to mark the occasion on Islam’s day of weekly public prayer. After the shooting at a Sikh temple in Wisconsin on Sunday and an arson attack on a mosque in Missouri on Monday, the opening went off without the protests or violence that some had feared.

Muslims from across Tennessee gathered at the 12,000-square-foot center to begin the final week of Ramadan. The congregation’s former building was so small that members often spilled into the parking lot and car-pooled to save parking spaces. Here, they fit comfortably.

“We’re all humbly enjoying the right to worship, an American tradition that a small minority tried to eliminate out of ignorance and misunderstanding,” said Nihad Awad, the executive director of the Council on American-Islamic Relations, who flew here from Washington.

For two years, the opposition in this city of 110,000 about 30 miles southeast of Nashville has been small but vocal. In 2010, vandals painted “not welcome” on construction signs at the mosque and set fire to construction equipment. A Texas man was indicted in June on charges that he left messages threatening to detonate a bomb at the center on Sept. 11.

In May, a county judge ruled that the construction plans had not received sufficient comment from the public and that an occupancy permit could not be granted. Federal prosecutors filed a discrimination lawsuit, and a federal judge ruled in the mosque’s favor last month.

Only one opponent of the mosque came to voice his concerns at the opening. Dan J. Qualls, 50, a former auto plant worker, wearing an “I Love Jesus” hat and a Ten Commandments shirt, said he understood that the First Amendment protected the right to worship freely but said he believed Islam represented violence. When he heard about the mosque’s opening on the local TV news, he decided to come out and “represent the Christians.”

“My honest opinion is, I wish this wasn’t here,” he said.

The mosque prayer hall forms just one part of the center, which will eventually be expanded to more than 50,000 square feet to include a gym, a swimming pool and other facilities, said Saleh Sbenaty, a board member. The prayer hall itself, about 4,500 square feet, can hold up to 500 people, but has a movable wall to divide the area to allow for other uses, like interfaith events with churches, synagogues and other religious groups.

The center is in a quiet, suburban neighborhood, beside a Baptist church. On Friday, workers hoisted an American flag up a pole.

Many in Murfreesboro have embraced the congregation’s right to worship freely. “That religious organization has been treated just exactly as we treat any other religious group,” said Ernest Burgess, the mayor of Rutherford County. “It has been a difficult struggle through the legal process. But we treated these people fairly, as they deserved.”

Mr. Sbenaty said the center will hold an official, full-scale opening in several weeks after a permanent certificate of occupancy is issued, but on Friday the prayer hall was opened for the weekly Friday worship, known as jumaa. He estimated there were about 250 to 300 Muslim families in the area who would likely be regularly served by the center.

Mr. Sbenaty said the center’s members were “very concerned” about safety after the Sikh temple shooting near Milwaukee and the fire at the mosque in Joplin, Mo., and had hired a private security team. “Even before those incidents, we were the subject of vandalism, intimidation, arson and bomb threats,” he said. “We are not new to this. But we are not going to be deterred. We are not going to give up our rights just because somebody is going to threaten us.”

Joe Brandon Jr., a lawyer representing several Murfreesboro residents who sued to block the mosque, could not be reached.

Robbie Brown reported from Murfreesboro, and Christine Hauser from New York.

Comments (10)

The Islamic Center of Murfreesboro's new mosque on Veals Road.

Tags: , , , , , , , , ,

Fight against Islam stretches beyond Murfreesboro mosque

Posted on 06 August 2012 by Amago

The Islamic Center of Murfreesboro's new mosque on Veals Road.

The Islamic Center of Murfreesboro’s new mosque on Veals Road.

Fight against Islam stretches beyond Murfreesboro mosque

From zoning issues to school prayer, this looks like a battle with no end

For more than two years, Rutherford County has been in the middle of a perfect storm over Islam.

While furor over the “ground zero” mosque in New York has faded, the dispute over the new Islamic Center of Murfreesboro — which began around the same time — has only grown more intense.

Fueled by fears that Muslims are gaining influence while Christians are losing clout, activists have battled to block construction of the Murfreesboro mosque. They’ve argued over the minutia of county zoning laws and whether Islam is a religion.

And the fight is unlikely to end anytime soon.

Mosque opponents say they are fighting for the soul of America. Now that the mosque is set to open this month, they are changing their tactics and broadening the scope of their complaints against Islam.

Their latest tactic is to protest requests for accommodations for Muslim students to pray in local schools. Dozens of critics of Islam showed up at a recent Rutherford County school board meeting to voice their disapproval.

And they plan to oppose any attempts by local Muslims to influence life in Rutherford County.

“We are going to closely scrutinize everything they do,” said the Rev. Darrel Whaley, mosque opponent and pastor of Kingdom Ministries Worship Center in Murfreesboro.

Long under the radar

From the outside, Rutherford County seems an odd spot for a fight over Islam.

There’s one local mosque with about 500 adherents, according to the Association of Statisticians of American Religious Bodies.

Local Muslims have held Friday prayer services for decades but were mostly under the radar.

Until the new Islamic Center was approved in 2010, “I didn’t know that there were any Muslims in this community,” said Pete Doughtie, owner of the Rutherford Reader, a local free newspaper.

His thoughts on Muslims are summed up in the headline of a recent column: “They have nothing positive to add to America.”

In person, Doughtie, 71, is genial rather than blunt. He moved to Rutherford County 13 years ago to be closer to his grandkids and started the Reader to keep busy in retirement.

His opposition to the mosque is a mix of God-and-country patriotism and tea party distrust of government.

His latest column slammed local school board officials for attending training about Islam in 2011.

“All it takes for those Islamic warriors is to get enough foothold in one area such as our government in order for them to feel they are on a roll,” he wrote. “Our schools are vulnerable and are sitting ducks right now.”

Aisha Lbhalla, chairwoman of the women’s committee at the Islamic Center of Tennessee, said she is often frustrated when people stereotype the believers as being radicals.

“I like to say there isn’t a war against Islam in Christianity. The war is good people versus evil people,” she said. “When you see a person that happens to be Muslim doing something atrocious, think of that as an evil person, not a representation of Islam.

“As citizens here, we should be working together to ward off any type of evil and amoral behavior in our society, not brand a whole people.”

‘Stealth jihad’ seen

Doughtie also worries about a so-called “stealth jihad.”

He learned that term from a book by the same name by author Robert Spencer, who runs a blog called Jihad Watch. The book says that Muslims want to undermine America from within.

Since at least 2009, that claim has been repeated by local activists meeting in churches and community groups in Middle Tennessee.

Those meetings have regularly featured anti-Islam speakers and authors like Spencer, Brigitte Gabriel of Act for America, Frank Gaffney of the Center for Security Policy, and Bill French, a former Tennessee State University professor who goes by the pseudonym Bill Warner.

They’ve persuaded activists like Doughtie to see almost every action by Muslims with suspicion.

So when a Muslim student asks for permission to pray at school — which is allowed under the First Amendment — critics see it as an attempt to infiltrate schools with Islam.

Imam Ossama Bahloul of the Islamic Center says critics are wrong. He and his congregation members want to live out their faith just like any other Americans. They’ve followed the laws to get approval of their site plan and want to be good citizens.

But he says some activists refuse to believe them.

“It’s very tough to make sense of nonsense,” he said. “It’s very hard to answer a question so many times and you intend not to listen.”

Bahloul moved to Murfreesboro in 2008 from Texas, where he was the imam of a mosque in Corpus Christi. He never expected the uproar that the mosque construction has caused.

“I came to Tennessee and chose a small place and thought it would be a quiet place,” he said. “And it got very busy.”

A focus on schools

The latest target for mosque foes is the school system.

Currently one Muslim student at Central Magnet School in Murfreesboro is allowed to pray in an empty room during lunch, said James Evans, spokesman for Rutherford County Schools.

Evans pointed out that Christian students hold a lunch Bible study at the same school and that a Christian club there called First Priority has several hundred members.

Doughtie said Muslim students should assimilate to Christian culture. Rather than allowing Muslim students to pray, he’d rather see all students take part in a Christian prayer each day at school.

“We have been a strong Christian country, and if we don’t get back to it, the whole face of this nation is going to change,” Doughtie said.

Amy Binder, an associate professor of sociology at the University of California at San Diego, said mosque critics seem similar to other conservative groups, like supporters of teaching creationism at school.

Both groups are worried about something called “status threat,” the idea that they are losing influence in American culture.

“People understand the world to be a zero sum game — so if someone else is winning, they are losing,” Binder said.

She said that when creationists have lost court battles, they regrouped and tried a new strategy.

That appears to be the case with mosque critics. Lawyers for anti-mosque plaintiffs recently filed a motion to intervene in the federal lawsuit filed by the mosque and did not dispute that Islam is a religion.

Binder said that losing in court might re-energize mosque opponents by making them feel like a persecuted minority standing up for what they think is right.

“Once you have that persecution complex, you want to hang together and you can’t hear what anyone else is saying,” she said.

A hell-bound matter

An evangelical Christian pastor, Whaley believes Muslims will go to hell if they don’t leave their faith and become Christians.

He says that he’s not a bigot and doesn’t hate Muslims.

But he can’t stand their religion and will do whatever he can to limit the spread of Islam in Rutherford County and in the United States.

“We are not against Muslims praying in a mosque,” Whaley said. “We are against Islam.”

Lbhalla said Islam has many commonalities with Christianity.

“Although there are some differences, there are much more things that bind us than separate us,” Lbhalla said.

The religious practice of fasting, which Muslims are now doing during Ramadan, is an example of that commonality, she said, noting that Jews and Christians also fast to attain righteousness.

“Many don’t know that we have reverence for Jesus — peace be upon him,” Lbhalla said. “We can’t even be believers unless we accept him. We accept him of the virgin birth, and his mother, Mary, is a leading woman for Muslim women to aspire to be like. These are things we have in our holy book, the Quran.”

A double standard?

Rutherford County’s handling of the mosque project has fueled the controversy by giving critics the impression that the mosque got special treatment.

Two years earlier, the planning commission treated another controversial religious-themed project differently. A developer wanted to build a Bible theme park in Rutherford County. Because the project needed a zoning change, there were public meetings with plenty of notice before the park was eventually voted down.

Because the site for the Islamic Center was already zoned for a religious building, there was no need for a public hearing. And county officials did not post the meeting agenda for the May 24, 2010, meeting during which the mosque was approved on their website. They said they forgot.

“Something that big and something that important should have been on the agenda,” Doughtie said.

Even when Judge Robert Corlew ruled that mosque opponents were right and that proper notice had not been given for the planning commission meeting during which the mosque was approved, Rutherford County did not stop construction of the mosque. Corlew’s ruling didn’t order the construction to stop, and county officials believed if they halted it, they would have violated federal laws.

But the continued construction angered opponents like the Rev. Whaley.

He believes that the county should have stopped the project and that mosque leaders should have halted construction until the site plan was reapproved.

“If they were as good of citizens as they say they are, they would have stopped the mosque,” he said.

Bloggers step up

In recent months, two bloggers with local ties have stirred up continued controversy. One is Eric Allen Bell, a former mosque supporter, and the other is Cathy Hinners, a retired police officer and Albany, N.Y., transplant.

Bell runs Globalinfidel.tv and Mosqueconfidential.com, two sites that criticize Islam. Hinners runs a site called the dailyrollcall.com, which has been active in the recent school board controversy in Murfreesboro.

She has become a regular on conservative Michael DelGiorno’s talk radio show, warning of the threat of Islam.

Recently she appeared on DelGiorno’s show to complain that local Muslims were demanding special privileges at local schools.

At issue was a handout called “A Teacher’s Guide to Muslim Students,” which was emailed to the Rutherford County School Board in 2008 by a board member of the Islamic Center of Murfreesboro, as well as a cultural awareness training for teachers and administrators run by the Department of Justice in 2011.

School officials say they get information from different faith groups all the time. Their policy allows students to ask for religious accommodations.

But Hinners, who did not respond to requests for comment, and DelGiorno see the handout as a demand for special treatment.

“They are not asking anymore,” Hinners said on the air. “They are telling you.”

Lobna “Luby” Ismail disagrees.

Ismail is the founder of Connecting Cultures, a company based in Silver Springs, Md., that led the training for Murfreesboro school officials. She said her company was asked to do the training because there were concerns that Muslim students had been bullied over the mosque controversy.

The training was designed to help create a safe environment for kids, she said.

“There were no demands for any accommodations,” she said.

A boost from court

Local Muslim leaders say they want the same religious rights as anyone else, and they are undeterred by critics.

Iman Ossama Bahloul said the mosque’s wins in court show that the Constitution applies to all Americans.

The opening of the new center — which could happen as early as this week, if required inspections are completed — will be a great day for Murfreesboro, he said.

“I think it will be a day of celebration for all of us that religious freedom is a fact existing in this nation,” he said.

“People can fight as much as they want, but what is right will prevail in the end. American values will prevail in the end.”

Tom Wilemon contributed to this report.
Contact Bob Smietana at 615-259-8228 or bsmietana@tennessean.com.

Comments (8)

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , ,

JihadWatch Zombie Eric Allen Bell Thinks He Hit it Big On Eric Bolling Show

Posted on 03 July 2012 by Garibaldi

"Can I haz cheeeezeburger?"

“Can I haz cheeeezeburger?”

Remember JihadWatch zombie Eric Allen Bell (real name Eric Edborg), the failed D level-movie producer who moved to Murfreesboro, Tennessee and decided to make a documentary about the concerted anti-Mosque campaign by local conspiracy theorists and religious wing-nuts? During the time Bell was filming his documentary he used to constantly email us, asking us to publish his writings and advertise his documentary, his articles were usually so terrible that we declined. There was always something strange about Bell, and this strangeness manifested itself when Bell joined the ranks of the JihadWatch looniverse.

When Bell’s documentary failed to achieve the payback he had hoped for, (he expected to make money off of the venture, just like he does from his GlobalOne.tv site, a new-age spiritual mishmash with adverts from psychics) he turned to funding from the Islamophobia movement.

His fortunes in this regard gained some momentum, he became fast friends with Robert Spencer, who tried to plug him into the Islamophobia network the best he could. Unfortunately for Bell, because he is ignorant about most things (especially Islam and Muslims), and because he is an opportunistic charlatan his gamble on bigotry failed.

Soon after his conversion to Islamophobia, armed with nothing more than a quick anti-Muslim crash course from Robert Spencer’s indoctrination program, Bell decided to debate a Muslim apologist by the name of Nadir Ahmed. The debate was a set up, the Glazov gang decided to try and “gang up” on Mr. Ahmed–humiliation ensued. It was clear that when it came to the topic of Islam and Muslims “even an illiterate 12 year old Afghan child memorizing Quran all day in a madrassah could defeat Eric Allen Bell in debate.”

Bell was so distraught after the humiliation that he remarked, “may be time to take a sabbatical from my jihad against jihad”.

Bell’s short sabbatical is over, he is back to his “jihad” against Muslims, he believes that his humiliation has subsided and people have forgotten that he doesn’t really know much about…well…much.

He’s been busy marketing himself as a “liberal” turned counter-jihadist who stands firmly against the religious freedom of Muslims in Murfreesboro. That’s how he is selling himself now, as a former PC Liberal who has “awakened” to the the threat of Islam. In this regard Bell received attention on the usual run-of-the-mill right wing sites, as well as in USA Today and the Huffington Post. The comments on the aforementioned stories about Bell were quite blistering, essentially cementing him as a micro-version of a flip-flopping Mitt Romney, who doesn’t know his ass from his mouth.

Bell, undeterred by such humiliation is going whole hog, believing in the Hollywood myth that any publicity is good publicity. In this vein Bell’s hit the gold, he finally made it…to the Eric Bolling Show on Fox News. (h/t: CriticalDragon):

Fox’s Bolling Can’t Get Enough Of Guest’s Inflammatory Anti-Muslim Comments

JUSTIN BERRIER (Media Matters)

Fox News’ Eric Bolling continued his campaign against American Muslims today, endorsing the views of a filmmaker who claimed Islam is “the worst, most deadly idea in the history of the world.”

Bolling’s guest was Eric Bell, a filmmaker who produced a documentary on a mosque in Murfreesboro, Tennessee.

Bell claimed he originally saw “the Muslim community as victims” and that he had an “inclination to stick up for them.” Bell further claimed that after doing “some serious research about Islam” he found that Islam is “a radical, savage religion” and “the worst, most deadliest idea in the history of the world.” According to the Huffington Post, Bell said in a different interview that “the biggest threat to human rights is Islam.” Not only did Bolling not push back on Bell’s inflammatory rhetoric, he responded to Bell by saying he would “[l]ove to have you back and maybe expand on it a little bit more.”

At the end of the program, Bolling replayed the worst of Bell’s anti-Islam comments and announced that he would return the next day for another interview, hyping Bell as someone who “told the truth about radical Islam.” But during his interview, Bell did not limit his attacks to “radical Islam,” he attacked the religion itself. Bell attacked Islam’s prophet Mohammed before claiming Islam “is a radical, savage religion” and called it “the worst, most deadliest idea in the history of the world”:

BOLLING: What is actually happening? I only have a couple of seconds. Tell me what you found.

BELL: I found that there’s a man who raped a 9-year-old girl, who owned slaves, who killed his critics, who beheaded a tribe full of Jews named Muhammad who is the highest moral example in Islam for 1.6 billion people. And that this is a radical, savage religion. The people aren’t all radical, thank god. But the religion is the worst, most deadliest idea in the history of the world. And we need to make sure that we keep a close eye on it in this country.

Bolling’s endorsement of Bell’s views came just days after a resident of Texas was indicted for “threatening to use violence” against the Murfreesboro mosque. In addition, The New York Times reported that the construction site of the mosque “has been repeatedly vandalized” and construction equipment at the site “has been set on fire.” Other mosques around the country have also been subjected to vandalism and arson. But it should come as no surprise that Bolling endorsed Bell’s extreme anti-Muslim comments, as he has a history of extreme, anti-Muslim comments himself.

Comments (45)

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , ,

Murfreesboro Mosque: Transparency Groups Take Issue with Judge’s Ruling

Posted on 11 June 2012 by Garibaldi

While JihadWatch Zombies in Tennessee are taking their Islamohphobic marching orders, (the newest conspiracy they are hawking is that the Murfreesboro Mosque is being built by “Hamas”) transparency groups discuss Judge Corlew’s ruling that the Mosque “did not provide sufficient notice to the public.”

The transparency groups seem to agree that the judge was in error, but of course these groups are all just taqiyyah blinded dhimmis right?:

Transparency groups see problems in Tennessee mosque ruling

(timesnews.net)

NASHVILLE — A court ruling that sets higher standards for a central component of the Tennessee’s open meetings law hasn’t drawn loud cheers from government transparency advocates.

In part that’s because the legal effort to stop construction of a mosque in Rutherford County is widely seen as being driven by fear of Muslims. But some good government groups also think the county government didn’t do anything wrong.

Rutherford County Chancellor Robert Corlew ruled May 29 that county officials violated the state’s Sunshine Law by not providing adequate public notice of the meeting where the Islamic Center of Murfreesboro’s new building was approved.

Corlew’s order does not require greater notice for all meetings in Rutherford County or even all meetings of the Planning Commission but specifically refers to meetings that involve either the Islamic Center or “further matters of significant public interest.”

Rick Hollow, a Knoxville attorney who consulted on the state’s Sunshine Law when it was written in 1974, said any time citizens challenge the government over open meetings and win it is a positive. He said the ruling enforces the idea that the Sunshine Law “should be obeyed and has some teeth.”

But he disagreed with the idea that notice for the Planning Commission meeting could be considered inadequate because the controversy surrounding the mosque construction made that agenda item especially important.

“For anyone to say you are going to tie adequate public notice to the topic being debated, I think that’s wrong,” he said. “Either you give adequate public notice or you don’t.”

Mosque opponents hoping to stop construction had raised numerous claims in court, including that Islam was not a legitimate religion deserving First Amendment protection and that mosque members were part of a secret plot to overthrow the U.S. Constitution.

The judge dismissed those claims and ruled only on the question of public meeting notice, but the anti-Muslim aspects of the case remain associated with it in many people’s minds.

“My perspective on it, it was not an open meetings issue,” said Kent Flanagan, director of the nonprofit Tennessee Coalition for Open Government, a nonprofit advocacy group which counts The Associated Press and other news organizations among its members. “If a Christian church has asked to build a new building for their congregation and put out similar notice, no one would have thought anything of it.”

Flanagan said the ruling will stir up discussion about what is considered adequate public notice, something Tennessee code does not define, but he thinks the ruling is too narrow to have much of an impact on improving public notice of meetings in general.

Jim Zachary, director of the Tennessee Transparency Project and editor of two East Tennessee newspapers, said he hasn’t written much about the case, which he thinks is championing government transparency for the wrong reasons.

“It’s not a landmark case,” he said. “It’s way too vague to give us definitive marching orders on open meetings. And it’s a shame, in some ways, that it has surrounded the building of a mosque.”

Frank Gibson, the public policy director of the Tennessee Press Association, considers the judge’s decision “good news for open government advocates” but said he doesn’t feel it is a case the association needs to take a stand on.

“I think the reason people are not more up in arms over it is this wasn’t done in a secret meeting,” he said.

Gibson said a sign announcing the future site of the Islamic Center of Murfreesboro had been on the property for months before the meeting. At one point it was defaced and a photograph ran in the Daily News Journal. A story about the plans for a new mosque also ran in that newspaper. That was in addition to the county’s paid notice in the Murfreesboro Post, which the judge found to be inadequate.

“I take the position that anybody had ample time to inquire about the legal status of the project and what was going to be done,” Gibson said.

Steve Schroeder, of the Rutherford Neighborhood Alliance, agreed, saying his group would probably be among the first to complain if they felt county officials were trying to get away with something.

The group filed an ethics complaint a few years ago when officials met secretly to negotiate a contract. But in the case of the mosque approval, Schroeder said there was nothing out of the ordinary.

“I believe I can say the membership feels we are in support of the construction and religious freedom,” he said. “We feel that local Muslims have been sorely tried.”

Comments (6)

Advertise Here
Advertise Here