I jumped to conclusions without knowing the full story, I’m sorry.

Standard GOP rule book, always attack. Whether it’s true or not, always attack.

Except PEGIDA leader had step down amid uproar over Hitler selfie https://www.loonwatch.com/2015/01/anti-islamization-leader-steps-down-amid-uproar-over-hitler-selfie/

Sure They never

gave Nazi salutes while riot police separated them from rival protesters changing “down with Pegida”. http://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-31103221

PEGIDA marched against immigrants, foreigners, and anyone a shade darker.

marched with banners claiming your city is overcrowded with Muslims.

Sure they are doing nothing wrong same as Der Stürmer was doing nothing wrong when it blamed all jews for the problems of Germany and i am sure PEGIDA is going out of it was to make sure they tell everyone they are talking only about the radicals

I would say there were also similarities between Islamophobia and anti-Catholicism, such as the “they’re outbreeding us” trope, and the notion that the religion is fundamentally incompatible with Enlightenment values.

The West’s historic internal “other” was Judaism, while the external “other” was Islam. Now as it finds large Muslim communities living as citizens within it, it has no historical tradition with which to demonize them apart from anti-semitism

http://theamericanmuslim.org/tam.php/features/articles/comparison-propaganda

I don’t know what all the fuss is about. These hate mongers are just taking pictures of their relatives. Let them enjoy their family photos. Although it is a bit morbid that their killing, cooking and eating said relatives, and possibly throwing their remains at Muslims and/ or Mosques. But hey, hate rots the mind.

I’m not sure, i’ve read about it on muslim run media sites.

In fact, my father, who was already almost fifty when I was born, recalled that when he was a student in Brooklyn, a ham sandwich order used to be called back to the kitchen as, “Douse the lights and chase the rabbi!”

I haven’t but it looks very interesting, I definitely follow Kundnani’s work. Has any media picked it up?

Ca-Chiiiing

You’re giving this guy way too much credit; This guy doesn’t seem like the employable type :P.

I really do hope its the end of a sad career and he can go and find something useful to do with his life . McDonalds has vacancies I am told .

Sir David

more from the Guardian http://www.theguardian.com/media/shortcuts/2015/jan/12/steven-emerson-muslims-birmingham-error-fox-news

Sir David

Looks like Steve’s “Butthurt-o-meter” is off the charts

http://i3.kym-cdn.com/photos/images/original/000/316/674/5d5.gif

Latest from Loonville http://www.bbc.com/news/uk-england-birmingham-30789759

Sir David

even better are the grumpy salafists on youtube complaining that music is forbidden .I wonder if they have read the grinch ?

Sir David

Ugg…this crap is still available ?

http://m.youtube.com/watch?v=0YBumQHPAeU

Murdoch owns CNN? Hmm, I knew he was planning on buying Time Warner (Cnns parent company) but last I heard he lost out on the bid. Nonetheless, the network mind as well be, it’s disgusting how low it has went to pander to the illiterate, backwater tea party crowd, and when they’re not doing that, hours of news time is spent on some celebrity’s death or an affair.

The best part is, you don’t even need any qualifications… Or education… Or brains… In fact, those things may actually get in the way of making money! Err, I mean, “exposing them evil moozlums.”

only by voting UKIP have they any hope of that

Sir David

He’s even got googly eyes and a folded hat! I served with guys who folded the brim of their ball-cap like that. They were none of them sane. And googly eyes, well, everypony has seen that.

Speaking of “bad karma,” How much bad karma are you hindutva fecal fascists getting as a result of your past rioting mob violence, and killing innocent Muslims and other minorities in India?

If I had some kind of authority, I would urge all muslims in the US to vote for Robert Spencer.

Further, if real ‘Jihad’, ‘struggle or strive’ as recommended in Qur’an and Hadeeth is observed by all human beings (irrespective of Muslim faith), the world will become a Paradise on earth. The ‘Violent only’ version to Jihad is purposefully given by the west and media to refrain non Muslims from getting closer to Islam, the Islamophobia.

Moreover, the west knows ISIS Chief Abu baker Al Baghdadi better than any Muslim. Nobody knew him a year before, until America throned him out of more than a decade dominance of Iraq. How did America feed/nourish such a poisonous personality during their absoluteness?

No Muslim is responsible for any other Muslim’s act. Don’t forget we are in 21st century, not living in 500 BC. For any crime that Government should be held responsible. If not, then what’s the duty of a Government? The perpetrators should be gunned down on the spot, to avoid “False Flag Conspiracy” or “Internal Job”.

You can find in any website. But it has never been accepted officially because the word conflicts with ‘jihad’. Just buy the book and see its not there.

Still, let me ask you this. What does it mean? well according to ‘oxford’- “A person involved in a jihad; an Islamic militant.”

“Let me feed your “competent” mind why is the word so misleading then, huh?”

http://islamicsupremecouncil.org/understanding-islam/legal-rulings/5-jihad-a-misunderstood-concept-from-islam.html?start=9 According to Islam; the word ” jihad” means struggling or striving..

Jihad is not a violent concept. Jihad is not a declaration of war against other religions. It is worth noting that the Koran specifically refers to Jews and Christians as “people of the book” who should be protected and respected.

So don’t think you can steal our voices. FYI, you’re evidently more incompetent than I am in this subject.

Histrory shows that more people have converted to islam than have apostasized from it. And those who have did mostly under coercion, outright force, were prisoners who had no hopes to be freed. An egregious exception is Emir Kusturica but in my eyes that he is an apostate is far less important than his being a traitor to his people and his natikon in times of war, and that is punishable by death even in many Western nations. A great film director he may be but that takes nothing away from being a traitor. And for that he merits my contempt and disdain.

Look who talks.

Seems more like a mole….no?

Hopefully they remain awake. All it takes for them to go backwards is just one guy with a smile bearing gifts.

The Serbs are going to have to get real eventually. The Russians are warming up to the Turks. The Russian South Stream pipeline project that was going to bring plenty of cash to Serbia has found its way to Turkey. And the Turks are solid supporters of Bosnia far more solid the Russian support for Serbia. All Serbia needs now is for someone to tell them that.

Sufis are very misunderstood in the west, a lot of Americans who know that the word Sufi “has something to do with religion” are completely unaware it is a variety of Islam.

Aha. yes. As far as I know Bosniaks have always been there in Bosnia even though they became Muslims only on the 16th and 17th centuries. Their name is mentioned in historic documents. Yes, the Greater Serbs try to rewrite history and that’s unacceptable. Who’s to say? Not just Bosniaks, many other people became Muslims. There sure are Bosniaks who are descended from Serbs (even though most are descended from Catholics); very few are descendants of Turks or of Andalusi Muslims who came to the Ottoman Empire after being ethnically cleansed from Spain. Others may be descended from Arabs, Chechens, Hungarians, Macedonians, Bulgarians, Greeks, Albanians who settled in Bosnia. Today that is not relevant at all. A person with South Slavic language and Muslim background is a Bosniak. And that’s that. To say that Bosniaks are Serbs is like saying that Latin Americans are Spanish. Even those who are direct descendants of the first Spaniards to come to the Americas don’t see themselves as Spaniards. Bosniaks are Bosniaks. Just like Native Americans are just that, no matter where their ancestores may have come from.

Not likely because the proportion of foreigners in Saxony is actually rather small. Thus there can be only a handful of Serbs there. Also I try to make the distinction; most Serbs are not actually evil, they just don’t know any better or are misguided or willfully ignorant. However, as for most of their leadership, if they had had to face the judges at Nurmeberg, it would have taken thedr judges all of 30 seconds to send thzem to the gallows, and deservedly so. The ICTY judges would be very well advised to grow some, but that’s another story. Whether a people can be said to be genocidal or not depends on the proportion that is willing to support genocidal policies. It’s difficult to say without an opinion poll; even so, the most I hear from Serbs on the www is hate speech or downright genocidal. Except for the contributions from the Serb Helsinki Committee. Xenophobia is not an exclusively Serb phenomenon but it was most notorious in the 1990s, and those who suffered because of it will feel the pain forever. And in view of the recent events and of the general feeling of anti-Muslim hostility and hysteria it can’t be ruled out that in the near future there will be pogroms, attempts and even the outlawing and ethnic cleansing of Muslims in Europe.

Hopefully. Unless several of over 600 mosques destroyed by the Bosnian Serbs.

Places like that should be protected and not subject to human idiocy and hate.

Ugh, I hate this tight jeans/tight pants trend. Thankfully it’s on its way out. Sadly, can’t say the same about Alcohol.

Dershowitz has a penchant for harming children. He also launched a smear campaign against a teenage victim of rape. He also defended a pedophile rabbi.

It’s interesting how you reflexively presume that merely because I’m critical of the notion that ‘Western values’ are little more than a smoke screen to justify bigotry by some, you make the assumption that I must be in favor of the dissolution between church and state. I am not; I have contempt for theocracy the same as many other forms of -ocracy in general. But that’s rather irrelevant. Never mind the fact that the Reformation only occurred in several parts of Europe – and if we’re talking Christianity collectively, it never really hit places like Russia (where the tsar was still using caesaropapism as a ruling tool up until the Romanovs got offed) or other Orthodox nations.

Nor was it really applicable to nations that were Catholicism was still alive and well; the Counter-Reformation was a thing. This doesn’t even begin to touch on the complex history of the Catholic Church with many nations, such as Mexico, that found themselves effectively ruled by many clergymen or gave them special privileges. Even the Protestants themselves had to grapple with this notion. After all, many settlements thought that those who were actively partook in church gatherings should lead. You correctly point out it was a long birthing process but the difference between you and myself seems to be in the presumption that Islam could not undergo something similar. Never mind the fact that it is not monolithic (come to think of it, just like Western values), but it too has changed throughout the centuries to meet local conditions.

The West has had much of the world’s wealth throughout world history. It can afford to have liberal interpretations of its theology in the form we have today. If one is to use examples from the Muslim world, see the lavish parties that Saudi princes throw; alcohol flows freely, as do drugs, and women are freely present. It goes without saying that poverty breeds conservative interpretations of religious thought; even though the poor of the United States might, comparatively speaking, be better off than many of their brethren in other countries, it’s still noticeable even in places like this country. Stability is comforting, even if the ideas that might be found therein might be awful to some. Many Muslim nations are poor – the wealth they have going into the pockets of their local tinpot military man or spoiled monarchs.

But I obviously support stoning gay people or female genital mutilation for having the temerity to suggest that the West might be hypocritical occasionally. You got me.

Immigrants brought to Europe came almost exclusively for economic reasons and were drawn and used for that purpose, you know very well that European nations face a demographic crises and for their economies to grow they brought immigrants. Once they came they were told you are not wanted anymore, you are not one of us–unless you can kick a soccer ball well.

An honest look into these perpetrators background and history should be done in a scientific way, just as Robert Pape, Sageman, and Atran have done. The evidence is there and socio-political reasons trump ideological simplistic causation that is forwarded by ideologues of the counter-terrorism establishment.

Dershowitz is already designing an enhanced interrogation program for toddlers.

I have read reports of this type of discriminatory “counter-terrorism” nonsense going on in the Netherlands (the place where this crap comes from) of turning in Muslim youth who appear to be “radicalized.” The serious problem with this is that it does not involve violent conduct or engaging in violence, but ideas and expressions. “Radicalization” has now been extended into religious and social conduct of Muslims that has nothing to do with violence, but is just discriminatory.

We also have the “personal disruption measures” in the Netherlands, which involves the police following and harassing a “terrorist suspect” at all hours of the day and night, in public and at home, usually with harassing telephone calls. This also includes harassing children of the “terrorist suspect.”

I think it serves to further demonize Muslims to the public as “a special danger” that others do not present. It works to Other Muslims and their communities and exclude them from the mainstream. Much of Dutch “counter-terrorism” is driven by fear of Muslims and foreigners, and this type of discriminatory nonsense serves only to stoke fear of Muslims in the larger community. There is a human rights argument that must be made here with these policies in that they are discriminatory in that they treat members of a religious faith differently.